不同角色对开放获取期刊的认知度与认可度调研与分析

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0367

农业图书情报学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 4-17.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0367

所属专题：开放科学

• 特约专稿 • 下一篇

不同角色对开放获取期刊的认知度与认可度调研与分析

初景利^1,2, 刘培一³, 翁彦琴^1,2, 李楠^1,2, 闫群³, 肖玥^1,2

1.中国科学院文献情报中心,北京 100190;
2.中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系,北京 100190;
3.中国科技出版传媒股份有限公司,北京 100717

收稿日期:2020-05-11 出版日期:2021-09-05 发布日期:2021-09-28
作者简介:初景利（ORCID：0000-0003-0723-3985）,博士,教授。刘培一,学士,编审。翁彦琴（ORCID：0000-0001-9105-7608）,博士,副研究馆员。李楠（ORCID：0000-0002-7576-1870）,博士研究生,馆员。闫群（ORCID：0000-0001-8790-0041）,硕士,副编审。肖玥（ORCID：0000-0003-1442-8000）,硕士研究生
基金资助:
国家社科基金重大项目“新时代我国文献信息资源保障体系重构研究”（19ZDA345）

Investigation and Analysis of Different Roles' Recognition and Acceptance of Open Access Journals

CHU Jingli^1,2, LIU Peiyi³, WENG Yanqin^1,2, LI Nan^1,2, YAN Qun^2,3, XIAO Yue^1,2

1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
2. Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
3. Beijing Zhongke Journal Publishing Co., Ltd., China Science Publishing & Media Ltd., Beijing 100717

Received:2020-05-11 Online:2021-09-05 Published:2021-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]旨在调研不同利益相关方对开放出版的态度与意见,形成对中国金色开放获取的基本共识与总体判断,以期为中国开放出版的国家政策及实施路径提供参考。[方法/过程]采用问卷调查法调研科研人员、期刊编辑、图书馆员等直接参与方对金色开放获取的认知度与认可度。[结果/结论]科研论文各相关方对金色开放获取较为欢迎,超过六成的科研人员、图书馆员、期刊编辑认为期刊论文应该开放,科研论文的阅读不应该再次收费。三方对于开放获取相关政策制订、平台建设与经费支持更为关注。开放获取更符合公共利益的最大化,随着开放获取的提出和大力推进,开放获取的未来发展趋势已经明朗,需考虑布局符合国情的相关政策及OA出版经费、平台等要素的解决路径,从而推动中国学术交流开放进程。

关键词: 开放获取, 科研人员, 图书馆员, 期刊编辑, 认可度

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] In this paper, we aim to investigate different stakeholders for their attitudes about and opinions of open access publishing, in order to explore the basic consensus and make an overall judgment of China's gold open access, which is expected to serve as a reference for the national policy and implementation path of open access publishing in China. [Method/Process] We carried out a questionnaire survey to researchers, editors and librarians about their recognition and acceptance of gold open access. [Results/Conclusions] All stakeholders hold a positive attitude towards gold open access. More than 60% of researchers, journal editors and librarians support that academic papers should be open, and researchers should not be charged twice for reading these papers. The three parties all pay more attention to the policy, platform construction and financial support of open access, which plays a better role in maximizing public interests. The future development trend of open access has been cleared with the introduction and promotion of open access. It is necessary to consider solutions in line with the national conditions to elements including the relevant policies, open access publishing funds, and platforms, so as to promote the open process of academic communication in China.

Key words: open access, scientific researchers, librarian, journal editors, acceptance

中图分类号:

G350

初景利, 刘培一, 翁彦琴, 李楠, 闫群, 肖玥. 不同角色对开放获取期刊的认知度与认可度调研与分析[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(9): 4-17.

CHU Jingli, LIU Peiyi, WENG Yanqin, LI Nan, YAN Qun, XIAO Yue. Investigation and Analysis of Different Roles' Recognition and Acceptance of Open Access Journals[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(9): 4-17.

参考文献

[1] 易志军, 庄岩, 江丽辉. 拟定全球“开放科学”准则: 促进后疫情时代的国际科学合作[J]. 科学观察, 2020, 15(5): 63-67.
YI Z J, ZHUANG Y, JIANG L H.Drafting global recommendation of "open science": Promoting international scientific cooperation in post COVID-19[J]. Science focus, 2020, 15(5): 63-67.
[2] 陈亚杨, 张智雄. 突发公共卫生事件下国际科研成果开放共享的主要发展历程[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(15): 90-103.
CHEN Y Y, ZHANG Z X.The main progress of global efforts on open and sharing of scientific results in the context of public health emergencies[J]. LIS, 2020, 64(15): 90-103.
[3] 王应宽. 中国科技界对开放存取期刊认知度与认可度调查分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2008, 19(5): 752-762.
WANG Y K.Investigative analysis on awareness and recognition of open-access journals by Chinese sci-tech circles[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2008, 19(5): 753-762.
[4] PIWOWAR H, PRIEM J, VINCENT LARIVI RE, et al.The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles[J]. Peer J, 2018, 6(4): E4375.
[5] VALERIE S, JENNY F, CLAIRE C, et al.Researchers' green open access practice: A corss-disciplinary analysis[J]. Journal of docu-mentation, 2013, 69(3): 334-359.
[6] CAROL T, KENNETH L, SUZIE A, et al.Trustworthiness and author-ity of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire[J]. Journal of the association for informationence & technology, 2016, 67(10): 2344-2361.
[7] JAMALI H R, NICHOLAS D, HERMAN E, et al.National comparisons of early career researchers' scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours[J]. Learned publishing, 2020, 33(4): 1-15.
[8] NICHOLAS D, RODRíGUEZ-BRAVO, BLANCA, et al. Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices[J]. Learned publishing, 2017, 30: 205-217.
[9] XU J, DAVE N, SU J, et al.Are open access journal trusted by Chi-nese scholars[J]. Geomatics and information science of Wuhan univer-sity, 2016(41): 131-135.
[10] ZHU Y.Open-access policy and data-sharing practice in UK academia[J]. Journal of information science, 2020, 46(1): 41-52.
[11] 任翔. 开放生态改变出版规则: 2019年欧美开放获取发展评述[J]. 科技与出版, 2020(3): 28-34.
REN X. Open ecology changing the rules of publishing: A review of open access developments in Europe and the US in2019[J]. Sci-ence-Technology & publication, 2020(3): 28-34.
[12] 张晓丹, 乔晓东, 顾立平, 等. 中国学术期刊对机构知识库存缴政策调查分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014(6): 1-7.
ZHANG X D, QIAO X D, GU L P, et al.A survey analysis of the intention of Chinese academic journals toward the institutional repository deposit policies[J]. New technology of library and infor-mation service, 2014(6): 1-7.
[13] LARA K.The library's role in the management and funding of open access publishing[J]. Learned publishing, 2015(28): 4-8.
[14] 中国政府网. 让创新成为实现中国经济升级的强大动力[EB/OL]. [2021-04-12]. http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/2014-05/27/content_2688220.htm.
Innovation become a powerful driving force for China's economic upgrading[EB/OL].[2021-04-12].http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/2014-05/27/content_2688220.htm.
[15] 王元杰, 齐秀丽, 王应宽. 国内外期刊开放获取出版现状与启示[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2020, 31(7): 828-835.
WANG Y J, QI X L, WANG Y K.Status quo of open access pub-lishing of domestic and foreign journals and corresponding enlight-enments[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2020, 31(7): 828-835.
[16] 治丹丹. 区块链技术支持的科技论文出版平台Orvium特色服务运营模式及启示[J]. 科技与出版, 2021(5): 85-92.
ZHI D D.Orvium, a scientific paper publishing platform supported by blockchain technology operation mode of characteristic service and its enlightenment[J]. Science-Technology & publication, 2021(5): 85-92.
[17] 袁青, 陈星辰. 高校图书馆推动学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的困境与出路[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(18): 15-20.
YUAN Q, CHEN X C.The dilemma and way out for university libraries to promote the transformation of academic journals from subscription mode to open access mode[J]. LIS, 2020, 64(18): 15-20.
[18] 张晓林. 实现开放获取支撑科技创新——有关国家和机构支持科技期刊开放出版的政策与措施[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2013, 28(3): 378-385.
ZHANG X L.Implement open access to support research and inno-vation - OA publishing policies and measures of major R & D countries and organizations[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese academy of sciences, 2013, 28(3): 378-385.
[19] 张晓林, 李麟. 资助学术论文开放出版的挑战与政策建议[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2014, 25(9): 1093-1099.
ZHANG X L, LI L.Challenges and policy recommendations for funding open access academic papers[J]. Chinese journal of scien-tific and technical periodicals, 2014, 25(9): 1093-1099.
[20] 孙清玉, 梁美宏, 胡晓辉. 区块链技术在机构知识库数据共享中的应用研究[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2020(7): 49-52.
SUN Q Y, LIANG M H, HU X H.Application of blockchain technology in data sharing of the institutional repository[J]. New century library, 2020(7): 49-52.
[21] 张峻. 掠夺性科技期刊与科技期刊中掠夺性现象的特征研究[J]. 编辑学报, 2020, 32(4): 376-379.
ZHANG J.Features of predatory journals and predatory phenomenon in scientific journals[J]. Acta editologica, 2020, 32(4): 376-379.
[22] 刘锦宏, 李若男, 阳杰. 基于内容质量的开放获取期刊知识传播效果影响因素研究[J]. 科技与出版, 2019(11): 108-114.
LIU J H, LI R N, YANG J.Influencing factors of knowledge dissemination in open access journals based on content quality[J]. Science-Technology & publication, 2019(11): 108-114.
[23] 曾建勋. 重视预印本及其系统生态建设[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2020(10): 1-2.
ZENG J X.More attention should be paid to the construction of preprint and system ecology[J]. Digital library forum, 2020(10): 1-2.

不同角色对开放获取期刊的认知度与认可度调研与分析

Investigation and Analysis of Different Roles' Recognition and Acceptance of Open Access Journals

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	万益嘉, 顾立平. 全球开放获取学术交流联盟平台政策、资源与服务研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(6): 24-35.
[2]	黄金霞, 汪煊, 杨恒, 刘静羽, 张智雄, 刘细文. 来自多方的声音：构建中国开放科学创新生态——第十届中国开放获取推介周（China OA Week）会议综述[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2022, 34(1): 49-61.
[3]	张蒙, 赵梓辰, 刘春艳. 黑龙江省高校图书馆OA资源建设现状调研[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(3): 54-61.
[4]	郑雨霏, 王铮. 疫情期间海外图书馆开放获取活动的特征与走向[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(12): 20-28.
[5]	郭雪薇, 高洁, 史全胜. 高校图书馆组织创新氛围对馆员创新行为的影响研究——以创新自我效能感为中介[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(10): 62-70.
[6]	李广利, 白雪, 张美琦. 中国金色OA论文现状分析——基于Web of Science数据[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(1): 40-46.
[7]	王超. 国内学术机构知识库可持续发展影响因素构建与实证[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2018, 30(8): 12-17.
[8]	黄筱瑾. 基于APC付费政策浅析数据期刊的可持续发展[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2018, 30(7): 133-136.
[9]	霍振响, 屈李纯, 李小平. 基于科技期刊编辑视角探讨抵制学术不端行为[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2018, 30(7): 137-140.
[10]	黄东霞, 赵宇波. 开放获取与中国图书馆的战略选择[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2018, 30(10): 91-94.
[11]	李春娜. 大数据时代图书馆馆员职业能力建设研究[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2018, 30(1): 197-200.
[12]	李树霞, 张凤巧, 王元立. 高校图书馆开放获取实践进展研究——以农业大学图书馆为例[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2018, 30(1): 140-142.
[13]	刘永武. 图书馆员绩效考核指标加减法[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2017, 29(9): 189-193.
[14]	刘紫薇, 牛晓宏. 图书开放获取模式选择——以Open Book Publisher为例[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2017, 29(9): 100-103.
[15]	翟欣. 日本大学图书馆在开放获取和开放科学运动中的功能[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2017, 29(8): 84-87.