高校科研绩效与学科发展潜力评价方法的研究

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.20-0721

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]在“双一流”建设背景下,科研绩效和学科评价日益受到关注。越来越多的高校利用已有的数据库资源,定位学校优势学科和潜力学科,为学校“双一流”建设提供服务。[方法/过程]本文基于InCites和ESI数据库提出一种高校科研绩效与学科发展潜力评价的方法。首先从科研影响力、国际合作能力、学科产出力三维视角构建评价体系;其次根据数据结果从发文量、论文被引、引文影响力、国际合作、ESI学科等二级指标全面剖析科研产出和潜力学科;最后形成一套较为全面的评价指标。为了更好的使用该方法,以北京工业大学为例进行数据呈现。[结果/结论]运用本方法可较为客观和全面的评价高校科研绩效与潜力学科,为学校的发展战略提供理论依据和数据支持。

关键词: ESI, InCites, 科研产出, 学科服务, 评价方法

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Under the background of "double first-class" university development, scientific research performance and disciplinary evaluation have been increasingly paid attention. More and more universities use the existing databases to find their advantageous subjects and disciplines that have development potential, and provide services in their efforts for the development of "double first-class" universities. [Method/Process] Based on the InCites/ESI databases, this paper proposes an evaluation method of university scientific research performance and disciplinary development potential. Firstly, the evaluation system is composed of scientific research influence, international cooperation ability and disciplinary output ability. Secondly, the scientific research outputs are analyzed from the aspects of the number of papers published, citation frequency, citation influence, international cooperation and ESI disciplines. Finally, a set of relatively comprehensive evaluation indicators is formed. In order to make better use of this method, Beijing university of technology (BJUT) is taken as an example for data presentation. [Results/Conclusions] This method can provide a scientific evaluation method for scientific research performance and disciplinary analysis of universities, and provide theoretical basis and data for the development strategy of universities.

Key words: ESI, InCites, research output, disciplinary service, evaluation method

中图分类号:

G353

李非凡, 刘彩娥, 李永芳. 高校科研绩效与学科发展潜力评价方法的研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(4): 68-77.

LI Feifan, LIU Caie, LI Yongfang. The Evaluation Method of University Research Performance and Disciplinary Development Potential[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(4): 68-77.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 关于印发《统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设实施办法(暂行)》的通知[EB/OL]. [2017-01-25].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_843/201701/t20170125_295701.html.
The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China. Notice on printing and distributing the implementation measures for promoting the construction of world class universities and first class disciplines (Provisional)[EB/OL]. [2017-01-25]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_843/201701/t20170125_295701.html.
[2] 教育部财政部国家发展改革委印发. 《关于高等学校加快“双一流”建设的指导意见》的通知[EB/OL]. [2018-08-08]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_843/201808/t20180823_345987.html.
Ministry of education, ministry of finance, National development and reform commission. Notice of "guiding opinions on speeding up the construction of "double first class" in higher education institutions"[EB/OL].[2018-08-08].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_843/201808/t20180823_345987.html.
[3] THOMSON R. Web of science[EB/OL]. [2020-05-22]. http://webofknowledge.com/WOS.
[4] CLARIVATE. InCites[EB/OL].[2020-05-22]. https://incites.clarivate.com/.
[5] CLARIVATE. Essential science indicators[EB/OL].[2020-05-22]. https://esi.clarivate.com/.
[6] MUNOZ D A.Assessing the research efficiency of higher education institutions in chile: A data envelopment analysis approach[J]. International journal of educational management, 2016, 30(6): 809-825.
[7] WANG D D.Performance-based resource allocation for higher edu-cation institutions in China[J]. Socio-economic planning sciences, 2019, 65: 66-75.
[8] SOMBATSOMPOP N, KOSITCHAIYONG A, MARKPIN T, et al.Scientific evaluations of citation quality of international research articles in the SCI databases: Thailand case study[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 66(3): 521-535.
[9] AURANEN O, NIEMINEN M.University research funding and publication performance-an international comparison[J]. Research policy, 2010, 39(6): 822-834.
[10] 邱均平, 杨瑞仙, 丁敬达, 等. 世界一流大学与科研机构学科竞争力评价研究报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
QIU J P, YANG R X, DING J D, et al.An evaluation report on subject competitiveness of world-Class universities and research institutions[M]. Beijing: Science press, 2009.
[11] 刘楠, 陈新艳, 员媛, 等. 基于ESI和专利文献信息的图书馆学科知识服务实践—武汉理工大学图书馆支持高校“双一流”建设实例[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2017(12): 76-83.
LIU N, CHEN X Y, YE Y, et al.The practice of the library subject knowledge service based on ESI and patents: The library of WUT supports “double first-class” construction of university[J]. Research on library science, 2017(12): 76-83.
[12] 白璐, 钟泳如, 顾萍. 基于ESI和In Cites的我国学科评价实证研究: 以分子生物学与遗传学学科为例[J]. 循证医学, 2017(5): 297-304.
BAI L, ZHONG Y R, GU P.An empirical study on the discipline evaluation in China based on ESI and InCites: A case study of molecular biology and genetics[J]. The journal of evidence-based medicine, 2017(5): 297-304.
[13] 朱丽献. 高校科研绩效考核与激励问题研究[M]. 沈阳:东北大学出版社, 2016.
ZHU L X.Research on the performance appraisal and incentive of scientific research in universities[M]. Shengyang: Northeast university press, 2016.
[14] 程艾军. 基于ESI和InCites的医学院校学科发展现状SWOT分析[J]. 医学信息学杂志, 2017, 38(7): 77-81.
CHENG A J.SWOT analysis on the disciplines development status of medical universities based on ESI and InCites[J]. Journal of medical informatics, 2017, 38(7): 77-81.
[15] 郭银清. 基于AHP的高校科研效益评价体系的构建[J]. 财政研究, 2014(2): 55-58.
GUO Y Q.The evaluation system construction of scientific research benefit in universities based on AHP[J]. Public finance research, 2014(2): 55-58.
[16] 周丽琴, 陆剑. 基于元评价的高校科研绩效量化考核评价[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016, 36(11): 101-105, 115.
ZHOU L Q, LU J.The quantitative assessment of scientific research performance in universities based on meta-evaluation[J]. Science and technology management research, 2016, 36(11): 101-105, 115.
[17] 沈立宏, 赵怡. 基于数据包络分析的地方高校科研绩效评价[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2016(3): 147-151.
SHEN L H, ZHAO Y.An evaluation on the performance of scientif-ic researches in local colleges and universities based on data envel-opment analysis[J]. Research in higher education of engineering, 2016(3): 147-151.
[18] SALAU O, OSIBANJO A, ADENIJI A, et al.Data regarding talent management practices and innovation performance of academic staff in a technology-driven private university[J]. Data in brief, 2018, 19: 1040-1045.
[19] 段晓梅. 系统思维下我国高校科研绩效的超效率DEA评价[J]. 系统科学学报, 2019(4): 51-54, 76.
DUAN X M.Super efficiency DEA evaluation of scientific research efficiency of universities in China under systematic thinking[J]. Chinese journal of systems science, 2019(4): 51-54, 76.