农业图书情报学报

• •    

生成式人工智能迭代中的个人信息安全治理:基于大模型技术演进视角

安琳   

  1. 陕西省图书馆,西安 710061
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-25 出版日期:2026-03-04
  • 作者简介:安琳(1987- ),女,硕士,副研究馆员,研究方向为信息权利和知识管理
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省文化和旅游厅2025年度文化和旅游课题“陕西城乡新型公共文化空间建设研究”(2025WL37)

Governance of Personal Information Security in the Iteration of Generative AI: From the Perspective of the Technological Evolution of Large Models

AN Lin   

  1. Shaanxi Library, Xi'an 710061
  • Received:2025-12-25 Online:2026-03-04

摘要:

【目的/意义】 旨在从生成式人工智能模型的技术迭代视角出发,构建以风险分级为核心的个人信息安全治理框架,探索生成式人工智能技术革新过程中兼顾创新发展与个人信息安全保护的可行路径,弥补现有研究缺乏技术演进视角的不足。 【方法/过程】 比较国内外主流大模型技术差异,剖析生成式人工智能在各环节面临的个人信息安全风险。基于DeepSeek技术创新要点,结合中国现行治理政策,提出一个以包容审慎为核心、风险分级为导向、覆盖各运行阶段的综合治理框架。 【结果/结论】 基于个人信息敏感程度构建覆盖数据采集、模型运行与内容生成的全流程风险分级治理体系。DeepSeek的开源可溯、决策透明和灵活部署等技术特性,为实施分级治理提供了关键支撑,有助于实现安全管控与技术创新的动态平衡,为中国构建适应技术发展的个人信息安全治理模式提供了实践参考。

关键词: 生成式人工智能, 个人信息安全, DeepSeek, 风险分级

Abstract:

[Purpose/Significance] The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is driving societal digital transformation, yet it simultaneously poses unprecedented systemic risks to personal information security due to the large-scale, automated, and complex nature of its data processing. Previous research has lacked exploration of governance pathways that consider endogenous technological evolution and specific model iterations. This paper takes the technological evolution of mainstream, large-scale generative AI models, both domestically and internationally as a starting point, and systematically reveals the impact of generative AI on personal information protection principles across the stages of data collection, model operation, and content generation. The focus is on analyzing how technological innovations in China's DeepSeek, including open-source traceability, decision transparency, and flexible deployment, lay the groundwork for risk-graded governance. This study not only broadens the theoretical perspective on AI governance and promotes the formation of a "technology-institution" collaborative governance paradigm, but also offers innovative and actionable insights for building an agile and effective personal information protection system in China amidst the rapid adoption of generative AI. [Method/Process] This study employs a comparative analysis and inductive research approach. First, it systematically compares the core technological differences among mainstream generative AI models, both domestic and international, across three dimensions: model ecosystem, model capabilities, and deployment methods. Through this comparison, it analyzes the challenges generative AI poses to personal information protection at various stages, including data collection, model operation, and content generation. Second, the study systematically examines the differentiated impacts brought about by DeepSeek's technological iterations on personal information security governance. Building on this foundation, the research proposes a comprehensive governance strategy centered on the principles of inclusiveness and prudence, guided by risk grading, and covering all operational stages of generative AI. This strategy emphasizes the critical role of DeepSeek's technical characteristics in supporting the implementation of this framework. [Results/Conclusions] The research indicates that constructing a risk-graded governance system based on the sensitivity of personal information is an effective approach to balancing security and innovation in generative AI. This system emphasizes distinguishing between sensitive and general information during data collection, achieving traceability and purpose control during model operation, and implementing differentiated security safeguards during content generation. With its technical advantages, including open-source traceability, decision transparency, and flexible deployment, DeepSeek provides technical validation and practical possibilities for graded governance. This facilitates the protection of sensitive personal information in high-risk scenarios while simultaneously fostering technological iteration and application innovation in medium- to low-risk contexts. Future research should further incorporate multi-dimensional governance elements such as industry self-regulation, social coordination, and international collaboration. Empirical analysis should also be conducted to test the applicability and effectiveness of the governance framework, thereby gradually developing a well-rounded personal information security governance scheme that adapts to the dynamic evolution of technology.

Key words: generative artificial intelligence, personal information security, deepseek, risk classification

中图分类号:  G203

引用本文

安琳. 生成式人工智能迭代中的个人信息安全治理:基于大模型技术演进视角[J/OL]. 农业图书情报学报. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.25-0750.

AN Lin. Governance of Personal Information Security in the Iteration of Generative AI: From the Perspective of the Technological Evolution of Large Models[J/OL]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture. https://doi.org/10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.25-0750.