农业图书情报学刊 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 81-86.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2017.09.019

• 工作研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于博弈论的信息产品定价——以科技查新为例

陈超   

  1. 成都理工大学图书馆,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-02 出版日期:2017-09-05 发布日期:2017-09-06
  • 作者简介:陈超(1966-),女,本科,成都理工大学图书馆馆员,研究方向:图书情报学 。

Information Product Pricing Based on the Game Theory——A Case Study of Sci-tech Novelty Retrieval

CHEN Chao   

  1. Chengdu University of Technology Library, Sichuan Chengdu 610059, China
  • Received:2017-03-02 Online:2017-09-05 Published:2017-09-06

摘要: 产品定价是目前营销学的核心。通过对于产品的定价,可以明确该产品的价值组成、销售策略和改进空间。目前国内科技查新机构定价策略依然比较混乱,科技查新的产品具备同质性,但基于相同产品相同客户群不同机构定价相差很大。结合博弈论的有关知识,利用古诺和贝特兰德模型对定价策略进行了分析,认为在完全市场竞争环境下,查新机构报价差异应当不显著;而提升的方向在于加强培训、打造优势项目和提升品牌口碑。

关键词: 科技查新, 博弈论, 信息产品, 产品定价

Abstract: Product pricing has occupied the central position in marketing. With a reasonable price, it can clearly know its price structure, selling strategy and improvement approach. Nowadays, price strategy of sci-tech novelty retrieval is still a problem. There is a big price gap between each institution of the same kind of customers based on the same products. Combining with the knowledge of game theory, this paper used Cournot and Bertrand model to analyzed its pricing strategy, and concluded that in the perfect market competition environment, the pricing of each institution should almost equal, and it should improve training, advantage projects and brand evaluation.

Key words: sci-tech novelty retrieval

中图分类号: 

  • G252

引用本文

陈超. 基于博弈论的信息产品定价——以科技查新为例[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2017, 29(9): 81-86.

CHEN Chao. Information Product Pricing Based on the Game Theory——A Case Study of Sci-tech Novelty Retrieval[J]. , 2017, 29(9): 81-86.