农业图书情报学刊 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 142-145.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2017.10.033

• 编辑出版 • 上一篇    下一篇

学术期刊编辑应妥善处理专家外审修后再审稿件

李祥敏,许素,陈昕,王昌群,唐晓燕,陶文绮   

  1. 《生态与农村环境学报》编辑部,江苏 南京 210042
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-19 修回日期:2017-10-10 出版日期:2017-10-05 发布日期:2017-10-10
  • 作者简介:李祥敏(1975-),女,编辑,硕士,研究方向:编辑与出版。

Academic Journals Editor Should Appropriately Handle Revised Manuscripts Which Have Been Peer-Reviewed

LI Xiangmin, XU Su, CHEN Xin, WANG Changqun, TANG Xiaoyan, TAO Wenqi   

  1. Editorial Office of Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, Jiangsu Nanjing 210042, China
  • Received:2017-03-19 Revised:2017-10-10 Online:2017-10-05 Published:2017-10-10

摘要: 对作者按外审专家审稿意见进行修改的修改稿再次进行学术把关,已受到国内外期刊编辑的重视。本文从提高论文学术质量、促进审稿人与作者的双向学术交流和减轻终审负担3个方面分析了稿件修后再审的必要性,按修后再审稿件的评判、退修和复审3个步骤阐述了编辑应如何处理外审阶段修后再审稿件。最后就修后再审中可能存在的增加审稿人负担和延长稿件发表时滞问题进行讨论。

关键词: 学术期刊, 专家外审, 编辑, 修改稿, 修后再审

Abstract: Re-examination of manuscripts revised according to the peer-reviewers, comments has received increasing emphasis from editors at home and abroad. The necessity for re-review was analyzed from the aspects of increasing the academic quality of manuscript, promoting the interaction between the reviewer and the author and reducing the workload of final review. The workflow to handle the manuscripts needing revision was proposed from the aspects of quality judgment, revision and re-review for the editors. The possibility of increasing workload of the reviewers and prolonging the publication delay were discussed.

Key words: academic journal

中图分类号: 

  • G255

引用本文

李祥敏,许素,陈昕,王昌群,唐晓燕,陶文绮. 学术期刊编辑应妥善处理专家外审修后再审稿件[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2017, 29(10): 142-145.

LI Xiangmin, XU Su, CHEN Xin, WANG Changqun, TANG Xiaoyan, TAO Wenqi. Academic Journals Editor Should Appropriately Handle Revised Manuscripts Which Have Been Peer-Reviewed[J]. , 2017, 29(10): 142-145.