中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 18-32.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.23-0738

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influencing Factors of Network Social Mentality in Public Emergencies: A Meta-Synthesis

HU Yuan1, GAO Wei1, CHEN Guodong2   

  1. 1. School of Public Policy and Administration, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000;
    2. Library and Information Center, Fuyang Institude of Technology, Fuyang 236031
  • Received:2023-10-27 Online:2023-12-05 Published:2024-04-07

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] When emergencies occur, the information environment becomes complex, users' emotions are strongly affected, and the social mentality fluctuates. This situation also poses new requirements for the management of network public opinion. It is urgent to actively and correctly manage the current social mentality. The research on the current social mentality mainly focuses on the macro level, while the micro-user emotion and the macro-network social mentality need to be further explored. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the fine-grained influencing factors of the network social mentality in public emergencies, so as to promote the effective response to public emergencies in China and manage social mentality. [Method/Process] The meta-synthesis method is used to formulate a reasonable retrieval strategy. Based on the mainstream databases at home and abroad, the literature is screened by topic, and the quality of related topic literature is evaluated to obtain effective literature and use it as the original data. Through the form of three-level coding, the included literature was interpreted, translated and aggregated to test the reliability and validity of the research results and confirm the validity of the results. This paper summarizes the key variables and implicit relations of the existing research results, and constructs a comprehensive and micro-theoretical framework of the influencing factors of network social mentality in public emergencies. The relationship between the dimensions and the main categories in the model was analyzed. [Results/Conclusions] The study finally obtained 90 initial concepts, 31 categories and 13 main categories, which were summarized into a model of influencing factors composed of four dimensions: user, event, government and social environment. As the main body and direct cause of the change of network social mentality, users and events are the core objects of network social mentality management. As the external environment for the change of network social mentality, society and government play an important role in the management and standardization of network social mentality. The theoretical model framework can provide some guidance and reference for promoting public emergency response and social mentality management. It is also of great significance for the study of network social mentality and user emotion. There are still some shortcomings in the article. The research object of this paper has not yet been more official and unified. The definition is a self-summary based on literature reading. In addition, due to the specificity of the research object, there may be a problem of incomplete literature search. In the future research, the management model will be further explored in combination with the development of practice, and the model framework will be revised and expanded.

Key words: public emergency, network social mentality, influencing factors, user emotion, Meta-synthesis

CLC Number: 

  • C921.64
[1] 万欣荣, 陈珂. 算法意识形态下舆论偏见的形成与治理[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 53(6): 51-59.
WAN X R, CHEN K.Formation and governance of public opinion bias under algorithmic ideology[J]. Journal of Nanchang university (humanities and social sciences), 2022, 53(6): 51-59.
[2] 余谓之. 着力塑造理性平和的社会心态[EB/OL]. [2023-03-07].https://paper.cntheory.com/html/2019-05/24/nw.D110000xxsb_20190524_3-A1.htm.
[3] 新华社. 中国共产党第十九届中央委员会第四次全体会议公报[EB/OL]. [2023-03-07]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2019-10/31/c_1125178024.htm.
[4] 吕小康, 付春野. 社会心态治理的元理论思考[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 10(2): 73-82.
LV X K, FU C Y.Theoretical thoughts on the governance of social mentality[J]. Journal of Soochow university (educational science edition), 2022, 10(2): 73-82.
[5] 唐子茜, 曹勇. 网络社会心态的特征及调适对策[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 14(1): 132-136.
TANG Z X, CAO Y.A study on the characteristics and adjustment measures of Internet social mentality[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong university (social sciences edition), 2015, 14(1): 132-136.
[6] JELODAR H, WANG Y L, ORJI R, et al.Deep sentiment classification and topic discovery on novel coronavirus or COVID-19 online discussions: NLP using LSTM recurrent neural network approach[J]. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2020, 24(10): 2733-2742.
[7] LE BON G.冯克利, 译. The crowd a study of the popular mind[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2004: 3.
[8] 汪新建, 姜鹤. 社会心态研究的学术谱系与主要议题[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2021, 58(2): 69-76.
WANG X J, JIANG H.The genealogy and major issues of social mentality research[J]. Journal of northwest normal university (social sciences), 2021, 58(2): 69-76.
[9] MURPHY G, KOVACH J K.林方, 王景和, 译. Historical introduction to modern psychology[M]. 上海: 商务印书馆, 1980: 646.
[10] 杨宜音. 个体与宏观社会的心理关系: 社会心态概念的界定[J]. 社会学研究, 2006(4): 117-131.
YANG Y Y.The psychological link between the individual and society: The concept of social mentality[J]. Sociological studies, 2006(4): 117-131.
[11] 刘璐, 谢耘耕. 当前网络社会心态的新态势与引导研究[J]. 新闻界, 2018(10): 75-81, 100.
LIU L, XIE Y G.Research on the new situation and guidance of the current network society mentality[J]. Journalism and mass communication monthly, 2018(10): 75-81, 100.
[12] HOON C, HOON C.Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: An approach to theory building[M]//Case Studies. 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016: III425.
[13] ZIMMER L.Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts[J]. Journal of advanced nursing, 2006, 53(3): 311-318.
[14] CATALANO A.Patterns of graduate students' information seeking behavior: A meta-synthesis of the literature[J]. Journal of documentation, 2013, 69(2): 243-274.
[15] 孙玉伟, 成颖, 谢娟. 科研人员数据复用行为研究: 系统综述与元综合[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2019, 45(3): 110-130.
SUN Y W, CHENG Y, XIE J.A review on the data reuse behavior of scholars: System review and meta synthesis[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2019, 45(3): 110-130.
[16] GLYNN L.A critical appraisal tool for library and information research[J]. Library hi tech, 2006, 24(3): 387-399.
[17] YAMANE T.Statistics, an introductory analysis[M]. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.
[18] HAMILTON M, HAMILTON M B.Online survey response rates and times background and guidance for industry[EB/OL]. [2023-03-07].https://www.supersurvey.com/SurveyQuestions.
[19] DIXON-WOODS M, CAVERS D, AGARWAL S, et al.Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups[J]. BMC medical research methodology, 2006, 6: 35.
[20] 完颜邓邓, 尹娇. 基于扎根理论的公共数字文化服务供给质量影响因素分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(21): 14-21.
WANYAN D D, YIN J.Analysis of the influencing factors of the supply quality of public digital cultural services based on grounded theory[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(21): 14-21.
[21] FRANCIS J J, JOHNSTON M, ROBERTSON C, et al.What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies[J]. Psychology & health, 2010, 25(10): 1229-1245.
[22] GUPTA A M.Investigating public sentiment towards government-issued COVID-19 policies and mandates through twitter lens: A data-centric approach[D]. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo, 2021.
[23] LEE H H.An investigation of the effects of self-construal, self-monitoring, and susceptibility to emotional contagion on negative mood contagion[D]. Ontario: The University of Western Ontario, 2012.
[24] NIE X T, FENG K, WANG S N, et al.Factors influencing public panic during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2021, 12: 576301.
[25] STEVENS E N.Potential moderators in the relation between self-discrepancies and mood in college students[D]. Dekalb: Northern Illinois University, 2014.
[26] 朱代琼, 王国华. 突发事件中网民社会情绪产生的影响因素及机理——基于三元交互决定论的多个案定性比较分析(QCA)[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(3): 95-104.
ZHU D Q, WANG G H.Influencing factors and mechanism of netizens' social emotions in emergencies - Qualitative comparative analysis of multiple cases based on ternary interactive determinism (QCA)[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2020, 39(3): 95-104.
[27] TAYLOR K M.An examination of the relationships among positive and negative mood states, cognition, and risk estimation[D]. Gainesville: University of Florida, 2000.
[28] XI Y H, ZHOU L, WANG Y.The construction of positive social psychology during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring the relationship between social support and peace of mind through a three-wave longitudinal cross-lag study[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2021, 12: 631748.
[29] 王月, 张涛. 突发事件下网民群体负面情绪演化影响因素分析[J]. 情报探索, 2022(4): 100-106.
WANG Y, ZHANG T.Analysis on influence factors of negative emotion evolution of netizen group under emergency[J]. Information research, 2022(4): 100-106.
[30] JOUDY R S.The moderating effect of self-discrepancy on self-focused attention and mood: An experience sampling study[D]. Palo Alto: Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, 2007.
[31] 李珩, 王玉英. 情绪模仿与感染: 突发公共卫生事件中社会情绪的形成路径研究[J]. 新闻研究导刊, 2020, 11(17): 160-161.
LI H, WANG Y Y.Emotional imitation and infection: A study on the formation path of social emotions in public health emergencies[J]. Journal of news research, 2020, 11(17): 160-161.
[32] WANG X B, JIN D, LIU M Q, et al.Emotional contagion-based social sentiment mining in social networks by introducing network communities[C]//Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM, 2019: 1763-1772.
[33] ROBBINS P.Consciousness and the social mind[J]. Cognitive systems research, 2008, 9(1/2): 15-23.
[34] LEBOWITZ M S, DOVIDIO J F.Implications of emotion regulation strategies for empathic concern, social attitudes, and helping behavior[J]. Emotion, 2015, 15(2): 187-194.
[35] PRECKEL K, KANSKE P, SINGER T.On the interaction of social affect and cognition: Empathy, compassion and theory of mind[J]. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2018, 19: 1-6.
[36] ZHONG Y.The association between environmental justice and tweet sentiment: A case study in New York City[D]. Boston: Tufts University, 2021.
[37] 盛海迪. 突发公共卫生事件公众恐慌情绪传播影响因素研究[D]. 成都: 四川外国语大学, 2021.
SHENG H D.Study on influencing factors of public panic spread in public health emergencies[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan International Studies University, 2021.
[38] HUANG H N, CHEN W F, XIE T, et al.The impact of individual behaviors and governmental guidance measures on pandemic-triggered public sentiment based on system dynamics and cross-validation[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021, 18(8): 4245.
[39] 范勇鹏. 用中国话语解释公信力问题[EB/OL].[2023-03-07]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-12/17/content_5247793.htm.
[40] 李泽, 谢熠, 罗教讲. 突发公共卫生事件社会心理影响因素分析[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2021(6): 91-93.
LI Z, XIE Y, LUO J J.Analysis of social and psychological influenc-ing factors of public health emergencies[J]. The party building and ideological education in schools, 2021(6): 91-93.
[41] KLAU M B.Exploring the social psychology of complex systems: A pilot study[D]. Boston: Harvard University, 2005.
[1] SUN Lili, WANG WeiJie, SHENG Jiefei. Influencing Factors of Scientific Data Value Increment Based on System Dynamics [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(9): 28-42.
[2] WU Yiwei, WEN Tingxiao. Effects of Public Online Health Information Search on Offline Medical Care Seeking Behavior [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(8): 30-42.
[3] YU Bo, CHEN Shiji, Zhao Jiayi. Influencing Factors and Indicator System Construction for the Evaluation of Talented People in Scientific and Technological Fields in Chinese Universities [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(7): 63-74.
[4] GAO Lan, TANG Anying, FAN Guangji, CHEN Lianfang. Influencing Factors of Public Demand for Digital Cultural Service in Fujian Province: Based on the Survey of Colleges and Universities in Fujian Province [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(3): 90-103.
[5] JIANG Zhihui, LI Xuan, CAO Gaohui. Causes and Influence Paths of Digital Stress among Social Media Users [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(11): 64-76.
[6] ZHAO Youlin, CAO Hongnan. Government Microblog Information Exchange Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors for Emergency Management [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 72-85.
[7] XING Fei, LIU Caihua, CHAI Xuefei, PENG Guochao. Influencing Factors of Elderly Users' Health Information Adoption Behavior Based on Social Platforms: Taking WeChat as an Example [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 53-64.
[8] GUO Weijia. Influencing Factors of Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Libraries [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(5): 47-56.
[9] XIONG Huan, LUO Aijing, XIE Wenzhao, HUANG Panhao. Status and Influencing Factors of Health Information Literacy of the Rural Elderly [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(10): 44-56.
[10] WANG Hui. The Influence of Knowledge Service Ability on the User's Intention of Using the Knowledge Service Platform Provided by University Libraries [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(9): 64-71.
[11] ZHANG Xin, TIAN Xuecan, ZHANG Lu, LI Yue. User Utilization Behavior and Influencing Factors of Hospital Online Information Service: A Case Study of Hebei Province [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(11): 38-49.
[12] HU Yuanyuan, DING Fenfen, DU Xiaodan. Study on Research Data Sharing Influencing Factors and Active Mechanism of Faculty in Local Universities in China [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(10): 79-86.
[13] MO Yidan. Influencing Factors of Digital Library Users' Willingness to Accept—— an Empirical Analysis Based on Questionnaires [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(1): 73-79.
[14] CHI Yuzhuo. Literature Review of Scientific Data Competence: the Connotation, Framework and Influencing Factors [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(1): 23-29.
[15] YANG Hai-ling. Correlation Analysis of Factors Influencing Readers’ use of Library [J]. , 2016, 28(6): 107-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!