农业图书情报学刊 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 159-163.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2017.12.035

• 编辑出版 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于专家审稿意见的稿件取舍问题实例分析

李祥敏, 许素, 陈昕, 唐晓燕, 陶文绮, 王昌群   

  1. 《生态与农村环境学报》编辑部,江苏 南京 210042
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-25 出版日期:2017-12-05 发布日期:2017-12-28
  • 作者简介:李祥敏(1975-),女,编辑,硕士,研究方向:编辑出版。

Manuscript Handling Based on the Peer Review Comments:Cases Analysis

LI Xiangmin, XU Su, CHEN Xin, TANG Xiaoyan, TAO Wenqi, WANG Changqun   

  1. Editorial Department of Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, Jiangsu Nanjing 210042, China
  • Received:2017-05-25 Online:2017-12-05 Published:2017-12-28

摘要: 专家审稿意见是编辑人员评判稿件学术质量、确定稿件能否发表的重要依据,是宝贵资料。为了有效利用专家审稿意见进行稿件处理,论文总结了专家审稿意见的类型,并对几种典型的审稿意见进行实例分析。最后,给出了如何有效利用专家审稿意见的思考和体会。

关键词: 审稿意见, 学术期刊, 实例分析, 有效性

Abstract: Peer review comments are valuable data and base for manuscript quality control and handling by the editors. To effectively utilize the peer review comments during manuscript handling, this paper summarized types of peer review comments and analyzed the typical comments with actual examples. At last, considerations and experiences were put forward on the effective utilization of peer review comments.

Key words: peer review comments

中图分类号: 

  • G232.2

引用本文

李祥敏, 许素, 陈昕, 唐晓燕, 陶文绮, 王昌群. 基于专家审稿意见的稿件取舍问题实例分析[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2017, 29(12): 159-163.

LI Xiangmin, XU Su, CHEN Xin, TANG Xiaoyan, TAO Wenqi, WANG Changqun. Manuscript Handling Based on the Peer Review Comments:Cases Analysis[J]. , 2017, 29(12): 159-163.