中国金色OA论文现状分析——基于Web of Science数据

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2019.10.19-0928

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]拟通过对中国科研人员发表的金色OA论文现状进行分析,一方面可以宏观的了解中国科研人员参与开放获取状况,另一方面通过对比,希望能够借鉴他国的开放获取经验,对推动中国的OA进程及政策制定有一定的参考意义。[方法/过程]基于Web of Science核心合集数据库收录的论文,分析了中国金色OA论文现状,分析指标包括论文生产力、影响力、基金资助、期刊分布及学科分布。[结果/结论]中国金色OA论文近年来展现出良好的发展势头,但是,金色OA论文率仍低于全球平均水平;中国金色OA论文的引文影响力接近非OA论文,但低于绿色OA论文;论文的金色OA率远远低于基金资助率;中国金色OA论文分布的期刊相对集中,发表在国内OA期刊上的数量较少;生命科学、预临床与健康领域对开放获取参与情况较好。

关键词: 开放获取, 中国, Web of Science

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This paper aims to analyze the current situation of golden OA papers published by Chinese scholars. On the one hand, it helps us understand the situation of Chinese scholars' participation in open access; on the other hand, through comparison, it provides insights for China to learn from the experience of other countries' open access, which is of value and reference in promoting China's OA process and policy-making. [Method/Process] Based on the papers included in the Web of Science Core Databases, this paper analyzes the status of golden OA papers in China, and the analysis indicators include paper productivity, influence, funding support, journals distribution and subjects distribution. [Results/Conclusions] China's golden OA papers have shown a good momentum of development in recent years, but the golden OA paper rate is still lower than the global average level; the citation influence of China's golden OA papers is close to non-OA papers, but lower than green OA papers; the rate of golden OA papers is far lower than the rate of papers supported by funding; China's golden OA papers are relatively concentrated into several journals, and the number of OA journals published in China is relatively small; life science, clinical, preclinical and health fields have a higher degree of acceptance of open access papers.

Key words: open access, China, Web of Science

中图分类号:

G250.2

李广利, 白雪, 张美琦. 中国金色OA论文现状分析——基于Web of Science数据[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(1): 40-46.

LI Guangli, BAI Xue, ZHANG Meiqi. Analysis of Gold Open Access in China Based on Web of Science[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(1): 40-46.

参考文献

[1] 中国科学院、国家自然科学基金委签署《柏林宣言》[EB/OL].[2019-10-30].http://oa.paper.edu.cn/xw_04.jsp.
[2] 黄金霞,王昉,肖曼,陈雪飞.从GoOA到OAinONE:开放资源的发展与再利用[J].农业图书情报,2019,31(1):4-10.
[3] open access2020[EB/OL].[2019-10-30].https://oa2020.org/be-informed/#info.
[4] 李麟.我国科研人员对科技信息开放获取的态度——以中国科学院科研人员为例[J].图书情报工作,2006(07):34-38+50.
[5] 金永成,李文潇.我国大学教师对开放获取期刊的态度实证[J].图书馆学刊,2016,38(12):121-124+129.
[6] 王涵,许洁,叶阳.近十年来我国开放获取政策及其实施效果研究[J].图书馆学研究,2017(22):7-13.
[7] 朱江,任晓亚.高质量学术期刊OA论文的分析研究——以Web of Science核心合集为例[J].知识管理论坛,2018,3(02):95-105.
[8] 郭雪梅. 基于SCIE平台OA期刊论文的文献计量分析——以天津医科大学为例[J].江苏科技信息,2017(22):14-16.
[9] 陈辉. 基于“在线平台”的安徽医科大学OA论文的调查与分析[J].农业图书情报学刊,2017,29(07):108-111.
[10] Torres-Salinas, Daniel; Robinson-García, Nicolás; Aguillo, Isidro F. Bibliometric and benchmark analysis of gold open access in Spain: big output and litle impact[J]. El profesional de la información, 2016,25(01):17-24.
[11] Mohammad Nazim.Bibliometric Analysis of Gold Open Access in India[J].International Information & Library Review, 2018, 50(1):13-23.
[12] 苏小波. 科研人员对开放获取出版的认知和行为研究述评[J].图书情报知识,2014(03):41-52.
[13] 李武,卢振波.科研人员对OA知识库的认知程度和使用现状分析[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(10):58-62.
[14] 杜亮,陈耀龙,王梦书,张琼文,何丹端,李幼平.我国医学工作者对"开放存取(Open Access)"的认知态度——《中国循证医学杂志》作者群调查结果分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2009,20(02):252-255.
[15] 王应宽. 中国科技界对开放存取期刊认知度与认可度调查分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2008,19(05):753-762.
[16] 沈坤,黄水清.现阶段国内用户对OA资源认同度的调查与分析——以南京高校为例[J].情报理论与实践,2008(02):241-245+255.
[17] 刘建华,黄水清.国内用户对开放获取的认同度研究——以高校调查分析为例[J].中国图书馆学报,2007(02):103-107.
[18] Bo-Christer Bjork, David Solomon.Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact[J]. Bmc Mediocine, 2012,10(1):73.
[19] David J. Solomon, Mikael Laakso, Bo-Christer Bj?rk. A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(3):642-650.
[20] 许鑫,于霜,李丹.基金资助论文的开放存取研究——基于自科领域八个学科的实证分析[J].情报科学,2019,37(06):133-140.
[21] 陈晋,阮延生.知识共享许可协议在中国本土化的实践及思考[J].四川图书馆学报,2013(06):16-19.
[22] 李书宁. 英国大学开放获取政策研究[J].图书情报知识,2017(01):98-105.
[23] ROARMAP[EB/OL].[2019-10-30]. http://roarmap.eprints.org/.
[24] Chawki Hajjem, Stevan Harnad, Yves Gingras.Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact[J]. Computer Science,2006,2013(4):39-47.
[25] Kristin Antelman.Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?[J]. College and Research Libraries,2004,65(5):372-383.
[26] Gunther Eysenbach.Citation advantage of open access articles[J].PLoS biology,2006,4(5):692.
[27] Yassine Gargouri, Chawki Hajjem, Vincent Lariviere, et al.Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research.[J].PloS one,2010,5(10):e13636.
[28] Heather Piwowar, Jason Priem, Vincent Larivière, et al.The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles[J]. Peerj,2018,6(4):e4375.
[29] Crowther TW, Ellers J, Harvey JA.Gold open access publishing in Mega-Journals:Developing countries pay the price of western premium academic output[J].Journal of Scholarly Publishing,2018, 49(1):89-102.
[30] 中国科学院,国家科学基金委,中国科学院力学研究所.中科院和国家自然科学基金委发布开放获取政策[EB/OL].[2019-10-30].http://www.irgrid.ac.cn/handle/1471x/839368?mode=full&submit_simple=Show+full+item+record.
[31] 孟辉. 国外开放获取政策最新动态述评[J].科技与出版,2014(09):92-96.