农业图书情报学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 72-82.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0151

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

“双一流”动态调整背景下师范类普通高校图书馆支撑学科建设的对标分析及其提升策略——以河北师范大学图书馆为例

姚秀敏1, 赵雪云1,*, 樊会霞1, 闫芬2   

  1. 1.河北师范大学 图书馆,石家庄 050024;
    2.河北师范大学 社会科学处,石家庄 050024
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-15 出版日期:2021-09-05 发布日期:2021-09-28
  • 通讯作者: * 赵雪云,女,硕士,副研究馆员,研究方向为科研支持服务。E-mail:307056491@qq.com
  • 作者简介:姚秀敏(ORCID: 0000-0001-9285-2283),女,硕士,研究馆员,研究方向为学科服务。樊会霞(ORCID: 0000-0002-2030-973X),女,学士,副研究馆员,研究方向为学科服务。闫芬(ORCID:0000-0003-1490-6922 ),女,硕士,副研究馆员,研究方向为学科建设
  • 基金资助:
    2019年河北省省级科技计划软科学研究专项“河北省高校图书馆助力‘双一流’学科建设研究”(19457652D)

Benchmarking and Improvement Strategies of Supporting Disciplinary Construction in Normal University Libraries under the Background of "Double First-class" Dynamic Monitoring: Taking Hebei Normal University library as an Example

YAO Xiumin1, ZHAO Xueyun1,*, FAN Huixia1, YAN fen2   

  1. 1. Hebei Normal University Library, Shijiazhuang 050024;
    2. Department of Social Sciences of Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024
  • Received:2021-03-15 Online:2021-09-05 Published:2021-09-28

摘要: [目的/意义]在“双一流”建设动态调整、不搞终身制前提下,文章回顾了对标研究在国内外图书馆领域的应用情况,尝试将对标研究法应用于改进师范类普通高校图书馆支撑学科建设的实践。[方法/过程]选取京津冀协同发展规划中唯一一所师范类“双一流”高校北京师范大学图书馆为对标馆、构建由5个一级指标和23个二级指标组成的对标研究指标体系来收集数据。从资源、服务、空间、技术、人员五大核心要素进行差距分析,拟定河北师范大学图书馆支撑学科建设的提升策略。[结果/结论]采用对标研究的科学方法和标准流程,学习目的明确、指标全面、数据翔实,制定和实施的提升策略做到了“扬己长、补短板、能实施、可持续”。

关键词: 双一流, 动态监测, 对标研究, 高校图书馆, 学科建设

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Under the premise of dynamic adjustment of "double first class" construction and no lifelong system, the article reviews the application of benchmarking research in the field of libraries at home and abroad,and attempts to apply the benchmarking research method to improve the practice of supporting disciplinary construction in normal university libraries. [Method/Process] This paper selects the library of Beijing Normal University, the only "double first-class" normal university in the collaborative development plan of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, as the benchmarking library, and constructs a benchmarking research index system composed of 5 first-class indicators and 23 second-class indicators to collect data. [Results/Conclusions] Adopting the scientific method and standard process of benchmarking research, the learning purpose is clear, the index is comprehensive, and the data are comprehensive and accurate. The development and implementation of the promotion strategy has achieved the goal of "developing one's own strengths, making up for weaknesses, being able to implement and sustainable".

Key words: double first class, dynamic monitoring, benchmarking study, university library, disciplinary development

中图分类号: 

  • G258.6

引用本文

姚秀敏, 赵雪云, 樊会霞, 闫芬. “双一流”动态调整背景下师范类普通高校图书馆支撑学科建设的对标分析及其提升策略——以河北师范大学图书馆为例[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(9): 72-82.

YAO Xiumin, ZHAO Xueyun, FAN Huixia, YAN fen. Benchmarking and Improvement Strategies of Supporting Disciplinary Construction in Normal University Libraries under the Background of "Double First-class" Dynamic Monitoring: Taking Hebei Normal University library as an Example[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(9): 72-82.