中国科技查新服务评价研究述评

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0366

农业图书情报学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 16-27.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0366

中国科技查新服务评价研究述评

夏冬¹, 徐英祺¹, 王超^2,3, 李蓓^4,*

1.中国科学院成都文献情报中心,成都 610000;
2.齐鲁工业大学（山东省科学院）,济南 250000;
3.山东省科学院情报研究所,济南 250000;
4.中南大学生命科学学院,长沙 410000

收稿日期:2021-05-11 出版日期:2021-11-05 发布日期:2021-12-03
通讯作者: ^*李蓓（ORCID：0000-0002-4185-1077）,女,副教授,研究方向为信息资源管理、医疗大数据。Email：libeiwu@126.com
作者简介:夏冬（ORCID：0000-0001-7538-3964）,男,馆员,研究方向为科技查新与科技服务。徐英祺（ORCID：0000-0003-3139-1721）,男,馆员,研究方向为科技政策评价、科技信息服务。王超（ORCID：0000-0003-0287-7730）,男,助理研究员,研究方向为科技与产业情报分析
基金资助:
四川省省级科技计划项目“基于PP-SFA和SDEM模型的四川省五大经济区创新协作发展研究”（2020JDR0011）; 中国科学院成都文献情报中心主任基金青年项目“网络环境下的科技查新机构服务质量评价模型构建研究”（Y9Z0010407）

Review of the Evaluation of Scientific and Technical Novelty Search Service in China

XIA Dong¹, XU Yingqi¹, WANG Chao^2,3, LI Bei^4,*

1. Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610000;
2. Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014;
3. Institute of Information Research, Shandong Academy of Sciences, Jinan 250014;
4. Department of Bio-information, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha 410000

Received:2021-05-11 Online:2021-11-05 Published:2021-12-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]针对中国科技查新服务评价的现状及特点进行研究,并提出中国科技查新服务评价的建议。[方法/过程]基于科技查新服务体系的视角,采用内容分析法,选取评价主客体、评价指标体系、评价方法及实证研究5方面,分析当前国内科技查新服务评价研究现状和存在的问题。[结果/结论]中国科技查新服务评价存在评价客体概念混淆、缺乏定量评价指标体系标准、忽视服务效能评价、未探讨评价后科技查新发展问题的问题,并提出厘清概念及其内涵边界,建立顶层指标体系标准,推行内外二元评价机制,契合需求注重细化发展的对策。

关键词: 科技查新, 评价, 学科服务

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This paper aims at discussing the current situation and characteristics of the scientific and technical novelty search evaluation, and putting forward suggestions for the research. [Method/Process] We analyze the research status and problems of the domestic scientific and technical novelty search evaluation from the aspects of evaluation subject and object, evaluation index system, evaluation methods, and empirical research through the literature content analysis method. [Results/Conclusions] It is found that there are some problems in the evaluation of scientific and technical novelty search in China, such as fuzzy and confused evaluation objects, a lack of quantitative evaluation indicator system and standard, , neglect of evaluation of the service efficiency, and a lack of discussion of the development of scientific and technical search after evaluation. Finally, some suggestions for future research are put forward, such as clarifying the evaluation object and its concept boundary, designing the top-level index system guided by efficiency, implementing the internal and external dual evaluation mechanism, and meeting the needs and focusing on detailed development.

Key words: scientific and technical novelty search, evaluation, subject service

中图分类号:

G254

夏冬, 徐英祺, 王超, 李蓓. 中国科技查新服务评价研究述评[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(11): 16-27.

XIA Dong, XU Yingqi, WANG Chao, LI Bei. Review of the Evaluation of Scientific and Technical Novelty Search Service in China[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(11): 16-27.

参考文献

[1] 曹姝, 刘伟, 陈婷, 等. 基于综合评价推动科技查新创新发展[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2017, 26(1): 68-70.
CAO SH, LIU W, CHEN T, et al.Promoting innovative development of scientific literature novelty assessment based on comprehensive evaluation[J]. Chinese journal of medical library and information science, 2017, 26(1): 68-70.
[2] 任珩, 王晓媛, 王君兰, 等. 我国科技查新机构的发展态势及转型思考[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(6): 65-70.
REN H, WANG X Y, WANG J L, et al.Thoughts on the develop-ment situation and transformation of Chinese sci-tech novelty search institutions[J]. Information studies: Theory & application, 2019, 42(6): 65-70.
[3] 夏冬, 文庭孝, 谢黎, 等. 我国一级科技查新咨询机构发展现状网络调查及对策研究[J]. 图书情报导刊, 2019, 4(9): 15-21.
XIA D, WEN T X, XIE L, et al.Investigation and countermeasure research on the development status of the first-level scientific & technological novelty retrieval institutions in China[J]. Journal of library and information science, 2019, 4(9): 15-21.
[4] 林芳. 国内公共数字文化服务评价研究述评[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(15): 146-152.
LIN F.Review on the current situation of domestic public digital culture service evaluation[J]. Library and information service, 2017, 61(15): 146-152.
[5] 孙清玉, 陈刚. “全评价”体系在科技查新质量评价中的应用研究[J]. 河北工程大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 32(1): 41-43.
SUN Q Y, CHEN G.Research on all-around evaluation system in the sci-tech novelty retrieval quality[J]. Journal of Hebei university of engineering (social science edition), 2015, 32(1): 41-43.
[6] GB/T 32003-2015. 科技查新技术规范B/T 32003-2015. 科技查新技术规范[S]. 2016.
GB/T 32003-2015. Specification of scientific and technical novelty searchB/T 32003-2015. Specification of scientific and technical novelty search[S]. 2016.
[7] 谢新洲, 柯贤能, 滕跃, 等. 科技查新机构评价指标体系研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2009, 53(12): 13-16.
XIE X Z, KE X N, TENG Y, et al.Research on the evaluation in-dex system of S & T novelty search institutes[J]. Library and infor-mation service, 2009, 53(12): 13-16.
[8] 赵桂英, 史蕴萍, 王秋艳, 等. 吉林省医药卫生科技查新项目分析与情报学评估[J]. 现代情报, 2005(10): 212-214.
ZHAO G Y, SHI Y P, WANG Q Y, et al.Analysis and information science evaluation of Jilin province medicine and health science and technology novelty retrieval projects[J]. Journal of modern information, 2005(10): 212-214.
[9] 王汝宽, 刘俊立, 马智, 等. 卫生部医药卫生科技项目查新咨询工作考核评估指标体系及其实施研究[J]. 医学情报工作, 2001(3): 1-7.
WANG R K, LIU J L, MA Z, et al.Research on the evaluation index system and implementation of scientific and technical novelty search of the ministry of health's medicine and health technology project[J]. Journal of medical intelligence, 2001(3): 1-7.
[10] 王子珍, 李燕群. 基于动态平衡计分卡的科技查新绩效评价研究[J]. 上海高校图书情报工作研究, 2014, 24(3): 47-49.
WANG Z Z, LI Y Q.Research on performance evaluation of scientific and technical novelty search based on dynamic balance scorecard[J]. Research on library & information work of Shanghai colleges & universities, 2014, 24(3): 47-49.
[11] 张伟聪. 教育部科技查新工作站绩效评价研究[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2014(1): 21-24.
ZHANG W C.Research on performance evaluation of scientific and technical novelty search workstation of ministry of education[J]. Li-brary theory and practice, 2014(1): 21-24.
[12] 黄宗坊. 查新咨询报告质量的综合评价——附50份查新报告质量试评分析[J]. 医学情报工作, 1992(5): 28-30.
HUANG Z F.Comprehensive evaluation of the quality of novelty search consulting reports - With an analysis of the quality of 50 novelty search reports[J]. Journal of medical intelligence, 1992(5): 28-30.
[13] 姚宝卿. 成果查新报告质量评价法初探[J]. 情报学刊, 1992(5): 364-367.
YAO B Q.A preliminary study on the quality evaluation method of achievement novelty search report[J]. Technology and market, 1992(5): 364-367.
[14] 陆海红, 朴春梅. 科技查新报告质量评价主要指标研究[J]. 中国科技信息, 2014(z1): 203-204.
LU H H, PU C M.Research on the main indexes of the quality evaluation of sci-tech novelty search[J]. China science and technology information, 2014(z1): 203-204.
[15] 黄瑞敏. 网络信息检索策略优化机制实证研究——基于查新质量评价因素分析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2010, 30(1): 65-67.
HUANG R M.Empirical research on optimizating mechanism of web information retrieval strategy - Based on analysis of novelty quality evaluation factors[J]. Library tribune, 2010, 30(1): 65-67.
[16] 张凌, 肖鲁, 原振秋, 等. 空军医药卫生科技查新工作指标综合评价[J]. 航空军医, 2002(3): 103-108.
ZHANG L, XIAO L, YUAN Z Q, et al.Comprehensive evaluation of air force medical and health science and technology novelty search indicators[J]. Flight surgeon, 2002(3): 103-108.
[17] 邱戌旦, 杜娟. 医药卫生查新项目中有关新颖性评价的若干问题[J]. 医学信息学杂志, 2008(6): 73-74.
QIU X D, DU J.Several issues related to novelty evaluation in medical and health novelty search projects[J]. Journal of medical informatics, 2008(6): 73-74.
[18] 杨丽莉, 王丽娜, 高琴, 等. 影响查新课题新颖性评价的人为因素[J]. 中华医学科研管理杂志, 2002(2):52-53.
YANG L L, WANG L N, GAO Q, et al.Human factors affecting the novelty evaluation of novelty search subjects[J]. Chinese journal of medical science research management, 2002(2): 52-53.
[19] 汪媛, 马瑞敏. 科技查新报告的质量评价模型[J]. 图书馆研究与工作, 2017(8): 58-60.
WANG Y, MA R M.On the quality evaluation model of sci-tech novelty retrieval reports[J]. Library science resarch & work, 2017(8): 58-60.
[20] 张静. 抽样方法在查新报告质量评估中的应用[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2017, 29(5): 107-109.
ZHANG J.Application of sampling method in quality evaluation of novelty report[J]. Journal of library and information sciences in agriculture, 2017, 29(5): 107-109.
[21] 曹姝, 马慧, 吴曙霞, 等. 科技查新报告复核评估的组织与管理[J]. 实用医药杂志, 2013, 30(3): 272-273.
CAO S, MA H, WU S X, et al.Organization and management of review and evaluation of sci-tech novelty retrieval report[J]. Practical journal of medicine & pharmacy, 2013, 30(3): 272-273.
[22] 王芸凤, 张仁琼. 基于熵权法的科技查新报告质量评价与提升策略研究[J]. 情报科学, 2012, 30(11): 1658-1661.
WANG Y F, ZHANG R Q.Study of quality assessment and promotion strategy of science and technology novelty retrieval report based on entropy method[J]. Information science, 2012, 30(11): 1658-1661.
[23] 连丽艳, 李杨, 张静. 基于神经网络的查新报告质量评价方法[J]. 中国科技信息, 2011(7): 195-197.
LIAN L Y, LI Y, ZHANG J.A quality evaluation method on novelty retrieval reports based on neural network[J]. China science and technology information, 2011(7): 195-197.
[24] 曹姝, 吴曙霞. 医药卫生科技查新机构评价指标分析[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2016, 25(5): 46-48.
CAO S, WU S X.Criteria for evaluation of medical and health lit-erature novelty assessment institutions[J]. Chinese journal of medi-cal library and information science, 2016, 25(5): 46-48.
[25] 曹姝, 吴曙霞, 郑力, 等. 军队医药卫生科技查新机构评价指标体系的构建[J]. 军事医学, 2014, 38(4): 305-308.
CAO S, WU S X, ZHENG L, et al.Construction of evaluation index system for military medical novelty retrieval organizations[J]. Mili-tary medical sciences, 2014, 38(4): 305-308.
[26] 夏蕾. 基于结构效度分析的查新机构评价指标体系优化研究[J]. 现代情报, 2011, 31(9): 41-43.
XIA L.Optimization research on indicators system in novelty search institutions based on structure validity analyse[J]. Journal of modern information, 2011, 31(9): 41-43.
[27] 李琼. 查新机构评价初探[J]. 科技情报开发与经济, 2010, 20(18): 122-124.
LI Q.Probe into the evaluation on novelty checking institutions[J]. Journal of library and information science, 2010, 20(18): 122-124.
[28] 温玉琼. 高校科技查新工作发展现状与服务拓展[J]. 甘肃科技, 2019, 35(5): 72-74.
WEN Y Q.The development status and service expansion of university sci-tech novelty search work[J]. Gansu science and technology, 2019, 35(5): 72-74.
[29] 武茹, 黄继东. 高校图书馆科技查新工作站的信息服务调查与思考[J]. 图书馆学刊, 2016, 38(9): 73-77.
WU R, HUANG J D.Investigation and thinking on information service of sci-tech novelty retrieval workstation of university library[J]. Journal of library science, 2016, 38(9): 73-77.
[30] 刘岩, 杜化荣, 何有琴, 等. 医学科技查新工作定量评价研究[J]. 医学信息学杂志, 2010, 31(1): 51-54.
LIU Y, DU H R, HE Y Q, et al.Research on quantitative evaluation of novelty retrieval of medical science and technology[J]. Journal of medical informatics, 2010, 31(1): 51-54.
[31] 夏蕾. 基于BP网络的查新工作人员服务质量评价研究[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2011, 23(9): 182-185.
XIA L.Study on quality evaluation of novelty search based on BP NNS[J]. Journal of library and information sciences in agriculture, 2011, 23(9): 182-185.
[32] 刘国俊, 冀妍, 于金海. 基于平衡计分卡的科技查新工作个人评价体系[J]. 价值工程, 2012, 31(13): 285-286.
LIU G J, JI Y, YU J H.A personal index system for novelty search performance evaluation based on balanced scorecard[J]. Value engineering, 2012, 31(13): 285-286.
[33] 韦彤. 科技查新客户评价体系及其应用[J]. 情报探索, 2015(7): 76-79.
WEI T.Sci-tech novelty search customer evaluation system and its application[J]. Information research, 2015(7): 76-79.
[34] 梅梅, 唐小利, 张玢, 等. 大数据环境下科技查新用户深层次精准服务推荐构想[J]. 医学信息学杂志, 2016, 37(6): 78-82.
MEI M, TANG X L, ZHANG F, et al.Concept of deeplevel and precise service recommendation for users of sei-tech novelty re-trieval in the environment of big data[J]. Journal of medical infor-matics, 2016, 37(6): 78-82.
[35] 李广利, 孔素然. 基于结构方程模型的科技查新用户满意度指标体系构建[J]. 情报探索, 2015(2): 31-33.
LI G L, KONG S R.Construction of evaluation indicator system of user satisfaction for sci-tech novelty retrieval basing on structure equation model[J]. Information research, 2015(2): 31-33.
[36] 李广利. 科技查新用户满意度影响因素分析[J]. 现代情报, 2014, 34(10): 162-165.
LI G L.Factor analysis of user satisfaction in sci-tech novelty search[J]. Journal of modern information, 2014, 34(10): 162-165.
[37] 马宏惠, 王家骥. 高校科技查新用户信息需求分析及服务模式探讨[J]. 情报探索, 2014(7): 79-82.
MA H H, WANG J J.On information demand of sci-tech novelty retrieval users and service mode in university[J]. Information research, 2014(7): 79-82.
[38] 连丽艳, 张静. 实施科技查新服务质量管理初探[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2018, 50(3): 102-109.
LIAN L Y, ZHANG J.Preliminary study on the implementation of scientific and technical novelty search service quality management[J]. China science & technology resources review, 2018, 50(3): 102-109.
[39] 蒋丽敏. 科技查新机构服务质量评价实证分析——以河南大学科技查新站(z16)为例[J]. 创新科技, 2016(2): 39-41.
JIANG L M.Empirical analysis on service quality evaluation of sci-tech novelty retrieval organization - A case study of Henan university sci-tech novelty retrieval station (z16)[J]. Innovation science and technology, 2016(2): 39-41.
[40] 罗臻, 张颖. 医学科技查新质量评价指标体系研究[J]. 江苏科技信息, 2020, 37(27): 24-26.
LUO Z, ZHANG Y.Research on the quality evaluation index system of medical sci-tech novelty search[J]. Jiangsu science & technology information, 2020, 37(27): 24-26.
[41] 孙会清, 邱利. 科技查新质量评价指标体系的量化研究[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济, 2015(12):137-138.
SUN H Q, QIU L.Quantitative research on the evaluation index sys-tem of sci-tech novelty retrieval quality[J]. Inner Mongolia science technology & economy, 2015(12): 137-138.
[42] 化明艳, 高月, 郭雪清. 基于灰色理论的科技查新质量评价指标体系构建[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2013, 22(7): 53-58.
HUA M Y, GAO Y, GUO X Q.Construction of grey theory-based nov-elty assessment index system for scientific literature[J]. Chinese jour-nal of medical library and information science, 2013, 22(7): 53-58.
[43] 王世雯, 肖雯. 查新报告质量的评价体系研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2010, 33(6): 94-97.
WANG S W, XIAO W.Research on the quality evaluation system of novelty checking report[J]. Information studies: Theory & appli-cation, 2010, 33(6): 94-97.
[44] 黄卓泳, 石芸. 基于BSC理论的地方科技查新机构的绩效评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2015, 44(10): 1423-1424.
HUANG Z Y, SHI Y.Research on the construction of performance evaluation index system of local sci-tech novelty search institutions based on BSC theory[J]. Chongqing medicine, 2015, 44(10): 1423-1424.
[45] 夏蕾. 基于自适应直觉模糊推理的查新站质量评价方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(18): 40-43.
XIA L.Research on quality evaluation in novelty search institutions based on adaptive intuitionistic fuzzy reasoning[J]. Library and in-formation service, 2010, 54(18): 40-43.
[46] 张静, 王克奇. 基于AHP-模糊数学的科技查新质量评价研究[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2011, 23(11): 16-19.
ZHANG J, WANG K Q.Research on the quality evaluation of sci-tech novelty retrieval based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy mathematics[J]. Journal of library and information sciences in agriculture, 2011, 23(11): 16-19.
[47] 刘小溪, 董斌, 胡璐璐, 等. 基于WBS分解的科技查新新颖性量化评价体系研究[J]. 科技与创新, 2019(21): 121-123.
LIU X X, DONG B, HU L L, et al.Research on quantitative evaluation system of novelty of science and technology novelty retrieval based on WBS decomposition[J]. Science and technology & innovation, 2019(21): 121-123.
[48] 张群, 朱治军. 基于支持向量机的社科查新工作指标体系评价[J]. 情报科学, 2014, 32(7): 66-69.
ZHANG Q, ZHU Z J.Evaluation of the working index system of social science's novelty search based on support vector machine[J]. Information science, 2014, 32(7): 66-69.
[49] 丁德臣. 杂合DEA和SOM的科技查新质量评价研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(8): 46-50.
DING D C.Hybrid DEA and SOM for a research on sci-tech novel-ty retrieval quality evaluation[J]. Library and information service, 2010, 54(8): 46-50.
[50] 席庆奎, 张彬, 陈永忠, 等. 基于AHP法的查新站工作质量评估体系[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2013(8): 36-37.
XI Q K, ZHANG B, CHEN Y Z.The work quality evaluation system of novelty search station based on AHP method[J]. Library theory and practice, 2013(8): 36-37.
[51] 侯林丽. 基于模糊综合评价方法的科技查新质量可靠性分析[J]. 情报科学, 2011, 29(9): 1318-1321.
HOU L L.Reliability analysis on sci-tech novelty retrieval quality based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Information science,2011, 29(9): 1318-1321.
[52] 何晓萍, 马巧花. 基于模糊AHP综合评价的科技查新质量评价实证分析[J]. 图书情报工作网刊, 2011(6): 7-13.
HE X P, MA Q H.An empirical analysis of the quality evaluation of sci-tech novelty retrieval based on fuzzy AHP comprehensive evaluation[J]. Library and information service online, 2011(6): 7-13.
[53] 宋乐平. 基于BSC和AHP的高校科技查新站绩效评估模型构建[J]. 情报科学, 2011, 29(8): 1221-1225.
SONG L P.Construction of performance evaluation model of university sci-tech novelty retrieval station based on BSC and AHP[J]. Information science, 2011, 29(8): 1221-1225.
[54] 王芸凤, 张仁琼. 改进的层次分析法在科技查新质量评价中的应用[J]. 情报探索, 2010(7): 74-76.
WANG Y F, ZHANG R Q.Application of improved analytic hierarchy process in quality evaluation of sci-tech novelty retrieval[J]. Information research, 2010(7): 74-76.
[55] 刘燕. 基于智能信息方法的科技查新质量评价研究[J]. 科技情报开发与经济, 2015, 25(11): 74-76.
LIU Y.Study on sci-tech novelty retrieval quality evaluation based on intelligent information method[J]. Sci-tech information development & economy, 2015, 25(11): 74-76.
[56] 孙清玉. 科技查新质量评价指标体系探讨[J]. 情报科学, 2009, 27(5): 743-746.
SUN Q Y.Discussion on the architecture of sci-tech novelty re-trieval quality evaluation indicators system[J]. Information science, 2009, 27(5): 743-746.
[57] 蒋丽敏. 科技查新服务质量评价研究[J]. 兰台世界, 2016(6): 154-155.
JIANG L M.Research on the evaluation of sci-tech novelty retrieval service quality[J]. Lantai world, 2016(6): 154-155.
[58] 周旭毓, 李文红, 罗淑莲. 系统评价方法及其对查新咨询工作的启发和借鉴[J]. 情报科学, 2002(4): 357-359.
ZHOU X Y, LI W H, LUO S L.Systematic reviews and enlighten-ing on the novelty-checking and inquiry[J]. Information science, 2002(4): 357-359.
[59] 杨传瑞. 查新咨询质量评价指标体系研究——指标体系的主因素及其约束[J]. 医学情报工作, 2001(5): 51-53.
YANG C R.Research on the index system of novelty search consultation quality evaluation - The main factors and constraints of the index system[J]. Journal of medical intelligence, 2001(5): 51-53.
[60] 杨勇, 张建中. 科技查新质量评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2010(5): 71-74.
YANG Y, YANG J Z.Research on the architecture of sci-tech novelty retrieval quality evaluation index system[J]. Research on library science, 2010(5): 71-74.
[61] 张立昆, 季叶克. 科技查新质量三维评价体系研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(4): 160-163.
ZHANG L K, JI Y K.A study on three-dimensional system of nov-elty retrieval evaluation model[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2016, 35(4): 160-163.
[62] 严栋, 顾立志, 李凡, 等. OAT三维度科技查新质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 四川图书馆学报, 2016(6): 36-39.
YAN D, GU L Z, LI F, et al.Construction of the quality evaluation index system in scientific and technological novelty searching based on three dimensions of OAT[J]. Journal of the library science society of Sichuan, 2016(6): 36-39.
[63] 国务院. 国务院关于加快科技服务业发展的若干意见[EB/OL]. [2020-02-18]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-10/28/content_9173.htm.
The State Council. Opinions of the state council on accelerating the development of science and technology service industry[EB/OL]. [2020-02-18]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-10/28/content_9173.htm.
[64] 张薇, 辛一, 李鹏. 科研鉴证:新形势下科技查新转型发展的方向——以陕西省科学技术情报研究院为例[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2018, 50(6): 42-47.
ZHANG W, XIN Y, LI P.Scientific research verification: Deliberation on the new definition of scientific and technical novelty search under the new situation, by Shaanxi institute of science and technology information as an example[J]. China information review, 2018, 50(6): 42-47.
[65] 国务院. 关于加快构建现代公共文化服务体系的意见[EB/OL]. [2020-02-08]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-01/14/content_2804250.htm.
The State Council. Opinions on accelerating the construction of modern public cultural service system[EB/OL]. [2020-02-18]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-10/28/content_9173.htm.
[66] 曹燕. 2017年全国科技查新工作交流会在哈举行[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2017, 49(4): 54.
CAO Y.2017 national sci-tech novelty retrieval exchange meeting held in Wenzhou[J]. China information review, 2017, 49(4): 54.
[67] 曹燕. 2018年全国科技查新工作交流会在温州举行[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2019, 51(1): 112.
CAO Y.2018 national sci-tech novelty retrieval exchange meeting held in Wenzhou[J]. China information review, 2019, 51(1): 112.
[68] 2019年全国科技查新工作交流会在柳州举行[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2020, 52(1): 112.
2019 national sci-tech novelty retrieval exchange meeting held in liuzhou[J]. China information review, 2020, 52(1): 112.

中国科技查新服务评价研究述评

Review of the Evaluation of Scientific and Technical Novelty Search Service in China

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张文君. 基于区块链的学术币流通系统构想[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(8): 42-51.
[2]	肖诗依, 文庭孝. 互联网环境下高校评价变革及实现路径研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(7): 98-106.
[3]	夏冬, 徐英祺, 王超, 任波. 科技查新精准化的挑战及对策研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(7): 88-97.
[4]	马蕴哲, 崔旭, 张小艺. 常态化疫情防控背景下24小时自助图书馆服务质量评价体系研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(3): 68-80.
[5]	万昊, 张福俊, 吕千千. 基于DEA超效率验证的项目同行评议结果有效性研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(2): 88-101.
[6]	石红青. 中国科技期刊的发展成就与建设世界一流科技期刊的目标和路径分析[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(7): 54-62.
[7]	杨思洛, 田沛霖, 朱传宇, 邱均平. 联合国教科文组织的人文社科研究特征：主题、演化与合作[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(6): 6-17.
[8]	李非凡, 刘彩娥, 李永芳. 高校科研绩效与学科发展潜力评价方法的研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(4): 68-77.
[9]	孟银涛, 赵蕾霞, 于倩倩. 面向科学数据保存的科学数据评价指标体系研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(12): 48-59.
[10]	袁庆莉, 杨思洛. 高职院校图书馆学科服务现状调查与提升对策——以56所中国特色高水平高职院校为例[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(12): 60-70.
[11]	兰雪, 韩毅. Altmetrics评价视域下社会化阅读平台图书评分数据可用性研究——以豆瓣读书为例[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(11): 74-82.
[12]	杨以明, 张兴龙, 张红岩, 郭春阳. 高校图书馆智慧环境下馆员能力评价研究——基于层次分析法和理想点法[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(11): 83-94.
[13]	刘倩, 郑思佳, 桂晨珺, 汪雪锋. 破“四唯”和“唯SCI”政策的学者评论分析[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(10): 46-58.
[14]	廖球. 有中国特色的高校学科评估体系构建研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(10): 59-68.
[15]	苏云梅, 武建光. 图书馆电子资源绩效评价影响因子模型构建及实证研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(10): 98-107.