中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 5-19.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2020.12.20-0928


• Open science • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis on Open Science Roadmap and Design on Decision-Making Method of Open Science Road

HUANG Jinxia1,2, ZHAO Zhanyi1,2, WANG Fang1   

  1. 1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190;
    2. Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190
  • Received:2020-10-16 Online:2020-12-05 Published:2021-01-06

Abstract: [Objective/Significance] Whether a country enters the open science and how to choose the path, it is urgent to provide the decision-making methods. [Method/Process] As a national science policy, open science can be planned and implemented by way of road map. This paper analyzes the characteristics of the six international open science roadmaps in their release, content and effect evaluation, and puts forward a decision-making method for a national open science road. [Results/Conclusions] The formation of the open science roadmap is influenced by many factors such as the national medium and long-term opening plan, supporting infrastructure and other factors. The implementation contents include the country's current situation, future plan and specific measures, which will ultimately improve the open maturity level and influence of a country or region's scientific research. Based on these characteristics, a decision-making model of the national open science process is preliminarily constructed, covering the decision-making contents of different stages (before the process, in process and after the process) in the implementation of open science, and a "three-step" decision-making process of open science is designed. This paper briefly mentions the next step of open science in China and the roles that libraries can play.

Key words: open science, roadmap, characteristics, decision-making method, decision-making factor model, think-takn

CLC Number: 

  • G250
[1] Editorial. Preregistration and open science practices in hearing sci- ence and audiology: The time has come[J]. Ear and hearing, 2020, DOI:10.1097/AUD. 0000000000000817.
[2] TAYLOR R, HAIMOVICH A, HORNG S, et al.Open science in e-mergency medicine research[J]. Annals of emergency medicine, 2020, 76(2): 247-248.
[3] BERNARD R.Open science: a revolution in sight?[J]. Interlending & document supply, 44(4): 155-160.
[4] 朱滢. “开放科学数据共享软件共享”, 你准备好了吗?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(6): 995-996.
[5] AYRIS P, BERNAL I, CAVALLI V, et al.LIBER open science roadmap[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://zenodo.org/record/1303002#.WzsCdtUzaM8.
[6] HOLZMEYER C.Open science initiatives: Challenges for public health promotion[J]. Health promot int, 2019(3): 3.
[7] Exploring the impact of social communication on the innovation potential of open science communities[J]. IEEE transactions onsystems, man, and cybernetics: Systems, 2016, DOI:10.1109/TSMC. 2015.2455956.
[8] Roadmap thinking - how to build a strategy using a roadmap[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://www.roadmap-planner.io/blog/how-to-build-a-roadmap-strategy/.
[9] Open science for a global transformation: CODATA coordinated submission to the UNESCO open science consultation[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://zenodo.org/record/3935461#.X5aFlBYzapr.
[10] DEGKWITZ A.Open science policy - a twisted road and clear aims[J]. Bibliothek der zukunft. zukunft der bibliothek (festschrift für elmar mittler), 2016: 78-91.
[11] 黄金霞, 赵展一, 王昉, 等. 国际反思背景下我国科研群体OA发展需求调查[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 11: 44-53.
[12] WEITZEL D, BOCKELMAN B, FRASER D, et al.Enabling campus grids with open science grid technology[J]. Journal of physics conference, 2011, 331(6): 062025.
[13] 黄雨婷, 赖彤. 美国开放科学中心: 实践进展、特点与启示[J]. 图书与情报, 2019(3): 105-113.
[14] LACEY J, COATES R, HERINGTON M.Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: Understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers[J]. Journal of responsible innovation, 2020, DOI:10.1080/23299460.2020.1800969.
[15] Open science and research leads to surprising discoveries and creative insights: Open science and research roadmap 2014-2017[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22]. http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/75210.
[16] Implementation roadmap for the European open science cloud[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://www.esfri.eu/project-landmarks-news/implementation-roadmap-european-open-science-cloud.
[17] Open science and its role in universities: a roadmap for cultural change[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://www.leru.org/publications/open-science-and-its-role-in-universities-a-roadmap-for-cultural-change.
[18] CNRS roadmap for open scienc [EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://www.science-ouverte.cnrs.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/CNRS_Roadmap_Open_Science_18nov2019.pdf.
[19] Roadmap for open science[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22]. http://science.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/eng/h_97992.html#7.
[20] 黄磊, 赵延东, 何光喜. 从开放获取到开放科学的变化与挑战——基于多指标比较的文献计量分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 11: 241-251.
[21] Open innovation, open science, open to the world[EB/OL]. [2020-10-26].https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3213b335-1cbc-11e6-ba9a-01aa75ed71a1.
[22] National plan open science[EB/OL]. [2020-10-26].https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:9e9fa82e-06c1-4d0d-9e20-5620259a6c65?collection=research.
[23] New Sparc Europe report provides analysis of open data and open science policies in Europe[EB/OL]. [2020-10-26]. http://sparceurope.org/new-sparc-europe-report-analyses-open-data-open-science-policies-europe/.
[24] Foster. Open science definition[EB/OL].[2020-08-22]. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-science-definition.
[25] Open science included in new Serbian law[EB/OL]. [2020-10-26].https://www.eifl.net/news/open-science-included-new-serbian-law.
[26] Ofspokesperson Office. World science day for peace and development[EB/OL]. [2002-11-12]. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/ MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/msg_ethiopia_02.pdf.
[27] VAN DIJK W, SCHATSCHNEIDER C, HART S A.Open sciencein education sciences[J]. Journal of learning disabilities, 2020, DOI: 10.35542/osf.io/qdj4t.
[28] 赵展一, 黄金霞. 开放科学基础设施的信息资源建设模式分析——以OpenAIRE为例[J/OL]. 图书馆建设: 1-12[2020-12-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1331.G2.20200921.0859.002.html.
[29] 邢文明, 郭安琪, 秦顺, 等. 科学数据管理与共享的FAIR原则——背景、内容与实施[J/OL]. 信息资源管理学报: 1-10[2020-12-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1812.G2.20200909.1157.002.html.
[30] 欧洲开放科学云正式启动[EB/OL]. [2020-02-21].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?biz=MzU5NTg0Mzk2MA==&mid=2247485021&idx=1&sn=51019c1fbc08216bf1e57c130563fe0d&source=41#wechat_redirect.
[31] 徐玲玲, 阚阅. 欧洲研究型大学联盟: 致力于教育、知识创新和全面性研究的推广[J]. 上海教育, 2018(26): 39-41.
[32] 石志松. 欧洲研究图书馆协会数字人文发展策略探析[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2019, 5: 24-31.
[33] 教科文组织为制定开放科学标准性文件启动全球协商[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/UaybpJDK10TZxtJZFfk1Qg.
[34] San Francisco declaration on research assessment[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22].https://sfdora.org/read/.
[35] Open science and research in Finland - Evaluation of openness in the activities of research organisations and research funding organisations in2016[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81237635.pdf.
[36] 欧洲开放科学云商业成功案例简介[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22]. http://www.ecas.cas.cn/xxkw/kbcd/201115_128157/ml/xxhcxyyyal/202003/t20200306_4554748.html.
[37] 上海科技创新资源数据中心成欧洲开放科学云首家非欧洲成员机构, 人工智能图谱上线[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22]. http://www.whb.cn/zhuzhan/kjwz/20200222/327184.html.
[38] 中国科技云与欧洲开放科学云启动战略合作[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22]. http://www.cas.cn/yx/202006/t20200624_4751116.shtml 2020.
[39] 吴建中. 推进开放数据助力开放科学[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2018, 37(2): 4-10.
[40] 段美珍, 顾立平, 赵昆华. 2015-2016年国际开放获取相关政策与实践进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(18): 19-28.
[41] 邱春艳, 黄如花. 近3年国际科学数据共享领域新进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016(3): 6-14.
[42] 石志松. 开放科学环境下研究型图书馆的角色与职责. 图书馆建设, 2019: 66-73.
[43] Open Science National Coordination Federation of Finish Learned Societies[EB/OL]. [2017-05-31].https://avointiede.fi/documents/10864/12232/The+impact+of+the+Finnish+Open+Science+and+Research+Initiative+(ATT)/c0424041-fc6c-44a5-a7cc-a4fb1145d86f.
[44] LACEY J, COATES R, HERINGTON M.Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: Understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers[J]. Journal of responsible innovation, 2020(8): 1-23.
[45] HUNTER, PHILIP.A DEAL for open access: The negotiations between the German DEAL project and publishers have global implications for academic publishing beyond just Germany[J]. Embo Reports, 2018: e46317.
[46] CAPPS B.Where does open science lead us during a pandemic? a public good argument to prioritize rights in the open commons[J]. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics: CQ: the international journal of healthcare ethics committees:2020: 1-14.
[47] GRAND A, WILKINSON C, BULTITUDE K, et al.Open science a new "trust technology"?[J]. Ence communication, 2012, 34(5): 679-689.
[48] Poupon V, Seyller A, Rouleau G A.The Tanenbaum open science institute: leading a paradigm shift at the Montreal neurological institute[J]. Neuron, 2017, 95(5): 1002.
[49] WOELFLE M, OLLIARO P, TODD M H.Open science is a research accelerator[J]. Nat chem, 2011, 3: 745-748.
[50] SHAW D L.Is open science the future of drug development?[J]. Yale journal of biology & medicine, 2017, 90(1): 147-151.
[51] JONG S, SLAVOVA K.When publications lead to products: the open science conundrum in new product development[J]. Research policy, 2014, 43(4): 645-654.
[52] GASSMANN O, WIDENMAYER B, FRIESIKE S, et al.Opening up science: Towards an agenda of open science in industry and academia[J]. Social ence electronic publishing, 2012, 40(4): 1-21.
[53] COOK B G, LLOYD J W, THERRIEN W J.Open science in the field of emotional and behavioral disorders[J]. Education and treatment of children, 2019, 42(4): 579-600.
[54] HESSE B W.Can psychology walk the walk of open science?[J]. American psychologist, 2018, 73(2): 126.
[55] FRANKENHUIS W E, DANIEL N.Open science is liberating and can foster creativity[J]. Perspectives on psychological ence, 2018, 13(4): 439-447.
[56] LAKE B.Can open science save us from a solar-driven monsoon?[J]. Journal of space weather and space climate, 2016, 6: 7.
[57] DICKEL, SASCHA, FRANZEN, MARTINA.Digital inclusion: the social implications of open science[J]. Ztschrift für soziologie, 2015, 44(5): 330-347.
[58] EVANS T R.Improving evidence quality for organisational change management through open science[J]. Journal of organizational change management, 2020, 33(2): 367-378.
[59] MIROWSKI, PHILIP.The future(s) of open science[J]. Social studies of ence, 2018, 48(2): 171.
[60] PEISERT S, WELCH V.The open science cyber risk profile: the Rosetta stone for open science and cybersecurity[J]. IEEE security& privacy, 2017, 15(5): 94-95.
[61] HEISE C; PEARCE J M.From open access to open science: The path from scientific reality to open scientific communication[J]. SAGE open, 2020, 10(2): 1-14.
[62] JENNY F, RALPH S, MATTHIJS D B.Open science in e-science: Contingency or policy?[J]. Journal of documentation, 2009, 65(1): 6-32.
[63] JOHN P W, HSINI H.Local context, academic entrepreneurship and open science: Publication secrecy and commercial activity a-mong Japanese and US scientists[J]. Research policy, 2014, 43(2):
[64] TIMOTHY C, SHAWN H H, YANN J.Open science versus commercialization: A modern research conflict?[J]. Genome medicine 2012, 4: 17.
[65] 教科文组织为制定开放科学标准性文件启动全球协商[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/UaybpJDK10TZxtJZFfk1Qg.
[66] 顾洁. 聚焦开放科学与开放创新, 助力上海建好新时代改革开放试验田——2019竞争情报上海论坛暨国际科学技术信息理事会年会盛大召开[J]. 竞争情报, 2019, 15(5): 6-8.
[67] 邵曾婷, 王译晗, 叶钰铭, 等.从开放获取到开放科学:开放获取周的主题、内容演变与启示[J/OL]. 图书情报工作: 1-13[2020-12-01]. https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.14.002.
[68] 张学文, 田华, 陈劲. 开放科学及建构的制度逻辑[J]. 自然辨证法通讯, 2020, 261(5): 86-92.
[69] JOACHIM S.Open supply? On the future of document supply in the world of open science[J]. Interlending & document supply, 2016, 44(4): 150-154.
[70] MASS M T, RUTH G H.Open science disrupting the status quo in academic libraries: A perspective of zimbabw[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2019(45): 406-412.
[71] 王燕军, 盛兴军. 《鲜活的知识: 大英图书馆2015-2023大英图书馆》战略规划报告的启示与思考[J]. 图书与情报, 2016, 2: 33-39.
[72] JOHN I O, AMAKA R O, SAMUEL S, et al.The roles of academic libraries in propagating open science: A qualitative literature review[J]. Information development, 2018, 34(2): 113-121.
[73] BASILI C.Information literacy requirements for open science-Sci-enceDirect[J]. Pathways into information literacy and communitiesof practice, 2017: 229-248.
[1] CHEN Xuefei, HUANG Jinxia, WANG Fang. Open Science: Connotation of Open Innovation and Its Mechanism for Innovation Ecology [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 5-14.
[2] XIAO Man, WANG Xuan, WANG Fang, HUANG Jinxia. Framework and Development Path of Open Science Capability [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 15-28.
[3] LIU Jingyu, JIA Yujie, HUANG Jinxia, WANG Fang. Ethics Principle Framework of Data Handling for Open Scientific Innovation Ecology [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 29-43.
[4] JIANG Lihui, YI Zhijun, HUANG Jinxia. Implementing UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science: Common and Inclusive Actions [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(9): 44-50.
[5] CHEN Shuxian, LIU Guifeng, LIU Qiong. Research Progress and Implementation of FAIR Principles for Scientific Data Management [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(8): 30-41.
[6] WANG Yihan, CHU Jingli. Quantitative Analysis and Enlightenment on Open Science Policy Texts in Scientific Research Institutions from the Perspective of Policy Tools [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(7): 39-52.
[7] ZHOU Wenjie, YANG Kehu. An Overview of the Evidence-based Digital Humanity Paradigm with Chinese Characteristics from the Perspective of the Construction of Independent Knowledge System [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(11): 5-13.
[8] HUANG Jinxia, WANG Xuan, YANG Heng, LIU Jingyu, ZHANG Zhixiong, LIU Xiwen. Summary of the 10th China OA Week: Voices from Some Stakeholders on the Construction of China's Open Scientific Innovation Ecology [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(1): 49-61.
[9] YUAN Qingli, YANG Siluo. Investigation on the Current Situation of Subject Service in Higher Vocational College Libraries and Countermeasures: Taking 56 High-level Vocational Colleges with Chinese Characteristics as Examples [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(12): 60-70.
[10] WANG Yihan, YE Yuming. Review on the Research of Open Science at Home and Abroad in Recent Ten Years [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(10): 20-35.
[11] CHANG Ruru, ZHAO Rongying, JIA Zengshuai, ZHANG Zhaoyang. The Characteristics and Impact of International Artificial Intelligence (AI) Patent Cooperation [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(2): 58-70.
[12] Peng Yuanyuan, Huang Jinxia, Chen Xuefei, Zhao Zhanyi. Open Access Journals' Development in the Open Science Process: 2017-2020 [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 29-40.
[13] CAO Yuqing, FENG Dongxin, ZHANG Xuefu, SUN Wei, LUO Tingting, XIAN Guojian. Opening up and Sharing Agricultural Scientific and Technological Information Resources: Case Study of the Practice of FAO [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 50-58.
[14] LIU Jingyu, ZHANG Cen, SUN Wenxi, HUANG Jinxia. Analysis of Intellectual Property Problems in Open Science [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 59-69.
[15] LI Hongjun, ZHAO Yong, ZHANG Hongwei, LI Maomao, REN Zhiguang. The Characteristics of First Class Agricultural-Related Universities in the World University Rankings——Based on Research of US News, QS and ARWU University Rankings [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(1): 30-39.
Full text



No Suggested Reading articles found!