中文    English

Agricultural Library and Information ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 67-72.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2019.06.19-0232

• Research paper • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Library Outsourcing Resource Base

WU Yuling1, 2   

  1. 1.Jiangxi Provincial Library, Jiangxi Nanchang 330046, China;
    2.The School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Hubei Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2019-03-26 Online:2019-06-05 Published:2019-08-02

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance]The research on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of library outsourcing resource base is conductive to the establishment of a comprehensive evaluation model of unified metrics, which makes the quality evaluation results of library outsourcing resource base more objective and accurate, and also provides reference decision for managers.[Method/Process]This paper takes Jiangxi Library Outsourcing Resource Base as an empirical case, makes dimensionless processing of various indicators data including benefit type and cost type, constructs a comprehensive evaluation model based on the weight of coefficient of variation and the combination of fuzzy matrix, and finally calculates the comprehensive ranking of the Outsourcing Resource Base by using MATLAB, which is a Data Analysis Tool.[Result/Conclusion] The experiment shows that when choosing Multi-dimensional and difficult-to-quantitative index evaluation model, the method of combining the Coefficient of Variation Weighting with the fuzzy matrix is often used. It can unify each index unit and carry out quantitative analysis, objectively reflect the quality level, and finally provide reference decision for managers.

Key words: library outsourcing resource base, quality evaluation model, fuzzy matrix, coefficient of variation weighting

CLC Number: 

  • G250.7
[1] 黄长伟. 基于数学建模的图书馆电子资源评价体系研究——以哈尔滨商业大学图书馆为例[J].世纪桥,2013(01):141-144.
[2] 闫晶,毕强,李洁,王福.图书馆数字资源聚合质量预测模型构建——基于改进遗传算法和BP神经网络[J].数据分析与知识发现,2017,1(12):49-62.
[3] 吴天吉,方东权.基于模糊理论的电子资源绩效综合评价模型及其应用——以华中农业大学图书馆为例[J].图书馆建设,2009(11):27-30+34.
[4] 刘正春,王坚毅.高校图书馆数字资源采访绩效定量评价模型研究[J].嘉兴学院学报,2010,22(06):101-106.
[5] 蒲筱哥,乔亚铭,胡亚敏.基于网络分析法的高校图书馆电子资源服务绩效评价模型及实证研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2014,32(04):41-49.
[6] 曹靖, 李建平. 同符号数相加“大数吃小数”的界限:理论分析[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 34(2):16-18.
[7] James F. Peters,Andrzej Skowron,Piotr Synak,Sheela Ramanna. Fuzzy Sets and Systems — IFSA2003[M].Springer Berlin Heidelberg:2003-06-24.
[8] 何超,李萌,李婷婷,彭雪,李婕,赵锦慧.多目标综合评价中四种确定权重方法的比较与分析[J].湖北大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(02):172-178.
[9] MBA智库百科:变异系数[EB/OL].[2018-9-30].https://wiki.mbalib.com/wiki/%E5%8F%98%E5%BC%82%E7%B3%BB%E6%95%B0.
[10] MatLab论坛:MATLAB R2018a 全球发布![EB/OL].[2018-9-30].https://www.ilovematlab.cn/thread-538669-1-1.html
[1] ZHOU Wenjie, YANG Kehu. An Overview of the Evidence-based Digital Humanity Paradigm with Chinese Characteristics from the Perspective of the Construction of Independent Knowledge System [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(11): 5-13.
[2] WeiZhipeng, Zhao Yueyan, Yang Kehu, Zhou Wenjie. Evidence-based Digital Humanity Paradigm of First-hand Evidence: A Co Word Analysis Based on Bao's Zhan Guo Ce [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(11): 14-25.
[3] WEN Yufeng, MA Qianni, YANG Kehu, ZHOU Wenjie. Exploring the Paradigm of Secondhand Evidence Based Digital Humanity Research: A Case Study of Dunhuang Wooden and Bamboo Slips of Han Dynasty [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(11): 26-37.
[4] SHANG Hongli, ZHANG Sijie, WEI Zhipeng, YANG Kehu, ZHOU Wenjie. Evidence Integration Framework of Evidence-based Digital Humanities [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(11): 38-47.
[5] WANG Fei, QIU Fengjie, WANG Hao. Library Green Transformation from the Prospect of Public Libraries' High-Quality Development [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(11): 57-68.
[6] XIAO Keyi, QIN Jiajia, LI Yunfan. Practice and Enlightenment of Japanese University Libraries in Using Institutional Repositories for Research Data Management [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(11): 100-109.
[7] CHEN Xuefei, HUANG Jinxia, WANG Fang. Open Science: Connotation of Open Innovation and Its Mechanism for Innovation Ecology [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 5-14.
[8] XIAO Man, WANG Xuan, WANG Fang, HUANG Jinxia. Framework and Development Path of Open Science Capability [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 15-28.
[9] LIU Jingyu, JIA Yujie, HUANG Jinxia, WANG Fang. Ethics Principle Framework of Data Handling for Open Scientific Innovation Ecology [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 29-43.
[10] JIANG Lihui, YI Zhijun, HUANG Jinxia. Implementing UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science: Common and Inclusive Actions [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 44-50.
[11] TAN Yawen. An Analysis on the Gamification Development Path of Library Open Data [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(6): 83-92.
[12] GUO Weijia. Influencing Factors of Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Libraries [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(5): 47-56.
[13] LI Guifen. Practice and Enlightenment on the Construction of Special Subject Libraries in Universities:Take the Law Research Center of Shenzhen University Town Library as an Example [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(12): 89-98.
[14] XIAO Peng, ZHAO Qingxiang. The Road to Digital Talent Power: Action Plan for Enhancing Digital Literacy and Skills of the People and College Students' Digital Literacy Education Strategy [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(12): 6-15.
[15] SU Yunmei, WU Jianguang. The Model Construction and Empirical Research on the Influencing Factors of Library Electronic Resources Performance Evaluation [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(10): 98-107.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!