图书馆电子资源绩效评价影响因子模型构建及实证研究

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.20-1055

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]通过构建新的电子资源绩效评价影响因子模型,并量化各个因子的影响路径权值系数,旨在优化电子资源绩效评价体系,建立更完善、更合理的资源评价权值量表系统,促进图书馆电子资源的高效、合理采购。[方法/过程]基于EQUINOX、ARL E-metrics两项重要测评体系,首先提炼出电子资源绩效测评所围绕、依据的资源传输系统,并定义、细化了影响因子及绩效评价的测量维度;利用实证分析构建电子资源绩效评价影响因子模型,并量化影响因子的路径权值。[结果/结论]研究和探明了电子资源绩效评价的影响因子,构建了一个更加科学、综合的图书馆电子资源绩效评价影响因子模型,讨论性地提出提高绩效评价的针对性建议。

关键词: 电子资源, 绩效评价, 测评指标, 影响因子, 因子模型

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] By building a new model of influencing factors of E-resource performance evaluation and quantifying the influence path weight coefficient of each factor, the purpose of this study is to optimize the performance evaluation system of electronic resources, establish an improved and reasonable resource evaluation weight scale system, and promote the efficient and reasonable procurement of electronic resources in libraries. [Method/Process] Based on two important evaluation systems, EQUINOX and ARL E-metrics, the resource transmission system around and based on the performance evaluation of electronic resources is established, and the measurement dimensions of influencing factors and performance evaluation are defined and refined; the influencing factors model of E-resource performance evaluation is constructed by empirical analysis and the path weights of influencing factors are quantified. [Results/Conclusions] The influencing factors of E-resource performance evaluation are studied and verified, and a more scientific and comprehensive model of influencing factors of Eresource performance evaluation in libraries is constructed, and the suggestions for improving performance evaluation are put forward.

Key words: electronic resources, performance evaluation, evaluation indicators, impact factor, factor model

中图分类号:

G250.7

苏云梅, 武建光. 图书馆电子资源绩效评价影响因子模型构建及实证研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(10): 98-107.

SU Yunmei, WU Jianguang. The Model Construction and Empirical Research on the Influencing Factors of Library Electronic Resources Performance Evaluation[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(10): 98-107.

参考文献

[1] 齐春泽. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的高校图书馆电子资源绩效评价[J]. 现代情报, 2014(4): 54-57.
QI C Z.Performance evaluation of university library electronic resources based on entropy weight TOPSIS method[J]. Journal of modern information, 2014(4): 54-57.
[2] 刘爽. 基于熵权法与TOPSIS模型的高校图书馆电子资源绩效评价实证研究[J]. 高校图书馆工作, 2018, 38(3): 43-47.
LIU S.Empirical research on universities libraries' electronic re-sources performance evaluation based on entropy weight method and TOPSIS model[J]. Library work in colleges and universities, 2018, 38(3): 43-47.
[3] 刘爽. 基于熵权法与TOPSIS模型的高校图书馆电子资源绩效评价实证研究[D]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2016.
LIU S.Empirical research on universities libraries’ electronic resources performance evaluation based on entropy weight method and TOPSIS model[D]. Shenyang: Liaoning university, 2016.
[4] 杨若冰. 图书馆电子资源绩效评价模型的建立[J]. 大学图书情报学刊, 2014(3): 41-43.
YANG R B.The establishment of the performance evaluation model in libraries based on electronic resources[J]. Journal of academic library and information science, 2014(3): 41-43.
[5] 宋建玮, 马磊. 基于平衡计分卡的图书馆电子资源绩效评价体系探讨[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2011(6): 48-50.
SONG J W, MA L.On the performance evaluation of library elec-tronic resources based on balanced score-card[J]. Library work and study, 2011(6): 48-50.
[6] 储文静, 邹美群, 罗颖. 采购决策视角下电子资源绩效评价方法构建及应用研究[J]. 图书情报导刊, 2019, 4(10): 74-79.
CHU W J, ZOU M Q, LUO Y.Research on the construction and ap-
7 plication of performance evaluation methods of electronic resources under the perspective of procurement decision[J]. Journal of library and information science, 2019, 4(10): 74-79.
[7] 贺秀英, 王晓文, 呼翠侠. 基于模糊语义法的高校图书馆电子资源绩效评价研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(2): 113-115.
HE X Y, WANG X W, HU C X.Research on the performance evalua-
8 tion of university library electronic resources based on fuzzy semantic method[J]. Information studies: Theory & application, 2016, 39(2): 113-115.
[8] 和媛媛, 巩在武. 基于模糊多属性决策的高校图书馆电子资源服务绩效评价研究[J]. 情报科学, 2011(3): 412-415, 420.
HE Y Y, GONG Z W.Study on the service evaluation of academic library electronic resources based on multi-attribute decision making[J]. Information science, 2011(3): 412-415, 420.
[9] 贾洁, 彭奇志. 基于BP神经网络的图书馆电子资源质量评价研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010(21): 84-87.
JIA J, PENG Q Z.Research on quality evaluation of library electronic resources based on BP neural network[J]. Library and information service, 2010(21): 84-87.
[10] 贺意林. 基于超效率DEA的高校图书馆电子资源绩效评价[J]. 四川图书馆学报, 2019(3): 22-25.
HE Y L.The performance evaluation of electronic resources of uni-versity libraries based on super efficiency DEA[J]. Journal of the Sichuan society for library science, 2019(3): 22-25.
[11] 蒲筱哥, 胡亚敏. 图书馆电子资源绩效多指标综合评价方法评析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013(7): 139-143.
PU X G, HU Y M.Review on multi-index comprehensive evaluation methods of electronic resources in libraries[J]. Library and informa-tion service, 2013(7): 139-143.
[12] 刘爽. 高校图书馆电子资源绩效评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 情报探索, 2017(4): 6-10.
LIU S.Research on construction of university library electronic resources performance evaluation indicators system[J]. Information research, 2017(4): 6-10.
[13] LIU H, SHAO Y, GAO H, et al.The establishment and application of evaluation criteria system for the electronic resources in university libraries[J]. Information science, 2010(11): 1702-1705.
[14] 史继红. 两个重要的电子资源使用绩效评价体系的比较——欧洲的EQUINOX项目与美国的ARL e-metrics项目[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2007(7): 53-57.
SHI J H.Comparison of two important performance evaluation systems of e-resources use-equinox project in Europe and ARL e-metrics project in America[J]. Digitalibary forum, 2007(7): 53-57.
[15] 张琪, 纪有书, 王东波. 定量对比视角下的国外数字人文研究进展分析[J]. 农业图书情报, 2019, 31(11): 4-14.
ZHANG Q, JI Y S, WANG D B.A review of international digital humanities research from the perspective of quantitative Comparison[J]. Agricultural library and information, 2019, 31(11): 4-14.
[16] 奚永旺. 大学图书馆电子资源绩效评价及其实施策略研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2014(2): 88-92.
XI Y W.Research on the performance evaluation and implementation strategy of university library electronic resources[J]. Information studies: Theory & application, 2014(2): 88-92.
[17] 李育平. 基于“投入-状态-产出”框架的图书馆电子资源服务绩效评价研究[J]. 晋图学刊, 2018(4): 20-25.
LI Y P.Research on performance evaluation of library electronic resource service based on the "input-state-output" framework[J]. Shanxi library journal, 2018(4): 20-25.
[18] 蔡思明. 面向数字学术资源保障体系的支撑型学术图书馆建设[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(9): 58-67.
CAI S M.Construction of academic libraries supporting security systems of digital academic resources[J]. Journal of library and in-formation science in agriculture, 2020, 32(9): 58-67.
[19] YOUNGHEE N.A study measuring the performance of electronic resources in academic libraries[J]. Aslib proceedings, 2012, 64(2): 134-153.
[20] 刘佳音, 邓同庆. 高校图书馆数据库利用率统计与绩效的研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2012(3): 46-51, 39.
LIU J Y, DENG T Q.Empirical research on the usage statistics and performance of databases in university libraries[J]. Library journal, 2012(3): 46-51, 39.
[21] 单甜甜, 曹洪欣. 2004-2013年国内图书馆电子资源绩效评价研究与展望[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2014, 23(8): 27-32.
SHAN T T, CAO H X.Papers on performance assessment of electronic resources in domestic libraries from 2004 to 2013 and their prospect[J]. Chinese journal of medical library and information science, 2014, 23(8): 27-32.
[22] LUIZA B M, CESALTINA P P.Measuring the economic value of the electronic scientific information services in Portuguese academ-ic libraries[J]. Journal of librarianship and information science, 2011(3): 146-156.
[23] 徐东雨, 刘冰, 王舰. 我国民营医院医疗服务效率综合评价的因子分析[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2017(5): 814-815, 817.
XU D Y, LIU B, WANG J.Factor analysis of comprehensive evaluation of medical service efficiency of private hospitals in China[J]. Chinese journal of health statistics, 2017(5): 814-815, 817.
[24] 胡伶俐, 陈远其,屈威. 基于矩阵低秩分解的图书馆电子资源评估因子分析模型[J]. 韶关学院学报, 2016(10): 7-9.
HU L L, CHEN Y Q, QU W.The factor analysis model for estimating the electronic resources in library based on low rank matrix decomposition[J]. Journal of Shaoguan university(social science edition), 2016(10): 7-9.
[25] 刘光霞, 齐明亮, 李顺文. 解析电子资源绩效评价研究中的影响因子[J]. 甘肃科技, 2010, 26(24): 63-65, 24.
LIU G X, QI M L, LI S W.Analysis of the influencing factors in the research of e-resources performance evaluation[J]. Gansu sci-ence and technology, 2010, 26(24): 63-65, 24.