中文    English

Agricultural Library and Information ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 4-9.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2019.03.19-0362

• Special review •     Next Articles

Biomedical Knowledge Discovery Based on Big Data Linkage Analysis

DU Jian   

  1. Institute of Medical Information & Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100005, China
  • Received:2019-01-29 Online:2019-03-05 Published:2019-06-04

Abstract: Extracting knowledge and insights from the data is the core of data science and informatics approach. In the medical field, big data analysis is applied to reveal causal relationships and enhance its repeatability and inter-pretability based on correlation mining. Analysis of data association with causality is of great significance for think tank research and intelligence perception. To reveal the causal relationship between knowledge, the paper introduces relevant data platforms and research progress, and proposes a medical knowledge mining ideas based on multi-space and deep data. One is the measurement and critical analysis of laboratory-clinical knowledge trans-formation; the other is scientific technological influence measurement; the third is the identification of cross-cutting and innovative frontiers; the last one is the mining of medical knowledge based on the combination of full-text, bib-liometrics and computational linguistics. The first three approaches expand the space of medical knowledge, includ-ing from basic research space to applied research space, and from scientific space to technological space. The fourth way deepens the disclosure and explanation of the causality of medical knowledge based on certainty or uncertainty of the medical knowledge.

Key words: big data linkage, biomedical knowledge discovery, non-patent literature, uncertainty argumentation mining, citation sentence analysis

CLC Number: 

  • G350
[1] 维克托·迈尔-舍恩伯格(Viktor Mayer-Schonberger)著, 盛杨燕、周涛译. 大数据时代:生活、工作与思维的大变革[M].浙江人民出版社, 2013.
[2] NIH OPA. iSearch v2.0: Summary of New Fea-tures[EB/OL]. https://dpcpsi.nih.gov/sites/default/files/iSearch%202.0%20-%20one%20pager%20-%2010302017.pdf.
[3] Jefferson O A, Jaffe A, Ashton D, et al.Mapping the global influence of published research on industry and innovation[J]. Nature biotechnology, 2018, 36: 31-39.
[4] Fujiwara T, Yamamoto Y.Colil: a database and search service for citation contexts in the life sciences domain[J]. Journal of biomedical semantics, 2015, 6(1): 38.
[5] 潘教峰, 杨国梁, 刘慧晖. 智库DIIS三维理论模型[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2018,33(12):97-104.
[6] 杜建, 唐小利. 转化研究过程测度与绩效评估:方法与实践[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(3): 103-111.
[7] Li R, Chambers T, Ding Y, et al.Patent citation analysis: Calculating science linkage based on citing motivation[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(5): 1007-1017.
[8] National Science Foundation. Science and Engineering Indicators2018[EB/OL]. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/figures.
[9] 日本の科学研究力の現状と課題[EB/OL]. http://www.nistep.go.jp/archives/38930. 2018-12-03.
[10] Weber G M.Identifying translational science within the triangle of biomedicine[J]. Journal of translational medi-cine, 2013, 11(1): 126.
[11] NIH Office of Portfolio Analysis. Translational Science Workshop IDENTIFYING TRANSLATION: iTrans[EB/OL].https://www.dpcpsi.nih.gov/sites/default/files/iTrans_one_pager%2004172018.pdf.
[12] Ke Q.Identifying translational science through embed-dings of controlled vocabularies[J]. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2019.
[13] Petersen A M, Rotolo D, Leydesdorff L.A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and tech-nological capabilities in terms of Medical Subject Head-ings[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(3): 666-681.
[14] Du J, Li P, Guo Q, et al.Measuring the knowledge trans-lation and convergence in pharmaceutical innovation by funding-science-technology-innovation linkages analy-sis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2019, 13(1): 132-148.
[15] 潘龙飞, 周程. 步入大科学时代的诺贝尔奖[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2016, 1(6):17-25.
[16] Ahmadpoor M, Jones B F.The dual frontier: Patented in-ventions and prior scientific advance[J]. Science, 2017, 357(6351): 583-587.
[17] Ke Q.Comparing scientific and technological impact of biomedical research[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12(3): 706-717.
[18] Ke Q.An analysis of the evolution of science-technology linkage in biomedicine[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10610, 2019.
[19] Li D, Azoulay P, Sampat B N.The applied value of public investments in biomedical research[J]. Science, 2017, 356(6333): 78-81.
[20] Jibu M.An analysis of the achievements of JST opera-tions through scientific patenting: linkage between pat-ents and scientific papers[C]//Science and Innovation Policy, 2011 Atlanta Conference on. IEEE, 2011: 1-7.
[21] 杜建, 孙轶楠, 李永洁, 等. 从科学—技术交叉处识别创新前沿: 方法与实证[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(1): 94-99.
[22] 杜建, 孙轶楠, 张阳, 等. 变革性研究的科学计量学特征与早期识别方法[J]. 中国科学基金, 2019 (1): 17.
[23] Du J, Li PX, Robin H, et al. Patent citations to scientific papers as early signs for predicting delayed recognition of scientific discoveries: a comparative study with instant recognition[C]//Accepted by the 17th International Con-ference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, 2019, Sapienza University, ROME, Italy.
[24] Ding Y, Song M, Han J, et al.Entitymetrics: Measuring the impact of entities[J]. PloS one, 2013, 8(8): 71416.
[25] Song M, Kang K, Young An J.Investigating drug-disease interactions in drug-symptom-disease triples via citation relations[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(11): 1355-1368.
[26] Radev D. R.,& Abu-Jbara, A. Rediscovering ACL Dis-coveries Through the Lens of ACL Anthology Network Citing Sentences[C]//In Proceedings of the ACL-2012 Special Workshop on Rediscovering 50 Years of Discov-eries. 2012:1-12.
[27] Small H, Tseng H, Patek M.Discovering discoveries: Identifying biomedical discoveries using citation con-texts[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11(1):46-62.
[28] Szarvas G, Vincze V, Farkas R, et al.Cross-genre and cross-domain detection of semantic uncertainty[J]. Com-putational Linguistics, 2012, 38(2): 335-367.
[29] Chen C, Song M, Heo G E.A scalable and adaptive method for finding semantically equivalent cue words of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12(1): 158-180.
[1] ZHAO Youlin, CAO Hongnan. Government Microblog Information Exchange Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors for Emergency Management [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 72-85.
[2] WAN Hao, ZHANG Fujun, LV Qianqian. The Validity of Peer Review Results of DEA Based Super Efficiency Projects [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(2): 88-101.
[3] FENG Shaohua, ZAN Dong, SU Ju, ZHANG Zhan. Characteristics of Global "Marine Aquatic Feed" Domain Development Based on Patent Analysis [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(12): 71-82.
[4] HAN Zhengbiao, ZHOU Mingfeng, YUE Hang. Rural Residents' Health Information Avoidance Behavior in Lower Risk Disease Context [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(11): 4-15.
[5] CHU Jingli, LIU Peiyi, WENG Yanqin, LI Nan, YAN Qun, XIAO Yue. Investigation and Analysis of Different Roles' Recognition and Acceptance of Open Access Journals [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(9): 4-17.
[6] AI Yuxi, XU Jian, HE Lin, QI Yun. A Construction Method of the Classification System Oriented to Content Analysis of Ancient Books [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(9): 18-26.
[7] MA Xiaowen, HE Lin, LIU Jianbin, LI Zhangchao, GAO Dan. The Trigger Verb Classification Method of Event Sentences in Ancient Chinese Classics Based on Bi-LSTM [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(9): 27-36.
[8] REN Ni, GUO Ting, SUN Yiwei, DAI Hongjun, ZHANG Chengcheng. An Analysis of Global Smart Agriculture Research Situation [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(9): 48-63.
[9] LIU Xiwen, GUO Shijie. A Database Construction of S&T Intelligence Cognition Models [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(1): 32-40.
[10] CHEN Yunwei. Review on Quantitative Methods of Science and Technology Evaluation [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(8): 4-11.
[11] CAO Qi. System Analysis of the Next-generation Library Service Platform Based on Microservice Architecture——Taking FOLIO as an Example [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(4): 51-58.
[12] CAO Qi. Visual Modeling of Keyword Dimension Reduction in Double First-Class University Funds Based on t-SNE Algorithm [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(2): 47-57.
[13] LI Feifan. Research on the Universities Scientific Cooperation Network and Evolution: Taking 211 and Co-construction of Provincial and Subordinate universities of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei region as an Example [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(8): 31-39.
[14] LIU Zhihui, WEI Juanxia. Research on SMEs' Competitive Technology Intelligence Methodology System Oriented Open Innovation [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(6): 12-20.
[15] YANG Siluo, YU Yonghao. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Papers and Books Based on Citation and Altmetric Indicators [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 5-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!