Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 18-29.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0838
Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Yanrun, WANG Yan, JIANG Tingting*
CLC Number:
| [1] KRIKELAS J.Information-seeking behavior: Pattern and concepts[J]. Drexel library quarterly, 1983, 19(2): 5-20. [2] KUHLTHAU C C.Developing a model of the library search process: Cognitive and affective aspects[J]. American library association, 1988, 28(2): 232-242. [3] KIRSTY W.Discovered by chance: the role of incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use[J]. Library & information science research, 1998, 20(1): 23-40. [4] 李易君. 大学生对推荐算法的认知与互动研究——基于1341名知乎平台用户的研究[J]. 新闻传播, 2020(24): 30-31. LI Y J. Research on college students' cognition and interaction of recommendation algorithm: Based on1341 Zhihu platform users[J]. News dissemination, 2020(24): 30-31. [5] ERDELEZ S.Information encountering: An exploration beyond information seeking[D]. Syracuse: Syracuse university of California, 1995. [6] 彭燕林. 个性化推荐中的“过滤气泡”现象相关研究综述[J]. 科技创业月刊, 2019, 32(4): 135-139. PENG Y L.Review of the phenomenon "filter bubble" in personal-ized recommendation[J]. Pioneering with science & technology monthly, 2019, 32(4): 135-139. [7] 彭兰. 导致信息茧房的多重因素及“破茧”路径[J]. 新闻界, 2020(1): 30-38, 73. PENG L.Multiple factors resulting in information cocoon and the approach of breakthrough[J]. Journalism and mass communication monthly, 2020(1): 30-38, 73. [8] 姜婷婷, 许艳闰. 窄化的信息世界: 国外信息茧房、选择性接触与回音室研究进展[J]. 图书情报知识, 2021, 38(5): 134-144. JIANG T T, XU Y R.Narrowed information universe: A review of research on information cocoons, selective exposure, and echo chambers[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2021, 38(5): 134-144. [9] 姜婷婷, 许艳闰. 国外过滤气泡研究: 基础、脉络与展望[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(10): 1108-1117. JIANG T T, XU Y R.Filter bubbles-induced by personalized recom-mendation algorithms: A review of related research[J]. Journal of the China society for scientific and technical information, 2021, 40(1): 1108-1117. [10] MAKRI S, BLANDFORD A.Coming across information serendipi-tously-Part 1: A process model[J]. Journal of documentation, 2012, 68(5): 684-705. [11] JIANG T, LIU F, CHI Y.Online information encountering: Modeling the process and influencing factors[J]. Journal of documentation, 2015, 71(6): 1135-1157. [12] ERDELEZ S.Investigation of information encountering in the controlled research environment[J]. Information processing and management, 2004, 40(6): 1013-1025. [13] MCCAY-PEET L, TOMS E G.Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it[J]. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 2015, 66(7): 1463-1476. [14] JIANG T, GUO Q, XU Y, et al.A diary study of information encountering triggered by visual stimuli on micro-blogging services[J]. Information processing and management, 2019, 56: 29-42. [15] KUIKEN J, SCHUTH A, SPITTERS M, et al.Effective headlines of newspaper articles in a digital environment[J]. Digital journalism, 2017, 5: 1300-1314. [16] BLOM J N, HANSEN K R.Click bait: Forward-references as lure in online news headlines[J]. Journal of pragmatics, 2015, 76: 87-100. [17] CASALO L V, FLAVIAN C, IBANEZ S.Antecedents of consumer intention to follow and recommend an Instagram account[J]. Online information review, 2017, 41(7): 1046-1063. [18] LIU J, WANG Y. Information worth spreading: An exploration of information sharing from social Q & A to other social media platforms[C/OL]//Annual meeting of the ASIST. ASIST, 2016.[2021-08-23]. doi:10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301112. [19] DENG S, JIANG Y, LI H, et al. Who contributes what? Scrutinizing the activity data of 4.2 million Zhihu users via immersion scores[J/OL]. Information processing and management, 2020, 57(5): 102274. [2021-08-23]. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102274. [20] KIM C, YANG S.Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other[J]. Public relations review, 2017, 43(2): 441-449. [21] SABATE F, BERBEGAL-MIRABENT J, CANABATE A, et al.Factors influencing popularity of branded content in Facebook fan pages[J]. European management journal, 2014, 32(6): 1001-1011. [22] WANG Z, ZHANG P. Examining user roles in social Q & A: The case of health topics in Zhihu.com[C/OL]//Annual meeting of the ASIST. ASIST, 2016. [2021-08-23]. doi:10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301103. [23] 范哲, 刘莉. 基于KANO模型的社会化搜索软件功能需求调查与分析——以“知乎”为例[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2017, 37(11): 113-120. FAN Z, LIU L.Investigation and analysis of the functional requirements of social search software based on kano model[J]. Library tribune, 2017, 37(11): 113-120. [24] 曹高辉, 梁梦丽, 王佳. 任务驱动下社会化问答平台用户信息搜寻行为研究[J]. 情报科学, 2018, 36(1): 80-86. CAO G H, LIANG M L, WANG J.Research on user information seeking behavior driven by task in the social Q & A platform[J]. Information science, 36(1): 80-86. [25] JIANG T, ZHANG C, LI Z, et al.Information encountering on social Q & A sites: A diary study of the process[C]//IConference 2018, Sheffield, UK, 2018: 476-486. [26] PANAHI S, WATSON J, PARTRIDGE H L.Information encountering on social media and tacit knowledge sharing[J]. Journal of information science, 2016, 42(4): 1-13. [27] HSIAO C H, CHANG J J, TANG K Y.Exploring the influencial factors in continuance usage of mobile social apps: Satisfaction, habit, and customer value perspectives[J]. Telematics & informatics, 2016, 33(2): 342-355. [28] ORIET C, PANDEY M, KAWAHARA J.Attention capture without awareness in a non-spatial selection task[J]. Consciousness and cognition, 2017, 48: 117-128. [29] PARK G, BAVEL J J V, HILL L B K, et al. Social groups prioritize selective attention to faces: How social identity shapes distractor interference[J/OL]. Plos one, 2016, 11(8): e0161426. [2021-08-23]. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161426. [30] LAKE J I, LABAR K S, MECK W H.Emotional modulation of inter-val timing and time perception[J]. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2016, 64: 403-420. [31] VECERA S P, COSMAN J D, VATTEROTT D B, et al.The control of visual attention[J]. Psychology of learning & motivation, 2014, 60: 303-347. [32] SUBOTIC S, MUKHERJEE B.Short and amusing: The relationship between title characteristics, downloads, and citations in psychology articles[J]. Journal of information science, 2014, 40(1): 115-124. [33] MA Y, CHEN J.Effects of platform and content attributes on information dissemination on we media: A case study on WeChat platform[C]//WHICEB 2017, Wuhan, China, 2017: 49-58. [34] LIU Y P, LIU W, et al.What drives click-through rates of tourism product advertisements on group buying websites?[J]. Procedia computer science, 2015, 55: 221-230. [35] ZEBREGS S, PUTTE B, NEIJENS P, et al.The differential impact of statistical and narrative evidence on beliefs, attitude, and intention: A meta-analysis[J]. Health communication, 2014, 30(3): 282-289. [36] HIROTANI M, FRAZIER L, RAYNER K.Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements[J]. Journal of memory and language, 2006, 54(3): 425-443. [37] ZHANG Z L.Feeling the sense of community in social networking usage[J]. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2010, 57(2): 225-239. [38] JIANG Z J, WANG W, TAN B, et al.The determinants and impacts of aesthetics in users' first interaction with websites[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2016, 33(1): 229-259. [39] SINGH K S, TRIPATHI A, KOHLI A.Humour in psychiatric clinical practice[J]. Delhi psychiatry journal, 2011, 14(2): 232-236. [40] HILDEBRAND K D, SMITH S D.Three approaches to qualitative content analysis[J]. Qualitative health research, 2014, 15(9): 1277-1288. [41] DONEWS. 知乎发布用户报告: 用户群体多元化, 认为知乎专业、真实、原创[EB/OL].[2021-08-31]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1581762309457478822&wfr=spider&for=pc. DONEWS. Zhihu publishes user reports: the user group is diversified and believes that Zhihu is professional, true and original[EB/OL].[2021-08-31]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1581762309457478822&wfr=spider&for=pc. [42] HUGHES H E.An expanded critical incident approach for exploring information use and learning[J]. Library and information research, 2012, 36(112): 72-95. [43] FLANGAN J C.The critical incident technique[J]. Psychological bulletin, 1954, 51(4): 327. [44] MAKRI S, BLANDFORD A.Coming across information serendipitously - Part 2: A classification framework[J]. Journal of documentation, 2012, 68(5): 706-724. [45] CASE D O.Looking for information: A survey of research on informa-tion seeking, needs, and behavior[M]. Bingley: Emerald group pub-lishing, 2012: 222-223. [46] FLORES W, CHEN J, ROSS W H.The effect of variations in banner ad, type of product, website context, and language of advertising on internet users' attitudes[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2014, 31: 37-47. [47] PEI S, LI M, HUANG L. Research on interface design strategies of online course video based on cognitive load[C/OL]//International conference on innovation design and digital technology (ICIDDT). IEEE, 2020. [2021-08-23]. doi:10.1109/ICIDDT52279.2020.00039. [48] FRANKISH K.Dual-process and dual-system theories of reasoning[J]. Philosophy compass, 2010, 5(10): 914-926. [49] BARDIN B, VIDAL P, FACCA L, et al.The effect of information quality evaluation on selective exposure in informational cognitive dissonance: The role of information novelty[J]. International review of social psychology, 2018, 31(1): 21-35. [50] WENDELIN M, ENGELMANN I, NEUBARTH J.User rankings and journalistic news selection[J]. Comparing news values and topics, 2015, 18(2): 135-153. |
|
||
