农业图书情报学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 45-54.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2020.01.06-1163

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中美ESI高被引论文计量特征比较分析

郭丽娜, 左文革, 周群*   

  1. 中国农业大学图书馆,北京 100193
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-17 出版日期:2020-05-05 发布日期:2020-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 周群(1982-),男,博士,副研究馆员,硕士生导师,研究方向:信息计量与情报分析方法,E-mail:qzhou@cau.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:郭丽娜(1996-),女,硕士,研究方向:信息计量与分析。左文革(1966-),女,副馆长,研究馆员,硕士生导师,研究方向:科学计量与学科评价。
  • 基金资助:
    ISTIC-CLARIVATE ANALYTICS科学计量学联合实验室开放基金

A bibliometric analysis of ESI highly cited papers from China and USA

GUO Lina, ZUO Wenge, ZHOU Qun*   

  1. Library of China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193
  • Received:2019-10-17 Online:2020-05-05 Published:2020-05-20

摘要: [目的/意义]当前综合国力的竞争更加依靠基础研究,高被引论文在基础研究的评估与分析中具有重要的研究价值。从高被引论文视角比较揭示中美两国在引领性的基础研究中的差距,为国家科研管理决策和机构建设提供基础数据支撑。[方法/过程]以ESI数据库中美高被引论文为研究对象,采用文献计量方法,结合揭示作者贡献的Y指数,比较分析中美高被引论文在发文概况、国家合作、机构产出3个维度上的具体计量特征及差异。[结果/结论](1)美国高被引论文数是中国高被引论文数的2.99倍,但差距逐年缩小,同时篇均被引频次和高被引论文比例较低仍是制约中国提升国际影响力的短板。(2)中美两国合作程度非常密切,美国在科研合作中居于主导地位,其第一作者和通讯作者比例及主导型论文的篇均被引频次均远高于中国。(3)中国高产出机构具有明显的通讯作者占比优势,机构间产出差距较大,而美国高产出机构分布均匀,且国际合作和机构间合作更加深入广泛。

关键词: ESI数据库, 中国, 美国, 高被引论文, Y指数, 文献计量

Abstract: [Purpose / Signficance] The current competition of comprehensive national strength relies more on fundamental research, and highly cited papers have important significance in the evaluation and analysis of fundamental research. Revealing the differences between China and USA in leading basic research from the perspective of highly cited papers, we provide basic data support for national scientific research management decision-making and institution building. [Method / Process] Based on ESI highly cited papers of China and USA, this article uses bibliometric methods and Y index to analyze the specific features and differences of China and USA among three dimensions—trends of publication, country cooperation and institutional output.[Results / Conclusions] The study shows that: (1) Overall, the highly cited papers of China is 2.99 times that of the American highly cited papers, but the gap is narrowing yearly. At the same time, the low citation frequency and the low proportion of highly cited papers are still the shortcomings that limit Chinese international influence. (2) China and USA are closely cooperating with each other. USA dominates scientific research cooperation, as the proportion of first authors and corresponding authors and leading papers is significantly higher than that in China. (3) Chinese high-output institutions have obvious advantages of corresponding authors, but the output gap between institutions is large. And the American high-output institutions are evenly distributed, and they are characterized by deeper and broader international cooperation and inter-agency cooperation.

Key words: ESI database, China, USA, highly cited papers, Y index, bibliometrics

中图分类号: 

  • G354.2

引用本文

郭丽娜, 左文革, 周群. 中美ESI高被引论文计量特征比较分析[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(5): 45-54.

GUO Lina, ZUO Wenge, ZHOU Qun. A bibliometric analysis of ESI highly cited papers from China and USA[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(5): 45-54.