Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 30-39.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0391
• Bibliometrics • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Min1,2, CHEN Yunwei1,2,*
CLC Number:
[1] 刘朋朋, 贠杰. 中国政府绩效评估领域研究述评[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2017(3): 18-27. LIU P P, YUN J.Review on the research of Chinese government performance evaluation[J]. Journal of Gansu administration institute, 2017(3): 18-27. [2] 中国行政管理学会课题组, 贾凌民. 政府公共政策绩效评估研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2013(3): 20-23. Research group of CPAS, JIA L M. Research on the performance eval-uation of government public policy[J]. Chinese public administration, 2013(3): 20-23. [3] 赵蓉英, 王旭, 王建品, 等. 中国科技评价研究态势与推进策略[J]. 情报科学, 2019, 37(5): 7-12. ZHAO R Y, WANG X, WANG J P, et al.Research situation and prompting strategies of S & T evaluation in China[J]. Information science, 2019, 37(5): 7-12. [4] CRONBACH L J, et al.Toward reform of program evaluation[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-bass, 1980. [5] POLSTER T H.Public program analysis: Applied methods[Z]. Baltlmore, University park press, 19789. [6] LIBECAP G D.Economic variables and law development: A case of western mineral property[J]. Economic history journal, 1978, 38(2). [7] CHARNES A, COOPER W W, RHODES E.Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European journal of operational research, 1978(2): 429-444. [8] 张永安, 郄海拓, 颜斌斌. 基于两阶段DEA模型的区域创新投入产出评价及科技创新政策绩效提升路径研究——基于科技创新政策情报的分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(1): 198-207. ZHANG Y A, QIE H T, YAN B B.Regional input-output evaluation and ascension path of scientific and technological innovation policy performance based on the two-stage DEA model-Analysis based on scientific and technological innovation policy information[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2018, 37(1): 198-207. [9] PAPPAS R, REMER D.Measuring R & D productivity[J]. Research management, 1985(2): 15-22. [10] FREEMAN C.Technology policy and economic performance: Experience from Japan[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2008. FREEMAN C.Technology policy and economic performance: Experience from japan[M]. Nanjing: Southeast university press, 2008. [11] DRONGELEN K V, COOK A.Design principles for the development of measurement systems for research and development processes[J]. R & D management, 1997, 27(4): 345-357. [12] WARDA J.Measuring the Value of R & D Tax Provisions[C]. OECD: Fiscal measures to promote R & D and innovation, Paris, 1996. [13] VAN POTTELSBERGHE B, CAPRON H.The public support to busi-ness research and development: An integrated assessment scheme and some additional quantitative evidence[C]. OECD conference on "Policy evaluation in innovation and technology", Paris, France, 1997. [14] BONNAL L, FOUGERE D, SERANDON A.Evaluating the impact of French employment policies on individual labour market histories[J]. Review of economic studies, 1997, 64(4): 683-713. [15] VAN TONGEREN F W. Microsimulation of corporate response to investment subsidies[J]. Journal of policy modeling, 1998, 20(1): 55-75. [16] 姚刚. 国外公共政策绩效评估研究与借鉴[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2008(4): 80-85. YAO G.A study of the assessment of the overseas public policy achievements: Its use for reference[J]. Journal of Shenzhen university(humanities & social sciences), 2008(4): 80-85. [17] 谭春辉, 谢荣, 刘倩. 政策工具视角下的我国科技评估政策文本量化研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(10): 181-190. TAN C H, XIE R, LIU Q.A quantitative study of Chinese science and technology evaluation policy text from the perspective of policy instrument[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2020, 39(10): 181-190. [18] CONGRESS T U.National science and technology policy, organization and priorities act (PL 94-282)[S]. Washington, DC: US congress, 1976. [19] CONGRESS R U.The government performance and results act (PL 103-62)[S]. Washington, DC: US congress, 1993. [20] DEGEORGES O J.Speaking power to truth: The politics of implementing policy evaluation in France//An account of the late French national evaluation policy(NEP), 1988-1993[D]. New York: New York university, 1997. [21] GAME C.Comprehensive performance assessment in English local government[J]. International journal of productivity & performance management, 2006, 55(6): 466-479. [22] 朱雪飞, 曾乐民, 卢进. 韩国科技评估现状分析及借鉴[J]. 科技管理研究, 2006(2): 45-47. ZHU X F, ZENG L M, LU J.Analysis and reference of the current situation of science and technology evaluation in South Korea[J]. Science and technology management research, 2006(2): 45-47. [23] 英城水間. 科学技術基本法について[J]. 情報管理, 1996, 38(12): 1080-1093. HIDEKI M.About the basic law on science and technology[J]. In-formation management, 1996, 38(12): 1080-1093. [24] 杨宏山. 政府绩效评估的国际比较及启示——以美国、英国、日本和韩国为例[J]. 北京电子科技学院学报, 2015, 23(1): 26-34. YANG H S.Institutional comparison of government performance evaluation systems and its enlightenment to China: A case study of USA, UK, Japan And Korea[J]. Journal of Beijing electronic science and technology institute, 2015, 23(1): 26-34. [25] 谈毅, 仝允桓. 韩国国家科技计划评估模式分析与借鉴[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2004(6): 46-49. TAN Y, TONG Y H.Analysis and reference of evaluation mode of South Korea's national science and technology plan[J]. Foreign eco-nomics & management, 2004(6): 46-49. [26] 马蔡琛, 赵笛. 公共支出政策绩效评价的国际经验与改革建议[J]. 地方财政研究, 2018(1): 100-106. MA C C, ZHAO D.International experience and reform suggestions of public expenditure policy performance evaluation[J]. Sub national fiscal research, 2018(1): 100-106. [27] TZELEPIS D, SKURAS D.The effects of regional capital subsidies on firm performance: An empirical study[J]. Journal of small busi-ness and enterprise development, 2004, 11(1): 121-129. [28] CZARNITZKI D, LICHT G.Additionality of public R & D grants in a transition economy: The case of eastern Germany[J]. Economics of transition, 2006, 14(1): 101-131. [29] CZARNITZKI D, EBERSBERGER B, FIER A.The relationship be-tween R & D collaboration, subsidies and R & D performance: Em-pirical evidence from Finland and Germany[J]. Journal of applied-econometrics, 2007, 22(7): 1347-1366. [30] RUEGG R, JORDAN G.Overview of evaluation methods for R & D programs. A directory of evaluation methods relevant to technology development programs[R]. Sandia national laboratories, 2007. [31] CZARNITZKI D, HOTTENROTT H.R & D investment and financ-ing constraints of small and medium-sized firms[J]. Small business economics, 2009, 36: 65-83. [32] CATOZZELLA A, VIVARELLI M.Assessing the impact of public support on innovative productivity[J]. DISCE-quaderni del dipartimento di scienze economiche e sociali, 2011. [33] MOTOHASHI K, MURAMATSU S.Examining the university industry collaboration policy in Japan: Patent analysis[J]. Technology in soci-ety, 2012, 34(2): 149-162. [34] SAMARA E, GEORGIADIS P, BAKOUROS I.The impact of innovation policies on the performance of national innovation systems: A system dynamics analysis[J]. Technovation, 2012, 32(11): 624-638. [35] 马海群, 吕红. 高校信息公开政策实施效果评价体系构建研究[J]. 情报科学, 2013, 31(7): 3-9. MA H Q, LV H.Construction of evaluation system on implementation effect of university information disclosure policy[J]. Information science, 2013, 31(7): 3-9. [36] BARJAK F, ES-SADKI N, ARUNDEL A.The effectiveness of policies for formal knowledge transfer from European universities and public research institutes to firms[J]. Research evaluation, 2015, 24(1): 4-18. [37] 杨思洛, 沈小雯, 欧佳. 新时期"五计学"的研究内容与趋势——以第16届ISSI会议为视角[J]. 图书情报知识, 2019(1): 67-80. YANG S L, SHEN X W, OU J.The research contents and trends of "five metrics" in the new period: From the perspective of the 16th ISSI conference[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2019(1): 67-80. [38] 彭纪生, 仲为国, 孙文祥. 政策测量、政策协同演变与经济绩效: 基于创新政策的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2008(9): 25-36. PENG J S, ZHONG W G, SUN W X.Policy measurement, policy co evolution and economic performance: An empirical study based on innovation policy[J]. Management world, 2008(9): 25-36. [39] 王帮俊, 朱荣. 产学研协同创新政策效力与政策效果评估——基于中国2006~2016年政策文本的量化分析[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(3): 30-35. WANG B J, ZHU R.Evaluation on policy efficacy and effect of industry-university-research cooperative innovation - Policy quantification in china from 2006 to 2016[J]. Soft science, 2019, 33(3): 30-35. [40] 张宝建, 李鹏利, 陈劲, 等. 国家科技创新政策的主题分析与演化过程——基于文本挖掘的视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(11): 15-31. ZHANG B J, LI P L, CHEN J, et al.Thematic analysis and evolu-tion process of national science and technology[J]. Science of sci-ence and management of S & T, 2019, 40(11): 15-31. [41] 赵婷茹, 李世杰, 朱沛祺. 基于实验设计的政策绩效评估计量方法述评[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(4): 170-175. ZHAO T R, LI S J, ZHU P Q.A review of measurement methods of policy performance evaluation based on experimental design[J]. Statistics & decision, 2021, 37(4): 170-175. [42] THISTLETHWAITE D L, CAMPBELL D T.Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment[J]. Journal of educational psychology, 1960, 51(6). [43] 王钊, 王良虎. 税收优惠政策对高技术产业创新效率的影响——基于断点回归分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(11): 109-116. WANG Z, WANG L H.Research on the impact of tax preferential policies on the innovation efficiency of high-tech industry - Based on breakpoint regression analysis[J]. Science & technology progress and policy, 2019, 36(11): 109-116. [44] ASHENFELTER O.Estimating the effect of training programs on earning[J]. The review of econoics and statistics, 1978, 60(1): 47-57. [45] BLOOM H S.Estimating the effect of Job-training programs, using longitudinal data: Ashenfelter’s findings reconsidered[J]. 1984, 19(4): 544-556. [46] CARD D, KATZ L F, KRUEGER A B.Comment on David Neumark and William Wascher, "employment effects of minimum and subminimum wages: Panel data on state minimum wage laws"[J]. Industrial & amp; labor relations review, 1994, 47(3). [47] MEYER B D, VISCUSI W K, DURBIN D L.Workers' compensation and injury duration: Evidence from a natural experiment[J]. The American economic review, 1995, 85(3): 322-340. [48] HECKMAN J J, SMITH J A.The pre-programme earnings dip and the determinants of participation in a social programme. Implica-tions for simple programme evaluation strategies[J]. The economic journal, 1999, 109(457). [49] PUHANI P A.Poland on the dole: the effect of reducing the unem-ployment benefit entitlement period during transition[J]. Journal of population economics, 2000, 13(1). [50] STEWART M B.The employment effects of the national minimum wage[J]. The economic journal, 2004, 114(494). [51] HECKMAN J, ICHIMURA H, TODD P.Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme[J]. Review of economic studies, 1997, 64(4): 605-654. [52] CARBONI O A.R & D subsidies and private R & D expenditures: Evidence from Italian manufacturing data[J]. International review of applied economics, 2011, 25(4): 419-439. [53] 陈玲, 段尧清. 政务大数据政策的技术创新效应分析——基于PSM-DID方法的估计[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(20): 96-105. CHEN L, DUAN Y Q.Technological innovation effect analysis of government big data policy - Estimation based on PSM-DID method[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(20): 96-105. |
[1] | ZHANG Wenjun. Conception of Academic Coin Circulation System Based on Blockchain [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(8): 42-51. |
[2] | XIAO Shiyi, WEN Tingxiao. Reform and Implementation Path of University Evaluation under the Internet Environment [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 98-106. |
[3] | WANG Jian, GAO Feng, FENG Jianzhong. Impact Mechanism of Information Service Supply on Entrepreneurship Performance under Rural Revitalization [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(6): 50-60. |
[4] | SONG Shanshan, BAI Wenlin. A Review of Big Data Governance Research in China [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(4): 4-17. |
[5] | MA Yunzhe, CUI Xu, ZHANG Xiaoyi. 24-Hour Service Quality Evaluation System of a Self-Service Library under the Background of Normal State of COVID-19 Epidemic Prevention and Control [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(3): 68-80. |
[6] | WAN Hao, ZHANG Fujun, LV Qianqian. The Validity of Peer Review Results of DEA Based Super Efficiency Projects [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(2): 88-101. |
[7] | XIONG Tao, LIU Wenjiang. Hot Topics and Frontier Evolution of Studies on Domestic Migrant Workers [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(8): 45-62. |
[8] | SHI Hongqing. Analysis of the Achievements and the Goal and Path of Building the World-Class S&T Journals in China [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(7): 54-62. |
[9] | GUAN Peng, WANG Yuefen, HUANG Qin, YE Longsheng, FU Zhu. Research on the Impact of Regional Innovation Cooperation Network on Technological Innovation Performance: Based on the Yangtze River Delta [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(6): 40-53. |
[10] | LI Feifan, LIU Caie, LI Yongfang. The Evaluation Method of University Research Performance and Disciplinary Development Potential [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(4): 68-77. |
[11] | MENG Yintao, ZHAO Leixia, YU Qianqian. Scientific Data Evaluation Index System for Scientific Data Preservation [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(12): 48-59. |
[12] | XIA Dong, XU Yingqi, WANG Chao, LI Bei. Review of the Evaluation of Scientific and Technical Novelty Search Service in China [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(11): 16-27. |
[13] | LAN Xue, HAN Yi. Data Usability of Book Rating Scores on Social Reading Platform from the Perspective of Altmetrics Evaluation: A Case Study of Douban Reading [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(11): 74-82. |
[14] | YANG Yiming, ZHANG Xinglong, ZHANG Hongyan, GUO Chunyang. The Evaluation of Librarians' Ability under the Environment of Smart University Libraries: Based on AHP and TOPSIS [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(11): 83-94. |
[15] | LIU Qian, ZHENG Sijia, GUI Chenjun, WANG Xuefeng. Analysis of Scholars' Comments on Breaking Through the Evaluation Criteria Based on"Four Only" [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(10): 46-58. |
|