中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2024, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 19-33.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.24-0417

    Next Articles

Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Farmers' Digital Literacy Levels in the Context of the Digital Countryside

Chen MA1,2,3, Jin LI1,2,3(), Zexin LI1,2,3, Beibei FAN1,2,3, Xian FENG1,2,3   

  1. 1. Information Technology Research Center of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097
    2. National Agricultural Information Engineering Technology Research Center, Beijing 100097
    3. Key Laboratory of Digital Village Technology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100097
  • Received:2024-05-18 Online:2024-07-05 Published:2024-11-26
  • Contact: Jin LI

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

23

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] Farmers' digital literacy is the prerequisite and foundation for the construction and development of digital rural areas. How to quantitatively assess farmers' digital literacy, accurately identify the influencing factors, and then purposefully improve farmers' digital literacy level, and stimulate farmers' vitality in digital village construction has become an urgent task for the current construction of digital villages in China. [Method/Process] Based on the definition of the relevant concepts of farmers' digital literacy, this article constructs an evaluation index system for farmers' digital literacy in Beijing based on theoretical and practical bases, and combines 236 pre-survey data to comprehensively use exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to test the rationality of the evaluation index system. Based on 1500 questionnaire survey data from 13 agricultural areas in Beijing, the current level of digital literacy among farmers in Beijing was evaluated and analyzed. A regression model was constructed to analyze and explore the influencing factors of digital literacy among farmers in Beijing from three dimensions: personal factors, resource supply factors, and environmental factors. [Results/Conclusions] Based on the KAP theoretical model and the practical development needs of Beijing's digital countryside and smart city construction, the article constructs an evaluation system for Beijing farmers' digital literacy indicators, which includes six primary indicators: digital concept awareness, digital general literacy, digital technology literacy, digital innovation literacy, digital social literacy, and digital security awareness, as well as 26 secondary indicators. According to the calculation, the overall digital literacy level of Beijing farmers is 68.15, and there are significant differences between different regions, dimensions, and groups. From a regional perspective, the digital literacy level of farmers in Fengtai District is relatively high, while that in Daxing District is relatively low. In terms of indicators, farmers have the highest level of digital security literacy, while their levels of digital innovation literacy and digital technology literacy are relatively low. In terms of group characteristics, small farmers and older people aged 60 and over have the lowest levels of digital literacy. Farmers' digital literacy is negatively influenced by age, but positively influenced by education level, income level, digital training, digital services, popularization of digital science, digital living atmosphere, and digital network. It is suggested to effectively enhance farmers' digital literacy and promote their participation in digital rural areas by strengthening top-level design, creating a good atmosphere, building a lifelong learning system, and establishing a guarantee mechanism.

Key words: digital countryside, farmers' digital literacy, conceptual framework, level evaluation, influencing factor

CLC Number: 

  • G725

Fig.1

Digital literacy framework for farmers in Beijing"

Table 1

Evaluation index system for digital literacy of Beijing farmers"

一级指标 二级指标 具体问项
数字概念意识（X1） 数字化概念辨析（X11） 能否熟练地区分机械化与数字化
数字化基础意识（X12） 认为通过互联网等数字化手段获取信息的重要性如何
数字化应用意识（X13） 认为通过互联网等数字化手段学习、工作、生产的重要性如何
数字通用素养（X2） 基本硬件使用技能（X21） 能否熟练掌握智能手机、电脑的一般功能
基本硬件维护技能（X22） 能否熟练地通过定期杀毒、系统升级等自主维护智能手机、电脑等终端的正常运转
基本软件下载技能（X23） 能否熟练地掌握下载与安装软件、APP的能力
基本软件使用技能（X24） 能否明确地知道不同软件的使用功能
数字技术素养（X3） 数字信息获取能力（X31） 遇到问题时，能否熟练地通过互联网进行在线搜索
数字理解与分析能力（X32） 在阅读涵盖数据、图表内容的文字、报告、新闻内容时，能否轻松地理解数据的含义以及数据之间的关系
数字化生产场景应用能力（X33） 能否熟练地运用数字化“新农具”（如使用数字化环境监控系统、水肥一体化系统、病虫害监测系统、农业物联网、畜禽舍综合管理系统、质量安全追溯系统）
数字化经营场景应用能力（X34） 能否熟练地运用电子商务平台进行农产品宣传与销售
数字化管理场景应用能力（X36） 能否熟练地运用农业相关管理系统（如农业基本信息管理系统、财务管理系统、销售管理系统、市场信息系统、客户管理系统等）
数字化生活场景应用能力（X36） 能否熟练地在网上缴纳水电费、燃气费、暖气费、电话费等生活开支
数字化学习场景应用能力（X37） 能否熟练地通过互联网进行专业知识/技能的学习与提升
数字化金融场景应用能力（X38） 能否熟练地运用微信、支付宝、网上银行进行网上收付
数字化娱乐场景应用能力（X39） 能否熟练地使用视频软件、音乐软件、游戏软件等娱乐软件
数字创新素养（X4） 数字化文本创新能力（X41） 能否熟练地使用office、WPS等软件编辑文字/表格并进行在线协同工作
数字化图像创新能力（X42） 能否熟练地制作生活、工作相关电子相册
数字化视频创新能力（X43） 能否熟练地制作、剪辑生活、工作相关短视频
数字媒体内容创新能力（X44） 能否会用微博、微信、QQ等媒体平台来表达自己的想法或观点
数字社交素养（X5） 亲人数字化社交能力（X51） 能否熟练地通过微信、QQ等平台与亲人/朋友进行线上聊天与信息共享
熟人数字化社交能力（X52） 能否熟练地通过电子邮件等数字化通信方式与熟人进行线上沟通、洽谈
陌生人数字化社交能力（X53） 能否在微博、抖音、快手、小红书等平台上建立自媒体账号，向陌生人分享自己的生活与工作
数字安全素养（X6） 个人信息和隐私防护意识（X61） 使用网上银行、支付宝等互联网金融平台时，能否采取措施或相关措施维护账号及密码等信息的安全（如绑定手机号、动态验证码等）
信息安全鉴别意识（X62） 能否会通过不同渠道来确定网上信息的真实性（如网络诈骗信息等）
网络健康辨别意识（X63） 能否区分网络中的不良信息或行为（如网络谣言、网络暴力等）

Table 2

Demographics of respondents in the second round of the sample survey"

变量 选项 样本量/人 比例/% 变量 选项 样本量/人 比例/%
年龄 18~30岁 159 10.6 所在区 朝阳区 60 4.0
31~40岁 415 27.7 丰台区 53 3.5
41~50岁 365 24.3 海淀区 60 4.0
51~60岁 341 22.7 门头沟区 38 2.5
60岁以上 220 14.7 房山区 124 8.3
性别 男 741 49.4 通州区 119 7.9
女 759 50.6 顺义区 158 10.5
学历 小学 123 8.2 昌平区 105 7.0
初中 631 42.1 大兴区 176 11.7
高中/技校/中专 270 18.0 怀柔区 45 3.0
大专/本科 411 27.4 平谷区 252 16.8
研究生及以上 65 4.3 密云区 216 14.4
婚姻状况 已婚 1352 90.1 延庆区 94 6.3
未婚 148 9.9

Table 3

Variables and descriptive statistics"

变量 定义 平均值 标准差 最小值 最大值
个人因素 受教育程度 小学及以下=1；初中=2；高中/中专/技校/职高=3；大专/本科=4；研究生及以上=5 2.91 0.99 1 5
务工经历 是=1；否=2 0.60 0.49 0 1
收入水平 家庭年人均可支配收入（万元） 8.99 7.19 0.95 60
年龄 18~30岁=1；31~40岁=2；41~50岁=3；51~60岁=4；60岁以上=5 2.93 1.24 1 5
环境因素 是否营造数字生活氛围 是=1；否=0 0.59 0.49 0 1
手机是否智能 是=1；否=0 0.99 0.07 0 1
是否接入网络 是=1；否=0 0.98 0.12 0 1
资源供给因素 开展数字化服务 是=1；否=0 0.46 0.49 0 1
是否开展过数字化培训 是=1；否=0 0.57 0.49 0 1
是否开展过数字科普宣传 是=1；否=0 0.53 0.49 0 1

Table 4

Regression coefficients"

模型 未标准化系数 标准化系数 t 显著性
B 标准误差 Beta
常量 7.369 0.277 26.646 0.000
年龄 -0.230 0.015 -0.263 -14.987 0.000
受教育程度 0.344 0.020 0.225 12.234 0.000
务工经历 -0.052 0.037 -0.024 -1.413 0.158
数字化培训 0.584 0.038 0.239 15.225 0.000
数字化服务 0.815 0.040 0.375 20.192 0.000
数字科普宣传 0.556 0.050 0.126 7.122 0.000
数字生活氛围 0.430 0.052 0.114 6.576 0.000
手机是否智能 0.365 0.041 0.025 1.579 0.115
网络环境 0.152 0.042 0.073 4.595 0.000
收入水平 0.114 0.012 0.094 5.830 0.000
1
任友群, 随晓筱, 刘新阳. 欧盟数字素养框架研究[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2014(5): 3-12.
REN Y Q, SUI X X, LIU X Y. Research on the EU digital literacy framework[J]. Modern distance education research, 2014(5): 3-12.
2
VUORIKARI R, PUNIE Y, CARRETERO G S, et al. DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens//Update phase 1: The conceptual reference model[R]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016.
3
张恩铭, 盛群力. 培育学习者的数字素养——联合国教科文组织《全球数字素养框架》及其评估建议报告的解读与启示[J]. 开放教育研究, 2019, 25(6): 58-65.
ZHANG E M, SHENG Q L. Developing digital literacy for learners: The interpretations and implications of UNESCO's reports on digital literacy global framework and its assessment[J]. Open education research, 2019, 25(6): 58-65.
4
王郦玉. 高校辅导员数字素养: 理论渊源、价值意蕴与培育路径[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2024, 42(2): 154-160.
WANG L Y. Digital literacy of college counselors: Theoretical origin, value implication and cultivation approaches[J]. Heilongjiang researches on higher education, 2024, 42(2): 154-160.
5
葛炳伟. 职校学生数字素养提升的困境与优化——以会计专业为例[J]. 中国成人教育, 2023(24): 58-61.
GE B W. Dilemma and optimization of vocational school students' digital literacy improvement - Taking accounting major as an example[J]. China adult education, 2023(24): 58-61.
6
赵梦楚, 吴芷逍, 翁可若, 等. 公务员数字素养: 概念特征、结构测度及提升路径[J]. 浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 52(2): 206-214.
ZHAO M C, WU Z YAO, WENG K R, et al. Digital literacy of civil servants: Conceptual characteristics, structural measurement, and improvement path[J]. Journal of Zhejiang university of technology(social sciences edition), 2024, 52(2): 206-214.
7
商宪丽, 张俊, 陈国宏, 等. 澳大利亚新南威尔士州提升老年人数字素养实践与启示——以TSS计划为例[J]. 图书馆, 2024(2): 109-117.
SHANG X L, ZHANG J, CHEN G H, et al. Practice and inspiration of enhancing digital literacy of elderly people in New South Wales, Australia: A case Study of TSS program[J]. Library, 2024(2): 109-117.
8
施歌. 中小学生数字素养的内涵构成与培养途径[J]. 课程 教材 教法, 2016, 36(7): 69-75.
SHI G. The components of and paths to primary and secondary students' digital competency[J]. Curriculum, teaching material and method, 2016, 36(7): 69-75.
9
张红春, 杨欢. 数字政府背景下的公务员数字素养框架: 一个概念模型[J]. 电子政务, 2023(1): 110-124.
ZHANG H C, YANG H. Digital literacy framework of civil servants under the background of digital government: A conceptual model[J]. E-Government, 2023(1): 110-124.
10
GILSTER P. Digital literacy[M]. New York: Wiley Publishing, 1997: 25-48.
11
AVIRAM A, ESHET-ALKALAI Y. Towards a theory of digital literacy: Three scenarios for the next steps[J]. European journal of open, distance and e-learning, 2006(9): 1-11.
12
SEFTON-GREEN J, NIXON H, ERSTAD O. Reviewing approaches and perspectives on "digital literacy"[J]. Pedagogies, 2009, 4(2): 107-125.
13
CALVANI A, FINI A, RANIERI M, et al. Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers[J]. Computers & education, 2012, 58(2): 797-807.
14
HATLEVIK O E, GUÐMUNDSDÓTTIR G B, LOI M. Digital diversity among upper secondary students: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cultural capital, self-efficacy, strategic use of information and digital competence[J]. Computers & education, 2015, 81: 345-353.
15
FRAILLON J, SCHULZ W, AINLEY J. International computer and information literacy Study: Assessment framework[J]. International association for the evaluation of educational achievement, 2013, 33(4): 95-103.
16
KUHLEMEIER H, HEMKER B. The impact of computer use at home on students' Internet skills[J]. Computers & education, 2007, 49(2): 460-480.
17
VAN DEURSEN A J A M, VAN DIJK J A G M. Using the Internet: Skill related problems in users' online behavior[J]. Interacting with computers, 2009, 21(5/6): 393-402.
18
ACARA. National assessment program e ICT literacy years 6 & 10 report 2011[C]//Sidney: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, 2012.
19
ERSTAD O. A new direction? Digital literacy, student participation and curriculum reform in Norway[J]. Education and information technologies, 2006, 11: 415-429.
20
ERSTAD O. Educating the digital generation[J]. Nordic journal of digital literacy, 2010, 5: 56-71.
21
LEE L, CHEN D T, LI J Y, et al. Understanding new media literacy: The development of a measuring instrument[J]. Computers & education, 2015, 85: 84-93.
22
COMBES B. Generation Y: Are they really digital natives or more like refugees?[J]. Synergy, 2009, 7: 31-40.
23
肖俊洪. 数字素养[J]. 中国远程教育, 2006(5): 32-33.
XIAO J H. Digital literacy[J]. China distance education, 2006(5): 32-33.
24
王春生. 元素养: 信息素养的新定位[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2013(21): 17-21.
WANG C S. Metaliteracy: A new positioning of information literacy[J]. Research on library science, 2013(21): 17-21.
25
李新房, 陈烽, 李静, 等. 数字媒介素养概念辨析及培养策略研究[J]. 牡丹江大学学报, 2016, 25(11): 158-160.
LI X F, CHEN F, LI J, et al. Analysis on the concept of digital media literacy and research on training strategies[J]. Journal of Mudanjiang University, 2016, 25(11): 158-160.
26
喻国明, 赵睿. 网络素养: 概念演进、基本内涵及养成的操作性逻辑——试论习总书记关于“培育中国好网民”的理论基础[J]. 新闻战线, 2017(3): 43-46.
YU G M, ZHAO R. Network literacy: Conceptual evolution, basic connotation, and operational logic of cultivation - A discussion on general secretary Xi Jinping's theoretical basis for "Cultivating Good Chinese Netizens"[J]. News front, 2017(3): 43-46.
27
秦小燕, 初景利. 科学数据素养内涵结构研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(18): 30-39.
QIN X Y, CHU J L. Research on the connotation structure of scientific data literacy[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(18): 30-39.
28
包雅君, 刘永贵, 刘瑞. 数字素养概念与内涵辨析——兼与信息素养、媒介素养、技术素养的比较[J]. 软件导刊, 2020, 19(6): 277-280.
BAO Y J, LIU Y G, LIU R. Analysis of the concept and connotation of digital literacy - Compared with information literacy, media literacy and technical literacy[J]. Software guide, 2020, 19(6): 277-280.
29
中共中央网络安全和信息化委员会办公室. 提升全民数字素养与技能行动纲要[EB/OL]. [2021-11-05].
30
中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部推出行业标准《教师数字素养》发布[EB/OL]. [2023-02-21].
31
中国社会科学院信息化研究中心. 乡村振兴战略背景下中国乡村数字素养调查分析报告[EB/OL]. [2023-03-23].
32
李小云. KAP研究法在农业技术采用研究与推广实践中的运用[J]. 农业技术经济, 2001(3): 17-19.
LI X Y. Application of KAP to agricultural technology research and extention[J]. Journal of agrotechnical economics, 2001(3): 17-19.
33
王琳. 多视角下自恋型领导对下属追随力影响机制研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2019.
WANG L. A study on the influence mechanism of narcissistic leadership on subordinates' follow-up ability from multiple perspectives[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2019.
34
陈董瑞. M宠物用品公司品牌拟人化营销策略研究[D]. 上海: 上海外国语大学, 2023.
CHEN D R. Research on brand personification marketing strategy of M pet products company[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai International Studies University, 2023.
35
项凯. 生态产品价值认知对农户生态治理参与意愿的影响研究——以浙江省富春江沿岸村庄为例[D]. 舟山: 浙江海洋大学, 2022.
XIANG K. Study on the influence of ecological product value cognition on farmers' willingness to participate in ecological governance - A case study of villages along Fuchunjiang River in Zhejiang Province[D]. Zhoushan: Zhejiang Ocean University, 2022.
36
杨爽, 周志强. 高校教师数字素养评价指标构建研究[J]. 现代情报, 2019, 39(3): 59-68, 100.
YANG S, ZHOU Z Q. Research on the evaluation index construction of college teachers' digital literacy[J]. Journal of modern information, 2019, 39(3): 59-68, 100.
37
周少博. 县城居民数字阅读行为研究——以汉寿县护城社区为例[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2023.
ZHOU S B. Research on the digital reading behavior of county residents - A case study of hucheng community in Hanshou County[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2023.
38
宋焕然, 刘玮琳, 王菲. 面向老年用户的智慧出行类APP用户体验研究[J]. 河南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(5): 75-82.
SONF H R, LIU W L, WANG F. Research on user experience of smart travel apps for elderly users[J]. Journal of Henan university of science and technology (social sciences edition), 2024(5): 75-82.
39
李远远, 云俊. 多属性综合评价指标体系理论综述[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版), 2009, 31(2): 305-309.
LI Y Y, YUN J. Synthetic research on the theory of multi-attribute comprehensive evaluation index system[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of technology (information & management engineering), 2009, 31(2): 305-309.
40
彭张林, 张爱萍, 王素凤, 等. 综合评价指标体系的设计原则与构建流程[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(S1): 209-215.
PENG Z L, ZHANG A P, WANG S F, et al. Design principle and construction process of comprehensive evaluation index system[J]. Science research management, 2017, 38(S1): 209-215.
41
丰台区科协. 丰台区全民科学素质建设工作开展情况展播[EB/OL]. [2024-06-13].
42
北京市丰台区人民政府. 北京市丰台区农业农村局关于印发《2020年新型农民培养工作方案》的通知[EB/OL]. [2020-06-03].
43
邢今涛. 面向未来网络信息保护的物理层安全技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京邮电大学, 2023.
XING J T. Research on physical layer security technology for future network information protection[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2023.
[1] SUN Lili, WANG WeiJie, SHENG Jiefei. Influencing Factors of Scientific Data Value Increment Based on System Dynamics [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(9): 28-42.
[2] WU Yiwei, WEN Tingxiao. Effects of Public Online Health Information Search on Offline Medical Care Seeking Behavior [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(8): 30-42.
[3] YU Bo, CHEN Shiji, Zhao Jiayi. Influencing Factors and Indicator System Construction for the Evaluation of Talented People in Scientific and Technological Fields in Chinese Universities [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(7): 63-74.
[4] GAO Lan, TANG Anying, FAN Guangji, CHEN Lianfang. Influencing Factors of Public Demand for Digital Cultural Service in Fujian Province: Based on the Survey of Colleges and Universities in Fujian Province [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(3): 90-103.
[5] HU Yuan, GAO Wei, CHEN Guodong. Influencing Factors of Network Social Mentality in Public Emergencies: A Meta-Synthesis [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(12): 18-32.
[6] JIANG Zhihui, LI Xuan, CAO Gaohui. Causes and Influence Paths of Digital Stress among Social Media Users [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(11): 64-76.
[7] ZHAO Youlin, CAO Hongnan. Government Microblog Information Exchange Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors for Emergency Management [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 72-85.
[8] XING Fei, LIU Caihua, CHAI Xuefei, PENG Guochao. Influencing Factors of Elderly Users' Health Information Adoption Behavior Based on Social Platforms: Taking WeChat as an Example [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 53-64.
[9] GUO Weijia. Influencing Factors of Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Libraries [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(5): 47-56.
[10] XIONG Huan, LUO Aijing, XIE Wenzhao, HUANG Panhao. Status and Influencing Factors of Health Information Literacy of the Rural Elderly [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(10): 44-56.
[11] WANG Guokai. Identification of Influencing Factors of Health Information Service Quality in Public Libraries Based on Fuzzy DANP [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(10): 33-43.
[12] WANG Hui. The Influence of Knowledge Service Ability on the User's Intention of Using the Knowledge Service Platform Provided by University Libraries [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(9): 64-71.
[13] ZHANG Xin, TIAN Xuecan, ZHANG Lu, LI Yue. User Utilization Behavior and Influencing Factors of Hospital Online Information Service: A Case Study of Hebei Province [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(11): 38-49.
[14] HU Yuanyuan, DING Fenfen, DU Xiaodan. Study on Research Data Sharing Influencing Factors and Active Mechanism of Faculty in Local Universities in China [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(10): 79-86.
[15] MO Yidan. Influencing Factors of Digital Library Users' Willingness to Accept—— an Empirical Analysis Based on Questionnaires [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(1): 73-79.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Editorial Board of Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture
Tel：(010)82109667　Fax：(010)82109667　E-mail：xuekan＠caas.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.
知识共享许可协议