农业图书情报学报

• •    

中国开放科学数据政策扩散影响因素与组态研究

迟玉琢, 张冰   

  1. 黑龙江大学 信息管理学院,哈尔滨 150080
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-25 出版日期:2025-10-17
  • 作者简介:

    迟玉琢(1982- ),女,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为情报分析与服务、科学数据管理

    张冰(1999- )女,硕士研究生,研究方向为科学数据政策

  • 基金资助:
    2021年度国家社科基金重大项目“面向数字化发展的公共数据开放利用体系与能力建设研究”(21&ZD336)

Determinants and Configurations of Open Scientific Data Policy Diffusion in China

CHI Yuzhuo, ZHANG Bing   

  1. School of Information Management, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080
  • Received:2025-06-25 Online:2025-10-17

摘要:

[目的/意义] 开放科学数据政策是促进科学数据公开共享、无障碍获取和再利用的制定基石,对开放科学数据政策的扩散研究有利于政策有效制定与推广,重政策制定、轻政策采纳的不足。 [方法/过程] 政策扩散模型与文献研究法相结合,对中国地市级政府于开放科学数据政策扩散的影响因素进行提取,采用事件史分析法对影响因素进行验证,经模糊集定性比较分析提炼开放科学数据政策扩散类型 [结果/结论] 研究发现,中国开放科学数据政策扩散共有4种基本路径:资源驱动型、组织人资主导型、多元协同型和技术引领型,应注意政策扩散过程对行政手段高度依赖和政策扩散影响因素的双刃剑效应,因地制宜选择适配的政策扩散类型。

关键词: 开放科学数据, 开放科学数据政策, 政策扩散模型, 定性比较分析

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] Open scientific data policies play a pivotal role in promoting the open sharing, unrestricted access to, and reuse of scientific data, thereby enhancing research efficiency and driving innovation. Despite their significance, research on the diffusion of these policies has predominantly focused on policy formulation, often neglecting the critical aspect of policy adoption and implementation at the local government level. This study aims to addres this gap by comprehensively examining the factors that influence the adoption of open scientific data policies by prefecture-level governments in China. The research was motivated by the need to understand how these policies spread across different regions, as well as the underlying mechanisms that facilitate or hinder their adoption. In doing so, the study expands the existing knowledge base by shedding light on the dynamics of policy diffusion in the context of open scientific data, a relatively under-explored area compared to other policy domains. [Method/Process] To achieve its objectives, the study employed an integrated research methodology. First, it utilized a policy diffusion model, adapted from the well-established Berry model, to theoretically frame the research. This model was enhanced by incorporating insights from a comprehensive literature review, which helps identify key internal and external factors influencing policy diffusion. Second, the study employed the event-history analysis to empirically test these factors using data from 286 Chinese cities over the period from 2018 to 2022. This method allows for the examination of the temporal sequence of policy adoption and the identification of causal relationships between the influencing factors and policy diffusion. Finally, a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was applied to refine the understanding of multiple causal configurations that lead to successful policy adoption. This approach captures the complexity and interdependence of factors in policy diffusion processes, offering a nuanced perspective that goes beyond traditional statistical methods. [Results/ [Conclusions] The study identified four primary pathways for the diffusion of open scientific data policies in China: resource-driven, organization-and-human-capital-led, multi-stakeholder collaborative, and technology-guided. The resource-driven pathway emphasizes the significance of research funding and the establishment of professional organizations in facilitating policy adoption. The organization-and-human-capital-led pathway highlights the role of government official mobility and a skilled workforce in driving policy diffusion. The multi-stakeholder collaborative pathway underscores the importance of coordinated efforts among various stakeholders, including government agencies, research institutions, and industry partners. Last, the technology-guided pathway focuses on innovation capacity and professional management as key drivers of policy adoption. The findings reveal a heavy reliance on administrative measures in driving policy diffusion, which may lead to unintended consequences such as policy sustainability issues and a lack of alignment with local needs. Therefore, local governments are encouraged to adopt tailored diffusion strategies that consider their specific contexts and resource endowments. Future research should explore the performance of these policies in achieving their intended outcomes and conduct comparative studies across different regions to enhance the generalizability of the findings.

Key words: open scientific data, open scientific data policy, policy diffusion model, qualitative comparative analysis

中图分类号:  G259.2

引用本文

迟玉琢, 张冰. 中国开放科学数据政策扩散影响因素与组态研究[J/OL]. 农业图书情报学报. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.25-0348.

CHI Yuzhuo, ZHANG Bing. Determinants and Configurations of Open Scientific Data Policy Diffusion in China[J/OL]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.25-0348.