有中国特色的高校学科评估体系构建研究

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.20-1163

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]建立科学的学科评估指标体系,是开展高校学科评估的关键。根据国情,重新构建一套有中国特色的、全面科学的学科评估体系,从而对一定时期和一定范围内的学科建设水平给出客观、科学的评价。[方法/过程]在比较分析国内外常用的几种学科评估体系的基础上,围绕高校不同层次人才培养的中心任务,兼顾不同学科之间的差异,推行分类评价,首先按高校类型、再按不同学科门类,分别构建多个学科评估体系。[结果/结论]以教学研究型大学中的工学为例,建立一个全面、科学、有中国特色的学科评估指标体系。该指标体系由5项一级指标、16项二级指标、40项三级指标构成。指标权重向“人才培养”倾斜,突出“思想政治教育成效”“师德师风建设”等中国特色。

关键词: 高校, 学科评估, 教育评价, 评估指标

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Establishing a scientific disciplinary evaluation indicator system is the key to conducting disciplinary evaluation in colleges and universities. According to China's conditions, we rebuild a set of comprehensive and scientific subject evaluation system with Chinese characteristics, so as to perform an objective and scientific evaluation at the level of subject construction in a certain period. [Method/Process] Based on a comparative analysis of several disciplinary evaluation systems commonly used at home and abroad, we believe that we should base ourselves on China's conditions, focus on the central task of talent development at different levels in universities, take into account the differences between different disciplines, and implement classified evaluation. According to different disciplines, multiple discipline evaluation systems are constructed. [Results/Conclusions] Take engineering in teaching and research universities as an example, this paper established a comprehensive, scientific, and Chinese-style subject evaluation indicator system. It consists of 5 first-level indicators, 16 second-level indicators, and 40 third-level indicators. The indicator weight is inclined to "personnel training", highlighting Chinese characteristics such as "effectiveness of Ideological and political education" and "construction of teachers' ethics".

Key words: college and university, subject evaluation, educational evaluation, evaluation indicator

中图分类号:

G644.4

廖球. 有中国特色的高校学科评估体系构建研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(10): 59-68.

LIAO Qiu. Construction of the Subject Evaluation System with Chinese Characteristics in Colleges and Universities[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(10): 59-68.

参考文献

[1] 张光辉. 浅析我国高校学科的国际评估[J]. 中国电力教育, 2014(2): 71-72, 74.
ZHANG G H.Analysis of international evaluation of disciplines in Chinese universities[J]. China electric power education, 2014(2): 71-72, 74
[2] 李燕. 世界一流学科评价及建设研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2018.
LI Y.Study of the evaluation and construction of world-class disciplines [D]. Hefei: University of science and technology of China, 2018.
[3] 王彤. 基于“双一流”目标的江苏优势学科绩效评价及提升路径研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2017.
WANG T.Research on the performance evaluation and promotion path of Jiangsu preponderant discipline based on the "double first-class"[D]. Xuzhou: China university of mining and technology, 2017.
[4] 光明日报:第四轮学科评估的思考[EB/OL]. [2020-10-20].https://news.gmw.cn/2016-11/22/content_23054880.htm.
Guangming daily: Thoughts on the fourth round of discipline evaluation[EB/OL]. [2020-10-20] https://news.gmw.cn/2016-11/22/content_23054880.htm.
[5] 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于深化项目评审、人才评价、机构评估改革的意见》[EB/OL]. [2020-10-21]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htm.
The general office of the CPC central committee and the general office of the state council issued the opinions on deepening the reform of project evaluation, talent evaluation and institutional evaluation[EB/OL]. [2020-10-21]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_ 5303251.htm.
[6] 教育部办公厅关于开展清理“唯论文、唯帽子、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项”专项行动的通知[EB/OL]. [2020-10-21]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s7062/201811/t20181113_354444.html.
Notice of the general office of the ministry of education on carrying out the special action of "only papers, only hats, only professional titles, only academic qualifications, only awards"[EB/OL].[2020-10-21]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s7062/201811/t20181113_354444.html.
[7] 陈宝生. 落实落实再落实: 在2019年全国教育工作会议上的讲话[EB/OL].[2020-10-21]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/moe_176/201901/t20190129_368518.html.
CHEN B S. Implementation and re implementation: speech at the national education conference in 2019[EB/OL]. [2020-10-21]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/moe_176/201901/t20190129_368518.html.
[8] 教育部科技部印发《关于规范高等学校SCI论文相关指标使用树立正确评价导向的若干意见》的通知[EB/OL]. [2020-10-21]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/moe_784/202002/t20200223_423334.html.
Notice of the ministry of education and the ministry of science and technology on printing and distributing "several opinions on standardizing the use of relevant indicators of SCI papers in colleges and universities and establishing correct evaluation guidance"[EB/OL].[2020-10-21].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/moe_784/202002/t20200223_423334.html.
[9] 教育部. 关于政协十三届全国委员会第三次会议第2776号(教育类246号)提案答复的函[EB/OL]. [2020-10-21]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/xxgk_jyta/jyta_jybxwzx/202008/t20200817_478448.html.
Ministry of education. Reply to proposal No. 2776 (Education No. 246) of the third session of the 13th national committee of the Chinese people's political consultative conference[EB/OL]. [2020-10-21]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/xxgk_jyta/jyta_jybxwzx/202008/t20200817_478448.html.
[10] 中共中央国务院印发《深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案》[EB/OL].[2020-10-21]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm.
The CPC central committee and the state council issued the overall plan for deepening the reform of education evaluation in the new era[EB/OL]. [2020-10-21]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm.
[11] 赵亚超. 教育部: 重点清理学科评估等活动“唯论文、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项”[EB/OL]. [2020-11-05]. http://k.sina.com.cn/article_6497146893_18342980d02000cuhb.html.
ZHAO Y C. Ministry of education: Focus on clearing up discipline evaluation and other activities "only papers, only titles, only academic qualifications, only awards"[EB/OL]. [2020-11-05]. http://k.sina.com.cn/article_6497146893_18342980d02000 cuhb.html.
[12] 朱明. 我国大学学科水平评价问题研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2015.
ZHU M.Research on the evaluation of discipline level in our universities[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing university of aeronautics and astronautics, 2015.
[13] 全国人大常委会. 中华人民共和国高等教育法(2018修正)[EB/OL]. [2020-10-21]. https://www.66law.cn/tiaoli/9822.aspx.

[1]	张红萍. 用户需求对图书馆文献资源建设、管理与服务促进机制——基于扎根理论的研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(9): 95-103.
[2]	肖诗依, 文庭孝. 互联网环境下高校评价变革及实现路径研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(7): 98-106.
[3]	邢文明, 刘我. 高校图书馆推进FAIR数据管理原则实施的服务调研[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(7): 65-75.
[4]	李博, 李洪莲, 关青, 刘杨. 基于CNN-BiLSTM-HAN混合神经网络的高校图书馆社交网络平台细粒度情感分析[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(4): 63-73.
[5]	廖思琴, 周宇. 中国高校图书馆专利信息服务现状与思考——以23所首批高校知识产权信息服务中心为例[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(2): 63-74.
[6]	黄海晶, 祝黎丽, 刘威妍, 黄冰洁. 智慧图书馆驱动下的高校图书馆转型实践探析——以浙大城市学院图书馆为例[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(2): 102-113.
[7]	李亦超, 李沁芯, 申静. 高校智库智力资本获取机制模型构建及应用——基于创新驱动发展理论[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(2): 29-39.
[8]	齐静. 高校元宇宙图书馆应用场景构建[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(11): 69-80.
[9]	肖可以, 秦佳佳, 李韫璠. 面向科研数据管理的日本高校图书馆机构知识库实践及启示[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(11): 100-109.
[10]	姚秀敏, 赵雪云, 樊会霞, 闫芬. “双一流”动态调整背景下师范类普通高校图书馆支撑学科建设的对标分析及其提升策略——以河北师范大学图书馆为例[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(9): 72-82.
[11]	王捷. 信息化时代大学生信息素养教育实践研究——以沈阳理工大学图书馆为例[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(8): 88-95.
[12]	杨学红, 贺玢, 王鲁燕. 基于图书智能管理系统的流通工作探讨——以中国农业大学图书馆为例[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(7): 92-99.
[13]	曾金晶, 刘田, 张锐. 面向专利供应链的高校图书馆专利信息服务策略[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(5): 40-50.
[14]	高飞. 基于区块链技术的高校“双一流”学科评估体系研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(5): 75-82.
[15]	安娜. 基于六何分析法的高校图书馆空间再造策略研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(4): 78-85.