区域创新合作网络对企业技术创新绩效的影响研究——以长三角为例

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0390

农业图书情报学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 40-53.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0390

所属专题：计量与评价

区域创新合作网络对企业技术创新绩效的影响研究——以长三角为例

关鹏^1,2, 王曰芬², 黄钦¹, 叶龙生¹, 傅柱³

1.巢湖学院经济与法学学院,合肥 238000;
2.南京理工大学经济管理学院,南京 210094;
3.江苏科技大学经济管理学院,镇江 212003

收稿日期:2021-04-23 出版日期:2021-06-05 发布日期:2021-06-15
作者简介:关鹏（ORCID：0000-0002-2308-3019）,男,博士,副教授,研究方向为数据分析与知识发现、技术创新管理。王曰芬（ORCID：0000-0002-7143-7766）,女,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为信息分析与情报研究、网络信息管理、知识服务等。黄钦,女,硕士,讲师,研究方向为知识管理、高校思想政治教育。叶龙生,男,硕士,助教,研究方向为应用经济学。傅柱（ORCID：0000-0003-2250-7542）,男,博士,副教授,研究方向为知识工程
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“面向知识创新服务的数据科学理论与方法研究”（16DZA224）; 安徽省社科基金项目“专利合作视角下长三角地区企业技术创新合作网络对创新绩效的影响研究”（AHSKQ2020D23）; 安徽省高校人文社会科学重点项目“基于专利文本挖掘的区域创新合作网络构建及演化分析-以长三角城市群为例”（SK2019A0550）; 安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划重点项目“基于复杂网络理论的科学合作网络演化建模与仿真研究”（gxyqZD2019066）

Research on the Impact of Regional Innovation Cooperation Network on Technological Innovation Performance: Based on the Yangtze River Delta

GUAN Peng^1,2, WANG Yuefen², HUANG Qin¹, YE Longsheng¹, FU Zhu³

1. School of Economics and Law, Chaohu University, Hefei 238000;
2. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094;
3. School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science & Technology, Zhenjiang 212003;

Received:2021-04-23 Online:2021-06-05 Published:2021-06-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]在区域创新合作网络聚集系数和平均最短路径长度的调节作用下,分析企业在合作网络的中心性指标对企业技术创新绩效的影响,为企业技术创新管理提供依据。[方法/过程]利用专利数据构建区域创新合作网络,以企业在合作网络中的程度中心性和中介中心性作为自变量,以合作网络聚集系数和平均最短路径长度作为调节变量,构建影响企业技术创新绩效的理论模型。[结果/结论]以长三角地区集成电路技术领域参与专利合作的企业作为研究样本,使用逐步多元线性回归模型进行分析,结果表明：合作网络密度、企业技术创新积累、企业研发人员数量、企业所在省份R&D投入强度对企业技术创新绩效具有显著的正向影响;相比合作伙伴为企业和科研院所,当企业与高校合作时,越有利于企业的技术创新绩效;企业在合作网络的程度中心性和中介中心对企业技术创新绩效具有显著的正向影响;平均最短路径长度对中介中心性与企业技术创新绩效之间的关系调节作用显著,当平均最短路径长度越长时,中介中心性对企业技术创新绩效的正向影响越明显。通过实证分析揭示了区域创新合作网络对企业技术创新绩效的影响机制,企业在合作网络的位置（中心、中介）对技术创新绩效影响显著,合作网络的结构属性对这种影响具有明显的调节作用。针对分析结果,提出提升企业技术创新绩效的对策和建议。

关键词: 区域创新合作网络, 专利, 技术创新绩效, 集成电路, 长三角

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Based on the moderating effect of regional innovation cooperation network's clustering coefficient and average shortest path length, the paper analyzes the impact of enterprise centrality in network on technological innovation performance, in order to provide reference to enterprise innovation management. [Method/Process] Using patent data to construct patent cooperation networks, this paper builds a theoretical model measuring technological innovation performance of an enterprise, with degree centrality and betweenness centrality of the enterprise in the network as independent variables, with the clustering coefficient and average shortest path length of patent cooperation network as a moderator variable. [Results/Conclusions] The empirical study in the field of integrated circuit technology in the Yangtze River Delta is carried out and the stepwise multiple linear regression results show the following conclusions. The density of cooperation network, the accumulation of technological innovation, the number of R&D personnel, and the intensity of R&D investment in the province where the firm is located have a significant positive impact on the firm's technological innovation performance. Compared with enterprises and research institutes, when enterprises cooperate with universities, their technological innovation performance is more favorable. The degree centrality and the betweenness centrality of a firm in the cooperation network have a significant positive impact on the firm's technological innovation performance. The average shortest path length has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between intermediary centrality and firms' technological innovation performance. The longer the average shortest path length is, the more obvious the positive effect of intermediary centrality on firms' technological innovation performance is. Through the empirical analysis, the paper reveals the influence mechanism of regional innovation cooperation network on firms' technological innovation performance. The position (center, intermediary) of firms in the cooperation network has a significant influence on firms' technological innovation performance, and the structural attribute of the cooperation network has a significant moderating effect on this effect. Based on the analysis results, countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to improve the technological innovation performance of enterprises.

Key words: regional innovation cooperation network, patent, technological innovation performance, integrated circuit, the Yangtze River Delta

中图分类号:

关鹏, 王曰芬, 黄钦, 叶龙生, 傅柱. 区域创新合作网络对企业技术创新绩效的影响研究——以长三角为例[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(6): 40-53.

GUAN Peng, WANG Yuefen, HUANG Qin, YE Longsheng, FU Zhu. Research on the Impact of Regional Innovation Cooperation Network on Technological Innovation Performance: Based on the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(6): 40-53.

参考文献

[1] SZUCS F2018. Research subsidies, industry-university cooperation and innovation[J]. Research policy, 47(7): 1256-1266.
[2] 张振刚, 李云健, 袁斯帆, 等. 企业家社会资本、产学研合作与专利产出: 合作创新意愿的调节作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(7): 54-64.
ZHANG Z G, LI Y J, YUAN S F, et al.Study on the relationship between entrepreneurial social capital, industry-university-research cooperation and patent output: the moderating role of intention to cooperative innovation[J]. Science of science and management of S & T, 2016, 37(7): 54-64.
[3] 谢伟伟, 邓宏兵, 苏攀达. 长江中游城市群知识创新合作网络研究-高水平科研合著论文实证分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(16): 44-50.
XIE W W, DENG H B, SU P D.Research on knowledge innovation cooperation network in the middle reaches of the Yangtze river-evidence from high-level scientific research co-author papers[J]. Science & technology process and policy, 2019, 36(16): 44-50.
[4] 陈暮紫, 秦玉莹, 李楠. 跨区域知识流动和创新合作网络动态演化分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(12): 2252-2264.
CHEN M Z, QIN Y Y, LI N.Dynamic evolution analysis of cross-regional knowledge flow and innovation cooperation network[J].Studies in science of science, 2019, 37(12): 2252-2264.
[5] 宋潇. 成渝双城经济圈区域合作创新特征与网络结构演化[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(4): 61-67.
SONG X.Characteristics of regional cooperation innovation and evolution of network structure in Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle[J]. Soft science, 2021, 35(4): 61-67.
[6] JAFFE A, TRAJTENBERG M, FOGARTY M.Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors[J]. American economic review, 2000, 90(2): 215-218.
[7] 李万, 周小玲, 胡曙虹, 等. 世界级科技创新城市群: 长三角一体化与上海科创中心的共同抉择[J]. 智库理论与实践, 2018, 3(4): 94-100.
LI W, ZHOU X L, HU S H, et al.World-class urban agglomeration of science and technology: Common choice of the Yangtze river delta integration and shanghai science and technology center[J]. Think tank theory and practice, 2018, 3(4): 94-100.
[8] OZMAN M.Inter-firm networks and innovation: a survey of literature[J]. Economic of innovation and new technology, 2009, 18(1): 39-67.
[9] GRANOVETTER M.The strength of weak ties[J]. American journal of sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360.
[10] CANTNER U, GRAF H.The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis[J]. Research policy, 2006, 35(4): 463-480.
[11] LI D, WEI Y D, WANG T.Spatial and temporal evolution of urban innovation network in China[J]. Habitat international, 2015, 49: 484-496.
[12] 谢其军. 技术创新合作网络对滞后区域创新绩效的影响研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2018.
XIE Q J.Research on influence of technological cooperation net-work on the innovation performance of lagging-behind regions[D]. Hefei: University of science and technology of China, 2018.
[13] SCHILLING M A, PHELPS C C.Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation[J]. Management science, 2007, 53(7): 1113-1126.
[14] TAKAGI S, TOYAMA R.On growth of network and centrality's change analysis of co-inventors network in enterprise[C]. World summit on knowledge society, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008: 422-427.
[15] NERKAR A, PARUCHURI S.Evolution of R & D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm[J]. Management science, 2005, 51(5): 771-785.
[16] 迟嘉昱, 孙翎, 杨晓华. 网络结构、地理接近性对企业专利合作的影响机制研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(16): 144-149.
CHI J Y, SUN L, YANG X H.An study on the influencing mecha-nism of network structure, geographic proximity on firms' patent cooperation[J]. Science and technology management research, 2018, 38(16): 144-149.
[17] FLEMING L, MINGO S, CHEN D.Collaborative brokerage, genera-tive creativity, and creative success[J]. Adminis-trative science quarterly, 2007, 52(3): 443-475.
[18] 唐建荣, 李晨瑞, 倪攀. 长三角城市群创新网络结构及其驱动因素研究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2018(11): 63-76.
TANG J R, LI C R, NI P.Research on innovation network structure and driving factors of the Yangtze river delta urban agglomeration[J]. Shanghai economic research, 2018(11): 63-76.
[19] 王海花, 孙芹, 杜梅, 等. 长三角城市群协同创新网络演化及形成机制研究-依存型多层网络视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(9): 69-78.
WANG H H, SUN Q, DU M, et al.Research on the evolution trend and mechanism of collaborative innovation network in the Yangtze river delta-The perspective of interdependent network[J]. Science & technology process and policy, 2020, 37(9): 69-78.
[20] 殷德生, 吴虹仪, 金桩. 创新网络、知识溢出与高质量一体化发展-来自长江三角洲城市群的证据[J]. 上海经济研究, 2019(11): 30-45.
YIN D S, WU H Y, JIN Z.Innovation networks, knowledge spillover and high-quality integrated development: An empirical study based on the urban agglomeration of the Yangtze river delta[J]. Shanghai economic research, 2019(11): 30-45.
[21] 解学梅, 左蕾蕾. 企业协同创新网络特征与创新绩效: 基于知识吸收能力的中介效应研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2013, 16(3): 47-56.
XIE X M, ZUO L L.Characteristics of collaborative innovation networks and innovation performance of firms: The mediating effect of knowledge absorptive capacity[J]. Nankai management review, 2013, 16(3): 47-56.
[22] 胡艳, 潘婷, 张桅. 一体化国家战略下长三角城市群协同创新的经济增长效应研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 51(5): 99-106, 239.
HU Y, PAN T, ZHANG W.On the economic growth effect of the coordinated innovation of the Yangtze river delta urban agglomera-tion under the integrated national strategy[J]. Journal of east China normal university(humanities and social sciences), 2019, 51(5): 99-106, 239.
[23] 王文霄. 从集成电路领域中国专利状况看“中国芯”的发展前景[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2015(7): 29-34.
WANG W X.Viewing the development prospect of "China chip" from the status of Chinese patents in the field of integrated circuits[J]. Inventions and patents in China, 2015(7): 29-34.
[24] GUAN J, ZUO K, CHEN K, et al.Does country-level R & D efficiency benefit from the collaboration network structure?[J].Research policy, 2016, 45(4): 770-784.
[25] BURT R S.The network structure of social capital[J]. Research in organizational behavior, 2000, 22(22): 345-423.
[26] 吴江. 社会网络的动态分析与仿真实验-理论与应用[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2012: 43-52.
WU J.Dynamic analysis and simulation of social networks-theory and applications[M]. Wuhan: Wuhan university press, 2012: 43-52.
[27] YAMAGUCHI K.The flow of information through social networks: Diagonal-free measures of inefficiency and the structural determinants of inefficiency[J]. Social networks, 1994, 16(1): 57-86.
[28] 吴慧, 顾晓敏. 产学研合作创新绩效的社会网络分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(10): 1578-1586.
WU H, GU X M.Social network analysis of innovation performance of industry-university-research cooperation[J]. Studies in science of science, 2017, 35(10): 1578-1586.
[29] TONG X, FRAME J D.Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data[J]. Research policy, 1994, 23: 133-141.
[30] BEAUDRY C, SCHIFFAUEROVA A.Impacts of collaboration and network indicators on patent quality: The case of Canadian nanotechnology innovation[J]. European management journal, 2011, 29(5): 362-376.
[31] ZEEBROECK N V, POTTERIE B V.Filing strategies and patent value[J]. Economics of innovation & new technology, 2011, 20(6821): 539-561.
[32] BLUNDELL R, GRIFFITH R, VAN REENEN J, et al.Dynamic count data models of technological innovation[J]. The economic journal, 1994, 105(429): 333-344.
[33] 何晓群. 应用回归分析[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2017: 156-158.
HE X Q.Applied regression analysis[M]. Beijing: Electronic industry press, 2017: 156-158.
[34] CHEN Y, JAW Y.How do business groups' small world networks effect diversification, innovation, and internationalization?[J]. Asia pacific journal of management, 2014, 31(4): 1019-1044.

区域创新合作网络对企业技术创新绩效的影响研究——以长三角为例

Research on the Impact of Regional Innovation Cooperation Network on Technological Innovation Performance: Based on the Yangtze River Delta

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	夏冬, 徐英祺, 王超, 任波. 科技查新精准化的挑战及对策研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(7): 88-97.
[2]	孟静, 唐研. 全球小麦遗传育种专利技术分析与研究进展[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(6): 93-103.
[3]	廖思琴, 周宇. 中国高校图书馆专利信息服务现状与思考——以23所首批高校知识产权信息服务中心为例[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(2): 63-74.
[4]	程兴茹, 康宇立, 孟子云, 李楠, 唐巧玲, 王友华. 基于全球专利的Bt抗虫基因研发态势分析与展望[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(11): 81-91.
[5]	许轶, 李婧, 许海云, 李姝影. 基于专利动态特征的技术转移潜力识别研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(6): 107-115.
[6]	曾金晶, 刘田, 张锐. 面向专利供应链的高校图书馆专利信息服务策略[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(5): 40-50.
[7]	李蕾, 宋俭宁, 宋天华. 基于创新网络社区主题发现和S曲线的技术预测[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(4): 45-57.
[8]	武庆圆, 赵思迪. 不同引证主体的专利引文实证比较研究——以5G通信技术领域为例[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(3): 16-27.
[9]	李新. 中国专利情报视角下的中日RV减速机专利技术研究现状与发展态势对标研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(2): 5-11.
[10]	范九江, 李睿. 专利视角下中国与新加坡技术竞争与合作态势分析[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(2): 12-23.
[11]	向姝璇, 李睿. 马来西亚与中国相互注册的专利信息对比分析[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(2): 24-34.
[12]	唐晗, 李睿. 基于A 类专利引文分析的中国和印度创新合作机会发现[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(2): 35-43.
[13]	张瀚东, 李睿. 中国与波兰的专利竞合态势分析[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(2): 44-53.
[14]	冯劭华, 昝栋, 苏菊, 张展. 专利视角下全球海洋水产饲料领域发展特征分析与启示[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(12): 71-82.
[15]	孙艺伟, 任妮, 郭婷, 戴红君. 设施畜牧业关键技术研究态势分析[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(10): 87-97.