中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 72-85.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.22-0230

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Government Microblog Information Exchange Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors for Emergency Management

ZHAO Youlin1,2,3, CAO Hongnan4   

  1. 1. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023;
    2. Business School of Hohai University, Nanjing 211100;
    3. Changzhou Key Laboratory of Industrial Bigdata Mining and Knowledge Management, Changzhou 213022;
    4. School of International Economics and Trade, Northeast University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025
  • Received:2022-04-03 Online:2022-09-05 Published:2022-11-28

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This paper aimed at evaluating information exchange efficiency of fire-fighting microblogs, in order to guiding information exchange and promoting the information exchange efficiency in emergency management. There are two primary innovations in this paper. First, compared with the existing research on emergency management and DEA methods, the existing research on the application of government microblogs in emergency management mainly focused on qualitative research. The research on DEA method focused on the performance evaluation of enterprises and banks. This paper used the DEA method to quantitatively analyze the efficiency of information exchange in emergency management. Second, this paper used the DEA method to divide the efficiency of fire-fighting microblogs into two parts: DEA effective and non-DEA effective, and comprehensively explored measures to improve efficiency from these two parts. [Method/Process] This paper took the highest level of fire-fighting microblogs officially certified by the provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities as the research resources. In order to do this research, an indicator system based on current influence of government microblog and the efficiency of communication was constructed; DEA-BBC model was used to measure the efficiency of fire-fighting microblog information exchange; the micro and macro influencing factors of fire-fighting microblog information exchange efficiency were identified; finally some measures were put forward to improve the efficiency of information exchange on fire-fighting microblogging. DEA is a non-parametric test method commonly used for enterprise performance and efficiency evaluation in management science. It can be used to evaluate decision-making units of multiple input indicators and multiple output indicators. Beyond that, the decision-making results of the method are not affected by the dimensions of input indicators and output indicators. This method also does not need to make weight assumptions, so it can provide more objective analysis results to make contribution to refining more effective improvement measures. [Results/Conclusions] The information exchange efficiency of the fire-fighting microblogs was generally rated as the medium level. It is better for us to arrange various inputs of the microblog account reasonably, and make full use of resources, which could improve the efficiency of information exchange. In addition, the operation of fire-fighting microblogs in different regions should be based on regional characteristics and period characteristics; local governments ought to strengthen network infrastructure construction and resource investment to eliminate the "digital divide"; government agencies should improve management systems, standardize the words and deeds of netizens and the daily work of relevant personnel. Microblog plays an important role in emergency management, which is also a necessary condition for the vigorous development of China's Internet governance.

Key words: emergency management, government microblog, fire-fighting microblog, efficiency measurement, influencing factors

CLC Number: 

  • G350
[1] HARRISON S, JOHNSON P.Challenges in the adoption of crisis crowdsourcing and social media in Canadian emergency management[J]. Government information quarterly, 2019, 3(36): 333-357.
[2] 人民网舆情数据中心. 2018年度人民日报: 政务指数微博影响力报告[Z]. 2019.
People's Network public opinion data center. 2018 People's Daily: Government affairs index Weibo influence report[Z]. 2019.
[3] 刘依卿. 微博:政府危机公关新手段[J]. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版), 2012(3): 132-135.
LIU Y Q.Weibo: A new approach to government crisis public relations[J]. Journal of Ningbo university (humanities edition), 2012(3): 132-135.
[4] GENES N, CHARY M, CHASON K.Analysis of Twitter users' sharing of official New York storm response messages[J]. Med 20, 2014, 3(1): E1.
[5] 牛春华, 江志欣. 重大公共安全事件防控的风险沟通: 整合框架与可能路径[J]. 兰州大学学报 (社会科学版), 2020, 48(2):25-37.
NIU C H, JIANG Z X.Integration framework and possible path:risk communication in the prevention and control of major public security events[J]. Journal of Lanzhou university(social sciences edition), 2020, 48(2):25-37.
[6] SUN X, YANG W, SUN T, et al.Negative emotion under haze: an investigation based on the microblog and weather records of Tianjin, China[J]. Int J environ res public health, 2018, 16(1): 40-42.
[7] MARTíNEZ-ROJAS M, PARDO-FERREIRA M D C, RUBIO-ROMERO J C. Twitter as a tool for the management and analysis of emergency situations: A systematic literature review[J]. International journal of information management, 2018, 43(6): 196-208.
[8] 张秀娟. 基于政务微博平台的自然灾害信息发布模式与公众关注度分析[D]. 北京:中国科学技术大学, 2017.
ZHANG X J.Analysis of natural disaster information release mode and public attention based on government affairs micro-blog platform[D]. Beijing: University of science and technology of China, 2017.
[9] RICHARD M W, JENSEN D W.Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: Analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter[J]. Journal of public affairs, 2011, 11(4): 353-363.
[10] KAVANAUGH A L, FOX E A, SHEETZ S D, et al.Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical[J]. Government information quarterly, 2012, 29(4): 480-491.
[11] 李琳. 政务微博对突发性事件的舆情应对[J]. 新闻世界, 2016(11): 50-53.
LI L.The public opinion response of government affairs micro-blog to emergencies[J]. The news world, 2016(11): 50-53.
[12] 李萍. 危机事件管理中政务微博作用机制及改进对策[D]. 大连: 东北财经大学, 2016.
LI P.The function mechanism and improvement countermeasures of government affairs microblog in crisis event management[D]. Dalian: Dongbei university of finance and economics, 2016.
[13] WANG F, WANG H, XU K, et al.Regional level influenza study with geo-tagged twitter data[J]. J med syst, 2016, 40(8): 189.
[14] 姚宝权. 突发自然灾害政务微博发布的实证研究——以北京7·21暴雨为例[J]. 怀化学院学报, 2012, 31(9): 48-51.
YAO B Q.An empirical study on the publishing of government Weibo of sudden natural disasters, taking the 7.21 rainstorm in Beijing as an example[J]. Journal of Huaihua university, 2012, 31(9): 48-51.
[15] PIERCE C E, BOURI K, PAMER C, et al.Evaluation of Facebook and twitter monitoring to detect safety signals for medical products: An analysis of recent FDA safety alerts[J]. Drug SAF, 2017, 40(4): 317-331.
[16] SMITH K, GOLDER S, SARKER A, et al.Methods to compare adverse events in Twitter to FAERS, drug information databases, and systematic reviews: Proof of concept with adalimumab[J]. Drug SAF, 2018, 41(12): 1397-1410.
[17] MARTINEZ-ROJAS M, DEL CARMEN PARDO-FERREIRA M, CARLOS RUBIO-ROMERO J. Twitter as a tool for the management and analysis of emergency situations: A systematic literature review[J]. International journal of information management, 2018, 43: 196-208.
[18] XIN-GANG Z, ZHEN W.The technical efficiency of China's wind power list enterprises: An estimation based on DEA method and micro-data[J]. Renewable energy, 2019, 133(4): 470-479.
[19] 张征超, 储慧琳, 刘宇. 上市流通企业融资效率研究——基于A股上市公司数据[J]. 商业经济研究, 2019(12): 165-167.
ZHANG Z C, CHU H L, LIU Y.Research on financing efficiency of listed and circulating enterprises, based on the data of a share listed companies[J]. Business economics research, 2019(12): 165-167.
[20] DAVIDOVIC M, UZELAC O, ZELENOVIC V.Efficiency dynamics of the Croatian banking industry: DEA investigation[J]. Economic research-ekonomska istrazivanja, 2019,54(6): 125-128.
[21] 孙晓明, 张爱臣, 田立忠. 基于DEA测度的图书馆效率实证研究[J]. 电脑知识与技术, 2019, 15(18): 280-283.
SUN X M, ZHANG A C, TIAN L Z.An empirical study of library efficiency based on DEA[J]. Computer knowledge and technology, 2019, 15(18): 280-283.
[22] 杨国梁, 刘文斌, 郑海军. 数据包络分析方法(DEA)综述[J]. 系统工程学报, 2013, 28(6): 840-860.
YANG G L, LIU W B, ZHENG H J.A survey of data envelope analysis(DEA)[J]. Journal of systems engineering, 2013, 28(6): 840-860.
[23] WANG L, XI F M, LI J X, et al.Efficiency of industrial energy conservation and carbon emission reduction in Liaoning province based on data envelopment analysis(DEA) method[J]. Chinese journal of applied ecology, 2016, 27(9): 2925-2932.
[24] COOPER W W, SEIFORD L M, ZHU J.Data Envelopment analysis: History, models, and interpretations[J]. Handbook on data envelop-ment analysis, 2011, 164: 1-39.
[25] 赵阿敏, 曹桂全. 政务微博影响力评价与比较实证研究——基于因子分析和聚类分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(3): 107-112.
ZHAO A M, CAO G Q.Evaluating and comparative empirical research on the influence of government microblogs, based on factor analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Intelligence magazine, 2014, 33(3): 107-112.
[26] CHA M, HADDADI H, BENEVENUTO F, et al.Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy[J]. ICWSM, 2010: 10-17.
[27] 潘芳, 钱春辉, 仲伟俊. 基于新浪微博的政务服务研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2014(7): 183-187, 170.
PAN F, QIAN C H, ZHONG W J.Research on government service based on Sina Weibo[J]. Intelligence magazine, 2014(7): 183-187, 170.
[28] 梁昌明, 李冬强. 基于新浪热门平台的微博热度评价指标体系实证研究[J]. 情报学报, 2015, 34(12): 1278-1283.
LIANG C M, LI D Q.An empirical study on the evaluation index system of Weibo popularity based on Sina popular platform[J]. Chinese journal of information, 2015, 34(12): 1278-1283.
[29] 李雪松. 基于微博粉丝特性提升高校图书馆移动服务[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2017, 29(10): 184-188.
LI X S.Based on the characteristics of Weibo fans to improve the mobile service of university libraries[J]. Agricultural library and information journal, 2017, 29(10): 184-188.
[30] 刘志明, 刘鲁, 苗蕊. 突发事件新闻报道与微博信息的爆发性模式比较[J]. 情报学报, 2013, 32(3): 288-298.
LIU Z M, LIU L, MIAO R.A comparison of the burst patterns between news reports of emergencies and Weibo information[J]. Chinese journal of information, 2013, 32(3): 288-298.
[31] 孟健, 刘阳. 基于DEA方法的省级公共图书馆微博运营效率研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2016(6): 51-57.
MENG J, LIU Y.Research on Weibo operation efficiency of provincial public libraries based on DEA method[J]. Library science research, 2016(6): 51-57.
[32] 张敏, 吴郁松, 霍朝光. 我国省级政务微博运营绩效测评与改进路径选择[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2015(17): 22-28.
ZHANG M, WU Y S, HUO C G.Operational performance evaluation and improvement path selection of provincial government microblogs in China[J]. Library science research, 2015(17): 22-28.
[33] 张敏, 霍朝光, 吴郁松. 基于SE-DEA的高校官方微博运营绩效评估与分析[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2016, 6(1): 44-51.
ZHANG M, HUO C G, WU Y S.Evaluation and analysis of official Weibo operation performance of colleges and universities based on SE-DEA[J]. Journal of information resource management, 2016, 6(1): 44-51.
[34] 刘虹, 孟凡赛, 孙建军. 基于DEA方法的政务微博信息交流效率研究[J]. 情报科学, 2017, 35(6): 9-13.
LIU H, MENG F S, SUN J J.Research on information exchange efficiency of government affairs microblog based on DEA[J]. Information science, 2017, 35(6): 9-13.
[35] 高安娜, 林海. 试析农业科技信息交流及其有效性[J]. 情报杂志, 1998, 2: 14-16.
GAO A N, LIN H.A tentative analysis of agricultural science and technology information exchange and its effectiveness[J]. Intelligence magazine, 1998, 2: 14-16.
[36] 陈靖. 政务微博在应急信息管理中的应用研究[D]. 湘潭: 湘潭大学, 2014.
CHEN J.Research on the application of government affairs microblog in emergency information management[D]. Xiangtan: Xiangtan university, 2014.
[37] 陈艳红, 陈靖. 政务微博在应急信息管理中的应用研究综述[J]. 成都理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(2): 11-15.
CHEN Y H, CHEN J.A review of the application of government microblog in emergency information management[J]. Journal of Chengdu university of technology (social science edition), 2014(2): 11-15.
[38] 宋迎法, 高娴. 国内网络问政研究综述[J]. 电子政务, 2012(2): 62-66.
SONG Y F, GAO X.A summary of domestic network politics research[J]. The e-government, 2012(2): 62-66.
[1] XING Fei, LIU Caihua, CHAI Xuefei, PENG Guochao. Influencing Factors of Elderly Users' Health Information Adoption Behavior Based on Social Platforms: Taking WeChat as an Example [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 53-64.
[2] GUO Weijia. Influencing Factors of Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Libraries [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(5): 47-56.
[3] SONG Kai, RAN Congjing. Digital Technologies Aid Intelligent Epidemic Prevention and Control: Community-based Rapid Detection and Tracking Platform of COVID-19 [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(5): 92-101.
[4] XIONG Huan, LUO Aijing, XIE Wenzhao, HUANG Panhao. Status and Influencing Factors of Health Information Literacy of the Rural Elderly [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(10): 44-56.
[5] ZHAO Xueqin, YANG Yifan. Analysis of Public Emergency Information Search Behavior and Research on Service Strategy Under Financial Emergencies [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(1): 74-85.
[6] WANG Hui. The Influence of Knowledge Service Ability on the User's Intention of Using the Knowledge Service Platform Provided by University Libraries [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(9): 64-71.
[7] ZHANG Xin, TIAN Xuecan, ZHANG Lu, LI Yue. User Utilization Behavior and Influencing Factors of Hospital Online Information Service: A Case Study of Hebei Province [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(11): 38-49.
[8] MU Di, CHEN An. Multi-dimensional intelligence model for public health emergencies and its application [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(4): 15-22.
[9] HU Yuanyuan, DING Fenfen, DU Xiaodan. Study on Research Data Sharing Influencing Factors and Active Mechanism of Faculty in Local Universities in China [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(10): 79-86.
[10] CHI Yuzhuo. Literature Review of Scientific Data Competence: the Connotation, Framework and Influencing Factors [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(1): 23-29.
[11] MO Yidan. Influencing Factors of Digital Library Users' Willingness to Accept—— an Empirical Analysis Based on Questionnaires [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(1): 73-79.
[12] FAN Chao, CHEN An. Literature Review on Emergency Management Based on Feature Analysis [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2018, 30(12): 5-17.
[13] ZHANG Chenyang, CHEN An. Trend Analysis on the Emergency and Emergency Management Research [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2018, 30(12): 18-23.
[14] YANG Hai-ling. Correlation Analysis of Factors Influencing Readers’ use of Library [J]. , 2016, 28(6): 107-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!