中文    English

Agricultural Library and Information ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 28-36.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2019.05.19-0388

• Altmetrics • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Influence Evaluation of Altmetrics Hot Papers from the Perspective of Citation Indicators

YU Yisheng, LIU Xinyan   

  1. Department of economics and management,South China Normal University, Guangdong Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2019-05-07 Online:2019-05-05 Published:2019-05-05

Abstract: This paper collects the index data of Top100 hot papers in 2017 from Altmetric.com platform. First of all, it analyzes the hot papers statistically, then combines the citation index data in Web of Science, through the coverage and correlation index screening, using the principal component analysis method to construct the paper influence model. The research results show that: (1) High-producing countrie is the United States; research institutes are mostly universities; the overall frequency of authors varies widely, and the directions of research are mostly in medicine, science and technology, and biology. (2) Twitter,Facebook, Blog, Mendeley, News and Wikipedia are the main indicators that make up the annual Altmetrics hot papers; It is more reasonable to introduce comprehensive evaluation of hot papers after citations; Chinese scholars and research institutes should also pay attention to their social influence while improving the academic influence of high-quality dissertations.

Key words: Altmetrics, hot papers, academic papers impact, evaluation model

CLC Number: 

  • G250.73
[1] 索传军. 知识转移视角下的学术论文老化与创新研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(05):5-12.
[2] What academic research caught the public imagination in2017?[EB/OL]. [2017-12-20]. https://www.Altmetrics.com/top100/2017/
[3] Holmberg K,Thelwall M.Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly Communication[J]. Scientometrics,2014,101(2):1027-1042.
[4] Thelwall M,Haustein S,Larivière V,et al.Do Altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services[J]. PLOS ONE,2013,8(5): e64841.
[5] Li Jiapei,Shin SeongYoon,???.Construction of Scientific Impact Evaluation Model Based on Altmetrics[J]. Journal of Information and Communication Convergence Engineering, 2017,(15):3.
[6] 郭飞,游滨,薛婧媛.Altmetrics热点论文传播特性及影响力分析[J].图书情报工作, 2016,60(15):86-93.
[7] 匡登辉. 从Altmetrics热点论文看科技期刊影响力——以Altmetrics.com Top100论文为例[J].中国科技期刊研究,2016,27(11):1188-1194.
[8] 王雯霞,刘春丽.不同学科间论文影响力评价指标模型的差异性研究[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(13):108-116.
[9] 赵蓉英,郭凤娇,谭洁.基于Altmetrics的学术论文影响力评价研究——以汉语言文学学科为例[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(01):96-108.
[10] 邱韵霏,罗颖,宰冰欣,刘晓娟.基于Mendeley阅读数据的论文使用分析[J].图书情报工作,2017,(14):123-131.
[11] EYSENBACH G.Can tweets predict citations?Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact[J]. Journal of medical Internet research,2011,13(4): e123.
[12] DE WINTER JCF.The relationship between tweets,citations,and article views for PLOS ONE articles[J].Scientometrics,2015,102(2):1773-1779.
[13] 因子分析. [EB/OL]. [2017-12-20].https://wenku.baidu.com/view/b5
5d944f2b160b4e767fcf01.html.
[14] 余厚强,Bradley M.Hemminger,肖婷婷,邱均平.新浪微博替代计量指标特征分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(04):20-36.
[15] 余以胜,刘鑫艳.Altmetrics现存问题及未来应用领域研究[J].图书情报知识,2017(06):35-41.
[16] 孟伟花,向菲.基于情感分析的Altmetrics学术质量评价方法研究[J].情报工作,2016,60(11):107-112.
[1] LI Xiaohui, WANG Jue, LANG Linfang. Academic Impact of Retracted Dissertations and Theses [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(7): 46-53.
[2] LAN Xue, HAN Yi. Data Usability of Book Rating Scores on Social Reading Platform from the Perspective of Altmetrics Evaluation: A Case Study of Douban Reading [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(11): 74-82.
[3] CHEN Yunwei. Review on Quantitative Methods of Science and Technology Evaluation [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(8): 4-11.
[4] WU Yuling. Research on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Library Outsourcing Resource Base [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(6): 67-72.
[5] YANG Siluo, YU Yonghao. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Papers and Books Based on Citation and Altmetric Indicators [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 5-12.
[6] LIU Chunli, LIU Liping, MA Fengmao. Research Status and Application Challenges of Altmetrics to Evaluate the Social Impact of Scientific Research Output [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 13-20.
[7] YU Houqiang, YIN Zihan, LI Longfei, CHANG Mengli. Study of Ways of Scientific Usage of Altmetrics Data Based on User Cases [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 21-27.
[8] ZHANG Yao. Research on Altmetric Indicators Evaluation system Model Based on Highly Cited Papers in Chinese Journals [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 37-42.
[9] YU Liping. The Evaluation Index of Classic Papers in Academic Periodicals: Journal Classic Index [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(1): 35-43.
[10] ZHANG Yang, YU Yanhui, HUANG Danqing. Comparison between High Attention Papers and ESI Hot Papers: A Case Study of Clinical Medicine [J]. , 2018, 30(10): 13-22.
[11] YANG Siluo, CHENG Aijuan, YUAN Qingli. Research on Three Dimensional Measuring Method of Papers' Influence Based on Altmetrics [J]. , 2018, 30(10): 5-12.
[12] HOU Zhiai. Research on the User Education and Evaluation of University Libraries in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei [J]. , 2017, 29(5): 121-124.
[13] FAN Yi-wen. College Library User Satisfaction Evaluation Model Based on RBF Neural Network [J]. , 2016, 28(3): 10-13.
[14] ZHANG Rui. Construction of Fuzzy Evaluation Model for the Effect of Organizational Culture on the Core Competitiveness of Library [J]. , 2016, 28(10): 91-94.
[15] HE Yan-ju. Evaluation Model of Readers’ Training based on Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model [J]. , 2014, 26(12): 121-123.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!