中美ESI高被引论文计量特征比较分析

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2020.01.06-1163

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]当前综合国力的竞争更加依靠基础研究,高被引论文在基础研究的评估与分析中具有重要的研究价值。从高被引论文视角比较揭示中美两国在引领性的基础研究中的差距,为国家科研管理决策和机构建设提供基础数据支撑。[方法/过程]以ESI数据库中美高被引论文为研究对象,采用文献计量方法,结合揭示作者贡献的Y指数,比较分析中美高被引论文在发文概况、国家合作、机构产出3个维度上的具体计量特征及差异。[结果/结论]（1）美国高被引论文数是中国高被引论文数的2.99倍,但差距逐年缩小,同时篇均被引频次和高被引论文比例较低仍是制约中国提升国际影响力的短板。（2）中美两国合作程度非常密切,美国在科研合作中居于主导地位,其第一作者和通讯作者比例及主导型论文的篇均被引频次均远高于中国。（3）中国高产出机构具有明显的通讯作者占比优势,机构间产出差距较大,而美国高产出机构分布均匀,且国际合作和机构间合作更加深入广泛。

关键词: ESI数据库, 中国, 美国, 高被引论文, Y指数, 文献计量

Abstract: [Purpose / Signficance] The current competition of comprehensive national strength relies more on fundamental research, and highly cited papers have important significance in the evaluation and analysis of fundamental research. Revealing the differences between China and USA in leading basic research from the perspective of highly cited papers, we provide basic data support for national scientific research management decision-making and institution building. [Method / Process] Based on ESI highly cited papers of China and USA, this article uses bibliometric methods and Y index to analyze the specific features and differences of China and USA among three dimensions—trends of publication, country cooperation and institutional output.[Results / Conclusions] The study shows that: (1) Overall, the highly cited papers of China is 2.99 times that of the American highly cited papers, but the gap is narrowing yearly. At the same time, the low citation frequency and the low proportion of highly cited papers are still the shortcomings that limit Chinese international influence. (2) China and USA are closely cooperating with each other. USA dominates scientific research cooperation, as the proportion of first authors and corresponding authors and leading papers is significantly higher than that in China. (3) Chinese high-output institutions have obvious advantages of corresponding authors, but the output gap between institutions is large. And the American high-output institutions are evenly distributed, and they are characterized by deeper and broader international cooperation and inter-agency cooperation.

Key words: ESI database, China, USA, highly cited papers, Y index, bibliometrics

中图分类号:

G354.2

郭丽娜, 左文革, 周群. 中美ESI高被引论文计量特征比较分析[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(5): 45-54.

GUO Lina, ZUO Wenge, ZHOU Qun. A bibliometric analysis of ESI highly cited papers from China and USA[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(5): 45-54.

参考文献

[1] Bauer J, Leydesdorff L, Bornmann L.Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science(LIS): authors, institutions, and network structures[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2016,67(12):3095-3100.
[2] 汪雪锋,陈云,黄颖,等.基于ESI学科覆盖图的中国高被引论文分析[J].情报杂志,2016,35(10):106-113.
[3] 赵元斌,吴志红,郭艳秋.高校学科发展分析评价实证研究——以河南省3所大学为例[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(15):115-121.
[4] 吴显强. 基于ESI的“985工程”高校科技竞争力研究[D].华南理工大学,2009.
[5] 黄晓斌,张欢庆.我国情报学高被引论文分析[J].情报科学,2018,36(1):54-60.
[6] 李小涛,秦萍,钱玲飞.图情领域基本科学指标数据库高被引论文的知识图谱分析[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(2):111-116.
[7] 聂兰英,王钢,金丹,等.我国11种医学影像学核心期刊的高被引论文分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(3):377-380.
[8] 卫世乾. 30种化学类核心期刊高被引论文研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(04):556-561.
[9] 邓侨侨.机构迁移:高被引科学家名校集聚的特征与原因分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(8):135-143.
[10] 刘俊婉. 高被引科学家人才流动的计量分析[J].科学学研究,2011,29(2):192-197.
[11] 莫富传,娄策群.高被引论文应用于研究热点识别的理论依据与路径探索[J].情报理论与实践,2019,42(4):59-63+35.
[12] Madhan M, Chandrasekar G, Arunachalam S.Highly cited papers from India and China[J]. Current Science, 2010,99(6):738-749.
[13] 张垒. 论文高被引的参考文献特征及其对影响因子贡献研究[J].情报科学,2016,34(8):94-98.
[14] 刘雪立. 基于Web of Science和ESI数据库高被引论文的界定方法[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(6):975-978.
[15] Elango B, Ho Y.A Bibliometric Analysis of highly cited papers from india in science citation index expanded[J]. Current Science,2017,112(8):1653.
[16] Chuang K Y, Ho Y S.An evaluation based on highly cited publications in Taiwan[J]. Current Science ,2015,108(5):933-941.
[17] Ho Y S.Top-cited articles in chemical engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering,2012,20(3):478-488.
[18] Ho Y S.A bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles in materials science[J]. Current Science,2014,107(9):1565-1572.
[19] Waltman L, van Eck N J. Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2015,9(4):872-894.
[20] 何春建. ESI学科排名指标的异化与纠正[J].图书情报知识,2017(4):122-129.
[21] Fu H Z, Ho Y S.Top cited articles in adsorption research using Y-index[J]. Research Evaluation, 2014,23(1):12-20.
[22] Shekofteh M, Mohseny M, Shahbodaghi A, et al.The correlation among Y-index and other scientometric indicators[J]. Current Science,2016,110(9):1823-1828.
[23] Ahmed A, Muhammad M, Mastura A, et al.What drives citation rates for articles in disability-related fields?[J]. Wudil Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences (WUJOPAS),2019,1(1):13-21.
[24] Marusic M, Bozikov J, Katavic V, et al.Authorship in a small medical journal: a study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics,2004,10(3):493-502.
[25] Shapiro D W, Wenger N S, Shapiro M F.The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers[J]. JaMa,1994,271(6):438-442.
[26] Bhandari M, Busse J W, Kulkarni A V, et al.Interpreting authorship order and corresponding authorship[J]. Epidemiology,2004,15(1):125-126.
[27] Sombatsompop N, Markpin T, Buranathiti T, et al.Categorization and trend of materials science research from Science Citation Index (SCI) database: a case study of ceramics, metallurgy, and polymer subfields[J]. Scientometrics,2007,71(2):283-302.
[28] Chuang K Y, Wang M H, Ho Y S.High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the essential science indicators database of the institute for scientific information[J]. Scientometrics, 2011,87(3):551-562.
[29] 李红军,赵勇,张红伟,李茂茂,任之光.一流涉农高校的大学排名特征分析——基于US News、THE和QS大学排行榜的研究[J].农业图书情报学报,2020,32(1):30-39.
[30] 牛奉高,邱均平.基于国家、学科合作网络和期刊分布的中国科研国际合作研究[J].情报科学,2015,33(5):111-118.
[31] 缪亚军,李峰,戚巍.卓越学术国际合作特征研究——基于年代与国别二维视角[J].科学学研究,2013,31(8):1141-1151.