中文    English

›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 38-48.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2018.10.005

• Metrology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Quantitative Analysis of Scientific Research Evaluation at Home and Abroad

ZHANG Yang, WANG Yuanyuan   

  1. School of Information Management, Sun Yat-Sen Univ.,Guangdong Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2017-09-01 Online:2018-10-05 Published:2018-10-12

Abstract: The distribution of papers, subjects, authors, organizations, published journals and frequency of keywords are discussed by quantitative methods. Using the tool of CiteSpace, this article analyses high frequency keyword co-ocurrence and document co-citation, which obtain hot topics and frontiers. Suming up main contents of the study, the distribution characteristics of content is revealed. On this basis, the paper evaluates its emphases and shortcomings, and explores the important research directions of journal evaluation.

CLC Number: 

  • G250.2
[1] 安宁,邓开喜,莫雷.高校科研评价体系构建的探讨——以华南师范大学科研业绩评价体系构建为例[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,(3):131-138.
[2] 王飒. “985”高校图书馆科研评价服务实践调研与分析[J].图书情报工作,2016(1):26-31.
[3] 科学技术部.评估动态[DB/OL].[2017-06-28].http://www.ncste.org.
[4] 黄小平,陈洋子.“双一流”大学科技创新能力评价:国际经验及启示——基于对英、法、美、澳科研评价体系的考察[J].江苏高教,2017(1):93-98.
[5] Rahman A I M J,Guns R,Rousseau R,et al.Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: A quantitative approach based on barycenters[J].Journal of Informetrics,2015,9(4):704-721.
[6] 熊彩纯. 论高校教师科研评价的革新策略[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(6):178-181.
[7] 王炼,武夷山.评价交叉科学研究人员的新思路[J].科学学研究, 2008,26(a01):124-126.
[8] 邱均平,朱少强,刘永.“金牌优先”法则应用于科研人才评价的思考[J].图书情报知识,2006,(4):101-104.
[9] 张树良,张志强,王雪梅.国际科研评价体系现存问题及发展新趋势分析[J].科学学研究,2015,33(8):1 127-1 133.
[10] Kousha K,Thelwall M,Rezaie S.Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator[J].Journal of Informetrics,2010,4(1):124-135.
[11] Franceschini F,Maisano D.Regularity in the research output of individual scientists: An empirical analysis by recent bibliometric tools[J].Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(3):458-468.
[12] 安宝晟,关忠诚,高星.国立科技单元的科研评价探讨[J].科研管理,2007,28(z1):84-89.
[13] Kuan C H,Huang M H,Chen D Z.Cross-field evaluation of publications of research institutes using their contributions to the fields’ MVPs determined by h-index[J].Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(2):455-468.
[14] Loizides O S,Koutsakis P.On evaluating the quality of a computer science/computer engineering conference[J].Journal of Informetrics, 2017,11(2):541-552.
[15] 宋歌. 科研成果创新力指标S指数的设计与实证[J].图书情报工作,2016,(5):77-86.
[16] 雷雪,王立学,曾建勋.作者合著有向网络构建与分析[J].图书情报工作,2015,(5):94-99.
[17] Fairclough R,Thelwall M.National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers[J].Journal of Informetrics,2015,9(4):845-859.
[18] Levitt J M,Thelwall M.A combined bibliometric indicator to predict article impact[J].Information Processing & Management,2011,47(2):300-308.
[19] Thelwall M.Three practical field normalised alternative indicator formulae for research evaluation[J].Journal of Informetrics,2017,11(1).
[20] Schneider J W.Caveats,for using statistical significance tests in research assessments[J].Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(1):50-62.
[21] Kulczycki E,Korzeń M,Korytkowski P.Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland[J].Journal of Informetrics,2017,11(1):282-298.
[1] LI Guangli, BAI Xue, ZHANG Meiqi. Analysis of Gold Open Access in China Based on Web of Science [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(1): 40-46.
[2] Fu Rongxin, Li Xuanjing, Huang liuxin, Liang yu, Yuan Zhenli, Yang Xiaohua. A Visual Analysis on Research in Wetland Biodiversity Besed on CiteSpace [J]. Agricultural Library and Information, 2018, 30(12): 52-60.
[3] ZHANG Yang, YU Yanhui, HUANG Danqing. Comparison between High Attention Papers and ESI Hot Papers: A Case Study of Clinical Medicine [J]. , 2018, 30(10): 13-22.
[4] ZHANG Yang, YE Yue. Co-authorship Network Analysis in the Field of Webometrics of Domestic and Foreign [J]. , 2018, 30(10): 23-29.
[5] ZHANG Yang, FANG Yiran. The analysis of Journal Evaluation Research Based on CSSCI [J]. , 2018, 30(10): 30-37.
[6] WANG Wenting. Research Status and Hotspot Analysis of China's Information Policy [J]. , 2018, 30(9): 75-80.
[7] HU Anqi. Research on Enterprise Competitive Intelligence Analysis Model Based on Social Media User Comments [J]. , 2018, 30(4): 46-51.
[8] SONG Lingling. Bibliometric Analysis on the Research of MOOC [J]. , 2017, 29(6): 60-65.
[9] NIU Linlin. Research on the Construction of Competitive Intelligence Service Platform for Marine Strategic Emerging Industries in the era of big data [J]. , 2017, 29(1): 5-7.
[10] REN Ni, LU Xue-wen, YU De-rong, ZHOU Jian-nong. Study on the Research Competitiveness Evaluation of four Provincial Academies of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu-Zhejiang-Shanghai-Shandong Area Based on SCI Articles [J]. , 2016, 28(3): 70-76.
[11] WU Zhen. The Co-author Analysis on Big Data Research in Domestic Library and Information Field [J]. , 2016, 28(3): 57-60.
[12] YANG Yang. Research Trends of Wheat Science Based on Web of Science [J]. , 2016, 28(1): 57-59.
[13] XIAO Qin. Analysis on the Research Status and Trend of Community of Practice in Recent Ten Years Based on SCI Database [J]. , 2015, 27(12): 62-66.
[14] AN Xiu-min, WU Lin. Bibliometric Analysis of Literature on Blueberry during 2005-2014 in China [J]. , 2015, 27(9): 57-60.
[15] WANG Hong. Research Advances on Co-word Analysis at Home and Abroad [J]. , 2015, 27(1): 51-54.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!