Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 56-61.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2020.10.20-0153
• Research paper • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHAI Jiaqi1, CHEN Shiji2
CLC Number:
| [1] 杨建林, 钱玲飞. 基于关键词对逆文档频率的主题新颖度度量方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(3): 99-102. [2] 党倩娜, 杨倩, 刘永千. 基于大数据方法的新兴技术新颖性测度[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(4): 91-100. [3] WANG J, VEUGELERS R, STEPHAN P E, et al.Bias against novelty in science: a cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators[J]. Research policy, 2017, 46(8): 1416-1436. [4] LEE Y, WALSH J P, WANG J, et al.Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact[J]. Research policy, 2015, 44(3): 684-697. [5] 杨京, 王芳, 白如江. 一种基于研究主题对比的单篇学术论文创新力评价方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(17): 75-83. [6] 周露阳. 论审评学术论文创新因素的指标体系[J]. 编辑学报, 2006(1): 68-70. [7] YEGROS-YEGROS A, RAFOLS I, D’ESTE P. Does interdisciplinary research lead to higher citation impact? The different effect of proximal and distal interdisciplinarity[J]. PloS one, 2015, 10(8). [8] ZENG A, SHEN Z, ZHOU J, et al.The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems[J]. Physics reports, 2017, 714: 1-73. [9] 邢美凤, 过仕明. 文本内容新颖性探测研究综述[J]. 情报科学,2011, 29(7): 1098-1103. [10] ARTHUR W B.The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves[M]. New York: Simon and schuster, 2009. [11] 许丹, 徐爽, 陈斯斯, 等. 基于自然语言词对法的文献主题新颖性探测研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(8): 130-13. [12] 曾建勋. 破除“SCI至上”需要弘扬“同行评议”[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2020(2): 1-2. [13] 许丹, 徐爽, 陈斯斯, 等. 主题词法和自然语言法探测文献主题新颖性对比分析[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2019, 28(1): 19-26. [14] ZHANG Y, TSAI F S.Chinese novelty mining[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: Association for computational lin-guistics, 2009, 3: 1561-1570. [15] 逯万辉, 谭宗颖. 学术成果主题新颖性测度方法研究——基于Doc2Vec和HMM算法[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(3): 22-29. [16] ZHANG M, SONG R, LIN C, et al.Expansion-based technologies in finding relevant and new information: Thu trec 2002: Novelty track experiments[J]. Nist special publication sp, 2003, 251: 586-590. [17] 陈斯斯, 董立平, 许丹, 等. 医学文献主题新颖性探测方法对比分析[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2018, 27(2): 20-25. [18] KUMARAN G, ALLAN J.Text classification and named entities for new event detection[C]//Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, 2004: 297-304. [19] TSAI F S, ZHANG Y.D2S: Document-to-sentence framework for novelty detection[J]. Knowledge and information systems, 2011, 29(2): 419-433. [20] 王颖. 科技文献内容语义描述模型研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报,2020, 32(8): 12-24. [21] RAJARAMAN K, TAN A H.Topic detection, tracking, and trend analysis using self-organizing neural net-works[C]//Pacific-Asia conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Springer, Berlin, Hei-delberg, 2001: 102-107. [22] 沈阳. 一种基于关键词的创新度评价方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2007(1): 125-127. [23] 任海英, 王德营, 王菲菲. 主题词组合新颖性与论文学术影响力的关系研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(9): 87-9. [24] 杨京, 王芳, 白如江. 一种基于研究主题对比的单篇学术论文创新力评价方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(17): 75-83. [25] MENG L, HUANG R, GU J.A review of semantic similarity measures in WordNet[J]. International journal of hybrid information technology, 2013, 6(1): 1-12. [26] 薛辰. 国际大数据研究论文的计量分析[J]. 现代情报, 2013, 33(9): 129-134, 139. [27] 吴菲菲, 杨梓, 黄鲁成. 基于创新性和学科交叉性的研究前沿探测模型——以智能材料领域研究前沿探测为例[J]. 科学学研究,2015, 33(1): 11-20. [28] NAGAOKA S, YAMAUCHI I.The use of science for inventions and its identification: Patent level evidence matched with survey[C]//Research institute of economy, trade and industry (RIETI), 2015. [29] CHEN C, CHEN Y, HOROWITZ M, et al.Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2009, 3(3): 191-209. [30] SMALL H.Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents[J]. Journal of the associa-tion for information science and technology, 1973, 24(4): 265-269. [31] UZZI B, MUKHERJEE S, STRINGER M J, et al.Atypical combinations and scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-472. [32] BOYACK K W, KLAVANS R. Atypical combinations are confounded by disciplinary ef-fects[C]//Proceedings of the science and technology indicators conference2014, Leiden, 64-70. [33] TAHAMTAN I, BORNMANN L.Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2018, 12(3): 906-930. [34] FOSTER J G, RZHETSKY A, EVANS J A, et al.Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies[J]. American sociological review, 2015, 80(5): 875-908. [35] FONTANA M, IORI M, MONTOBBIO F, et al.A bridge over troubled water: Interdisciplinarity, novelty, and impact[R]. Università cattolica del sacro cuore, dipartimenti e istituti di scienze economiche (DISCE), 2018. |
| [1] | HOU Xiangying, CUI Yunpeng, LIU Juan. Applications and Prospect Analysis of Deep Learning in Plant Genomics and Crop Breeding [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(8): 4-18. |
| [2] | WAN Yijia, KU liping. Policies, Resources and Services of Global Alliance of Open Access Scholarly Communication Platforms [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(6): 24-35. |
| [3] | SUN Shaodan, DENG Jun, ZHANG Zishu, ZHONG Chuyi, SHENG Panpan. Topic Knowledge Organization of Modern Newspaper Resources by Incorporating the Knowledge Element Concept: Taking the "Shengjing Times" as an Example [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(4): 50-62. |
| [4] | WAN Hao, ZHANG Fujun, LV Qianqian. The Validity of Peer Review Results of DEA Based Super Efficiency Projects [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(2): 88-101. |
| [5] | ZHENG Guangchun, ZHANG Yuhao, YAN Hui. From Backburner to the Forefront: Review of the Application of Autoethnography in the Information Science Field [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(2): 40-47. |
| [6] | ZHANG Min. Overseas Copyright Literacy Research: Origins, Progress and Advances [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(9): 83-92. |
| [7] | ZHAO Rongying, CHANG Ruru, WANG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Zhaoyang. Progress of Library and Information Science During the 13th Five-year Plan：Analysis on Funded Papers [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(6): 18-29. |
| [8] | WANG Feifei, HAN Wenfei, SU Ziyao, YI Xinyue. Exploring the Academic Exchange among Countries along the "The Belt and Road": Bibliometrics Perspective of Highly Cited Papers [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(6): 94-106. |
| [9] | YU Liping. An Analysis of "Four Only" Elements' Relationships, Comparison of Their Dangers and Countermeasures in Humanities and Social Sciences [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(1): 53-61. |
| [10] | CHEN Yunwei. Review on Quantitative Methods of Science and Technology Evaluation [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(8): 4-11. |
| [11] | ZHOU Zhenguo. Data Governance Research from the Perspective of Governance Framework [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(7): 57-62. |
| [12] | LIN Hai, GU Tinghua, WU Yubing. Development Context and Characteristics of Social Commerce: Review and Prospect Based on Visualization Technology [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(5): 31-44. |
| [13] | GUO Lina, ZUO Wenge, ZHOU Qun. A bibliometric analysis of ESI highly cited papers from China and USA [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(5): 45-54. |
| [14] | DING Xujie. Evaluation of the Humanities Resource Construction of University Libraries from the Perspective of the Guarantee Rate of Citation: Taking the Department of Philosophy of Shanghai Jiao Tong University as an Example [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 77-86. |
| [15] | CHAI Miaoling, HUANG Lin, REN Yunyue. A Review of Construction of Major Agricultural Open Scientific Data Resources [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(10): 25-34. |
|
||
