中文    English

Journal of library and information science in agriculture

   

Simulation Modeling in Bibliometrics: Digital Humanities and Agricultural Knowledge Services Perspectives

ZHANG Ling   

  1. Shenzhen University Town Library, Shenzhen 518055
  • Received:2025-12-01 Online:2026-02-03

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] This study aims to systematically examine the application of simulation modeling in bibliometrics and to clarify its methodological position within the broader framework of digital humanities tools and agricultural knowledge services. In particular, the paper highlights the innovative potential of integrating simulation modeling with generative artificial intelligence, which enables more flexible representation of heterogeneous behaviors and context-dependent decision-making processes. By bridging bibliometrics, digital humanities tools, and agricultural knowledge services, this research contributes to the theoretical advancement of bibliometric methodology and provides a structured foundation for future applications in agricultural information practice. [Method/Process] This study adopts a systematic literature-based analytical approach to review and synthesize major simulation modeling methods applied in bibliometrics. The analysis covers several representative categories of simulation models, including dynamic modeling of classical bibliometric laws, evolution models of co-authorship and citation networks, multi-agent-based simulation, information and knowledge diffusion models, and evolutionary game-theoretic models. These methods are examined with respect to their modeling objects, underlying assumptions, key parameters, and analytical capabilities. Rather than organizing the review solely by research topics, this study emphasizes simulation modeling logic as the central analytical thread. Each category of simulation method is analyzed in terms of how micro-level rules and interactions generate macro-level bibliometric patterns. Particular attention is paid to the role of digital humanities tools in operationalizing these models, especially through visualization, system integration, and interactive simulation environments that facilitate exploration and interpretation. In addition, this study introduces recent advances in generative artificial intelligence, particularly large language model-based agents, as an extension of traditional multi-agent simulation. By incorporating generative AI into simulation frameworks, it becomes possible to model heterogeneous agents with richer cognitive representations, adaptive behaviors, and contextual reasoning abilities. The methodological discussion draws on theoretical foundations from bibliometrics, complex systems, and computational social science, while also considering practical constraints related to data availability, model calibration, and validation. [Results/Conclusions] The analysis demonstrates that simulation modeling significantly enhances the explanatory power of bibliometric research by revealing dynamic mechanisms behind literature growth, collaboration structures, and knowledge diffusion processes. Compared with traditional static indicators, simulation-based approaches provide deeper insights into how bibliometric patterns emerge and evolve over time. The integration of generative artificial intelligence further expands this capability by enabling more realistic modeling of behavioral heterogeneity and context-sensitive decision-making among research actors. From an application perspective, the study shows that simulation models and associated digital humanities tools can be effectively embedded into agricultural knowledge service workflows. These applications include research evaluation, scientific information services, and policy communication, where simulation-based scenario analysis can support strategic planning and decision-making. At the same time, the study identifies several challenges, including data quality constraints, computational costs, and issues related to model interpretability and transparency. The findings suggest that future research should focus on improving data integration, enhancing model validation strategies, and further exploring the integration of generative AI to support more adaptive and explainable simulation systems. By doing so, simulation-based bibliometrics can play a more substantial role in advancing agricultural information services and research management in complex, data-intensive environments.

Key words: digital humanities, knowledge services, agents, simulation methods, generative artificial intelligence, bibliometrics

CLC Number: 

  • G302
[1] 邱均平. 文献计量学[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.
Qiu Junping. Bibliometrics[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Science Press, 2019.
[2] 薛皓白, 张玲. 科技文献的计量分析与仿真模拟[M]. 新加坡: 世界联合出版社, 2024.
Xue Haobai, ZHANG Ling. Bibliometric Analysis and Simulation Modeling of Scientific Literature[M]. Singapore: World United Press, 2024.
[3] Scharnhorst A, Börner K, van den Besselaar P. Models of Science Dynamics: Encounters Between Complexity Theory and Information Sciences[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012.
[4] Chen Y S, Leimkuhler F F. A relationship between lotka's law, Bradford's law, and zipf's law[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1986, 37(5): 307-314.
[5] De Solla Price D. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1976, 27(5): 292-306.
[6] Oluić-Vuković V. Bradford's distribution: From the classical bibliometric "law" to the more general stochastic models[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997, 48(9): 833-842.
[7] Simon H A. On a class of skew distribution functions[J]. Biometrika, 1955, 42(3/4): 425-440.
[8] Egghe L, Rousseau R. Generalized success-breeds-success principle leading to time-dependent informetric distributions[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1995, 46(6): 426-445.
[9] Gilbert N. A simulation of the structure of academic science[J]. Sociological Research Online, 1997, 2(2): 91-105.
[10] 郭强, 赵瑾, 张芳, 等. 历时的布拉德福定律研究[J]. 情报科学, 2009, 27(2): 239-243.
Guo Qiang, Zhao Jin, Zhang Fang, et al. Study of time-dependent version of the Bradford's law[J]. Information Science, 2009, 27(2): 239-243.
[11] Chen Y S, Chong P P, Tong M Y. Dynamic behavior of Bradford’s law[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1995, 46(5): 370-383.
[12] Barabási A, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J]. Science, 1999, 286(5439): 509-512.
[13] Bianconi G, Barabási A L. Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks[J]. Europhysics Letters (EPL), 2001, 54(4): 436-442.
[14] Wang D S, Barabási A L. The Science of Science[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
[15] Newman M E J. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(): 5200-5205.
[16] Barabási A L, Jeong H, Néda Z, et al. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2002, 311(3/4): 590-614.
[17] Macal C M. Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation[J]. Journal of Simulation, 2016, 10(2): 144-156.
[18] Weisberg M, Muldoon R. Epistemic landscapes and the division of cognitive labor[J]. Philosophy of Science, 2009, 76(2): 225-252.
[19] Kovanis M, Trinquart L, Ravaud P, et al. Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: A large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 113(1): 651-671.
[20] Goffman W, Newill V A. Generalization of epidemic theory: An application to the transmission of ideas[J]. Nature, 1964, 204(4955): 225-228.
[21] Brauer F, Castillo-Chavez C. Mathematical Models in Population Biology and Epidemiology[M]. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012.
[22] Newman M E J. The structure and function of complex networks[J]. SIAM Review, 2003, 45(2): 167-256.
[23] 徐涵, 张庆. 复杂网络上传播动力学模型研究综述[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(10): 159-167.
Xu Han, Zhang Qing. A review of epidemic dynamics on complex networks[J]. Information Science, 2020, 38(10): 159-167.
[24] Szabó G, Fáth G. Evolutionary games on graphs[J]. Physics Reports, 2007, 446(4/5/6): 97-216.
[25] Wan Pengfei, Wang Xiaoming, Min Geyong, et al. Optimal control for positive and negative information diffusion based on game theory in online social networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2023, 10(1): 426-440.
[26] 朱庆华, 刘璇, 沈超, 等. 计算实验方法及其在情报学中的应用[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2012, 35(12): 1-6.
Zhu Qinghua, Liu Xuan, Shen Chao, et al. Computational experiments & their applications in information science[J]. Information Studies (Theory & Application), 2012, 35(12): 1-6.
[27] 郑德铭,李思佳,郑健龙,等.跨社交平台耦合网络舆情传播建模与仿真研究[J].农业图书情报学报,2024,36(8):69-81.
Zheng Deming, Li Sijia, Zheng Jianlong, et al. Modeling and simulation of coupled network public opinion propagation across social media platforms[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2024, 36(8): 69-81.
[28] Gao Chen, Lan Xiaochong, Li Nian, et al. Large language models empowered agent-based modeling and simulation: A survey and perspectives[J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2024, 11: 1259.
[29] Suzuki R, Arita T. An evolutionary model of personality traits related to cooperative behavior using a large language model[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14: 5989.
[1] SHEN Hongjie, SHEN Hongwei, WANG Junli. Generative AI Empowering Information Literacy Education in Digital Libraries: Path Exploration, Challenge Analysis, and Response Strategies [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(7): 50-60.
[2] ZHAI Jun, MENG Zihan, LI Fangsu, SHEN Lixin. AI Guides in Research Libraries of North America under the AI4S Context: Based on the Survey of 125 ARL Libraries [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(7): 35-49.
[3] SHI Xujie, YUAN Fan, LI Jia. Searching as Learning in the Context of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Technological Pathways, Behavioral Evolution, and Ethical Challenges [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(5): 40-57.
[4] QIAN Li, WANG Qianying, LIU Yi, ZHANG Yuanzhe, CHANG Zhijun. Agent Technology and Its Applications in Scientific Research [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(5): 5-14.
[5] ZHANG Li, WANG Bo, JING Shui. Generative AI-Driven Resource Discovery in Public Libraries: Service Optimization Based on a Dynamic Evaluation Model [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(5): 58-71.
[6] GOU Ruike, LUO Wei. Influencing Factors of Continuous Use Intention of "Generation Z" Users of an AIGC Platform [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(3): 66-80.
[7] QIAO Jinhua, MA Xueyun. Risks and Regulations for Application of the LLaMA Model in University Future Learning Centers [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(2): 37-48.
[8] GUO Limin, LIU Yueru, FU Yaming. Design and Transformation Pathways of Library Systems Driven by Generative Agents [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(12): 36-47.
[9] SUN Lijuan. Exploring the Transition of Public Librarians to "Prompt Librarians" from the Perspective of New Quality Productive Forces [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(1): 17-32.
[10] LUO Guofeng, YI Tong, YAN Zhouzhou. Critical Information Literacy Education in University Libraries from the Perspective of AIGC Application [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2025, 37(1): 47-58.
[11] Haoxian WANG, Ziming ZHOU, Feifei DING, Chengfu WEI. Digital Humanities & Large Language Models: Practice and Research in Semantic Retrieval of Ancient Documents [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(9): 89-101.
[12] Huaming LI. Opportunities and Challenges: The Use of ChatGPT in Enabling Library Knowledge Services [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(8): 96-105.
[13] Baiyang LI, Rong SUN. Construction of an AI Literacy General Education Curriculum Based on "Knowledge-Skills" Navigation [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(8): 34-42.
[14] Jia LIU. Innovation and Risk Avoidance of Smart Library Services Based on Generative Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(7): 63-75.
[15] Mo LI, Bin YANG. From Generative Artificial Intelligence to Artificial General Intelligence: Enabling Innovation Models in Library Knowledge Services [J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(6): 50-61.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!