中文    English

›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 159-163.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2017.12.035

• Editing &Publishing • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Manuscript Handling Based on the Peer Review Comments:Cases Analysis

LI Xiangmin, XU Su, CHEN Xin, TANG Xiaoyan, TAO Wenqi, WANG Changqun   

  1. Editorial Department of Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, Jiangsu Nanjing 210042, China
  • Received:2017-05-25 Online:2017-12-05 Published:2017-12-28

Abstract: Peer review comments are valuable data and base for manuscript quality control and handling by the editors. To effectively utilize the peer review comments during manuscript handling, this paper summarized types of peer review comments and analyzed the typical comments with actual examples. At last, considerations and experiences were put forward on the effective utilization of peer review comments.

Key words: peer review comments

CLC Number: 

  • G232.2
[1] 金晓明.论学术期刊的审稿方法与发展趋势[J].中国科技期刊研究,2007,18(3):372-374.
[2] 赵丽莹,冯树民,刘彤,等.如何选择“小同行”审稿专家[J].编辑学报,2007,19(1):75.
[3] 杨波,赵丽莹,张荣丽.审稿专家的搭配法[J].编辑学报,2009,21(1):51-52.
[4] 朱大明,夏庆麒.审稿意见的分歧及对策[J].科技与出版,2004,(1):39-40.
[5] 汪勤俭.综合性医学期刊同行专家审稿规范化的初步设想[J].编辑学报,2015,27(2):134-136.
[6] 聂兰英,王钢,金丹,等.论科技期刊审稿专家队伍的建设[J].编辑学报,2008,20(3):241-242.
[7] 陈斌,李伟.如何使审稿工作中的学术评判尺度适当[J].编辑学报,2007,19(1):23-24.
[8] 益西巴珍.科技期刊审稿专家库的构建及有效利用[J].编辑学报,2011,23(4):341-343.
[9] 金顺爱.学术期刊专家审稿意见的利用与管理[J].编辑学报,2005,17(6):440-441.
[10] 张宏,赵丽莹,李航,等.编辑应能协调作者与审稿专家的不同意见[J].编辑学报,2016,28(2):139-141.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!