农业图书情报学刊 ›› 2014, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (10): 153-156.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2014.10.039

• 信息教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

高校图书馆勤工助学考评制度反思

陶海柱   

  1. 中原工学院,河南 郑州 450007
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-23 出版日期:2014-10-05 发布日期:2014-09-16
  • 作者简介:陶海柱(1979-),男,硕士,助理馆员,研究方向:伦理学、图书馆学,发表论文7篇。

Reflection on the University Library’s Work-study Examination and Evaluation System

TAO Hai-zhu   

  1. Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China
  • Received:2014-04-23 Online:2014-10-05 Published:2014-09-16

摘要: 传统的高校图书馆勤工助学考评制度存在考评目标与手段相脱节,考评方式缺乏完整性和客观性、考评机制缺乏科学性等诸多弊端。完善勤工助学考评制度就必须确立正确的目标体系,建构科学的考评模式,采用合理的考评方式,形成健全、长效、稳定的考评机制。

关键词: 高校图书馆, 勤工助学, 考评制度

Abstract: Traditional work-study examination and evaluation system of university library has many disadvantages such as disjunction between target and means, lack of integrity and objectivity on examination and evaluation methods, lack of science on examination and evaluation mechanism. We must establish correct target system, construct the scientific examination and evaluation mode, use reasonable methods and form a sound, long-term and stable mechanism in order to improve the work-study examination and evaluation system.

Key words: University library

中图分类号: 

  • G251

引用本文

陶海柱. 高校图书馆勤工助学考评制度反思[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2014, 26(10): 153-156.

TAO Hai-zhu. Reflection on the University Library’s Work-study Examination and Evaluation System[J]. , 2014, 26(10): 153-156.