农业图书情报学报

• •    

科技循证政策制定中的证据推荐方法研究与应用

何莹1,3, 孙巍1,2(), 李周晶1,2, 马晓敏1,2   

  1. 1. 中国农业科学院农业信息研究所,北京 100081
    2. 农业农村部 农业大数据重点实验室,北京 100081
    3. 南京大学 数据管理创新研究中心,苏州 215163
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-25 出版日期:2025-12-12
  • 通讯作者: 孙巍
  • 作者简介:

    何莹(2001- ),博士研究生,研究方向为知识图谱、LLM应用

    李周晶(1987- ),博士,助理研究员,研究方向为科技动态监测

    马晓敏(1976- ),副研究员,研究方向为科技政策解析

  • 基金资助:
    2025中国农业科学院创新工程项目“大豆产业形势的动态模拟——基于AI技术与传统计量的比较研究”(CAAS-ASTIP-2025-AII); 2025年中国农业科学院农业信息所公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金青年探索研究项目“面向科技决策的多源新闻文本智能监测与价值量化研究”(JBYW-AII-2025-18)

Research and Application of Evidence Recommendation Methods in Science and Technology Evidence-Based Policy Making

HE Ying1,3, SUN Wei1,2(), LI Zhoujing1,2, MA Xiaomin1,2   

  1. 1. Agricultural Information Institute of China Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
    2. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Big Data, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081
    3. Research Institute for Data Management & Innovation, Nanjing University, Suzhou 215163
  • Received:2025-07-25 Online:2025-12-12
  • Contact: SUN Wei

摘要:

目的/意义 针对科技循证政策制定中证据推荐的准确性和高效性不足问题,本研究提出一种基于知识图谱的证据推荐方法,旨在提升政策制定中证据使用的科学性和智能化水平,为政策决策提供更加可靠的数据支撑。 方法/过程 本研究围绕政策与论文的引用关系构建知识图谱,创新性地引入KGAT算法建模政策与证据间的高阶语义关系进而实现证据推荐,在农业科技政策领域开展实证研究验证方法有效性,设计并实现了支持自然语言查询的精准证据推荐系统。 结果/结论 实验结果表明,所提方法在多个评价指标上均优于对比算法,具有更强的推荐性能与解释能力,同时证据智能推荐系统能够高效识别与政策需求匹配度高的证据资源,增强了科技政策制定的科学支撑,为实现政策智能化与循证化提供了新路径。

关键词: 循证政策, 知识图谱, 证据推荐

Abstract:

Purpose/Significance The formulation of evidence-based science and technology policy critically relies on the timely and accurate provision of relevant, high-quality evidence. However, current evidence recommendation practices often suffer from significant limitations in both accuracy and efficiency, hindering the scientific rigor and intelligent application of evidence within the policy-making process. These shortcomings hinder policymakers' ability to leverage the most pertinent research and data, potentially leading to suboptimal decisions. Addressing this critical gap, this research proposes a novel knowledge graph-based evidence recommendation method. The primary objective is to substantially enhance the scientific foundation and intelligent capabilities of evidence utilization during policy formulation. This method aims to empower policymakers by providing more reliable, contextually relevant, and efficiently retrieved data support. Ultimately this will foster more robust, transparent, and demonstrably effective science and technology policies grounded in comprehensive research insights. Method/Process To achieve these objectives, this study systematically constructs a domain-specific knowledge graph meticulously centered on the intricate citation relationships between policy documents and academic research papers. This graph serves as the foundational semantic network representing entities (policies, articles, topics, authors, institute etc.) and their multifaceted interconnections. Most importantly, we introduce and adapt the Knowledge Graph Attention Network (KGAT) algorithm n an innovative way. Leveraging KGAT's sophisticated graph attention mechanisms, our model effectively captures and learns complex, high-order semantic relationships between policy requirements (represented as queries or specific nodes) and potential evidence sources (research paper nodes). This deep relational understanding enables nuanced evidence relevance scoring and personalized recommendation. To rigorously validate the proposed method's practical efficacy and performance, we conducted an extensive empirical study within the specific domain of agricultural science and technology policy. Furthermore, to demonstrate real-world applicability and provide a tangible tool for policymakers, we designed and implemented a fully functional Evidence Intelligent Recommendation System (EIRS). This system seamlessly integrates the core KG-based recommendation engine and incorporates advanced intelligent analysis capabilities. Significantly, EIRS supports an end-to-end workflow initiated by natural language policy questions posed by users, enabling intuitive interaction and precise, demand-driven evidence retrieval and recommendation. [Results/ Conclusions Experimental results, conducted on real-world datasets within the agricultural science and technology policy domain, demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed KGAT-based recommendation method. It consistently outperforms several state-of-the-art baseline algorithms across multiple key evaluation metrics, including precision, recall, normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG), and mean reciprocal rank (MRR). This quantitatively confirms its significantly stronger recommendation capability. In addition to quantitative metrics, the model inherently offers enhanced explainability due to the transparent nature of the knowledge graph structure and the attention weights learned by KGAT, allowing for insights into why specific evidence is recommended, based on its semantic connections to the policy query. Concurrently, the implemented EIRS has proven to be highly effective in practice. It efficiently identifies and recommends evidence resources exhibiting a strong match with complex policy requirements expressed in natural language. The system's successful deployment underscores its potential to tangibly augment the scientific underpinning of science and technology policy development. By effectively bridging the gap between vast research knowledge and specific policy needs through intelligent, accurate, and explainable recommendations, this research provides a novel, practical pathway towards realizing truly intelligent and rigorously evidence-based policy formulation processes. The methodology and system prototype offer a valuable and adaptable framework for various policy domains beyond the presented case study.

Key words: evidence-based policy, knowledge graph, evidence recommendation

中图分类号:  G301,G353.1

引用本文

何莹, 孙巍, 李周晶, 马晓敏. 科技循证政策制定中的证据推荐方法研究与应用[J/OL]. 农业图书情报学报. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.

HE Ying, SUN Wei, LI Zhoujing, MA Xiaomin. Research and Application of Evidence Recommendation Methods in Science and Technology Evidence-Based Policy Making[J/OL]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.