基于区块链技术的高校“双一流”学科评估体系研究

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.20-1157

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]本文借助区块链技术应用视角,以建构有“双一流”的学科评估区块链为研究对象,从技术层面和内涵层面对传统学科评估体系进行重构。[方法过程]通过搭建校内私有链和机构间的公有链一方面可改进数据共享、协同效率、业务流程等亟需解决的问题,另一方面也从构建中国学术成果平台、创建诚信体系等维度强化“双一流”学科评估体系的建立。[结果/结论]目前区块链应用于图书情报领域的实践还不是很成熟,但是基于区块链技术打造高校“双一流”学科评估平台将是一次有益的尝试,将对实现高校学科评估的转型升级提供有益参考。

关键词: 区块链, 双一流, 学科评估, 高校

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Based on the perspective of blockchain technology applications, this paper takes the construction of subject evaluation blockchain with Chinese characteristics as the research object, and reconstructs the traditional subject evaluation system from the perspective of technology and content. [Method/Process] On the one hand, it can improve data sharing, collaborative efficiency, and business process by building the private chain within a university and the public chain between institutions. On the other hand, it can also strengthen the establishment of the disciplinary evaluation system with Chinese characteristics from the perspectives of building the Chinese academic achievement platform and establishing the integrity system. [Results/Conclusions] At present, the application of blockchain in the field of library and information science (LIS) is not mature, but it will be a useful attempt to build a "double first-class" subject evaluation platform based on the blockchain technology in order to provide useful reference for the transformation and upgrading of subject evaluation in colleges and universities.

Key words: block chain, double first-class subject, subject assessment, colleges and universities

中图分类号:

G237.5

高飞. 基于区块链技术的高校“双一流”学科评估体系研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(5): 75-82.

GAO Fei. The "Double First-Class" Subject Evaluation System of Universities Based on Blockchain Technologies[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(5): 75-82.

参考文献

[1] 方跃平. “双一流”建设背景下高等教育价值的当代建构[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.
FANG Y P.Study on contemporary construction of higher education values under the background of building" double first-class" universities[D]. Xuzhou: China university of mining and technology, 2019.
[2] 刘振天. 现代高等教育评价体系建设: 成效、经验及完善之路[J]. 社会科学战线, 2021(3): 223-232.
LIU Z T.The construction of modern higher education evaluation system: Effect, experience and the way to perfection[J]. Social sci-ence front, 2021(3): 223-232.
[3] 刘益东. 面向用户的开放评价与一流学科建设——从“以尖识才”力破“五唯”开始[J]. 科技与出版, 2021(2): 5-13.
LIU Y D.User oriented open evaluation and first-class discipline construction: Starting from "recognizing talents with sharp points" to break through "five talents"[J]. Science and technology and publishing, 2021(2): 5-13.
[4] 倪晓茹, 郭笑笑. “双一流”建设下学科评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国高校科技, 2021(z1): 15-19.
NI X R, GUO X X.Research on subject evaluation index system under the construction of "double first class"[J]. Science and technology of Chinese universities, 2021(z1): 15-19.
[5] 包水梅, 李明芳. 一流学科建设: 从管理走向治理——兼论我国高校学科治理的路径依赖及其突破[J]. 现代教育管理, 2021(1): 25-30.
BAO S M, LI M F.First class discipline construction: From manage-ment to governance - On the path dependence and breakthrough of discipline governance in Chinese universities[J]. Modern education management, 2021(1): 25-30.
[6] 刘振天, 俞兆达, 陈恩伦, 等. 新时代学科评估改革的新思维(笔谈)[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 42(1): 59-76.
LIU Z T, YU Z D, CHEN E L, et al.New thinking of discipline evaluation reform in the new era[J]. Journal of Jishou university (social science edition), 2021, 42(1): 59-76.
[7] 胡春蕾. “双一流”建设背景下学科环境与发展战略研究[J]. 江苏高教, 2020(12): 60-63.
HU C L.Research on discipline environment and development strategy under the background of "double first class" construction[J]. Jiangsu higher education, 2020(12): 60-63.
[8] 张继平, 刘婷, 赵欢. 以中国特色的学科评估推进“双一流”建设: 问题与进路[J]. 研究生教育研究, 2020(6): 70-75.
ZHANG J P, LIU T, ZHAO H.Promoting "double first class" construction with discipline evaluation with Chinese characteristics: Problems and approaches[J]. Graduate education research, 2020(6): 70-75.
[9] 邱均平, 舒非, 卢坚, 等. 面向评价需求的ESI学科分类与我国一流学科类目的匹配研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 27(1): 110-121.
QIU J P, SHU F, LU J, et al.Research on the matching of ESI subject classification for evaluation needs and China's first-class subject cat-egories[J]. Journal of Chongqing university (social science edition), 2021, 27(1): 110-121.
[10] 张应强, 周钦. “双一流”建设背景下的高校分类分层建设和特色发展[J]. 大学教育科学, 2020(1): 14-21.
ZHANG Y Q, ZHOU Q.Classified and hierarchical construction and characteristic development of colleges and universities under the background of "double first class" construction[J]. University education science, 2020(1): 14-21.
[11] 工业和信息化部. 《中国区块链技术和应用发展白皮书(2016)》[EB/OL]. [2020-05-11]. http://www.199it.com/archives/526865.html.
Ministry of industry and information technology. White paper on Chi-na's blockchain technology and application development (2016)[EB/OL]. [2020-05-11]. http://www.199it.com/archives/526865.html.
[12] 新华社. 中央政治局就区块链技术发展现状和趋势进行第十八次集体学习[EB/OL]. [2020-5-11]. http://www.cnganbu.com/news/view?id=44404.
Xinhua news agency. The political bureau of the CPC central committee conducted the 18th collective study on the current situation and trend of blockchain technology development[EB/OL].[2020-05-11]. http://www.cnganbu.com/news/view?id=44404.
[13] 黄宝印, 任超, 陈燕, 等. 加快构建更高水平的中国特色学科评估体系[J]. 中国高等教育, 2018(17): 20-24.
HUANG B Y, REN C, CHEN Y, et al.Accelerating the construction of a higher level discipline evaluation system with Chinese characteristics[J]. Higher education in China, 2018(17): 20-24.
[14] 吕方婷. 区块链技术在机构知识库中的应用研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2019(4): 70-73.
LU F T.Research on the application of blockchain technology in institutional repository[J]. Library work and research, 2019(4): 70-73.
[15] 师衍辉, 韩牧哲, 刘桂锋. 融合区块链技术的机构知识库科学数据监护模型研究[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(1): 101-109.
SHI Y H, HAN M Z, LIU G F.Research on scientific data monitoring model of institutional repository integrated with blockchain technology[J]. Modern intelligence, 2020, 40(1): 101-109.
[16] 刘中华, 焦基鹏. 区块链视阈下图书馆出版跨界融合博弈均衡机理研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2020(7): 37-43, 57.
LIU Z H, JIAO J P.Research on the game equilibrium mechanism of library publishing cross border integration from the perspective of blockchain[J]. Library work and research, 2020(7): 37-43, 57.
[17] 梅振荣, 裴丽. 基于区块链的智慧图书馆用户隐私保护[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2019, 28(2): 55-59.
MEI Z R, PEI L.User privacy protection of smart library based on blockchain[J]. Chinese journal of medical library and information, 2019, 28(2): 55-59.
[18] 俞立平. 规范使用SCI下科技评价的问题与解决路径研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2020, 41(2): 64-69.
YU L P.Research on problems and solutions of sci-tech evaluation under standardized use of SCI[J]. Information and data work, 2020, 41(2): 64-69.
[19] 教育部. 《关于规范高等学校SCI论文相关指标使用树立正确评价导向的若干意见》的通知[EB/OL]. [2020-05-11].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1659322179328547090&wfr=spider&for=pc.
Ministry of education. Some opinions on standardizing the use of relevant indexes of sci papers in colleges and universities and establishing correct evaluation guidance[EB/OL].[2020-05-11]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1659322179328547090&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[20] 蒋林浩, 黄俊平, 陈洪捷, 等. 学科评估体系实践与影响的国际比较研究[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2020(4): 72-77.
JIANG L H, HUANG J P, CHEN H J, et al.International comparative study on the practice and influence of discipline evaluation system[J]. Degree and postgraduate education, 2020(4): 72-77.
[21] 王传毅, 程哲, 王宇昕. 学科可持续发展能力评价的指标体系构建: 基于知识生产的视角[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2020(3): 1-6.
WANG C Y, CHENG Z, WANG Y X.Index system construction of discipline sustainable development ability evaluation: From the per-spective of knowledge production[J]. Degree and postgraduate edu-cation, 2020(3): 1-6.
[22] 苏林琴. 综合性大学教育学科发展的生态学考察[J]. 教育研究, 2020, 41(2): 101-110.
SU L Q.Ecological investigation on the development of education discipline in comprehensive universities[J]. Education research,2020, 41(2): 101-110.
[23] 周海涛, 徐珊. 近年来学科建设研究的重点领域及其展望[J]. 现代教育管理, 2020(1): 15-20.
ZHOU H T, XU S.Key fields and prospects of discipline construction research in recent years[J]. Modern education management, 2020(1):15-20.