论文新颖性测度研究综述

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2020.10.20-0153

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]明确论文新颖性的概念及不同测度方法,归纳国内外新颖性测度的不同类型及研究进展,这对科学发展和科技规划具有重要启发。[方法/过程]对已有关于论文新颖性及其测度的中英文文献整理归纳,从新颖性定义、新颖性测度不同方法如内容分析法和引文分析法及评价的角度出发形成综述。[结论/结果]现有方法多是从单一角度出发测度论文新颖性,较少结合多种方法对新颖性进行测度,未来发展方向应当结合定量和定性的方法全面分析。

关键词: 论文, 新颖性测度, 综述, 文献计量

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This paper clarifies the concept of novelty, reviews different novelty measurements, and summarizes different types and research progress of novelty detection at home and abroad. It is of great significance to the development of science and scientific technological planning. [Method/Process] By summarizing existing relevant Chinese and English literature, this paper reviews the definitions of novelty, different novelty measurements such as content analysis and citation analysis, as well as their evaluation methods. [Result/Conclusion] Most of the existing methods measure the novelty from a single perspective, and few used combined methods. Therefore, both qualitative and quantitative methods should be taken into consideration to form a comprehensive analysis in the future.

Key words: paper, novelty measurement, review, bibliometircs

中图分类号:

G353.1

柴嘉琪, 陈仕吉. 论文新颖性测度研究综述[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(10): 56-61.

CHAI Jiaqi, CHEN Shiji. Review on Paper Novelty Measurement[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(10): 56-61.

参考文献

[1] 杨建林, 钱玲飞. 基于关键词对逆文档频率的主题新颖度度量方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(3): 99-102.
[2] 党倩娜, 杨倩, 刘永千. 基于大数据方法的新兴技术新颖性测度[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(4): 91-100.
[3] WANG J, VEUGELERS R, STEPHAN P E, et al.Bias against novelty in science: a cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators[J]. Research policy, 2017, 46(8): 1416-1436.
[4] LEE Y, WALSH J P, WANG J, et al.Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact[J]. Research policy, 2015, 44(3): 684-697.
[5] 杨京, 王芳, 白如江. 一种基于研究主题对比的单篇学术论文创新力评价方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(17): 75-83.
[6] 周露阳. 论审评学术论文创新因素的指标体系[J]. 编辑学报, 2006(1): 68-70.
[7] YEGROS-YEGROS A, RAFOLS I, D’ESTE P. Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity[J]. PloS one, 2015, 10(8).
[8] ZENG A, SHEN Z, ZHOU J, et al.The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems[J]. Physics reports, 2017, 714: 1-73.
[9] 邢美凤, 过仕明. 文本内容新颖性探测研究综述[J]. 情报科学,2011, 29(7): 1098-1103.
[10] ARTHUR W B.The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves[M]. New York: Simon and schuster, 2009.
[11] 许丹, 徐爽, 陈斯斯, 等. 基于自然语言词对法的文献主题新颖性探测研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(8): 130-13.
[12] 曾建勋. 破除“SCI至上”需要弘扬“同行评议”[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2020(2): 1-2.
[13] 许丹, 徐爽, 陈斯斯, 等. 主题词法和自然语言法探测文献主题新颖性对比分析[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2019, 28(1): 19-26.
[14] ZHANG Y, TSAI F S.Chinese novelty mining[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: Association for computational lin-guistics, 2009, 3: 1561-1570.
[15] 逯万辉, 谭宗颖. 学术成果主题新颖性测度方法研究——基于Doc2Vec和HMM算法[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(3): 22-29.
[16] ZHANG M, SONG R, LIN C, et al.Expansion-based technologies in finding relevant and new information: Thu trec 2002: Novelty track experiments[J]. Nist special publication sp, 2003, 251: 586-590.
[17] 陈斯斯, 董立平, 许丹, 等. 医学文献主题新颖性探测方法对比分析[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2018, 27(2): 20-25.
[18] KUMARAN G, ALLAN J.Text classification and named entities for new event detection[C]//Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, 2004: 297-304.
[19] TSAI F S, ZHANG Y.D2S: Document-to-sentence framework for novelty detection[J]. Knowledge and information systems, 2011, 29(2): 419-433.
[20] 王颖. 科技文献内容语义描述模型研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报,2020, 32(8): 12-24.
[21] RAJARAMAN K, TAN A H.Topic detection, tracking, and trend analysis using self-organizing neural net-works[C]//Pacific-Asia conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Springer, Berlin, Hei-delberg, 2001: 102-107.
[22] 沈阳. 一种基于关键词的创新度评价方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2007(1): 125-127.
[23] 任海英, 王德营, 王菲菲. 主题词组合新颖性与论文学术影响力的关系研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(9): 87-9.
[24] 杨京, 王芳, 白如江. 一种基于研究主题对比的单篇学术论文创新力评价方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(17): 75-83.
[25] MENG L, HUANG R, GU J.A review of semantic similarity measures in WordNet[J]. International journal of hybrid information technology, 2013, 6(1): 1-12.
[26] 薛辰. 国际大数据研究论文的计量分析[J]. 现代情报, 2013, 33(9): 129-134, 139.
[27] 吴菲菲, 杨梓, 黄鲁成. 基于创新性和学科交叉性的研究前沿探测模型——以智能材料领域研究前沿探测为例[J]. 科学学研究,2015, 33(1): 11-20.
[28] NAGAOKA S, YAMAUCHI I.The use of science for inventions and its identification: Patent level evidence matched with survey[C]//Research institute of economy, trade and industry (RIETI), 2015.
[29] CHEN C, CHEN Y, HOROWITZ M, et al.Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2009, 3(3): 191-209.
[30] SMALL H.Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents[J]. Journal of the associa-tion for information science and technology, 1973, 24(4): 265-269.
[31] UZZI B, MUKHERJEE S, STRINGER M J, et al.Atypical combinations and scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-472.
[32] BOYACK K W, KLAVANS R. Atypical combinations are confounded by disciplinary ef-fects[C]//Proceedings of the science and technology indicators conference2014, Leiden, 64-70.
[33] TAHAMTAN I, BORNMANN L.Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2018, 12(3): 906-930.
[34] FOSTER J G, RZHETSKY A, EVANS J A, et al.Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies[J]. American sociological review, 2015, 80(5): 875-908.
[35] FONTANA M, IORI M, MONTOBBIO F, et al.A bridge over troubled water: Interdisciplinarity, novelty, and impact[R]. Università cattolica del sacro cuore, dipartimenti e istituti di scienze economiche (DISCE), 2018.