马来西亚与中国相互注册的专利信息对比分析

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.20-0669

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]马来西亚是重要的“一带一路”沿线国家,国家层面专利信息对比分析具有宏观科技情报意义,能为国家制定相关科技政策提供参考。[方法/过程]本文通过IPC统计与关键词提取解读了马来西亚和中国在对方国家注册专利的技术领域分布,对比分析了注册时间线变化、专利权人类型、引用来源国,再基于IPC共现网络与专利引文类型对两国专利竞争关系进行分析。[结果/结论]研究发现：对比下中国在信息技术、化学工程领域优势显著,马来西亚在棕榈、橡胶产品以及其他动植物产品开发上经验丰富;中国在马来西亚注册专利专利权人类型较单一;马来西亚对中国存在技术依赖;马来西亚在动植物产品研发、医药制造、通用/专用设备制造、电气机械制造、环境管理、信息传输和软件等领域有一定的竞争能力。

关键词: 一带一路, 专利分析, 马来西亚, 国家间专利对比, 竞争情报

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Malaysia is an important member of "one belt, one road". A comparative analysis of patents on the national level brings macro-level scientific and technological information. It can provide reference for the strategy of building "one belt, one road" and formulating science and technology related policies. [Method/Process] Through IPC statistics and keyword extraction, this paper interprets the technical field distribution of mutual registered patents between Malaysia and China in each other's countries. Then it compares and analyzes the registration time line, the type of patentees and the source country of citations, and then analyzes the patent competition relationships between the two countries based on IPC co-occurrence network and patent citation types.[Results/Conclusions] The results show that China has significant advantages in the fields of information technology and chemical engineering, while Malaysia has rich experience in the development of palm, rubber products and other animal and plant products; More types of Malaysian patentees are engaged in patent registering in China; Malaysia is technically dependent on China; Malaysia is competitive in the following fields: animal and plant product research and development, pharmaceutical manufacturing, general/special equipment manufacturing, electrical machinery manufacturing, environmental management, information transmission and software.

Key words: the Belt and Road, patent analysis, Malaysia, national patents comparative analysis, competitive intelligence

中图分类号:

S126

向姝璇, 李睿. 马来西亚与中国相互注册的专利信息对比分析[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(2): 24-34.

XIANG Shuxuan, LI Rui. Comparative Analysis of Registered Patents between Malaysia and China[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(2): 24-34.

参考文献

[1] 陈军, 张韵君, 王健. 基于专利分析的中美人工智能产业发展比较研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2019, 38(1): 41-47.
CHEN J, ZHANG Y J, WANG J.A comparative study on the development of AI industry between China and U.S.A. based on patent analysis[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2019, 38(1): 41-47.
[2] 李国红, 姜磊, 张超. 人工智能关键技术专利态势分析[J]. 信息通信技术与政策, 2019(10): 6-9.
LI G H, JIANG L, ZHANG C.Patent situation analysis of key technologies of artificial intelligence[J]. Information and communications technology and policy, 2019(10): 6-9.
[3] 黄鲁成, 薛爽. 机器学习技术发展现状与国际竞争分析[J]. 现代情报, 2019, 39(10): 165-176.
HUANG L C, XUE S.The development status and international competition analysis of machine learning[J]. Journal of modern
4 information, 2019, 39(10): 165-176.
[4] 张志娟, 郭斌梅, 赵蕴华, 等. 中日美质谱仪技术领域专利比较研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(11): 16-21.
ZHANG Z J, GUO B M, ZHAO Y H, et al.A comparative analysis on patent intelligence of mass spectrometer in China, Japan and America[J]. Journal of information, 2013, 32(11): 16-21.
[5] 郑祥, 孔亚东, 谭送琴, 等. 中美膜领域科研实力比较——基于文献计量学的视角[J]. 膜科学与技术, 2020, 40(3): 136-144.
ZHENG X, KONG Y D, TAN S Q, et al.Comparison of scientific research strength between China and the United States-based on bibliometric perspective[J]. Membrane science and technology, 2020, 40(3): 136-144.
[6] 王永芳, 黄剑斌, 宋洁琼. 基于专利分析的在轨服务机器人发展研究[J]. 载人航天, 2020, 26(2): 261-268.
WANG Y F, HUANG J B, SONG J Q.Research on development of On-orbit service robots based on global patent analysis[J]. Manned spaceflight, 2020, 26(2): 261-268.
[7] 谢华玲, 吕璐成, 杨艳萍. 全球冠状病毒疫苗专利分析[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2020, 40(z1): 57-64.
XIE H L, LV L C, YANG Y P.Patent analysis of global coronavirus vaccine[J]. China biotechnology, 2020, 40(z1): 57-64.
[8] 蒋佳妮, 王灿, 翟欢欢. 中国核电技术专利国际竞争力研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2017(6): 92-100.
JIANG J N, WANG C, ZHAI H H.On the international competitive-ness of China's nuclear power technology patents[J]. Forum on sci-ence and technology in china, 2017(6): 92-100.
[9] 高芳, 赵志耘. 中美增材制造领域发展对比研究及启示[J]. 科技管理研究, 2017, 37(10): 128-133.
GAO F, ZHAO Z Y.A comparative study on the addictive manufacturing of China and America[J]. Science and technology management research, 2017, 37(10): 128-133.
[10] 严哲. 专利视角下中国C9与美国IVY联盟科技创新能力的对比研究[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2020(1): 38-42.
YAN Z.A comparative study on the technological innovation capability of C9 in China and Ivy League in the United States from the perspective of patent[J]. New century library, 2020(1): 38-42.
[11] 靳军宝, 曲建升. 我国与主要科技强国专利产出发展态势分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(19): 7-15.
JIN J B, QU T S.Analysis on the development situation of patent output in China and the main scientific and technological powers[J]. Science and technology management research, 2019, 39(19): 7-15.
[12] 张先伟, 杨祖国. 金砖五国在美授权专利比较研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2015, 35(24): 148-151, 164.
ZHANG X W, YANG Z G.Comparative study on BRICS' Patents Granted by the USPTO[J]. Science and technology management research, 2015, 35(24): 148-151, 164.
[13] 刘凤朝, 李滨, 孙玉涛. 中、印、巴专利发展与技术领域比较优势分析[J]. 科学管理研究, 2008, 26(6): 118-121.
LIU F C, LI B, SUN Y T.The development of patent and comparative advantage of technical fields of China, India and Brazil[J]. Scientific management research, 2008, 26(6): 118-121.
[14] 佟贺丰, 雷孝平, 张静. 基于专利计量的国家H指数分析[J]. 情报科学, 2013, 31(12): 78-83.
TONG H F, LEI X P, ZHANG J.A patentometric analysis of national patent H-Index[J]. Information science, 2013, 31(12): 78-83.
[15] 冷昕. “金砖五国”信息产业国际竞争力比较研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2014.
LEN X.Comparative study on the competitiveness of the BRIC countries' information industry[D]. Changchun: Jilin university, 2014.
[16] 叶阳平, 马文聪, 张光宇. 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家科技合作现状研究——基于专利和论文的比较分析[J]. 图书情报知识, 2016(4): 60-68.
YE Y P, MA W C, ZHANG G Y.Research on the current situation of science and technology cooperation between China and countries along the Belt and Road -comparative analysis based on patent and paper data[J]. Document, information & knowledge, 2016(4): 60-68.
[17] 梁梦洁, 张明倩. 专利合作技术领域比较优势存续期研究——基于中国与“一带一路”专利数据[J]. 华东经济管理, 2019, 33(10): 101-107.
LIANG M J, ZHANG M Q.Research on the duration of comparative advantage in the fields of patent cooperation-based on patent data of China and countries along the Belt and Road[J]. East China economic management, 2019, 33(10): 101-107.
[18] 陈欣. “一带一路”沿线国家科技合作网络比较研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(7): 22-32.
CHEN X.A comparative study of the S&T collaboration networks in countries along the Belt and Road[J]. Science research management, 2019, 40(7): 22-32.
[19] KLINCEWICZ K.Robotics in the context of industry 4.0: Patenting activities in Poland and their comparison with global developments[J]. Univ Warsaw, fac management, 2019, 17(2): 53-95.
[20] FERREIRA J J, FERNANDES C, RATTEN V.Environmental-related patent technology transfer effectiveness a comparison between Portugal and Australia using OECD data[J]. World journal of entrepreneurship management and sustainable development, 2018, 14(3): 206-221.
[21] BACCHIOCCHI E, MONTOBBIO F.Knowledge diffusion from university and public research: A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations[J]. Journal of technology transfer, 2009, 34(2): 169-181.
[22] WOO, LEE C.The study on technological innovation in Korea, China and Japan: Based on comparison of international patent data[J]. Chinese studies, 2019, 68: 333-346.
[23] WU L F, ZHU H Y, CHEN H C, et al.Comparing nanotechnology landscapes in the US and china: A patent analysis perspective[J]. Journal of nanoparticle research, 2019, 21(8): 180.
[24] SHENG Y, GAO S F. Shipbuilding industry' technology innovation capabilities from the perspective of patent portfolio: Comparison of China, Japan and South Korea[C].2018 2nd international conference on advanced education and management science (AEMS 2018), 2018.
[25] KANG B, HUO D, MOTOHASHI K.Comparison of Chinese and Korean companies in ICT global standardization: Essential patent analysis[J]. Telecommun policy, 2014, 38(10): 902-913.
[26] KADRI H, SAYKHEDKAR M.Post-TRIPS patenting trends in India with special reference to USA: A comparative analysis[J]. Journal of intellectual property rights, 2011, 16(3): 217-224.
[27] MAKHOBA X, POURIS A.A patentometric assessment of selected R & D priority areas in South Africa, a comparison with other BRICS countries[J]. World patent information, 2019, 56: 20-28.
[28] 刘洋, 瞿卫军, 黄庆, 等. 专利评价指标体系(三)——运用专利评价指标体系进行的地区评价[J]. 知识产权, 2004(5): 35-38.
LIU Y, QU W J, HUANG Q, et al.Patent evaluation index system (3) - regional evaluation using patent evaluation index system[J]. Intellectual property, 2004(5): 35-38.
[29] 赵芳芳. 外资企业技术溢出对本土企业创新绩效的影响 --以人力资本为调节变量[D]. 西安:西北大学, 2018.
ZHAO F F.Study on the influence of technology spillover of foreign-invested enterprises on innovation performance of local enterprises-taking human capital as regulatory variable[D]. Xi'an: Northwest university, 2018.
[30] 别晓东. 中国企业技术引进与自主创新的关系研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2017.
BIE X D.Research on the relation between technology import and self-innovation of Chinese enterprises[D]. Jinan: Shandong university, 2017.
[31] 王宏起, 夏凡, 王珊珊. 新兴产业技术融合方向预测: 方法及实证[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(6): 1009-1017, 1075.
WANG H Q, XIA F, WANG S S.Forecast on technological fusion direction of emerging industries: Method and empirical research[J]. Studies in science of science, 2020, 38(6): 1009-1017, 1075.
[32] 王絮絮. 马来西亚在中国的专利布局现状与分析[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2020, 2(16): 13-16.
WANG X X.The current situation and analysis of Malaysia's patent distribution in China[J]. Technology innovation and application, 2020, 2(16): 13-16.
[33] 王天策. 马来西亚科技政策研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2012.
WANG T C.Science and technology policy research of Malaysia[D]. Nanning: Guangxi university, 2012.