农业图书情报 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 4-14.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2019.10.19-1077

所属专题: 数字人文专题

• 数字人文专题 •    下一篇

定量对比视角下的国外数字人文研究进展分析

张琪1, 纪有书1, 王东波1,2   

  1. 1.南京农业大学信息科学技术学院,江苏 南京 210095;
    2.南京农业大学领域知识关联研究中心,江苏 南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-04 出版日期:2019-11-05 发布日期:2019-12-20
  • 作者简介:张琪,硕士研究生,南京农业大学信息科学技术学院。纪有书,硕士研究生,南京农业大学信息科学技术学院。王东波,教授,博士生导师,南京农业大学信息科学技术学院。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目“基于典籍引得的句法级汉英平行语料库构建及人文计算研究”(项目编号:71673143)

A Review of International Digital Humanities Research From the Perspective of Quantitative Comparison

ZHANG Qi1, JI Youshu1, WANG Dongbo1,2   

  1. 1.College of Information science & Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Jiangsu Nanjing 210095, China;
    2.Research Center for Correlation of Domain Knowledge, Nanjing Agricultural University, Jiangsu Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2019-09-04 Online:2019-11-05 Published:2019-12-20

摘要: [目的/意义]数字人文研究在国内的发展已经近十年,明确国内外数字人文研究的差异有助于国内数字人文研究的进一步开展。[方法/过程]首先通过对学科与机构合作的定量统计对比了国内外数字人文研究中各学科参与度、机构合作模式的差异。针对存在的差异,利用CiteSpace中的共被引聚类、突现检测、双图叠加等功能,以图谱为线索介绍了国外数字人文研究的研究进展。[结果/结论]国内外数字人文研究的主要差异在于国内外计算机、人文学科的参与程度。结合CiteSpace的共被引聚类功能,确定了国际数字人文研究中计算机学科的7个类群和两个研究主题,人文学科中的五个类群和两个研究主题。通过对两学科共被引网络的双图叠加,发现国际数字人文研究中计算机学科和人文学科的合作相对较少,前者较为先进的技术未能较快融入后者的研究中。综上,笔者提倡国内计算机和人文学科深入参与数字人文研究中,并应注重加强数字人文基础学科与应用学科之间的合作。

关键词: 数字人文, 科学计量学, CiteSpace

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Digital humanities research has been developing in China for nearly ten years. It is important for further developing digital humanities research in China to clarify the differences between domestic and foreign digital humanities research.[Method/Process] Firstly, this paper compares the differences in the participation of various disciplines and cooperation modes of institutions in digital humanities research at home and abroad through quantitative statistics. Based on the existing differences, co-citation clustering, emergence detection, double-graph superposition and other functions in CiteSpace are used to introduce the research progress of digital humanities in foreign countries.[Results/Conclusions] The main difference of domestic digital humanities research lies in the low degree of participation of computer science and humanities. In international digital humanities research, there are seven groups and two research topics in computer science, and five groups and two research topics in ARTS&HUMANITIES. In addition, there is relatively little cooperation between basic subjects(computer science and information science) and humanities(ARTS&HUMANITIES OTHER TOPICS and son) in international digital humanities research, The advanced technologies in computer science are not quickly integrated into the research of humanities disciplines. It is suggested that domestic computer science and humanities should be deeply involved in the research of digital humanities, and the cooperation between basic subjects and applied subjects of digital humanities should be strengthened.

Key words: digital humanities, bibliometrics, CiteSpac

中图分类号: 

  • G250

引用本文

张琪, 纪有书, 王东波. 定量对比视角下的国外数字人文研究进展分析[J]. 农业图书情报, 2019, 31(11): 4-14.

ZHANG Qi, JI Youshu, WANG Dongbo. A Review of International Digital Humanities Research From the Perspective of Quantitative Comparison[J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2019, 31(11): 4-14.