跨学科知识融合：研究现状与展望

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.24-0274

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]跨学科研究已经成为一种知识创新的共识,其核心是知识融合。深入理解跨学科知识融合的研究内容对推动跨学科创新至关重要。[方法/过程]本研究以Web of Science和CNKI数据库为数据来源,调研了跨学科知识融合相关文献,在厘清跨学科知识融合内涵的基础上,从知识融合程度、知识融合内容、知识融合过程3个层面归纳国内外跨学科知识融合研究成果,总结现有研究的局限性,并对未来发展方向进行了初步思考。[结果/结论]结果表明,现有成果广泛探讨了跨学科知识融合的内涵、测度方法、内容和过程等方面,但存在方法适用性受限、语义揭示不足、缺乏系统性等问题。未来应进一步提升方法适用性、加强知识增量视角下的知识融合研究,拓展知识融合的应用范围与应用价值。

关键词: 知识融合, 跨学科, 引文分析, 知识融合测度

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Interdisciplinary research has emerged as a key driver of knowledge innovation, its essence being integration of knowledge from different disciplines. A deep and nuanced understanding of the research content of interdisciplinary knowledge integration is essential to foster innovation beyond traditional academic boundaries. Most of the research reviews on interdisciplinary research summarize theories, concepts and indicators from the macro level, while the content of interdisciplinary knowledge integration at the micro level is scattered, and lacks systematicity and logic. Therefore, this study attempts to classify and summarize the research methods, research content and research ideas involved in order to provide reference for scholars and researchers engaged in interdisciplinary knowledge integration. [Method/Process] Based on Web of Science (WOS) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database as the primary data sources, we reviewed the relevant literature on interdisciplinary knowledge integration. By clarifying the intrinsic meaning of interdisciplinary knowledge integration, we have systematically reviewed and summarized the existing research findings from three aspects. First, research on the degree of knowledge integration mainly involves measurement methods. Second, research on the content of knowledge integration is based on citations and keywords. Third, research on the process of knowledge integration involves its integration path and process, and the characteristics of the integration stage. On this basis, this paper also summarizes the limitations and challenges of existing research, and provides research perspectives for subsequent research on interdisciplinary knowledge integration. [Results/Conclusions] The existing results have extensively explored the definition, measurement method, content, and process of interdisciplinary knowledge integration, but there are problems such as limited applicability of knowledge integration measurement methods, insufficient semantic disclosure, and the lack of systematic research on the degree of knowledge integration. Future research in this area should pay attention to the following three aspects. First, the applicability of methods for measuring interdisciplinary knowledge integration should be improved in order to better adapt to the development of interdisciplinary knowledge integration. Second, there is also a need to strengthen the study of knowledge integration from the perspective of knowledge increment, examining how new knowledge is created and how it contributes to the advancement of the area. In addition, efforts should be made to explore new theories and methods, grasp the development law of interdisciplinary knowledge integration, and expand the application scope and application value of interdisciplinary knowledge integration.

Key words: knowledge integration, interdisciplinary, citation analysis, knowledge integration measurement

中图分类号: G353.1

姚茹, 王晋飞, 林巧, 孔令博, 聂迎利. 跨学科知识融合：研究现状与展望[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2024, 36(4): 21-35.

YAO Ru, WANG Jinfei, LIN Qiao, KONG Lingbo, NIE Yingli. Interdisciplinary Knowledge Integration: Current Situation and Perspectives[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2024, 36(4): 21-35.

参考文献

[1] RAFOLS I, MEYER M.How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 70(3): 633-650.
[2] KLEIN J T.Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research a literature review[J]. American journal of preventive medicine, 2008, 35(2): S116-S123.
[3] TRUFFER B.Knowledge integration in transdisciplinary research projects-The importance of reflexive interface management wissensintegration in transdisziplinaren projekten-Flexibles rollenverstandnis als schl? Sselkompetenz für das schnittstellenmanagement[J]. GAIA - Ecological perspectives for science and society, 2007, 16(1): 41-45.
[4] RAFOLS I, MEYER M.Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(2): 263-287.
[5] ZHOU Y, DONG F, KONG D J, et al.Unfolding the convergence process of scientific knowledge for the early identification of emerg-ing technologies[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2019, 144: 205-220.
[6] National Academy of Scences Naoe. Facilitating interdisciplinary research[Z]. Washington: The National Academies Press, 2005.
[7] REPKO A F.Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory[M]. Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory, 2008.
[8] PORTER A L, COHEN A S, DAVID ROESSNER J, et al.Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(1): 117-147.
[9] WAGNER C S, ROESSNER J D, BOBB K, et al.Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(1): 14-26.
[10] 邱均平, 余厚强. 知识科学视角下国际知识融合研究进展与趋势[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(8): 126-132, 148.
QIU J P, YU H Q.Research progress and trends of international knowledge fusion at the perspective of knowledge science[J]. Li-brary and information service, 2015, 59(8): 126-132, 148.
[11] PREECE A, HUI K, GRAY A, et al.The KRAFT architecture for knowledge fusion and transformation[J]. Knowledge-based systems, 2000, 13(2/3): 113-120.
[12] SMIRNOV A V.Rapid knowledge fusion in the scalable infosphere: A concept and possible manufacturing applications[C]. International NAISO congress on information science innovations, 2001: 273-276.
[13] CHENG X, ZHANG Q P.How to develop the interdisciplinary innovation teams sustainably? - A simulation model from a perspective of knowledge fission and fusion[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(9): 3134.
[14] 张雪燕. 跨学科研究团队社会资本对知识整合的影响机制研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2021.
ZHANG X Y.Research on the influence of social capital on knowl-edge integration in interdisciplinary research teams[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021.
[15] 樊飞月. 高校跨学科团队知识整合机制对创新绩效影响的实证研究[D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2014.
FAN F Y.An empirical study on integration mechanisms of interdisciplinary knowledge impact on performance of team innovation in university[D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2014.
[16] FELDHOFF B, STOCKMANN N, FANDERL N, et al.Bridging theories and practices: Boundary objects and constellation analysis as vehicles for interdisciplinary knowledge integration[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(19): 5357.
[17] XUE L N, RIENTIES B, VAN PETEGEM W, et al.Learning relations of knowledge transfer(KT) and knowledge integration(KI) of doctoral students during online interdisciplinary training: An exploratory study[J]. Higher education research & development, 2020, 39(6): 1290-1307.
[18] WANG S Y, MAO J, CAO Y J, et al.Integrated knowledge content in an interdisciplinary field: Identification, classification, and application[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(11): 6581-6614.
[19] 陈英和, 张淳俊. 基于跨学科概念图的跨学科知识整合模型[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2010(1): 37-44.
CHEN Y H, ZHANG C J.A model of interdisciplinary knowledge integration moderated by interdisciplinary concept mapping[J]. Journal of Beijing normal university(social sciences), 2010(1): 37-44.
[20] 宋晓鸽. 跨学科融合视域下的初中劳动教育研究——以临潼区中学为例[D]. 延安: 延安大学, 2022.
SONG X G.Research on junior middle school labor education from the perspective of interdisciplinary integration[D]. Yan'an: Yan'an University, 2022.
[21] 周源, 董放, 刘宇飞. 融合新兴领域知识融合过程研究——以生物信息领域为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(8): 127-134.
ZHOU Y, DONG F, LIU Y F.Research on the process of knowledge fusion in emerging fields: A case study of bioinformatics[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(8): 127-134.
[22] SCHUMMER J.Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3): 425-465.
[23] QIN J, LANCASTER F W, ALLEN B.Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences[J]. Journal of the American society for information science, 1997, 48(10): 893-916.
[24] HU J M, ZHANG Y.Discovering the interdisciplinary nature of big data research through social network analysis and visualization[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(1): 91-109.
[25] 闵超, 孙建军. 学科交叉研究热点聚类分析——以国内图书情报学和新闻传播学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(1): 109-116.
MIN C, SUN J J.Clustering analysis on discipline- crossing research hotspots: An example of library and information science and journal-ism and communication studies[J]. Library and information service, 2014, 58(1): 109-116.
[26] 孙海生. 情报学跨学科知识引用实证研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(7): 113-118, 100.
SUN H S.Empirical study on knowledge citations of other disciplines to information science[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2013, 32(7): 113-118, 100.
[27] 陈琼, 朱庆华, 闵华, 等. 基于领域主题的学科交叉特征识别方法研究——以医学信息学为例[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(4): 11-24.
CHEN Q, ZHU Q H, MIN H, et al.Research on method of recog nizing interdisciplinary features based on domain topics - Taking medical informatics for example[J]. Journal of modern information, 2022, 42(4): 11-24.
[28] 陈仕吉, 陈晨, 韩涛, 等. 基于重叠结构的跨学科链接探测与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(15): 94-100.
CHEN S J, CHEN C, HAN T, et al.Interdisciplinary link detection and analysis based on overlapping community structure[J]. Library and information service, 2016, 60(15): 94-100.
[29] 李长玲, 刘非凡, 郭凤娇. 运用重叠社群可视化软件CFinder分析学科交叉研究主题——以情报学和计算机科学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(7): 75-80.
LI C L, LIU F F, GUO F J.Analysis on interdisciplinary research topics with cinder of overlapping communities visualization software - Taking the information science and computer science for example[J]. Library and information service, 2013, 57(7): 75-80.
[30] KIM H, PARK H, SONG M.Developing a topic-driven method for interdisciplinarity analysis[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2022, 16(2): 101255.
[31] RIP A, COURTIAL J P.Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 1984, 6(6): 381-400.
[32] BA Z C, CAO Y J, MAO J, et al.A hierarchical approach to analyzing knowledge integration between two fields - A case study on medical informatics and computer science[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 119(3): 1455-1486.
[33] 彭国超, 孔泳欣, 王玉文. 多维指标融合的主题突变检测研究[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(6): 584-593.
PENG G C, KONG Y X, WANG Y W.Burst term detection study based on multi-indicators[J]. Journal of the China society for scientific and technical information, 2022, 41(6): 584-593.
[34] PORTER A L, ROESSNER D J, HEBERGER A E.How interdisciplinary is a given body of research?[J]. Research evaluation, 2008, 17(4): 273-282.
[35] 黄颖, 高天舒, 王志楠, 等. 基于Web of Science分类的跨学科测度研究[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(3): 124-132.
HUANG Y, GAO T S, WANG Z N, et al.Interdisciplinary measure-ment research based on web of science classification[J]. Science research management, 2016, 37(3): 124-132.
[36] 陈红丽, 张自然, 叶佳鑫, 等. 基于ESI数据的学科交叉宏观态势测度研究[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(1): 96-103.
CHEN H L, ZHANG Z R, YE J X, et al.Research on the measurement in interdisciplinary macro situation based on ESI data[J]. Information science, 2021, 39(1): 96-103.
[37] PORTER A L, CHUBIN D E.An indicator of cross-disciplinary research[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 8(3): 161-176.
[38] LEYDESDORFF L.Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2007, 58(9): 1303-1319.
[39] LEYDESDORFF L, RAFOLS I.Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations[J]. Journal of infor-metrics, 2011, 5(1): 87-100.
[40] SALTON G, MCGILL M.Introduction to modern information retrieval[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986.
[41] SHANNON C E.A mathematical theory of communication[J]. Bell system technical journal, 1948, 27(3): 379-423.
[42] SIMPSON E H.Measurement of diversity[J]. Nature, 1949, 163(4148): 688.
[43] GRANT R M, JAMMINE A P, THOMAS H.Diversity, diversification, and profitability among British manufacturing companies, 1972-1984[J]. Academy of management journal, 1988, 31(4): 771-801.
[44] BRILLOUIN L, HELLWARTH R W.Science and information theory[J]. Physics today, 1956, 9(12): 39-40.
[45] STEELE T W, STIER J C.The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: A forestry case study[J]. Journal of the American society for information science, 2000, 51(5): 476-484.
[46] HUANG M H, CHANG Y W.A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(3): 789-803.
[47] STIRLING A.A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J]. Journal of the royal society interface, 2007, 4(15): 707-719.
[48] ZHANG L, ROUSSEAU R, GLANZEL W.Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account[J]. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 2016, 67(5): 1257-1265.
[49] LEYDESDORFF L.Diversity and interdisciplinarity: How can one distinguish and recombine disparity, variety, and balance?[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116(3): 2113-2121.
[50] LEYDESDORFF L, WAGNER C S, BORNMANN L.Diversity measurement: Steps towards the measurement of interdisciplinarity?[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2019, 13(3): 904-905.
[51] HILL M O.Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences[J]. Ecology, 1973, 54(2): 427-432.
[52] RAFOLS I.Knowledge integration and diffusion: Measures and map-ping of diversity and coherence[M]//Measuring Scholarly Impact. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014: 169-190.
[53] XU H Y, GUO T, YUE Z H, et al.Interdisciplinary topics of information science: A study based on the terms interdisciplinarity index series[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(2): 583-601.
[54] 黄菡, 王晓光, 王依蒙. 复杂网络视角下的研究主题学科交叉测度研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 99-109.
HUANG H, WANG X G, WANG Y M.Research on the interdisciplinary measurement of research topics from the perspective of complex networks[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(19): 99-109.
[55] 杜德慧, 李长玲, 相富钟, 等. 基于引文关键词的跨学科相关知识发现方法探讨[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(9): 189-194.
DU D H, LI C L, XIANG F Z, et al.Discussion on the method of interdisciplinary related knowledge discovery based on citation keywords[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2020, 39(9): 189-194.
[56] PORTER A L, RAFOLS I.Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 719-745.
[57] 胡玉宁, 胡观伟. 多源主题融合的科学知识结构模型构建与实证研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(7): 100-105.
HU Y N, HU G W.The construction of scientific knowledge structure model based on integrating subjects and empirical research[J]. Information studies: Theory & application, 2019, 42(7): 100-105.
[58] ZHOU X, HUANG L, ZHANG Y, et al.A hybrid approach to detecting technological recombination based on text mining and patent network analysis[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 121(2): 699-737.
[59] PAN X L, YAN E J, CUI M, et al.Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2018, 12(2): 481-493.
[60] PETTIGREW K E, MCKECHNIE L E F. The use of theory in information science research[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2001, 52(1): 62-73.
[61] YU Q, DING Y, SONG M, et al.Tracing database usage: Detecting main paths in database link networks[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2015, 9(1): 1-15.
[62] DING Y, SONG M, HAN J, et al.Entitymetrics: Measuring the impact of entities[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(8): e71416.
[63] YU Q, WANG Q, ZHANG Y F, et al.Analyzing knowledge entities about COVID-19 using entitymetrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(5): 4491-4509.
[64] 黄颖, 张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 等. 跨学科的三维测度——外部知识融合、内在知识会聚与科学合作模式[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(1): 25-35.
HUANG Y, ZHANG L, SUN B B, et al.Interdisciplinarity measurement: External knowledge integration, internal information convergence and research activity pattern[J]. Studies in science of science, 2019, 37(1): 25-35.
[65] 徐庶睿, 卢超, 章成志. 术语引用视角下的学科交叉测度——以PLOS ONE上六个学科为例[J]. 情报学报, 2017, 36(8): 809-820.
XU S R, LU C, ZHANG C Z.Measurement of interdisciplinary research from the perspective of terminology citation: Six disciplines on PLOS ONE[J]. Journal of the China society for scientific and technical information, 2017, 36(8): 809-820.
[66] 徐庶睿, 章成志, 卢超. 利用引文内容进行主题级学科交叉类型分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(23): 15-24.
XU S R, ZHANG C Z, LU C.Using citation contents for the interdisciplinary type analysis at a topical level[J]. Library and information service, 2017, 61(23): 15-24.
[67] MAO J, LIANG Z T, CAO Y J, et al.Quantifying cross-disciplinary knowledge flow from the perspective of content: Introducing an approach based on knowledge memes[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2020, 14(4): 101092.
[68] 王璐. 基于多视角的交叉学科知识贡献研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2020.
WANG L.Multi-perspective research on interdisciplinary knowledge contributions[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2020.
[69] WANG S Y, MAO J, LU K, et al.Understanding interdisciplinary knowledge integration through citance analysis: A case study on eHealth[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2021, 15(4): 101214.
[70] WANG S Y, MAO J, TANG J, et al.Content characteristics of knowledge integration in the eHealth field: An analysis based on citation contexts[J]. Journal of data and information science, 2021, 6(3): 58-74.
[71] WANG Y Z, ZHANG C Z.What type of domain knowledge is cited by articles with high interdisciplinary degree?[J]. Proceedings of the association for information science and technology, 2018, 55(1): 919-921.
[72] ENGERER V.Exploring interdisciplinary relationships between linguistics and information retrieval from the 1960s to today[J]. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 2017, 68(3): 660-680.
[73] XU J, BU Y, DING Y, et al.Understanding the formation of interdisciplinary research from the perspective of keyword evolution: A case study on joint attention[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(2): 973-995.
[74] 赵婉颖. 交叉学科中主题交互融合模式研究——以细胞科学为例[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2018.
ZHAO W Y.Study on topic interactions in interdisciplinary domain, take cell, biology field as an example[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2018.
[75] 闵超, 孙建军. 基于关键词交集的学科交叉研究热点分析——以图书情报学和新闻传播学为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(5): 76-82.
MIN C, SUN J J.Discipline-crossing research hotspots analysis based on keyword intersection: An example of library and informa-tion science and journalism and communication studies[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2014, 33(5): 76-82.
[76] 王卫军, 姚畅, 乔子越, 等. 基于词嵌入的国家自然科学基金学科交叉知识发现方法——以“人工智能” 与“信息管理” 为例[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(8): 831-845.
WANG W J, YAO C, QIAO Z Y, et al.Method of discovering interdisciplinary knowledge of the national natural science foundation of China based on word embedding: A case study on artificial intelligence and information management[J]. Journal of the China society for scientific and technical information, 2021, 40(8): 831-845.
[77] 商宪丽. 基于潜在主题的交叉学科知识组合与知识传播研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2017.
SHANG X L.Research on knowledge combination and knowledge dissemination in cross-discipline based on latent topics[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2017.
[78] CHAKRABORTY T.Role of interdisciplinarity in computer sci-ences: Quantification, impact and life trajectory[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 114(3): 1011-1029.
[79] 刘宇飞, 苗仲桢, 黎凌峰, 等. 战略性新兴产业多领域知识融合路径研究——基于引用网络和文本信息的分析[J]. 中国工程科学, 2020, 22(2): 120-129.
LIU Y F, MIAO Z Z, LI L F, et al.Multi-domain knowledge con-vergence trajectory analysis of strategic emerging industries based on citation network and text information[J]. Strategic study of CAE, 2020, 22(2): 120-129.
[80] 商宪丽, 王施运, 操玉杰, 等. 基于引文内容分析的交叉领域知识内化过程研究[J]. 情报科学, 2023, 41(2): 118-125.
SHANG X L, WANG S Y, CAO Y J, et al.Analyzing the knowledge internalization process of interdisciplinary field based on citation content[J]. Information science, 2023, 41(2): 118-125.
[81] 操玉杰, 毛进, 潘荣清, 等. 学科交叉研究的演化阶段特征分析——以医学信息学为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(5): 107-116.
CAO Y J, MAO J, PAN R Q, et al.Analyzing characteristics of interdisciplinary research evolutions: Case study of medical informatics[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2019, 3(5): 107-116.
[82] 曾德明, 于英杰, 文金艳, 等. 基于Web of Science分类的学科交叉融合演化特征分析[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(8): 872-884.
ZENG D M, YU Y J, WEN J Y, et al.Characteristics and evolution of the trend of interdisciplinarity in China: An analysis based on web of science classifications[J]. Journal of the China society for scientific and technical information, 2020, 39(8): 872-884.
[83] LEYDESDORFF L, IVANOVA I.The measurement of "interdisciplinarity" and "synergy" in scientific and extra-scientific collaborations[J]. SSRN electronic journal, 2021,72(4):387-402.
[84] 熊文靓, 付慧真. 交叉科学测度理论、进展与展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(21): 132-144.
XIONG W J, FU H Z.Theory, research progress and prospect of interdisciplinary research measurement[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(21): 132-144.