定量对比视角下的国外数字人文研究进展分析

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2019.10.19-1077

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]数字人文研究在国内的发展已经近十年,明确国内外数字人文研究的差异有助于国内数字人文研究的进一步开展。[方法/过程]首先通过对学科与机构合作的定量统计对比了国内外数字人文研究中各学科参与度、机构合作模式的差异。针对存在的差异,利用CiteSpace中的共被引聚类、突现检测、双图叠加等功能,以图谱为线索介绍了国外数字人文研究的研究进展。[结果/结论]国内外数字人文研究的主要差异在于国内外计算机、人文学科的参与程度。结合CiteSpace的共被引聚类功能,确定了国际数字人文研究中计算机学科的7个类群和两个研究主题,人文学科中的五个类群和两个研究主题。通过对两学科共被引网络的双图叠加,发现国际数字人文研究中计算机学科和人文学科的合作相对较少,前者较为先进的技术未能较快融入后者的研究中。综上,笔者提倡国内计算机和人文学科深入参与数字人文研究中,并应注重加强数字人文基础学科与应用学科之间的合作。

关键词: 数字人文, 科学计量学, CiteSpace

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Digital humanities research has been developing in China for nearly ten years. It is important for further developing digital humanities research in China to clarify the differences between domestic and foreign digital humanities research.[Method/Process] Firstly, this paper compares the differences in the participation of various disciplines and cooperation modes of institutions in digital humanities research at home and abroad through quantitative statistics. Based on the existing differences, co-citation clustering, emergence detection, double-graph superposition and other functions in CiteSpace are used to introduce the research progress of digital humanities in foreign countries.[Results/Conclusions] The main difference of domestic digital humanities research lies in the low degree of participation of computer science and humanities. In international digital humanities research, there are seven groups and two research topics in computer science, and five groups and two research topics in ARTS&HUMANITIES. In addition, there is relatively little cooperation between basic subjects(computer science and information science) and humanities(ARTS&HUMANITIES OTHER TOPICS and son) in international digital humanities research, The advanced technologies in computer science are not quickly integrated into the research of humanities disciplines. It is suggested that domestic computer science and humanities should be deeply involved in the research of digital humanities, and the cooperation between basic subjects and applied subjects of digital humanities should be strengthened.

Key words: digital humanities, bibliometrics, CiteSpac

中图分类号:

G250

张琪, 纪有书, 王东波. 定量对比视角下的国外数字人文研究进展分析[J]. 农业图书情报, 2019, 31(11): 4-14.

ZHANG Qi, JI Youshu, WANG Dongbo. A Review of International Digital Humanities Research From the Perspective of Quantitative Comparison[J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(11): 4-14.

参考文献

[1] Wang X., Inaba M., 2009. Analyzing Structures and Evolution of Digital Humanities Based on Correspondence Analysis and Co-word Analysis[J]. Art research 9, 123-134.
[2] Wang X., Inaba M., 2009. Analyzing Structures and Evolution of Digital Humanities Based on Correspondence Analysis and Co-word Analysis[J]. Art research 9, 123-134.
[3] Busa, Roberto.‘The Annals of Humanities Computing: The Index Thomisticus’[J]. in Computers and the Humanities, 1980, 14: 83-90.
[4] 王晓光. “数字人文”的产生、发展与前沿[M]. 方法创新与哲学社会科学发展,武汉:武汉大学出版社,2010.11.
[5] McCarty, W., Humanities Computing[J]. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2005.
[6] Nyhan J., Terras M., Vanhoutte E., Introduction, in: Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader[M. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2013.
[7] 柯平,宫平.数字人文研究演化路径与热点领域分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(06):13-30.
[8] Web of Science核心合集帮助[EB/OL].[2019-10-23].http://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS56B5/help/zh_CN/WOS/hp_research_areas_easca.html.
[9] Web of Science核心合集帮助[EB/OL].[2019-10-25].http://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS56B5/help/zh_CN/WOS/hp_subject_category_terms_tasca.html.
[10] 高瑾.量化数字人文综述[J/OL].图书馆论坛:1-20[2019-12-03].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/44.1306.G2.20190925.1310.004.html.
[11] Zirker A, Bauer M.Explanatory Annotation in the Context of the Digital Humanities: Introduction[J]. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2017, 11(2): 145-152.
[12] Liu A.The meaning of the digital humanities[J]. pmla, 2013, 128(2): 409-423.
[13] Jean-Caurant A, Tamani N, Courboulay V, et al.Lexicographical-Based Order for Post-OCR Correction of Named Entities[C]//2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR). IEEE, 2017, 1: 1192-1197.
[14] Robinson L.Information science: communication chain and domain analysis[J]. Journal of Documentation, 2009, 65(4): 578-591.
[15] Romanello M.Exploring Citation Networks to Study Intertextuality in Classics[J]. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 2016, 10(2).
[16] Wattenberg M, Viégas F B.The word tree, an interactive visual concordance[J]. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 2008, 14(6): 1221-1228.
[17] Geng, Zhao, et al.“ShakerVis: Visual Analysis of Segment Variation of German Translations of Shakespeare’s Othello.”[J] Information Visualization, 2015, 14(4): 273-288
[18] Cohen D J, Frisch M, Gallagher P, et al.Interchange: The promise of digital history[J]. The Journal of American History, 2008, 95(2): 452-491.
[19] Thomas III W G, Ayers E L. An overview: the differences slavery made: a close analysis of two American communities[J]. The American Historical Review, 2003, 108(5): 1299-1307.
[20] Offen K.Historical geography II: Digital imaginations[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2013, 37(4): 564-577.
[21] Moretti F.Distant reading[M]. Verso Books, 2013.
[22] Janicke S, Franzini G, Cheema M F, et al.Visual text analysis in digital humanities[C]//Computer Graphics Forum. 2017, 36(6): 226-250.
[23] Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T.Linked data: The story so far[M]//Semantic services, interoperability and web applications: emerging concepts. IGI Global, 2011: 205-227.
[24] De Boer V, Oomen J, Inel O, et al.DIVE into the event-based browsing of linked historical media[J]. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2015, 35: 152-158.
[25] Merono-Penuela A, Ashkpour A, Van Erp M, et al.Semantic technologies for historical research: A survey[J]. Semantic Web, 2015, 6(6): 539-564.
[26] Jaskot P B.Digital Art History as the Social History of Art: Towards the Disciplinary Relevance of Digital Methods[J]. Visual Resources, 2019, 35(1-2): 21-33.
[27] Purves R S, Derungs C.From space to place: Place-based explorations of text[J]. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2015, 9(1): 74-94.
[28] Murrieta-Flores P, Favila-Vázquez M, Flores-Morán A.Spatial Humanities 3.0: Qualitative Spatial Representation and Semantic Triples as New Means of Exploration of Complex Indigenous Spatial Representations in Sixteenth Century Early Colonial Mexican Maps[J]. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2019, 13(1-2): 53-68.
[29] Cole T, Hahmann T.Geographies of the Holocaust: Experiments in GIS, QSR, and Graph Representations[J]. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2019, 13(1-2): 39-52.
[30] D’Ignazio C, Klein L F. Feminist data visualization[C]//Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities (VIS4DH), Baltimore. IEEE. 2016.
[31] Enoch J, Bessette J.Meaningful engagements: Feminist historiography and the digital humanities[J]. College Composition and Communication, 2013: 634-660.
[32] Mortara M, Catalano C E, Bellotti F, et al.Learning cultural heritage by serious games[J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2014, 15(3): 318-325.
[33] Fung C.Playing with Identities: Queering Digital Narratology and the Exploration of Gender and Sexual Identities[J]. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 2017, 11(3).
[34] 黄水清. 人文计算与数字人文:概念、问题、范式及关键环节[J].图书馆建设,2019(05):68-78.