中文    English

Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 30-39.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2019.10.19-0870

• Research paper • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Characteristics of First Class Agricultural-Related Universities in the World University Rankings——Based on Research of US News, QS and ARWU University Rankings

LI Hongjun1, ZHAO Yong1, ZHANG Hongwei1, LI Maomao2, REN Zhiguang3   

  1. 1. Information Research Center, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083;
    2. Department of Science and Technology Research, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083;
    3. Division of Management, China Natural Science Foundation, Beijing 100085
  • Received:2019-10-08 Online:2020-01-05 Published:2020-01-21

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] To understand the characteristics of the first class agricultural-related universities. [Method/Process] The changes of the overall ranking and agricultural discipline ranking of top 10 and top 50 agricultural-related universities from 2017 to 2019 in US News, QS and Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) University Rankings were analyzed, respectively. [Results/Conclusions] (1) most top 10 agricultural-related universities are lower-ranked, with 2/3 ranked outside of top 100, (2) top 10 agricultural-related universities' rankings are not stable, and only four universities, Cornell University, Wageningen University & Research, California University Davis and China Agricultural University are listed as top 10 agricultural universities in all three rankings, (3) top 10 agricultural-related universities come from more countries than top 10 universities do, and Chinese universities have better performance in agriculture than in other fields, and (4) numbers and position of selected fields by university rankings have more influence on overall ranking than numbers of students and teachers and their ratio. Chinese universities which take agriculture as their main field should strengthen their expertise in agricultural-related disciplines, establish new disciplines with characteristics and improve their international influence.

Key words: world university rankings, agricultural-related universities, ranking characteristics

CLC Number: 

  • G644.5
[1] Shin J C.Impacts of Performance-based Accountability on Institutional Performance in the US[J]. Higher Education,2010,60(1) :47-68.
[2] Altbach P G. The Costs and Benefits of World-class Universities[EB/OL].[2010-05-01].http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2004/JF /Feat/altb.html.
[3] Mohrman K, Ma W, Baker R.The Research University in Transition: The Emerging Global Model[J].Higher Education Policy,2008,21(1):29-48.
[4] 徐治国. 大学排行是非[J].科学新闻,2011(11):12-15.
[5] 刘博超.不能把大学排名太当回事儿[N].光明日报,2016-11-15(13).
[6] 熊丙奇.政府发展大学不要在意排名[N].南方都市报,2013-07-18(03).
[7] 凌馨,瞿振元.大学不能被“排行榜”牵着走[N].中国教育报,2015-12-05(05).
[8] 汪嘉波. 大学排名科学吗[N]. 光明日报,2011-08-13(05).
[9] 吴学安. 大学排行榜有多少可信度[N].证券时报,2018-01-30(A03).
[10] 陈晓珊. 大学排行榜对大学行为的影响[J].当代教育科学,2016(21):56-60.
[11] 刘尧. 大学排名被曲解误用的困境何以突破?——从习近平讲“别太在意排名”谈起[J].上海教育评估研究,2017,6(03):40-45.
[12] 郑浩,刘贤伟.世界一流大学的类型、特征与趋势——基于三大全球大学排行榜(2013-2016年)的实证研究[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2019,32(03):117-123.
[13] 刘路,刘志民.世界一流大学10年排名位序变动性研究——基于2005、2015年THE、QS、ARWU的数据[J].高等工程教育研究,2017(03):179-182.
[14] 宋福进,胡薇.基于USNEWS全球大学排名的中国大学表现分析[J].高教发展与评估,2015,31(06):54-59+83.
[15] 孙艳香,吴美珍,谭建刚.大学排行榜视角下的中医药类院校学科建设与发展[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2019,43(04):374-378.
[16] 钟源.国家重点研发计划经费分配浮出水面[N].经济参考,2019-06-12(02).
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!