中文    English

Journal of library and information science in agriculture

   

Supply Coverage, Experience Barriers, and Supply-Demand Adaptation of Health Information Service Spaces in Public Libraries

WANG Chao1, CHEN Jie2(), HOU Hui2   

  1. 1.Library, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001
    2.Library, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004
  • Received:2026-04-01 Online:2026-06-25
  • Contact: CHEN Jie E-mail:441751938@qq.com

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] Public libraries are increasingly expected to support health knowledge dissemination, health literacy improvement, and equitable access to trustworthy information. In China, the policy context shaped by the Healthy China strategy, national health literacy initiatives, and the public service mission of libraries, has created a practical demand for health information services that extend beyond simply providing collections. Existing studies have mainly examined service items, activity models, or institutional pathways, while relatively limited attention has been paid to whether the supply of physical and digital service elements is aligned with users' actual experiences. To address this gap, this study develops an analytical framework of "supply coverage–experience barriers–supply-demand adaptation" and applies it to health information service spaces in public libraries. The contribution of this study lies in combining verifiable supply-side evidence with user-generated review texts, thereby shifting the discussion of service space from normative description to evidence-based diagnosis and differentiated governance. This study also clarifies the conceptual boundary of health information service space. The core service layer consists of health-themed resources, consultations, activities, online access points, and interaction mechanisms. Lighting, seating, hygiene, accessibility, and other basic environmental conditions are supporting conditions that affect accessibility, continuity of use, and perceived service quality. These conditions are not considered core health information services themselves. [Method/Process] This study adopts an extended secondary data analysis design. Based on a publicly released dataset and supplementary verification materials, supply-side evidence from 20 public libraries was reorganized into 12 binary indicators, including six physical-space indicators and six digital-space indicators. Each indicator was coded as 1 when explicit and verifiable public evidence was available and as 0 when such evidence was absent or insufficient. Physical-space coverage, digital-space coverage, and overall coverage were then calculated, and the median values of physical and digital coverage were used to construct a four-quadrant supply typology. On the demand side, 658 valid health-related user reviews from a mainstream consumer review platform were cleaned and analyzed. Text similarity networks, TF-IDF character n-grams, Louvain community detection, manual verification, and barrier coding were used to identify thematic clusters and experience barriers. For the supply-demand matching analysis, 12 libraries with complete supply-side evidence and at least 10 valid health-related reviews were retained. Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine exploratory associations between coverage indicators, average health-related ratings, and the proportions of different barrier types. Relative indicators, rather than absolute review counts, were used to reduce the influence of differences in city activity, library size, and platform popularity. [Results/Conclusions] The results show that the sampled libraries present a pattern of medium overall coverage and structural differentiation. The high physical–high digital coordination type accounts for the largest share, but low physical-low digital and unevenly developed types remain visible, indicating that physical and digital health information service elements have not yet formed a balanced system in all libraries. User reviews are mainly concentrated in five themes: environmental experience and basic services, health education and outreach activities, accessibility and health resource acquisition, mental health and emotional support, and sports and health management. High-intensity barriers are concentrated in supporting environmental conditions and key service touchpoints, including hygiene problems, insufficient seating, crowding, service response, appointment restrictions, platform usability, and access-point visibility. Correlation results indicate that physical-space coverage is significantly and positively associated with average health-related ratings, while the associations between digital-space coverage and platform barriers, and between physical-space coverage and supporting environmental barriers, are negative but not statistically significant. These findings should therefore be interpreted as exploratory rather than causal. Accordingly, public libraries should adopt differentiated governance strategies based on their supply typology. Libraries with extensive physical and digital resources should transition from ensuring basic availability to focusing on quality control and sustainable operations. Physical-dominant libraries should improve unified online access points, appointment processes, and feedback channels. Digital-dominant libraries should reinforce on-site capacity, accessibility, and order management. Libraries with limited resources on both sides should first establish basic accessible and usable service touchpoints before introducing more complex intelligent tools. The limitations of this study include the small matched sample, the limited visibility of public evidence, the use of secondary data, and possible biases among users of a single review platform. Future research may use a combination of larger regional samples, internal library service data, questionnaires, interviews, and longitudinal tracking to examine the effects and improvement mechanisms of health information service spaces in public libraries more thoroughly.

Key words: public libraries, health information service spaces, information commons, user experience barriers, information behavior, text mining, Louvain clustering

CLC Number: 

  • G252

Table 1

Regional distribution, administrative level, and review matching of sampled libraries"

编号样本馆区域馆舍层级供给侧证据健康相关评论数/条供需匹配
1上海图书馆华东省级/直辖市级馆完整0
2杭州图书馆华东副省级/市级馆完整65
3天津图书馆华北省级/直辖市级馆完整64
4首都图书馆华北省级/直辖市级馆完整115
5南京图书馆华东省级馆完整48
6广东省中山图书馆华南省级馆完整43
7山东图书馆华东省级馆完整0
8海南图书馆华南省级馆完整0
9深圳图书馆华南副省级/市级馆完整49
10长沙图书馆华中地市级馆完整33
11湖北图书馆华中省级馆完整69
12安徽图书馆华东省级馆完整0
13山西图书馆华北省级馆完整0
14辽宁图书馆东北省级馆完整39
15吉林图书馆东北省级馆完整0
16黑龙江图书馆东北省级馆完整0
17重庆图书馆西南省级/直辖市级馆完整65
18四川图书馆西南省级馆完整37
19陕西图书馆西北省级馆完整31
20甘肃图书馆西北省级馆完整0

Table 2

Indicator system and binary scoring criteria for the supply side of health information service spaces"

维度指标代码二级指标证据载体(示例)
实体空间I1支撑环境层-无障碍设施公开渠道中有无障碍通道、电梯、卫生间、母婴室、特殊群体服务指引等明确说明或证据
实体空间I2核心服务层-健康服务固定空间公开渠道中有健康咨询、健康阅读、健康活动或健康主题服务固定空间的说明、照片或导览信息
实体空间I3流程连接层-基础智能设备公开渠道中有自助检索、智能导览、电子阅览或其他支持健康信息获取的基础智能设备证据
实体空间I4核心服务层-专用健康服务设备公开渠道中有健康检测、健康阅读辅助、康复/适老辅助等专用健康服务设备证据
实体空间I5流程连接层-分馆/流动点健康服务公开渠道中有分馆、流动服务点或基层服务点开展健康主题资源、活动或宣传服务的证据
实体空间I6核心服务层-健康分馆建设公开渠道中有健康主题分馆、健康阅读专区或健康服务专题空间建设证据
虚拟空间V1核心服务层-线上健康信息入口官网、微信公众号、APP或小程序中包含健康信息、健康主题导航或健康服务入口
虚拟空间V2核心服务层-健康信息资源汇总分类线上平台提供健康信息资源汇总、专题分类、权威资源链接或电子资源导航
虚拟空间V3核心服务层-移动端健康主题板块移动端设置健康主题栏目、活动板块、资源专题或健康服务页面
虚拟空间V4流程连接层-个性化健康信息推送线上平台有健康主题推送、订阅、推荐或面向特定人群的信息触达机制
虚拟空间V5核心服务层-心理健康服务线上平台设置心理健康、情绪支持、阅读疗法或心理科普相关服务内容
虚拟空间V6流程连接层-用户反馈线上平台提供咨询、留言、反馈、问答或用户互动入口,并可追溯服务响应路径

Table 3

Supply typology of health information service spaces (N=20)"

分型类别N/馆实体覆盖率均值/%虚拟覆盖率均值/%综合覆盖率均值/%主要特征描述

双高协同型

PPmed, QQmed

959.2661.1160.19线上线下协同推进,服务体系较为完备

实体主导型

PPmed, Q<Qmed

350.0033.3341.67依赖传统阵地,数字化触点缺失

数字驱动型

P<Pmed, QQmed

233.3358.3345.83平台建设超前,实体支撑薄弱

双弱起步型

P<Pmed, Q<Qmed

633.3322.2227.78基础要素尚未形成体系化配置

Table 4

Distribution and rating characteristics of health-related review clusters (n=658)"

主题簇ID主题簇样本量n/占比/%平均评分低分比例(<=2星)/%高分比例(>=4星)/%
1环境体验与基础服务30145.744.413.9989.37
2医疗科普与活动服务16925.684.451.7895.86
3无障碍与健康资源获取8112.314.520.0097.53
4心理健康与情绪支持6610.034.481.5292.42
5运动健身与健康管理406.084.257.5087.50
0其他/未聚类10.151.00100.000.00

Table 5

Top 10 experience barriers and experience barrier intensity index (n=658)"

障碍方面提及n/个占比/%平均评分低分比例(<=2星)/%体验障碍强度指数
卫生间/卫生问题支撑环境类16324.774.403.070.0295
座位不足/拥挤排队支撑环境类9714.744.312.060.0204
服务人员态度/响应问题服务响应与心理感知类304.563.7323.330.0116
停车/到达不便支撑环境类426.384.364.760.0082
预约限制/预约难平台可达类548.214.540.000.0076
无障碍设施不足支撑环境类192.894.530.000.0027
噪音影响/不够安静服务响应与心理感知类243.654.620.000.0027
系统卡顿/打不开/加载慢平台可达类162.434.500.000.0024
入口难找/检索困难平台可达类91.374.220.000.0021
网络/Wi-Fi体验差数字基础设施类111.674.730.000.0009

Table 6

Spearman rank correlation between supply-side coverage and demand-side experience (n=12)"

关联假设路径(X vs Y)相关系数(ρP显著性判定
实体覆盖率(P)×健康评论平均星级0.5800.048*
虚拟覆盖率(Q)×平台类障碍占比-0.3390.281n.s.
综合覆盖率(T)×健康评论平均星级0.4820.112n.s.
实体覆盖率(P)×支撑环境类障碍占比-0.3410.277n.s.
[1] 中共中央, 国务院. “健康中国2030”规划纲要[EB/OL]. (2016-10-25)[2026-04-28]. .
[2] 健康中国行动推进委员会. 健康中国行动(2019-2030年)[EB/OL]. (2019-07-15)[2026-04-28]. .
[3] 国务院办公厅. “十四五”国民健康规划[EB/OL]. (2022-05-20)[2026-04-28]. .
[4] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 《中华人民共和国公共图书馆法》[EB/OL]. (2017-11-04)[2026-04-28]. .
[5] 国务院. 《全民阅读促进条例》[EB/OL]. (2025-12-09)[2026-04-28]. .
[6] 金佳丽, 潘晶, 张紫徽, 等. AI驱动的未来图书馆范式重构与创新路径[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2025, 51(5): 67-78.
Jin Jiali, Pan Jing, Zhang Zihui, et al. AI-driven paradigm shift and innovation pathways for the future library[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2025, 51(5): 67-78.
[7] 曹海霞. 美国公共图书馆公众健康信息服务发展历史研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2021, 40(2): 88-94.
Cao Haixia. Research on the historical development of public health information service of American public library[J]. Library Journal, 2021, 40(2): 88-94.
[8] Morgan A U, Dupuis R, D'Alonzo B, et al. Beyond books: Public libraries as partners for population health[J]. Health Affairs, 2016, 35(11): 2030-2036.
[9] 王军. 中美公共图书馆健康信息服务多维比较研究[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2022(3): 32-39.
Wang Jun. Multidimensional comparison of health information services between Chinese and American public libraries[J]. Digital Library Forum, 2022(3): 32-39.
[10] 周晓英, 于小宁. 公共图书馆健康服务的目标和内容研究[J]. 晋图学刊, 2022(3): 78-83.
Zhou Xiaoying, Yu Xiaoning. Research on the objectives and contents of public library health service[J]. Shanxi Library Journal, 2022(3): 78-83.
[11] 金燕, 张启源. 我国公共图书馆健康信息服务现状调查与分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2018, 35(2): 24-31, 23.
Jin Yan, Zhang Qiyuan. Investigation and analysis on the status of health information service of public libraries in China[J]. Documentation, Information & Knowledge, 2018, 35(2): 24-31, 23.
[12] 黄百川. 后疫情时期图书馆健康信息服务研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2020(2): 120-123, 42.
Huang Baichuan. Research on library health information services in the post-epidemic period[J]. Library & Information, 2020(2): 120-123, 42.
[13] 林宜榕, 谈大军. 爱尔兰地区公共图书馆面向弱势群体的健康信息服务研究[J]. 图书馆, 2023(5): 94-100.
Lin Yirong, Tan Dajun. Research on health information services for disadvantaged groups in Irish regional public libraries[J]. Library, 2023(5): 94-100.
[14] Beagle D. Conceptualizing an information commons[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1999, 25(2): 82-89.
[15] 夏有根, 刘剑虹. 图书馆生态位概念及基本原理研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(1): 24-28.
Xia Yougen, Liu Jianhong. The study on the concept and principle of library ecological niche[J]. Library and Information Service, 2010, 54(1): 24-28.
[16] 朱峻薇, 粟慧. 以“痛点”思维营建数字图书馆体验的良好环境[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(21): 46-49, 65.
Zhu Junwei, Su Hui. Building a good digital library experience environment based on "pain point thinking"[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014, 58(21): 46-49, 65.
[17] 王利蕊. 数智时代高校图书馆智能空间构建的理论依据、方法和服务策略研究[J]. 图书馆, 2023(7): 24-30.
Wang Lirui. Research on the theoretical basis, method, and service strategy of the intelligent space construction of university libraries in the digital-intelligent era[J]. Library, 2023(7): 24-30.
[18] Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V A, Berry L L. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality[J]. Journal of Retailing, 1988, 64(1): 12-40.
[19] 刘一鸣, 王诗音. AI赋能公共图书馆健康信息服务空间再造研究数据集[DS/OL]. 《图书馆杂志》投稿中心数据集, 2025[2026-04-28]. hdl:20.500.12304/13381.
Liu Yiming, Wang Shiyin. Dataset for AI-enabled reconstruction of health information service spaces in public libraries[DS/OL]. Library Journal Submission Center Dataset, 2025[2026-04-28]. hdl:20.500.12304/13381.
[20] Brewster L. The public library as therapeutic landscape: A qualitative case study[J]. Health & Place, 2014, 26: 94-99.
[21] Karki M, El Asmar M L, Sasco E R, et al. Public libraries to promote public health and wellbeing: A cross-sectional study of community-dwelling adults[J]. BMC Public Health, 2024, 24(1): 1226.
[1] QIN Miao, WANG Qingfei. Large AI Model Utilization Optimization in Libraries Based on Multimodal Resource Profiling [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2026, 38(6): 98-114.
[2] LYU Lucheng, ZHOU Jian, SUN Wenjun, ZHAO Yajuan, HAN Tao. Performance of Fine-Tuned Large Language Models in Patent Text Mining [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2026, 38(4): 36-46.
[3] HOU Yanhui, WANG Zixuan, WANG Jiakun. "Innovation-Aturity" Technology Opportunity Identification Based on Technological Complementarity [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2026, 38(1): 44-57.
[4] ZHAO Yajing. A Study of the Factors Influencing Participation Behavior among Users with Depression on User-Generated Content (UGC) Platforms [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(6): 70-86.
[5] GOU Ruike, LUO Wei. Influencing Factors of Continuous Use Intention of "Generation Z" Users of an AIGC Platform [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(3): 66-80.
[6] LI Xiao, QU Jiansheng. Influencing Factors of User Participation Intention of Crowdsourcing in Evidence Synthesis [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(3): 92-105.
[7] CHEN Nan. Strategies for Smart Library Services in Public Libraries during the Digitally-Intelligence Era under the 15th Five-Year Plan [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(12): 64-80.
[8] SHI Qin, XIE Jing, WU Shang. Influencing Factors and Correlations of User Satisfaction with Mobile Health Applications [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(1): 33-46.
[9] YOU Ge, LI Jielin, ZHANG Fangshun. Generating Mechanism of Online Public Opinion Heat in Public Emergencies from the Perspective of Information Ecology: Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on 50 Cases [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(1): 86-99.
[10] Guowei GAO, Shanshan ZHANG, Jialan YU. A Review of Health Information Behaviors of Older People from the Perspective of Topic Differentiation [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(7): 34-49.
[11] Liqin YAO, Hai ZHANG. Model Construction and Empirical Research on the Influencing Factors of AIGC User Dropout Behavior [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(5): 79-92.
[12] Chunling GAO, Liyuan JIANG. Elderly People's Online Health Information Seeking Behavior Based on Evolutionary Dynamics [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(5): 65-78.
[13] LIU Yang, LYU Shuyue, LI Ruojun. Concept, Task, and Application of Social Robots in Information Behavior Research [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(3): 4-20.
[14] ZHOU Xin. Machine Functionalism and the Digital-Intelligence Divide: Evolutionary Pathways, Generative Logic and Regulatory Strategies [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(3): 59-71.
[15] SHI Yanqing, LI Lu, SHI Qin. Impact of User Heterogeneity on Knowledge Collaboration Effectiveness from a Network Structure Perspective [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(3): 72-82.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!