中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 63-74.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.23-0418

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influencing Factors and Indicator System Construction for the Evaluation of Talented People in Scientific and Technological Fields in Chinese Universities

YU Bo1, CHEN Shiji1, Zhao Jiayi2   

  1. 1. Chinese Academy of Science and Education, Evaluation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018;
    2. University of Edinburgh Futures Academy, Scotland EH89YL, UK
  • Received:2023-05-28 Online:2023-07-05 Published:2023-09-20

PDF (PC)

61

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] In the ever-evolving realm of higher education, the pronounced significance of methodically evaluating talented people in scientific and technological (S&T) fields within academic institutions has risen to paramount importance. This research endeavors to intricately dissect the manifold factors of shaping the evaluation of talented people in Chinese colleges and universities. Simultaneously, it seeks to meticulously design a comprehensive indicator system custom-tailored to this unique milieu. The dual objective encompasses unraveling the intricate dynamics underpinning the evaluation of talented people in S&T fields and invigorating talent cultivation and igniting innovation in scientific research across the academic landscape. [Method/Process] Guided by a meticulous review of both domestic and international advancements in the domain of the evaluation of talented people in S&T fields in higher education, this paper diligently dissects the intricate interplay of systems, theories, methodologies, and evaluation frameworks within Chinese academic institutions. By meticulously addressing associated challenges, conducting extensive discourse on influential variables, and meticulously examining facets of S&T prowess assessment within universities, this study culminates in the construction of an evaluation indicator system tailored to the unique nature of institutions of Chinese higher education. [Results/Conclusions] The findings echo the existence of critical gaps in the ongoing evaluation of talented people in S&T fields within Chinese universities. These noteworthy limitations encapsulate the intricate equilibrium sought between objectivity and subjectivity, the imperative for indicators to be comprehensive yet operationally feasible, the mandate for assessment to be dynamic and timely, and the essentiality of embracing multi-dimensional evaluation. This compels us to chart a trajectory towards the future where the development of an evaluation system of talented people in S&T fields rests on the bedrock of data-driven and intelligent assessment paradigms. This envisioned system must incorporate multi-dimensional evaluation approaches, integrate behavioral assessment modalities, deploy dynamic evaluation mechanisms, and, equally, factor in dimensions of social influence, sustainability, and internationalization. As we navigate this academic journey, further empirical research and meticulous indicator validation exercises must be undertaken within the realm of the evaluation of talented people in S&T fields in Chinese higher education institutions. These empirical undertakings, by virtue of their in-depth insights, are poised to illuminate our path forward, serving as compasses guiding the development of talented people in S&T fields in China's academic sphere. The journey towards comprehensive evaluation necessitates data-driven intelligence, multifaceted assessment perspectives, and a clear alignment with the pulse of societal dynamics and global imperatives. The culmination of these efforts will invariably shape the trajectory of the progression of talented people in S&T fields, ensuring that they remain at the vanguard of innovation and advancement. In essence, the evaluation of talented people within Chinese higher education institutions is primed for an evolution characterized by acumen, innovation, and internationalization. Through the harmonious amalgamation of rigorous research methodologies and adaptive frameworks, the academic community is poised to craft a transformative path that enriches talent development, propels research breakthroughs, and fuels the advancement of knowledge-based societies.

Key words: evaluation of talented people in scientific and technological fields in colleges and universities, influencing factors, indicator system, evaluation research

CLC Number: 

  • G316
[1] 王少. 科技人才评价的地位、遵循与本质要求[J]. 科学管理研究, 2019, 37(4): 142-145.
WANG S.Status, compliance and essential requirements of science and technology talents evaluation[J]. Scientific management research, 2019, 37(4): 142-145.
[2] 孙安平. 进一步改革创新人才评价制度[J]. 中国人才, 2018(8): 39.
SUN A P.Further reform the evaluation system of innovative talents[J]. Chinese talents, 2018(8): 39.
[3] 唐慧, 王继平, 刘锦. 我国技能人才评价制度的历史演进、当下构建及逻辑发展[J]. 职业技术教育, 2022, 43(13): 6-13.
TANG H, WANG J P, LIU J.Historical evolution, current construction and development logic of skilled talents evaluation system in China[J]. Vocational and technical education, 2022, 43(13): 6-13.
[4] 萧鸣政, 陈新明. 中国人才评价制度发展70年分析[J]. 行政论坛, 2019, 26(4): 22-27.
XIAO M Z, CHEN X M.Analysis on the development of talent evalua-tion system in China in the past 70 years[J]. Administrative tribune, 2019, 26(4): 22-27.
[5] 姜国钧. 略论中国古代的选举制度与人才培养的关系[J]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2016, 15(1): 91-97.
JIANG G J.On relationship between election systems and talents training in ancient China[J]. Journal of educational science of Hunan normal university, 2016, 15(1): 91-97.
[6] 余绪缨. 对高层次人才评价中几个基本理论问题的新认识[J]. 高等教育研究, 2006, 27(1): 88-93.
YU X Y.Some new insights into the basic theory concerning the high-level talents' appraisal[J]. Journal of higher education, 2006, 27(1): 88-93.
[7] 孙锐. 构建适应新时代发展要求的人才评价机制[J]. 中国人才, 2019(7): 24-26.
SUN R.Constructing talent evaluation mechanism to meet the development requirements of the new era[J]. Chinese talents, 2019(7): 24-26.
[8] 章小林. 人才评价类型论[J]. 求索, 2004(4): 95-96.
ZHANG X L.Talent evaluation type theory[J]. Seeker, 2004(4): 95-96.
[9] 袁景蒂. 高校科研人才评价理论·反思·重构——基于工具理性与对话理性的视角[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(3): 25-32.
YUAN J D.Theory, reflection and reconstruction of the evaluation of scientific research talents in universities - Based on the perspective of instrumental rationality and dialogue rationality[J]. Forum on science and technology in China, 2022(3): 25-32.
[10] 杨月坤, 查椰. 国外科技人才评价经验的启示与借鉴——基于英国、美国、德国的研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2020, 38(1): 160-165.
YANG Y K, ZHA Y.Enlightenment and reference from the experience of foreign scientific and technological talents: A study based on Britain, the United States and Germany[J]. Scientific management research, 2020, 38(1): 160-165.
[11] 周华强, 周颖, 冯文帅, 等. 论文人才评价作用的反思: 回归、认可、补充与反对[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(1): 143-155.
ZHOU H Q, ZHOU Y, FENG W S, et al.Study on papers' roles in talent evaluation: Regression, recognition, replenishment and rejection[J]. Forum on science and technology in China, 2020(1): 143-155.
[12] 徐曾旭林, 谢靖, 于倩倩. 人才多元评价模型设计方法研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(8): 122-131.
XU Z X L, XIE J, YU Q Q. Designing new evaluation model for talents[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2021, 5(8): 122-131.
[13] 胡丰华, 周小燕. 基于潜在价值的高校人才评价指标的遴选[J]. 中国成人教育, 2012(23): 44-46.
HU F H, ZHOU X Y.Selection of talent evaluation index in colleges and universities based on potential value[J]. China adult education, 2012(23): 44-46.
[14] 丁宁, 苏颖, 胡豫, 等. “破四唯” 背景下我国高校附属公立医院人才评价体系分析[J]. 中华医院管理杂志, 2021, 37(12): 953-957.
DING N, SU Y, HU Y, et al.Analysis of talent evaluation system in university affiliated public hospitals of China under the background of "breaking 4 unique conditions"[J]. Chinese journal of hospital administration, 2021, 37(12): 953-957.
[15] 胥彦玲, 袁汝兵, 王健美. 情报视角下的高端人才评价体系构建及实证研究[J]. 现代情报, 2018, 38(7): 160-164, 177.
XU Y L, YUAN R B, WANG J M.The construction and empirical study on top talent evaluation system in view of intelligence[J]. Journal of modern information, 2018, 38(7): 160-164, 177.
[16] 杨庆, 尤欣赏, 张再生. 基于改进最优最劣法的海外高层次人才评价体系构建[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(12): 92-102.
YANG Q, YOU X S, ZHANG Z S.Construction of high-level overseas talents evaluate system based on I-BWM[J]. Science and technology management research, 2018, 38(12): 92-102.
[17] 李红锦, 李胜会, 许林. 科技人才分类评价改革能否促进高校科研水平的高质量发展——基于9所高校改革试点的准自然实验[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(10): 114-123, 179.
LI H J, LI S H, XU L.Does the reform of classified evaluation of scientific and technological talents promote the high quality development of scientific research level in universities - Based on the quasi natural experiment of 9 universities reform[J]. Forum on science and technology in China, 2021(10): 114-123, 179.
[18] 王雪梅. 创新型科技人才分类评价方法[J]. 科技导报, 2021, 39(21): 72-79.
WANG X M.Classification and evaluation methods of innovative scientific and technological talents[J]. Science & technology review, 2021, 39(21): 72-79.
[19] 刘璇, 段宇锋, 朱庆华. 基于合著网络的学术人才评价方法研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(12): 77-82.
LIU X, DUAN Y F, ZHU Q H.Study on scholars' evaluation method based on co-author network[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2014, 33(12): 77-82.
[20] 李思宏, 罗瑾琏, 张波. 科技人才评价维度与方法进展[J]. 科学管理研究, 2007, 25(2): 76-79.
LI S H, LUO J L, ZHANG B.Research on the progress of the evaluating dimension and method of S & T talents[J]. Scientific management research, 2007, 25(2): 76-79.
[21] 肖小溪, 周建中. 国立科研机构科研人员评价的模式研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2009, 30(4): 20-24.
XIAO X X, ZHOU J Z.A model study on the evaluation of scientific research personnel in national scientific research institutions[J]. Science of science and management of science and technology, 2009, 30(4): 20-24.
[22] 林德珊, 吕建秋. DEMATEL方法在高校科技创新能力影响因素分析中的应用[J]. 科技管理研究, 2014, 34(17): 53-56.
LIN D S, LV J Q.Application of DEMATEL method in analysis of influence factors for university science and technology innovative capacity[J]. Science and technology management research, 2014, 34(17): 53-56.
[23] 赵伟, 林芬芬, 彭洁, 等. 创新型科技人才评价理论模型的构建[J]. 科技管理研究, 2012, 32(24): 131-135.
ZHAO W, LIN F F, PENG J, et al.Building of evaluation theory model of innovative scientific & technical talents[J]. Science and technology management research, 2012, 32(24): 131-135.
[24] 苏津津, 李颖. 影响科技领军人才成长的关键因素分析——基于对天津市科技领军人才的实证分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2013, 33(8): 83-86.
SU J J, LI Y.Analysis of the key factors affecting the growth of science and technology leading talent - Based on empirical analysis of Tianjin science and technology leading talent[J]. Science and technology management research, 2013, 33(8): 83-86.
[25] ABBAS A M.Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(1): 107-131.
[26] JIA X J, LI M, ZHAO J A.The cultivation quality evaluation of international talents based on deep learning[J]. International journal of emerging technologies in learning (iJET), 2022, 17(9): 110-124.
[27] 马景惠. 高校人才培养质量跟踪评价体系的信息化建设探析——以吉林大学为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(8): 180-185.
MA J H.Analysis on evaluation system information construction of personnel training quality tracking in colleges and universities: Taking Jilin university as an example[J]. Science and technology management research, 2021, 41(8): 180-185.
[28] 吴翠花, 李慧, 张雁敏. 高端引进人才社会经济贡献评价指标的构建[J]. 统计与决策, 2014(17): 32-35.
WU C H, LI H, ZHANG Y M.Construction of social and economic contribution evaluation index of high-end imported talents[J]. Statistics & decision, 2014(17): 32-35.
[29] 刘颖. 构建多元化创新科技人才评价体系[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019(5): 90-95.
LIU Y.Constructing A diversified innovation-oriented assessment system for science and technology talents[J]. Chinese public administration, 2019(5): 90-95.
[30] 田军, 刘阳, 周琨, 等. 陕西省科技人才评价指标体系与评价方法构建[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(4): 89-96.
TIAN J, LIU Y, ZHOU K, et al.Construction of evaluation index sys-tem and evaluation method for scientific and technological talents in Shaanxi province[J]. Science and technology management research, 2022, 42(4): 89-96.
[31] 姚占雷, 陈红伶, 许鑫. 科研人才分类分级评价研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 2020, 41(6): 234-240.
YAO Z L, CHEN H L, XU X.Research on classification and grading evaluation of scientific research talents[J]. Journal of southwest Minzu university (humanities and social science), 2020, 41(6): 234-240.
[32] 袁铭, 左晓利, 田晓冰. 加快推进科技人才评价改革政策落实落地[J]. 中国人才, 2020(10): 18-20.
YUAN M, ZUO X L, TIAN X B.Accelerate the implementation of the reform policy for the evaluation of scientific and technological talents[J]. Chinese talents, 2020(10): 18-20.
[33] 田永常, 杜远生, 张云姝, 等. 地质类高校科技人才评价体系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(S1): 52-56.
TIAN Y C, DU Y S, ZHANG Y S, et al.A research on the evaluation system of science and technology talents in geological universities[J]. Science research management, 2018, 39(S1): 52-56.
[34] 王琦, 曾晨曦, 董玛力. 测绘地理信息技能人才评价标准体系创新研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2020(9): 143-147.
WANG Q, ZENG C X, DONG M L.Innovative research on evaluation standard system of skilled talents on surveying and mapping geo-graphic information industry[J]. Bulletin of surveying and mapping, 2020(9): 143-147.
[1] GAO Lan, TANG Anying, FAN Guangji, CHEN Lianfang. Influencing Factors of Public Demand for Digital Cultural Service in Fujian Province: Based on the Survey of Colleges and Universities in Fujian Province [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(3): 90-103.
[2] WANG Lin, YAO Feifei. Construction and Application of the Evaluation Indicator System of Government Data Openness Maturity in China [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(1): 56-72.
[3] ZHAO Youlin, CAO Hongnan. Government Microblog Information Exchange Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors for Emergency Management [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 72-85.
[4] XING Fei, LIU Caihua, CHAI Xuefei, PENG Guochao. Influencing Factors of Elderly Users' Health Information Adoption Behavior Based on Social Platforms: Taking WeChat as an Example [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 53-64.
[5] GUO Weijia. Influencing Factors of Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Libraries [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(5): 47-56.
[6] XIONG Huan, LUO Aijing, XIE Wenzhao, HUANG Panhao. Status and Influencing Factors of Health Information Literacy of the Rural Elderly [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(10): 44-56.
[7] WANG Hui. The Influence of Knowledge Service Ability on the User's Intention of Using the Knowledge Service Platform Provided by University Libraries [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(9): 64-71.
[8] ZHANG Xin, TIAN Xuecan, ZHANG Lu, LI Yue. User Utilization Behavior and Influencing Factors of Hospital Online Information Service: A Case Study of Hebei Province [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(11): 38-49.
[9] HU Yuanyuan, DING Fenfen, DU Xiaodan. Study on Research Data Sharing Influencing Factors and Active Mechanism of Faculty in Local Universities in China [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(10): 79-86.
[10] CHI Yuzhuo. Literature Review of Scientific Data Competence: the Connotation, Framework and Influencing Factors [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(1): 23-29.
[11] MO Yidan. Influencing Factors of Digital Library Users' Willingness to Accept—— an Empirical Analysis Based on Questionnaires [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(1): 73-79.
[12] HAN Jing, MEN Weili. Evaluation Research on the Efficiency of Agricultural Information Service Websites with DEA Method [J]. , 2017, 29(5): 67-70.
[13] YANG Hai-ling. Correlation Analysis of Factors Influencing Readers’ use of Library [J]. , 2016, 28(6): 107-109.
[14] ZHANG Zheng-ya,GU Chao-bing,GENG Xiao. Study of Performance Evaluation of Enterprise Competitive Intelligence [J]. , 2014, 26(9): 36-41.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Editorial Board of Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture
Tel：(010)82109667　Fax：(010)82109667　E-mail：xuekan＠caas.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.
知识共享许可协议