中文    English

Agricultural Library and Information ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 35-43.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2019.01.004

;

• Research paper • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Evaluation Index of Classic Papers in Academic Periodicals: Journal Classic Index

YU Liping   

  1. School of statistics and mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310018, China
  • Received:2019-01-21 Online:2019-01-05 Published:2019-03-12

Abstract: Measuring the level of classical papers in academic journals is of great significance to journal evaluation, and there is a lack of evaluation indicators in this respect. In this paper, journal papers are divided into highly cited papers and general papers, and highly cited papers are further divided into classical papers and hot papers. The journal classical index is the proportion of citation frequency of early papers in the total citation frequency. Research on Citation Data of CSSCI Periodicals Based on Library Information and Philology and CNKI database shows: Classical Index is a New Index for Evaluating Classical Papers in Academic Journals. It is better to use the papers of 5 years ago as the basis for calculating the journal classical index. The journal classical index is not related to the influencing factors. The journal classical index is positively correlated with the H index and with lower goodness of fit. Suitable selection of classical index is needed in the evaluation of academic journals.

Key words: journal classical index, classical papers, hot papers, highly cited papers, academic journal

CLC Number: 

  • G302
[1] 陶范. 深入我心的经典论文[J].编辑学报,2018,30(01):109-110.
[2] Henk F Moed.The impact- factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits[J]. Nature, 2002,415(6873):731-732.
[3] Bharathi D G.Methodology for the evaluation of scientific journals: aggregated citations of cited articles[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 86(3):563-574.
[4] Blessinger K,Hrycaj P.Highly cited articles in library and information science: An analysis of content and authorship trends[J]. Library & Information Science Research,2010,32(2):156-162.
[5] 张垒. 高被引论文的特征因素及其对影响因子贡献研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(08):880-885.
[6] 王宁,张以民,李云霞,张娟,孙鲁娟,赵伶俐,翁凌云.专注高、低被引论文,提升JIA学术影响力[J].农业图书情报学刊,2018,30(07):68-71.
[7] 高志,张志强.科学家个人学术影响力随时间变化的计算方法研究[J].现代情报,2017,37(05):66-71.
[8] 吴明智,高硕.基于ESI的中国农业科学十年发展态势的文献计量分析[J].农业图书情报学刊,2015,27(09):69-72.
[9] 俞立平. 学术期刊h指数的时间演变规律研究[J].情报杂志,2015,34(01):96-99.
[10] Martinez M,Herrera M,Contreras E,et al.Characterizing highly cited papers in Social Work through H-Classics[J].Scientometrics,2015(2):1713-1729.
[11] Seglen P O.Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research[J]. BMJ,1997,314(7079) : 498-502
[12] Wang X W,Fang Z C,Sun X L.Usage patterns of scholarly articles on Web of Science: a study on Web of Science usage count[J].Scientometrics,2016(2):917-926
[13] 俞立平,王作功,孙建红.时间窗口对学术期刊评价的影响研究[J].情报杂志,2017,36(10):137-140.
[14] 刘自强,王效岳,白如江.基于时间序列模型的研究热点分析预测方法研究[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(05):27-33.
[15] Garfield E. Long-Term Vs.Short-Term Journal Impact: Does It Matter?[J]. Scientist,1998,12(3):11-12
[16] 顾欢,盛丽娜.不同引证时间窗口的年度h指数与累积h指数对比分析——以SSCI信息科学与图书馆学期刊为例[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(04):145-149.
[17] 付中静. 不同引证时间窗口论文量引关系实证研究——基于论文与期刊视角[J].情报杂志,2017,36(07): 128-133.
[18] 方红玲. 不同引证时间窗口影响因子百分位在期刊学术评价中的比较研究[J].科技与出版,2018(12): 179-184.
[19] 盖双双,刘雪立,张诗乐,刘睿远.同年不同月份发表的论文被引频次的演进规律——兼谈优先数字出版的价值和局限性[J].编辑学报,2014,26(03):210-214
[20] Schubert E.Use and misuse of impact factor[J]. Systematics and Biodiversity,2012(4):391-394.
[21] Pan R K,Fortunato S.Author Impact Factor: tracking the dynamics of individual scientific impact[J]. Scientific reports,2014,4(4880):7-8.
[22] Jacso P.Five-year Impact Factor Data in the Journal Citation Reports[J]. Online Information Review,2009,33(3): 603-614.
[23] Campanario J M.Empirical Study of Journal Impact Factors Obtained Using the Classical Two-year Citation Window Versus a Five-year Citation Window[J]. Scientometrics,2011, 87(1):189-204
[24] Vanclay J K.Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?[J]. Scientometrics,2012, 92(2) : 211-238
[25] 白云. 中国人文社会科学期刊被引半衰期分析研究[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(04):127-130.
[26] 于光,郭蕊.互引期刊群中出版延时对被引半衰期的影响[J].科学学研究,2006(S2):528-531.
[27] 盛丽娜. 不同引证时间窗口影响因子对期刊排序的影响——以SSCI信息科学和图书馆学期刊为例[J].中国科技期刊研究,2016,27(05):521-525.
[28] 刘雪立,盖双双,张诗乐,王璞,方红玲.不同引证时间窗口影响因子的比较研究——以SCI数据库眼科学期刊为例[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(12):1509-1512.
[29] Redner S.How Popular is your Paper An Empirical Study of the Citation Distribution[J]. Eur Phys. J. B 4,1998:131-134
[30] Adler R., Ewing J.,Taylor P.Citation statistics[J]. Statistical Science, 2009,24(1): 1-26.
[1] SHANG Lina, SONG Xiaolin. Research Progress in Digital Publishing of Academic Journals in China [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(7): 72-80.
[2] WANG Feifei, HAN Wenfei, SU Ziyao, YI Xinyue. Exploring the Academic Exchange among Countries along the "The Belt and Road": Bibliometrics Perspective of Highly Cited Papers [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(6): 94-106.
[3] GUO Lina, ZUO Wenge, ZHOU Qun. A bibliometric analysis of ESI highly cited papers from China and USA [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(5): 45-54.
[4] YU Yisheng, LIU Xinyan. Research on the Influence Evaluation of Altmetrics Hot Papers from the Perspective of Citation Indicators [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(5): 28-36.
[5] SONG Danhui. Analysis of Highly Cited Papers and Potential Highly Cited Papers in University Based on InCites and ESI——A Case Study of Shenzhen University [J]. , 2018, 30(7): 55-64.
[6] JIN Qiongqiong, BAO Yong, SUN Hongzhong, LIU Zushang, LU Yao, JIANG Dehui. Construction and Communication of Wechat Public Platform in Academic Journals [J]. , 2018, 30(6): 104-107.
[7] YANG Yuxia. Rational Analysis on Cooperation between Chinese Academic Journals and new Databases [J]. , 2017, 29(8): 151-153.
[8] LI Xiangmin, XU Su, CHEN Xin, TANG Xiaoyan, TAO Wenqi, WANG Changqun. Manuscript Handling Based on the Peer Review Comments:Cases Analysis [J]. , 2017, 29(12): 159-163.
[9] ZHAO Bing, GUO Caizheng, QIAN Jing. The Revelation of RSC Advances Publishing Mode on China's Academic Journals [J]. , 2017, 29(12): 156-158.
[10] WANG Ruixia, FEI Liwen. Analysis of Highly Cited Papers Published in ACTA EDULIS FUNGI in 2007-2016 [J]. , 2017, 29(12): 70-74.
[11] LI Xiangmin, XU Su, CHEN Xin, WANG Changqun, TANG Xiaoyan, TAO Wenqi. Academic Journals Editor Should Appropriately Handle Revised Manuscripts Which Have Been Peer-Reviewed [J]. , 2017, 29(10): 142-145.
[12] PAN Zhi-ping. The Role of Academic Journals in the Cultivation of Young Scientific and Technological Talents [J]. , 2016, 28(3): 144-146.
[13] XU Shi-yong, LI Qi-zheng, FU Ya-qin, ZHANG Zu-yao. A Personal Perspective of Reform and Development of University Journal under New Situations [J]. , 2015, 27(6): 135-138.
[14] ZHANG Juan, ZHANG Yi-min, LI Yun-xia, WANG Ning, SUN Lu-juan, WENG Ling-yun. Practice of Journal of Integrative Agriculture in new Developing Stage [J]. , 2015, 27(1): 136-140.
[15] National Library of China, Beijing 100081, China. Study on Chinese Newspaper Cataloging and Standardization [J]. , 2014, 26(3): 84-87.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!