国外深度伪造技术政策文本分析与启示——以美国、欧盟为例

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.22-0501

Abstract

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] In the digital age, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies based on intelligent algorithms have a huge impact on people's lives, and one representative technology is deepfake technology. It is a derivative technology that appears naturally in the development of AI technology, and is mainly used in speech synthesis, AI face changing, etc. However, the abuse of deepfake technologies has caused varying degrees of threat to national security, social and public security, and privacy and reputation. Therefore, it is necessary for the government to formulate policies to guide the behavior of deepfake technology subjects. [Method/Process] Through online research, it is found that the United States and the European Union have paid much attention to the alienation of deepfake technology, and have formulated a series of policies to govern it. Therefore, the deepfake technology policies of the United States and the European Union were selected as the research object. This paper adopts the "X-Y" two-dimensional analysis framework to analyze the deepfake policy text. The X dimension is the basic policy tool, and the Y dimension is the perspective of how to deal with technology alienation. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of the two was carried out, that is, the application of policy tools in dealing with technology alienation is studied. This paper uses Nvivo12 to complete the coding of policy tools, codes the policy terms one by one according to the selected policy tool types, and then analyzes the coding results and draws conclusions. [Results/Conclusions] The deepfake technology policies of the United States and the European Union have certain characteristics in content, such as focusing on environmental policy tools, paying more attention to the governance of technology, individuals and organizations, and focusing on the publicity and education of technology ethics. But in general, it is based on its existing system to increase the governance of the alienation phenomenon of deepfake technology, so as to strengthen the mutual promotion and integration of new policies and old policies. For China, the governance of deepfake technology alienation should be started as soon as possible. Specific measures include formulating deepfake technology alienation governance plans, promoteing government-led deepfake technology innovation practices, realizing the combination of technology ethics and policy tools, actively participating in international governance of deepfake technology alienation. In addition, this paper takes the deepfake technology policies of the United States and the European Union as an example, which has certain limitations, so in the future research, we will expand the selection of samples.

Key words: deepfake, policy analysis, technological alienation, national security, disinformation

CLC Number:

D521

ZHAO Xueqin, LI Tian'e, HU Huihui. Analysis and Enlightenment of International Deepfake Technology Policy Texts: Taking the United States and the European Union as Examples[J].Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 60-71.

References

[1] JUDGE H B, DIXON JR(Ret). Deepfakes: More frightening than photoshop on steroids[J]. Judges' journal, 2019, 58(3): 35.
[2] GüERA D, DELP E J. Deepfake video detection using recurrent neural networks[C]. IEEE international conference on advanced video and signal based surveillance (AVSS), 2018(15): 1-6.
[3] 朱新同, 唐云祁, 耿鹏志. 基于特征融合的篡改与深度伪造图像检测算法[J]. 信息网络安全, 2021, 21(8): 70-81.
ZHU X T, TANG Y Q, GENG P Z.Falsification and deep forgery image detection algorithm based on feature fusion[J]. Information network security, 2021, 21(8): 70-81.
[4] 王丽娜, 聂建思, 汪润, 等. 面向深度伪造的溯源取证方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(5): 959-964.
WANG L N, NIE J S, WANG R, et al.A method of forensic tracing for deep forgery[J]. Journal of Tsinghua university(natural science edition), 2022, 62(5): 959-964.
[5] 张爱军, 王芳. 人工智能视域下的深度伪造与政治舆论变异[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 23(4): 29-36, 106.
ZHANG A J, WANG F.Deepfake and the variation of political public opinion from the perspective of artificial intelligence[J]. Journal of Hohai university(philosophy and social sciences edition), 2021, 23(4): 29-36, 106.
[6] 龙坤, 马钺, 朱启超. 深度伪造对国家安全的挑战及应对[J]. 信息安全与通信保密, 2019(10): 21-34.
LONG K, MA Y, ZHU Q C.The challenge and response of deepfake to national security[J]. Information security and communication confidentiality, 2019(10): 21-34.
[7] CHESNEY R, CITRON D K.Deepfakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security[J]. California law review, 2019, 107(6): 1753-1819.
[8] 熊波. “深度伪造”的扩张化刑事治理风险及其限度[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 44(6): 106-113.
XIONG B.Risks and limits of expanded criminal governance of "deepfake"[J]. Journal of Anhui university(philosophy and social sciences edition), 2020, 44(6): 106-113.
[9] 陈昌凤, 徐芳依. 智能时代的“深度伪造”信息及其治理方式[J]. 新闻与写作, 2020(4): 66-71.
CHEN C F, XU F."Deepfake" information in the age of intelligence and its governance[J]. News and writing, 2020(4): 66-71.
[10] CHESNEY R, CITRON D K.Deepfakes and the new disinformation war: The coming age of post-truth geopolitics[J]. Foreign affairs, 2019, 98(1): 147-155.
[11] 安全内参. ASPI报告: 武器化深度造假对国家安全与民主的影响[EB/OL]. [2022-02-04].https://www.secrss.com/articles/19188.
Security insider. ASPI report: The impact of weaponized deepfakes on national security and democracy[EB/OL].[2022-02-04]. https://www.secrss.com/articles/19188.
[12] 安全内参. CSET报告: Deepfakes的基本威胁评估[EB/OL]. [2022-02-04].https://www.secrss.com/articles/25428.
Security insider. CSET report: Basic threat assessment of Deepfakes[EB/OL].[2022-02-04]. https://www.secrss.com/articles/25428.
[13] AMY M.Many Americans say made-up news is a critical problem that needs to be fixed[EB/OL]. [2022-02-04].https://www.journalism.org/2019/06/05/many-americans-say-made-up-news-is-a-critical-problem-that-needs-to-be-fixed/.
[14] 顾建光. 公共政策工具研究的意义、基础与层面[J]. 公共管理学报, 2006, 3(4): 58-61.
GU J G.The significance, basis and levels of research on public policy tools[J]. Journal of public administration, 2006, 3(4): 58-61.
[15] HOWLETT M, RAMESH M, PERL A.Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems[M]. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2003: 92.
[16] PHHAL R, O'SULLIVAV E. A framework for mapping industrial emergence[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2011, 78(2): 217-230.
[17] ROTHWELL R, ZEGVELD W.Reindusdalization and technology[M]. Logman group limited, 1985: 83-104.
[18] 韩莉莉, 马万利. 技术异化视域下科技伦理人文效应探析[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2020(6): 92-95.
HAN L L, MA W L.An analysis of the humanistic effect of science and technology ethics from the perspective of technological alienation[J]. People's forum·academic frontiers, 2020(6): 92-95.
[19] 苗争鸣, 尹西明, 许展玮, 等. 颠覆性技术异化及其治理研究——以“深度伪造”技术的典型化事实为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(12): 83-98.
MIAO Z M, YIN X M, XU Z W, et al.Research on disruptive technology alienation and its governance: Taking the typical fact of "deepfake" technology as an example[J]. Science and science and technology management, 2020, 41(12): 83-98.
[20] 贾婕. 生态社会主义视域下的科学技术异化[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 2018, 35(3): 122-126.
JIA J.Alienation of science and technology from the perspective of ecological socialism[J]. Research in philosophy of science and technology, 2018, 35(3): 122-126.
[21] GRIMES M G, WILLIAMS T A, ZHAO E Y.Beyond hybridity: Accounting for the values complexity of all organizations in the study of mission and mission drift[J]. Academy of management review, 45(1): 234-238.
[22] 柳卸林, 董彩婷, 丁雪辰. 数字创新时代: 中国的机遇与挑战[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(6): 3-15.
LIU X L, DONG C T, DING X C.The era of digital innovation: China's opportunities and challenges[J]. Science and science and technology management, 2020, 41(6): 3-15.
[23] 薛桂波, 闫坤如. “负责任创新”视角下技术伦理的政策转向[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 39(1): 9-14.
XUE G B, YAN K R.Policy turn of technological ethics from the perspective of "responsible innovation"[J]. Journal of Dalian university of technology (social science edition), 2018, 39(1): 9-14.
[24] 汤蓓. 试析国际组织的协同治理策略——以国际劳工组织推广“社会保障底线”政策为例[J]. 国际观察, 2017(3): 65-80.
TANG B.An analysis of the collaborative governance strategies of international organizations - Taking the promotion of the "social security bottom line" policy of the international labour organization as an example[J]. International observation, 2017(3): 65-80.