从开放科学路线图分析到开放科学道路决策方法设计

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2020.12.20-0928

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目标/意义]一个国家是否进入开放科学、如何选择路径,亟待决策方法。[方法/过程]开放科学作为国家科学政策,可以通过路线图方式进行规划实施。分析当前6个国际开放科学路线图的发布、内容、效果评估等特征,初步提出一个国家开放科学道路的决策方法。[结果/结论]开放科学路线图的形成受国家中长期开放计划、配套基础设施等多因素影响,实施内容覆盖到国家的未来、现状和具体措施,最终将提升一个国家或地区科学研究的开放成熟度水平及其影响力。基于这些特征,初步构建国家开放科学进程决策模型,覆盖开放科学实施前、实施、实施后不同阶段的决策内容,并设计开放科学道路决策的“三步法”。本文简略介绍中国面向开放科学的工作构想,以及其中图书馆发挥的作用。

关键词: 开放科学, 路线图, 特征, 决策方法, 决策因素模型, 智库

Abstract: [Objective/Significance] Whether a country enters the open science and how to choose the path, it is urgent to provide the decision-making methods. [Method/Process] As a national science policy, open science can be planned and implemented by way of road map. This paper analyzes the characteristics of the six international open science roadmaps in their release, content and effect evaluation, and puts forward a decision-making method for a national open science road. [Results/Conclusions] The formation of the open science roadmap is influenced by many factors such as the national medium and long-term opening plan, supporting infrastructure and other factors. The implementation contents include the country's current situation, future plan and specific measures, which will ultimately improve the open maturity level and influence of a country or region's scientific research. Based on these characteristics, a decision-making model of the national open science process is preliminarily constructed, covering the decision-making contents of different stages (before the process, in process and after the process) in the implementation of open science, and a "three-step" decision-making process of open science is designed. This paper briefly mentions the next step of open science in China and the roles that libraries can play.

Key words: open science, roadmap, characteristics, decision-making method, decision-making factor model, think-takn

中图分类号:

G250

黄金霞, 赵展一, 王昉. 从开放科学路线图分析到开放科学道路决策方法设计[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(12): 5-19.

HUANG Jinxia, ZHAO Zhanyi, WANG Fang. Analysis on Open Science Roadmap and Design on Decision-Making Method of Open Science Road[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(12): 5-19.

参考文献

[1] Editorial. Preregistration and open science practices in hearing sci- ence and audiology: The time has come[J]. Ear and hearing, 2020, DOI:10.1097/AUD. 0000000000000817.
[2] TAYLOR R, HAIMOVICH A, HORNG S, et al.Open science in e-mergency medicine research[J]. Annals of emergency medicine, 2020, 76(2): 247-248.
[3] BERNARD R.Open science: a revolution in sight?[J]. Interlending & document supply, 44(4): 155-160.
[4] 朱滢. “开放科学数据共享软件共享”, 你准备好了吗?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(6): 995-996.
[5] AYRIS P, BERNAL I, CAVALLI V, et al.LIBER open science roadmap[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://zenodo.org/record/1303002#.WzsCdtUzaM8.
[6] HOLZMEYER C.Open science initiatives: Challenges for public health promotion[J]. Health promot int, 2019(3): 3.
[7] Exploring the impact of social communication on the innovation potential of open science communities[J]. IEEE transactions onsystems, man, and cybernetics: Systems, 2016, DOI:10.1109/TSMC. 2015.2455956.
[8] Roadmap thinking - how to build a strategy using a roadmap[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://www.roadmap-planner.io/blog/how-to-build-a-roadmap-strategy/.
[9] Open science for a global transformation: CODATA coordinated submission to the UNESCO open science consultation[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://zenodo.org/record/3935461#.X5aFlBYzapr.
[10] DEGKWITZ A.Open science policy - a twisted road and clear aims[J]. Bibliothek der zukunft. zukunft der bibliothek (festschrift für elmar mittler), 2016: 78-91.
[11] 黄金霞, 赵展一, 王昉, 等. 国际反思背景下我国科研群体OA发展需求调查[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 11: 44-53.
[12] WEITZEL D, BOCKELMAN B, FRASER D, et al.Enabling campus grids with open science grid technology[J]. Journal of physics conference, 2011, 331(6): 062025.
[13] 黄雨婷, 赖彤. 美国开放科学中心: 实践进展、特点与启示[J]. 图书与情报, 2019(3): 105-113.
[14] LACEY J, COATES R, HERINGTON M.Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: Understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers[J]. Journal of responsible innovation, 2020, DOI:10.1080/23299460.2020.1800969.
[15] Open science and research leads to surprising discoveries and creative insights: Open science and research roadmap 2014-2017[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22]. http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/75210.
[16] Implementation roadmap for the European open science cloud[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://www.esfri.eu/project-landmarks-news/implementation-roadmap-european-open-science-cloud.
[17] Open science and its role in universities: a roadmap for cultural change[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://www.leru.org/publications/open-science-and-its-role-in-universities-a-roadmap-for-cultural-change.
[18] CNRS roadmap for open scienc [EB/OL]. [2020-08-22].https://www.science-ouverte.cnrs.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/CNRS_Roadmap_Open_Science_18nov2019.pdf.
[19] Roadmap for open science[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22]. http://science.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/eng/h_97992.html#7.
[20] 黄磊, 赵延东, 何光喜. 从开放获取到开放科学的变化与挑战——基于多指标比较的文献计量分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 11: 241-251.
[21] Open innovation, open science, open to the world[EB/OL]. [2020-10-26].https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3213b335-1cbc-11e6-ba9a-01aa75ed71a1.
[22] National plan open science[EB/OL]. [2020-10-26].https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:9e9fa82e-06c1-4d0d-9e20-5620259a6c65?collection=research.
[23] New Sparc Europe report provides analysis of open data and open science policies in Europe[EB/OL]. [2020-10-26]. http://sparceurope.org/new-sparc-europe-report-analyses-open-data-open-science-policies-europe/.
[24] Foster. Open science definition[EB/OL].[2020-08-22]. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-science-definition.
[25] Open science included in new Serbian law[EB/OL]. [2020-10-26].https://www.eifl.net/news/open-science-included-new-serbian-law.
[26] Ofspokesperson Office. World science day for peace and development[EB/OL]. [2002-11-12]. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/ MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/msg_ethiopia_02.pdf.
[27] VAN DIJK W, SCHATSCHNEIDER C, HART S A.Open sciencein education sciences[J]. Journal of learning disabilities, 2020, DOI: 10.35542/osf.io/qdj4t.
[28] 赵展一, 黄金霞. 开放科学基础设施的信息资源建设模式分析——以OpenAIRE为例[J/OL]. 图书馆建设: 1-12[2020-12-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1331.G2.20200921.0859.002.html.
[29] 邢文明, 郭安琪, 秦顺, 等. 科学数据管理与共享的FAIR原则——背景、内容与实施[J/OL]. 信息资源管理学报: 1-10[2020-12-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1812.G2.20200909.1157.002.html.
[30] 欧洲开放科学云正式启动[EB/OL]. [2020-02-21].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?biz=MzU5NTg0Mzk2MA==&mid=2247485021&idx=1&sn=51019c1fbc08216bf1e57c130563fe0d&source=41#wechat_redirect.
[31] 徐玲玲, 阚阅. 欧洲研究型大学联盟: 致力于教育、知识创新和全面性研究的推广[J]. 上海教育, 2018(26): 39-41.
[32] 石志松. 欧洲研究图书馆协会数字人文发展策略探析[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2019, 5: 24-31.
[33] 教科文组织为制定开放科学标准性文件启动全球协商[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/UaybpJDK10TZxtJZFfk1Qg.
[34] San Francisco declaration on research assessment[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22].https://sfdora.org/read/.
[35] Open science and research in Finland - Evaluation of openness in the activities of research organisations and research funding organisations in2016[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81237635.pdf.
[36] 欧洲开放科学云商业成功案例简介[EB/OL]. [2020-08-22]. http://www.ecas.cas.cn/xxkw/kbcd/201115_128157/ml/xxhcxyyyal/202003/t20200306_4554748.html.
[37] 上海科技创新资源数据中心成欧洲开放科学云首家非欧洲成员机构, 人工智能图谱上线[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22]. http://www.whb.cn/zhuzhan/kjwz/20200222/327184.html.
[38] 中国科技云与欧洲开放科学云启动战略合作[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22]. http://www.cas.cn/yx/202006/t20200624_4751116.shtml 2020.
[39] 吴建中. 推进开放数据助力开放科学[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2018, 37(2): 4-10.
[40] 段美珍, 顾立平, 赵昆华. 2015-2016年国际开放获取相关政策与实践进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(18): 19-28.
[41] 邱春艳, 黄如花. 近3年国际科学数据共享领域新进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016(3): 6-14.
[42] 石志松. 开放科学环境下研究型图书馆的角色与职责. 图书馆建设, 2019: 66-73.
[43] Open Science National Coordination Federation of Finish Learned Societies[EB/OL]. [2017-05-31].https://avointiede.fi/documents/10864/12232/The+impact+of+the+Finnish+Open+Science+and+Research+Initiative+(ATT)/c0424041-fc6c-44a5-a7cc-a4fb1145d86f.
[44] LACEY J, COATES R, HERINGTON M.Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: Understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers[J]. Journal of responsible innovation, 2020(8): 1-23.
[45] HUNTER, PHILIP.A DEAL for open access: The negotiations between the German DEAL project and publishers have global implications for academic publishing beyond just Germany[J]. Embo Reports, 2018: e46317.
[46] CAPPS B.Where does open science lead us during a pandemic? a public good argument to prioritize rights in the open commons[J]. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics: CQ: the international journal of healthcare ethics committees:2020: 1-14.
[47] GRAND A, WILKINSON C, BULTITUDE K, et al.Open science a new "trust technology"?[J]. Ence communication, 2012, 34(5): 679-689.
[48] Poupon V, Seyller A, Rouleau G A.The Tanenbaum open science institute: leading a paradigm shift at the Montreal neurological institute[J]. Neuron, 2017, 95(5): 1002.
[49] WOELFLE M, OLLIARO P, TODD M H.Open science is a research accelerator[J]. Nat chem, 2011, 3: 745-748.
[50] SHAW D L.Is open science the future of drug development?[J]. Yale journal of biology & medicine, 2017, 90(1): 147-151.
[51] JONG S, SLAVOVA K.When publications lead to products: the open science conundrum in new product development[J]. Research policy, 2014, 43(4): 645-654.
[52] GASSMANN O, WIDENMAYER B, FRIESIKE S, et al.Opening up science: Towards an agenda of open science in industry and academia[J]. Social ence electronic publishing, 2012, 40(4): 1-21.
[53] COOK B G, LLOYD J W, THERRIEN W J.Open science in the field of emotional and behavioral disorders[J]. Education and treatment of children, 2019, 42(4): 579-600.
[54] HESSE B W.Can psychology walk the walk of open science?[J]. American psychologist, 2018, 73(2): 126.
[55] FRANKENHUIS W E, DANIEL N.Open science is liberating and can foster creativity[J]. Perspectives on psychological ence, 2018, 13(4): 439-447.
[56] LAKE B.Can open science save us from a solar-driven monsoon?[J]. Journal of space weather and space climate, 2016, 6: 7.
[57] DICKEL, SASCHA, FRANZEN, MARTINA.Digital inclusion: the social implications of open science[J]. Ztschrift für soziologie, 2015, 44(5): 330-347.
[58] EVANS T R.Improving evidence quality for organisational change management through open science[J]. Journal of organizational change management, 2020, 33(2): 367-378.
[59] MIROWSKI, PHILIP.The future(s) of open science[J]. Social studies of ence, 2018, 48(2): 171.
[60] PEISERT S, WELCH V.The open science cyber risk profile: the Rosetta stone for open science and cybersecurity[J]. IEEE security& privacy, 2017, 15(5): 94-95.
[61] HEISE C; PEARCE J M.From open access to open science: The path from scientific reality to open scientific communication[J]. SAGE open, 2020, 10(2): 1-14.
[62] JENNY F, RALPH S, MATTHIJS D B.Open science in e-science: Contingency or policy?[J]. Journal of documentation, 2009, 65(1): 6-32.
[63] JOHN P W, HSINI H.Local context, academic entrepreneurship and open science: Publication secrecy and commercial activity a-mong Japanese and US scientists[J]. Research policy, 2014, 43(2):
245-260.
[64] TIMOTHY C, SHAWN H H, YANN J.Open science versus commercialization: A modern research conflict?[J]. Genome medicine 2012, 4: 17.
[65] 教科文组织为制定开放科学标准性文件启动全球协商[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22].https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/UaybpJDK10TZxtJZFfk1Qg.
[66] 顾洁. 聚焦开放科学与开放创新, 助力上海建好新时代改革开放试验田——2019竞争情报上海论坛暨国际科学技术信息理事会年会盛大召开[J]. 竞争情报, 2019, 15(5): 6-8.
[67] 邵曾婷, 王译晗, 叶钰铭, 等.从开放获取到开放科学:开放获取周的主题、内容演变与启示[J/OL]. 图书情报工作: 1-13[2020-12-01]. https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.14.002.
[68] 张学文, 田华, 陈劲. 开放科学及建构的制度逻辑[J]. 自然辨证法通讯, 2020, 261(5): 86-92.
[69] JOACHIM S.Open supply? On the future of document supply in the world of open science[J]. Interlending & document supply, 2016, 44(4): 150-154.
[70] MASS M T, RUTH G H.Open science disrupting the status quo in academic libraries: A perspective of zimbabw[J]. The journal of academic librarianship, 2019(45): 406-412.
[71] 王燕军, 盛兴军. 《鲜活的知识: 大英图书馆2015-2023大英图书馆》战略规划报告的启示与思考[J]. 图书与情报, 2016, 2: 33-39.
[72] JOHN I O, AMAKA R O, SAMUEL S, et al.The roles of academic libraries in propagating open science: A qualitative literature review[J]. Information development, 2018, 34(2): 113-121.
[73] BASILI C.Information literacy requirements for open science-Sci-enceDirect[J]. Pathways into information literacy and communitiesof practice, 2017: 229-248.