中文    English

Journal of library and information science in agriculture

   

Construction and Empirical Study of Journal Hotspot Index Based on Highly Cited Papers

GAI Yingzhao1,2, HUANG Qimeng1, WANG Ning1, ZHANG Ying3, ZHOU Qun1()   

  1. 1. Library of China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083
    2. Institute of Science and Technology Strategy Consulting, Beijing 100190
    3. International Office, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083
  • Received:2025-12-29 Online:2026-03-23
  • Contact: ZHOU Qun

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] To promote the development of world-class scientific journals, it is necessary for journals to enhance their understanding of the evolving trends in scientific frontiers and research hotspots. Therefore, characterizing the participation and functional role of journals in research hotspots from the perspective of the journals themselves is of great significance for advancingg journal evaluation theory and promoting discipline development, and journal construction. Relatively little existing research has addressed the role of journals in forming research hotspots within disciplines. It is difficult to reveal the functional differences between journals in the formation and evolution of research hotspots. This study proposed a journal hotspot index evaluation and method based on highly cited papers, revealing the role and function of academic journals in research hotspots in the field, promoting the diversified evaluation of academic journals, and providing a new perspective and useful supplement to journal evaluation. [Methods/Process] Highly cited papers are often concentrated on research topics that have received high attention and continuous discussion in the academic community within a specific period. Their concentrated appearance usually corresponds to the formation of research hotspots or important theoretical progress. Based on the participation and citation of highly cited papers by journals, this study constructed two measurement indicators: the journal's hotspot leadership and hotspot absorption. Based on this, a quadrant diagram was established to classify and evaluate four different types of journal sets, revealing their distribution characteristics and patterns. This study used ESI agricultural science journals as an example to explore the correlation between the journal hotspot index and traditional journal metrics. [Results/Conclusions] The journal hotspot index demonstrates good discriminatory and identifiable characteristics, complementing existing journal evaluation metrics to some extent and identifying journals playing a key role in the development of research hotspots in the field. As a valuable supplement to the journal evaluation index system, the journal hotspot index offers a new analytical perspective on journal development and quality levels, facilitating a more comprehensive and accurate evaluation and positioning of journals, and providing a reference for the development and construction direction of journals in my country. However, the index system still has certain limitations, mainly in the time window for highly cited papers and its adaptability to different subject areas. Future research could expand into more subject areas to further verify the interdisciplinary applicability of this method. Furthermore, we will consider introducing more dynamic window mechanisms to enhance the index's adaptability to emerging disciplines and journals, thereby improving the universality and explanatory power of the journal hotspot index.

Key words: journal hotspot index, impact factor, journal evaluation, highly cited papers

CLC Number: 

  • G350

Fig.1

Quadrant for journal hotspot index evaluation"

Table 1

Descriptive statistics of journal indicators in the first quadrant"

指标 热点引领度 热点吸收度 影响因子 载文量/篇 篇均被引频次 JCI 特征因子
最大值 13.764 4.451 20.961 20 001 43.364 3.090 0.020
最小值 1.002 1.070 3.480 29 4.533 0.600 0.001
均值 3.155 1.808 7.999 2 822 19.948 1.476 0.004
标准差 2.828 0.722 3.564 3 798 9.852 0.478 0.005
离散系数 0.896 0.399 0.446 1.346 0.494 0.324 1.250

Table 2

Descriptive statistics of journal indicators in the second quadrant"

指标 热点引领度 热点吸收度 影响因子 载文量/篇 篇均被引频次 JCI 特征因子
最大值 0.944 2.500 6.317 10 700 21.594 2.050 0.089
最小值 0.000 1.017 1.138 18 1.222 0.270 0.000
均值 0.357 1.368 3.644 2 290 10.581 0.763 0.006
标准差 0.300 0.383 1.171 2 463 4.872 0.318 0.015
离散系数 0.840 0.280 0.321 1.076 0.460 0.417 2.500

Table 3

Descriptive statistics of journal indicators in the third quadrant"

指标 热点引领度 热点吸收度 影响因子 载文量/篇 篇均被引频次 JCI 特征因子
最大值 0.919 0.979 6.391 11 675 22.381 2.320 0.115
最小值 0.000 0.011 0.022 57 0.079 0.020 0.000
均值 0.123 0.405 1.822 1 071 6.071 0.499 0.003
标准差 0.210 0.236 1.226 1 350 4.192 0.351 0.009
离散系数 1.707 0.583 0.673 1.261 0.690 0.703 3.000

Table 4

Descriptive statistics of journal indicators in the fourth quadrant"

指标 热点引领度 热点吸收度 影响因子 载文量/篇 篇均被引频次 JCI 特征因子
最大值 12.871 0.990 9.323 22 449 57.176 2.400 0.018
最小值 1.007 0.275 2.560 193 5.666 0.370 0.000
均值 2.355 0.654 5.869 2 994 20.068 1.299 0.003
标准差 2.435 0.195 1.384 4 573 8.999 0.472 0.004
离散系数 1.034 0.298 0.236 1.527 0.448 0.363 1.333

Fig.2

Evaluation chart of hot spot index for journals in the field of agricultural science"

Table 5

Results of the hot topics index measurement for journals in the first quadrant"

期刊 热点引领度 热点吸收度 影响因子
Nature Food 6.268 2.194 20.961
Trends in Food Science & Technology 13.764 2.443 16.002
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 11.328 1.768 15.786
Food Hydrocolloids 5.373 3.261 11.504
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 5.480 1.584 11.208
Current Opinion in Food Science 2.811 2.601 9.800
Food Chemistry 2.889 1.711 9.231
Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment 5.255 1.497 9.027
Food Packaging and Shelf Life 2.505 4.451 8.749
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 5.015 1.261 8.546
Food Science and Human Wellness 2.865 1.427 8.022
Food Research International 1.937 1.904 7.425
Geoderma 1.971 1.179 7.422
Soil & Tillage Research 1.449 1.298 7.366
Annals of Agricultural Sciences 5.128 1.650 7.241
Innovative Food Science &Emerging Technologies 1.270 2.154 7.104
Meat Science 1.659 1.157 7.077
npj Science of Food 2.367 1.828 7.000
Postharvest Biology and Technology 1.409 1.079 6.751
Food Engineering Reviews 2.247 1.878 6.738
Food Control 1.425 1.146 6.652
Biology and Fertility of Soils 1.621 1.522 6.605
Soil 4.013 1.501 6.373
Food Quality and Preference 1.578 1.070 6.345
Current Research in Food Science 1.862 2.757 6.269
Journal of Food Engineering 1.392 1.321 6.203
Field Crops Research 1.783 1.079 6.145
Food Reviews International 1.539 1.913 6.043
Foods 1.011 2.279 5.561
Food Bioscience 1.002 2.474 5.318
Frontss in Sustainable Food Systems 1.058 1.290 5.005
Chemical and BiologicalTechnologies in Agriculture 2.448 1.316 4.839
European Journal of Soil Science 1.395 1.218 4.178
Efsa Journal 2.161 2.256 3.480

Table 6

Percentage of journals from major research countries in each quadrant"

国家 期刊总数/个 第一象限占比/% 第二象限占比/% 第三象限占比/% 第四象限占比/%
美国 80 17.65 36.59 20.48 25.00
英国 57 32.35 21.95 11.65 25.00
荷兰 30 26.47 14.63 3.61 18.75
德国 25 5.88 4.88 7.63 6.25
巴西 20 0.00 0.00 8.03 0.00
日本 15 0.00 0.00 6.02 0.00
法国 11 0.0 4.88 3.21 3.13
瑞士 10 5.88% 2.44 2.01 6.25
中国 10 5.88 2.44 0.80 15.63
意大利 9 2.94 0.00 3.21 0.00

Fig.3

Distribution of Chinese journals in each quadrant"

Table 7

Percentage of journals from major publishing institutions in each quadrant"

出版机构 期刊总数/个 第一象限占比/% 第二象限占比/% 第三象限占比/% 第四象限占比/%
Elsevier 48 58.82 21.95 4.02 28.13
Wiley 45 8.82 34.15 9.64 12.50
Springer 33 8.82 17.07 8.03 9.38
Taylor & Francis Group 33 5.88 7.32 10.84 3.13
Cambridge University Press 10 0.00 0.00 3.21 6.25
Oxford University Press 6 0.00 2.44 0.40 12.50
Czech Academy Agricultural Sciences 6 0.00 0.00 2.41 0.00
MDPI 5 2.94 2.44 0.80 3.13
Sage Publications 3 0.00 2.44 0.80 0.00
Amer Soc Horticultural Science 3 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00

Fig.4

Heatmap showing the correlation between journal popularity index and traditional journal metrics"

[1]
李立, 王媛媛, 米然, 等. “四个面向”战略下中国科技期刊内容质量提升实践现状与对策建议[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2023, 34(11): 1427-1434.
Li Li, Wang Yuanyuan, Mi Ran, et al. Current status and countermeasures for improving content quality of Chinese scientific journals under "Four Orientations" strategy[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2023, 34(11): 1427-1434.
[2]
Franceschet M. The difference between popularity and prestige in the sciences and in the social sciences: A bibliometric analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(1): 55-63.
[3]
Sombatsompop N, Kositchaiyong A, Markpin T, et al. Scientific evaluations of citation quality of international research articles in the SCI database: Thailand case study[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(3): 521-535.
[4]
Wang Xu. Research on the discourse power evaluation of academic journals from the perspective of multiple fusion: Taking Medicine, General and Internal journals as an example[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2024, 50(4): 811-830.
[5]
Zhang Cheng, Liu Xu, Xu Y C, et al. Quality-structure index: A new metric to measure scientific journal influence[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(4): 643-653.
[6]
Moed H F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(3): 265-277.
[7]
Colledge L, de Moya-Anegón F, Guerrero-Bote V, et al. SJR and SNIP: Two new journal metrics in Elsevier's Scopus[J]. Serials: the Journal for the Serials Community, 2010, 23(3): 215-221.
[8]
刘艳华, 华薇娜. 期刊评价新指标——特征因子[J]. 情报杂志, 2010, 29(7): 122-126.
Liu Yanhua, Hua Weina. A new journal evaluation indicator-eigenvector[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2010, 29(7): 122-126.
[9]
Harzing A W, van der Wal R. A Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(1): 41-46.
[10]
Huh S. The journal citation indicator has arrived for emerging sources citation index journals, including the journal of educational evaluation for health professions, in June 2021[J]. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 2021, 18: 20.
[11]
莫富传, 冯翠翠, 苏玲. 国内外高被引论文研究综述[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2019, 15(7): 66-72.
Mo Fuchuan, Feng Cuicui, Su Ling. Research review on domestic and international high-cited papers[J]. Digital Library Forum, 2019, 15(7): 66-72.
[12]
莫富传, 娄策群. 高被引论文应用于研究热点识别的理论依据与路径探索[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(4): 59-63, 35.
Mo Fuchuan, Lou Cequn. Research the theoretical basis and path of hotspots identification based on high-cited papers[J]. Information Studies (Theory & Application), 2019, 42(4): 59-63, 35.
[13]
苏林伟, 乔利利. 国际合作下的ESI高被引论文产出及其影响力研究[J]. 现代情报, 2019, 39(4): 143-152.
Su Linwei, Qiao Lili. Output and impact study of highly cited papers under international academic collaboration based on ESI[J]. Modern Information, 2019, 39(4): 143-152.
[14]
张琦, 张勇. 中美ESI高被引论文对比分析及启示[J]. 出版广角, 2018(21): 58-61.
Zhang Qi, Zhang Yong. Comparative analysis and enlightenment of Chinese and American ESI highly cited papers[J]. View on Publishing, 2018(21): 58-61.
[15]
王玉奇, 陈悦, 宋超, 等. 基于合作位态的国家科研实力测度——以ESI高被引论文为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(10): 14-24.
Wang Yuqi, Chen Yue, Song Chao, et al. A novel metric for national research strength based on cooperation status - An empirical analysis of ESI highly cited papers[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2022(10): 14-24.
[16]
景晶. 地区差异视角下的我国高校学科发展现状分析——基于ESI数据库[J]. 现代情报, 2017, 37(11): 93-97.
Jing Jing. Analysis of the discipline development of the Chinese universities form the perspective of regional difference - Based on the databases of ESI[J]. Modern Information, 2017, 37(11): 93-97.
[17]
张宛姝, 汪雪锋, 于璇. 基于ESI论文数据的高校学科评价研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(2): 60-72.
Zhang Wanshu, Wang Xuefeng, Yu Xuan. A research on evaluation of disciplines in universities based on ESI data[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(2): 60-72.
[18]
李小涛, 金心怡, 李艳, 等. 基于ESI高被引论文的医学信息学研究前沿可视化分析[J]. 现代情报, 2018, 38(12): 120-125.
Li Xiaotao, Jin Xinyi, Li Yan, et al. Visualized analysis of research frontier in medical informatics based on ESI highly cited papers[J]. Modern Information, 2018, 38(12): 120-125.
[19]
Leiden University. CWTS leiden ranking[EB/OL]. [2025-10-29].
[20]
U.S. News Education[EB/OL]. [2025-06-17].
[21]
俞立平. 期刊下载因子: 传播、影响、知识与信息量的综合指标——提高文献计量指标时效性新的尝试[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2023, 35(11): 77-85.
Yu Liping. Journal download factor: A composite indicator of dissemination, impact, knowledge and information[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(11): 77-85.
[22]
任胜利. 特征因子(Eigenfactor): 基于引证网络分析期刊和论文的重要性[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2009, 20(3): 415-418.
Ren Shengli. Eigenfactor: Analyzing the importance of journals and papers based on citation network[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2009, 20(3): 415-418.
[23]
Bornmann L, de Moya Anegón F, Leydesdorff L. Do scientific advancements lean on the shoulders of giants? a bibliometric investigation of the Ortega hypothesis[J]. PLoS One, 2010, 5(10): e13327.
[1] YU Liping, PAN Weibo. Key Indicators of Journal Evaluation Based on K-means and PLS-DA [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2022, 34(12): 55-64.
[2] WANG Feifei, HAN Wenfei, SU Ziyao, YI Xinyue. Exploring the Academic Exchange among Countries along the "The Belt and Road": Bibliometrics Perspective of Highly Cited Papers [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2021, 33(6): 94-106.
[3] SU Yunmei, WU Jianguang. The Model Construction and Empirical Research on the Influencing Factors of Library Electronic Resources Performance Evaluation [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2021, 33(10): 98-107.
[4] GUO Lina, ZUO Wenge, ZHOU Qun. A bibliometric analysis of ESI highly cited papers from China and USA [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2020, 32(5): 45-54.
[5] YU Liping. The Evaluation Index of Classic Papers in Academic Periodicals: Journal Classic Index [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2019, 31(1): 35-43.
[6] SONG Danhui. Analysis of Highly Cited Papers and Potential Highly Cited Papers in University Based on InCites and ESI——A Case Study of Shenzhen University [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2018, 30(7): 55-64.
[7] WU Yabei, LI Xiaohong, LI Yunjing. Standardization of Impact Factors Across Field [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2018, 30(6): 156-159.
[8] ZHAO Shan, YANG Feng. Comparative Research on the Journal Evaluation Based on CiteScore and JIF ——Case Study on Journals of Library and Information Science [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2018, 30(5): 132-136.
[9] ZHANG Juan. Analysis on the Academic Influence and Development Tendency of Sci-tech Journals of CAAS [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2018, 30(11): 131-134.
[10] ZHANG Yang, FANG Yiran. The analysis of Journal Evaluation Research Based on CSSCI [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2018, 30(10): 30-37.
[11] WANG Ruixia, FEI Liwen. Analysis of Highly Cited Papers Published in ACTA EDULIS FUNGI in 2007-2016 [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2017, 29(12): 70-74.
[12] HUANG Mingrui. Discussion on the Relationship among four core Evaluation Indexes of Periodical [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2017, 29(12): 151-155.
[13] LIU Xin-yong, YANG Xiao-ping, LIN Ling-na. Study on the Comprehensive Evaluation Index Selection and System Construction of Agricultural Technical Journals—Taking Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology as an Example [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2016, 28(9): 155-159.
[14] ZHANG Kun, ZHANG Li, CAO Long, ZHOU Li-ping. Quantitative Analysis on the Relevant Indicators of Funded Papers in Forestry University Journals [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2016, 28(1): 42-46.
[15] WU Long-feng, ZENG Tong. The Application of Visualization Toolkit Based on Journal Evaluation Index [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2015, 27(9): 129-132.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!