农业图书情报学报

• •    

从人机交互到人智协同:中国信息资源管理学科自主知识体系建构的前沿视角

吴丹1,3, 许浩2,3   

  1. 1.华中师范大学 信息管理学院,武汉 430079
    2.南京大学 信息管理学院,南京 210023
    3.华中师范大学 人智交互与协同创新研究中心,武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-08 出版日期:2026-05-09
  • 作者简介:吴丹(1978- ),教授,博士生导师,华中师范大学信息管理学院,研究方向为知识组织与检索、人智交互行为与协同决策、智慧图书馆等
    许浩(1992- ),男,助理教授,南京大学信息管理学院,研究方向为人智交互、信息行为、公共文化服务等
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金创新群体项目“以人为本的人工智能创新应用”(2023AFA012)

From Human-Computer Interaction to Human-AI Collaboration: A Frontier Perspective on Constructing an Independent Knowledge System for Information Resource Management in China

WU Dan1,3, XU Hao2,3   

  1. 1.School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
    2.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
    3.Research Center for Human-AI Interaction and Collaborative Innovation, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
  • Received:2026-05-08 Online:2026-05-09

摘要:

[目的/意义] 生成式人工智能正重塑信息获取、知识组织与知识服务方式。本文旨在以人智协同为切入点,阐释中国信息资源管理学科自主知识体系建构的理论依据与实践方向。 [方法/过程] 采用理论阐释与文献综述方法,围绕范式跃迁、核心向度、体系重塑、实践进路四个研究脉络展开分析。 [结果/结论] 中国信息资源管理学科自主知识体系建构应以人智协同为关键入口,并从核心向度、体系重塑和实践进路3个层面展开。首先,在核心向度上,应形成资源、服务和伦理三重支点:推动中华文化资源由可检索资源转向可协同语料,夯实具有中国语义、中国叙事和中国立场的知识根基;推动知识服务由一般性信息供给转向面向国家战略需求的协同知识服务,形成自主可控、可验证、可追踪的垂直知识服务体系;推动学科伦理由工具理性转向人本协同伦理,维护人在智能知识生产和公共决策中的主体地位。其次,在体系重塑上,应推动信息资源管理知识结构实现三重转向:知识关联由静态组织转向协同生成,交互机制由界面响应转向语义协商,服务场景由通用供给转向垂直协同,使学科从资源管理和信息服务拓展为面向复杂知识任务的人智协同知识生产体系。最后,在实践进路上,应凝练人智协同原创概念体系,构建人智协同跨学科研究机制,培养面向人智协同的数智治理人才,推动理论创新、方法融合、场景验证与制度建构协同展开,最终形成具有中国立场、中国语义和国际解释力的学科自主知识体系。

关键词: 信息资源管理, 图书情报与档案管理, 自主知识体系, 中国特色哲学社会科学, 人智协同, 生成式人工智能

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] Generative artificial intelligence is reshaping the ways in which information is accessed, organized, generated, evaluated, and applied. In the field of information resources management, this transformation represents not only a technological change, but also a paradigm shift that necessitates a re-evaluation of its research objectives, theoretical principles, service models, and institutional obligations. Against the background of constructing an independent knowledge system for philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics, this paper takes the transition from human-computer interaction to human-AI collaboration as its central perspective. It aims to clarify how information resources management in China can incorporate AI into the internal logic of disciplinary reconstruction, rather than treating it merely as an external tool for improving efficiency. The study highlights the theoretical and practical significance of building concepts, frameworks, and service systems rooted in Chinese practice while maintaining the capacity for global academic dialogue. [Method/Process] This study adopts methods of theoretical interpretation and literature review. With a focus on four research threads - paradigm transition, core dimensions, system reconstruction, and practical pathways - this analysis explores the role of human-AI collaboration in developing an independent knowledge system for managing information resources in China. Specifically, it examines the shift from command-driven interaction to understanding intentions, from tool-based assistance to cognitive partnership, and from interface response to intelligent coupling. It also discusses the value, resource, and governance foundations of disciplinary construction, the reconstruction of knowledge organization and semantic services, and the practical approaches of discourse creation, interdisciplinary integration, and talent cultivation. [Results/Conclusions] The study concludes that the construction of an independent knowledge system for information resources management in China should take human-AI collaboration as a key entry point and proceed through three interrelated dimensions: core dimensions, system reconstruction, and practical pathways. In terms of its core dimensions, the discipline should provide three key areas of support: resources, services, and ethics. Chinese cultural resources should be transformed from retrievable resources into collaborative corpora that provide a semantic foundation of Chinese discourse, Chinese narratives, and Chinese cultural meanings. Knowledge services should move from general information provision to collaborative knowledge services oriented toward national strategic needs, thereby developing trustworthy, controllable, verifiable, and traceable vertical service systems. Disciplinary ethics should shift from instrumental rationality to people-centered collaborative ethics, safeguarding human agency, professional judgment, critical reflection, and accountability in intelligent knowledge production and public decision-making. In terms of system reconstruction, the discipline should promote three structural transformations. Knowledge association should move from static organization to collaborative generation, so that knowledge resources can support semantic understanding, evidence integration, and responsible content generation. Interaction mechanisms should move from interface response to semantic negotiation, enabling users and intelligent agents to jointly clarify intentions, compare evidence, refine questions, and form judgments. Service scenarios should move from general supply to vertical collaboration, embedding human-AI collaboration into smart libraries, archival intelligence, digital humanities, public knowledge services, enterprise intelligence, and other domain-specific contexts. Through these transformations, information resources management can move beyond resource management and information provision toward a human-AI collaborative knowledge production system for complex knowledge tasks. In terms of practical pathways, future development should focus on refining original concepts of human-AI collaboration, building interdisciplinary research mechanisms for human-AI collaboration, and cultivating digital-intelligent governance talents. These pathways can connect theoretical innovation, methodological integration, scenario-based validation, and institutional construction. Through sustained efforts in discourse creation, research organization, and talent development, information resources management in China can establish an independent disciplinary knowledge system with Chinese standpoint, Chinese semantics, and international explanatory power.

Key words: information resource management, library, information and archives management, independent knowledge system, philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics, human-intelligence collaboration, generative artificial intelligence

中图分类号:  G203

引用本文

吴丹, 许浩. 从人机交互到人智协同:中国信息资源管理学科自主知识体系建构的前沿视角[J/OL]. 农业图书情报学报. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.26-0282.

WU Dan, XU Hao. From Human-Computer Interaction to Human-AI Collaboration: A Frontier Perspective on Constructing an Independent Knowledge System for Information Resource Management in China[J/OL]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.26-0282.