中文    English

Journal of library and information science in agriculture ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 47-58.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.25-0013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Critical Information Literacy Education in University Libraries from the Perspective of AIGC Application

LUO Guofeng, YI Tong, YAN Zhouzhou   

  1. Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100
  • Received:2024-12-13 Online:2025-01-05 Published:2025-04-27

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] With the rapid development of artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC) technology and the deepening of social impact, it is an important responsibility and historical mission of university libraries to cultivate and enhance students' critical information literacy (IL) in the application of AIGC. The research aims to explore the content and pedagogical strategies of critical IL education in university libraries for AIGC applications, promote the ability of college students to critically recognize and apply AIGC in the AI era, and also provide reference for the development of critical IL education in university libraries. [Method/Process] By reviewing the relevant literature at home and abroad, this paper summarizes the research status of critical IL education for AIGC applications. Based on the requirements of the "Higher Education Information Literacy Framework" for the cultivation of critical thinking ability, the current situation of critical IL education in university libraries, and the relevant policies and guidelines for the development of AI literacy education at home and abroad are reviewed. The content of critical IL education in university libraries for AIGC applications can be categorized into three aspects: AIGC application knowledge, AIGC application skills, and AIGC application ethics. At the same time, based on the requirements of IFLA library's Strategic Response to Artificial Intelligence' and the lack of IL education system in university libraries, it is proposed that the critical IL education of university libraries from the perspective of AIGC application should be ensured and implemented from the aspects of educational content integration, educational team building, educational mode development and educational system optimization. [Results/Conclusions] The research on critical IL education for AIGC application has a critical role in promoting the cultivation and improvement of students' critical thinking ability for AIGC. University libraries should be aware of their responsibilities, actively respond to the new requirements of critical IL education for AIGC applications, innovate and expand the content and form of IL education, and help students acquire the new IL skills needed for AIGC applications. At the same time, university libraries should also continuously update the content of critical IL education from the perspective of AIGC application, and have the courage to explore new teaching methods and strategies, so as to better cultivate and improve students' IL of AIGC application, help students use AIGC scientifically, correctly and normatively, and realize lifelong learning.

Key words: generative artificial intelligence, AIGC, university libraries, critical information literacy education, AI ethics, digital literacy

CLC Number: 

  • G258
1 方师师, 唐巧盈. 聪明反被聪明误: ChatGPT错误内容生成的类型学分析[J]. 新闻与写作, 2023(4): 31-42.
FANG S S, TANG Q Y. Being smarter is better than being smarter: A typological analysis of ChatGPT error content generation[J]. News and writing, 2023(4): 31-42.
2 陈祖鹏. 由“解释”走向“理解”: 教育研究思维方式的转换[J]. 现代大学教育, 2021, 37(3): 26-32.
CHEN Z P. From "explanation" to "interpretation": Paradigm shift in education research[J]. Modern university education, 2021, 37(3): 26-32.
3 89 percent of college students admit to using ChatGPT for homework, study claims[EB/OL]. [2023-09-06]. .
4 赵瑞雪, 黄永文, 马玮璐, 等. ChatGPT对图书馆智能知识服务的启示与思考[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2023, 35(1): 29-38.
ZHAO R X, HUANG Y W, MA W L, et al. Insights and reflections of the impact of ChatGPT on intelligent knowledge services in libraries[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2023, 35(1): 29-38.
5 崔宇红, 白帆, 张蕊芯. ChatGPT在高等教育领域的应用、风险及应对[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2023, 37(5): 16-25.
CUI Y H, BAI F, ZHANG R X. Application, risks and countermeasures of ChatGPT in the field of higher education[J]. Journal of Chongqing university of technology (social science), 2023, 37(5): 16-25.
6 IFLA. IFLA statementon libraries and artificial intelligence[EB/OL]. [2023-08-24]. .
7 ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee. Toptrend in academic libraries: A review of the trends and issues[J]. College and research libraries news, 2022(6): 243-256.
8 韩丽风, 王茜, 李津, 等. 高等教育信息素养框架[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2015, 33(6): 118-126.
HAN L F, WANG X, LI J, et al. Information literacy framework of higher education[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2015, 33(6): 118-126.
9 肖珑, 赵飞. 面向学习环境的大学生信息素养体系研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2015, 33(5): 50-57, 38.
XIAO L, ZHAO F. Information literacy system in learning environment for college students[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2015, 33(5): 50-57, 38.
10 张靖, 林佳萍, 彭秋平, 等. 批判性信息素养及其教育实践[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2017, 36(12): 54-60.
ZHANG J, LIN J P, PENG Q P, et al. Critical information literacy and education[J]. Library journal, 2017, 36(12): 54-60.
11 ELMBORG J. Critical information literacy: Implications for instructional practice[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2006, 32(2): 192-199.
12 SCOTT-BRANCH J, LAWSR, TERZI P. The intersection of AI, information and digital literacy: Harnessing ChatGPT and other generative tools to enhance teaching and learning[EB/OL]. [2024-08- 30]. .
13 COX C, TZOC E. ChatGPT: Implications for academic libraries[J]. College & research libraries news, 2023, 84(3): 99-102.
14 RUSANDI M A, AHMAN, SARIPAH I, et al. No worries with ChatGPT: Building bridges between artificial intelligence and education with critical thinking soft skills[J]. Journal of public health, 2023, 45(3): e602-e603.
15 刘彩娥, 韩丽风. AIGC背景下高校信息素养教育的发展[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2024, 42(2): 46-51.
LIU C E, HAN L F. The development of information literacy education in colleges in the context of AIGC[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2024, 42(2): 46-51.
16 储节旺, 杜秀秀. 英美大学ChatGPT使用规定对我国高校图书馆的启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2024, 68(5): 42-53.
CHU J W, DU X X. Enlightenment of chat GPT guidance in British and American universities to Chinese University libraries[J]. Library and information service, 2024, 68(5): 42-53.
17 蔡迎春, 张静蓓, 虞晨琳, 等. 数智时代的人工智能素养: 内涵、框架与实施路径[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2024, 50(4): 71-84.
CAI Y C, ZHANG J B, YU C L, et al. Artificial intelligence literacy in the digital intelligence era: Connotation, framework, and implementation pathways[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2024, 50(4): 71-84.
18 ARL. Research libraries guiding principles for artificial intelligence[R/OL]. [2024-05-05]. .
19 彭立伟. 美国信息素养标准的全新修订及启示[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2015, 35(6): 109-116.
PENG L W. The extensive revision of information literacy competency standards for higher education in America and enlightenment[J]. Library tribune, 2015, 35(6): 109-116.
20 Stanford HAI. Artificial intelligence definitions[R/OL]. [2024-05-05]. .
21 EDUCAUSE (2024a). A framework for AI literacy[EB/OL]. [2024-06-04]. .
22 UNESCO. A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2[R/OL]. [2024-05-07]. .
23 OECD (2019a). Artificial intelligence in society[R/OL]. [2024-05-05]. .
24 中华人民共和国国家互联网信息办公室. 《全球人工智能治理倡议》[EB/OL]. [2024-07-05]. .
25 EU. DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens-With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes[R/OL]. [2024-05-05]. .
26 JISC. Building digital capabilities framework[R/OL]. [2024-05-05]. .
27 NAIAC. Recommendation: Enhancing AI literacy for the United States of America. November 2023[R/OL]. [2024-05-05]. .
28 胡凡刚, 孟志远, 庞茗月, 等. 基于欧盟AI伦理准则的教育虚拟社区伦理: 规范轮构建与作用机制[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2019, 37(6): 41-49.
HU F G, MENG Z Y, PANG M Y, et al. Ethics of educational virtual community based on EU AI ethics guidelines: Construction of ethical norms wheel and action mechanism[J]. Journal of distance education, 2019, 37(6): 41-49.
29 UNESCO (2021a). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence[R/OL]. [2024-05-23]. .
30 中华人民共和国科学技术部. 《新一代人工智能伦理规范》[EB/OL]. [2024-07-05]. .
31 UN. Interim report: Governing AI for humanity[R/OL]. [2024-05-13]. .
32 IFLA. Developing a library strategic response to artificial intelligence[EB/OL]. [2023-12-19]. .
33 华中科技大学图书馆. [2023秋季]第13讲: 零基础快速入门AIGC[EB/OL]. [2024-12-02]. .
34 中山大学图书馆.带你走近ChatGPT[EB/OL]. [2024-06-13]. .
35 武汉大学图书馆. 最新培训计划[EB/OL]. [2024-08-19]. .
36 上海外国语大学图书馆. AI时代生存指南: 大学生AI素养养成[EB/OL]. [2025-03-12]. .
37 四川大学图书馆. 生成式人工智能专题[EB/OL]. [2024-12-17]. .
38 Libraries MIT. Citing AI tools: Home[EB/OL]. [2024-03-19]. .
39 The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Library. Can AI write scholarly articles for us –An exploratory journey with ChatGPT[EB/OL]. [2024-05-12]. .
40 [美]莱斯利·P. 斯特弗, [美]杰里·盖尔. 高文, 等译. 教育中的建构主义[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2002.
LESLIE P S, JERRY G. Constructivism in education[M]. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2002.
41 吴丹, 孙昕玦. 以人为本的人工智能素养教育探究:UNESCO教师和学生人工智能能力框架的解读与启示[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2024, 36(8): 4-19.
WU D, SUN X J. Exploring human-centered AI literacy education: Interpretation and insights from UNESCO's AI competency framework for teachers and students[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(8): 4-19.
42 Stanford University. Course policies on generative AI use[EB/OL]. [2024-10-19]. .
43 California Institute of Technology. Guidance on the use of generative AI and large language model tools[EB/OL]. [2024-02-19]. .
44 四川大学图书. 2024年春夏季明远学术讲座安排[EB/OL]. [2024-09-19]. .
45 朱益. 基于学习风格的学习策略及其在线咨询系统开发[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2010.
ZHU Y. The learning strategy design and its online consulting system development based on learning style[D]. Jinhua: Zhejiang Normal University, 2010.
46 成功大学图书馆. AI入门课程精选[EB/OL]. [2024-08-21]. .
47 University of South Florida Libraries. AI tools and resources[EB/OL]. [2024-07-02]. .
48 University College London Library. Acknowledging the use of AI and referencing AI [EB/OL]. [2024-12-19]. .
49 Lund University. Artificial intelligence: Ethical and social challenges[EB/OL]. [2024-11-15]. .
[1] SUN Lijuan. Exploring the Transition of Public Librarians to "Prompt Librarians" from the Perspective of New Quality Productive Forces [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(1): 17-32.
[2] Xuemei LUO, Yuzhe LIN. Graduate Student Digital Literacy Promotion Pathway Driven by AIGC [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(9): 70-77.
[3] Huaming LI. Opportunities and Challenges: The Use of ChatGPT in Enabling Library Knowledge Services [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(8): 96-105.
[4] Baiyang LI, Rong SUN. Construction of an AI Literacy General Education Curriculum Based on "Knowledge-Skills" Navigation [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(8): 34-42.
[5] Keyi XIAO, Yingying CHEN. Scientific Data Management Based on a Data Life Cycle Perspective: Using the Institutional Repositories Base of 24 Universities in the United States as an Example [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(7): 88-99.
[6] Chen MA, Jin LI, Zexin LI, Beibei FAN, Xian FENG. Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Farmers' Digital Literacy Levels in the Context of the Digital Countryside [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(7): 19-33.
[7] Jia LIU. Innovation and Risk Avoidance of Smart Library Services Based on Generative Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(7): 63-75.
[8] Mo LI, Bin YANG. From Generative Artificial Intelligence to Artificial General Intelligence: Enabling Innovation Models in Library Knowledge Services [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(6): 50-61.
[9] YANG Xing. Practice and Enlightenment of Developing Librarians' Digital Scholarship Service Skills at the University of Florida Library [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(5): 93-101.
[10] WANG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Suluo. Farmers' Digital Literacy under the Background of Digital Rural Construction: Concept and Framework Construction [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(5): 52-64.
[11] Liqin YAO, Hai ZHANG. Model Construction and Empirical Research on the Influencing Factors of AIGC User Dropout Behavior [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(5): 79-92.
[12] ZOU Yayi. ChatGPT Strengthens Library Intelligence Services: Opportunities, Challenges and Development Strategies [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(2): 71-80.
[13] WANG Weizheng, QIAO Hong, LI Xiaojun, WANG Jingjing. User Willingness to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence Based on AIDUA Framework [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(2): 36-50.
[14] YI Tong, LUO Guofeng. Improving Digital Literacy of University Librarians Using Educational Technology [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(2): 61-70.
[15] Yijia WAN, Liping GU. Behavioral Motivation and Influencing Factors of Graduate Students Using AIGC Tool: An Empirical Analysis Based on Questionnaire Survey [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(10): 4-22.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!