撤销学位论文学术影响力研究

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.20-0968

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]分析被撤销学位的博硕士学位论文分布情况,揭示其在学术系统的不良影响,为管理部门制订相关政策提供建议和参考,为具体实践提供方法和策略。[方法/过程]通过媒体的公开报道获得撤销学位案例,在学位论文数据库和网络阅读分享平台中获得撤销学位论文的分布数据、引用数据和Altmetrics数据,分析撤销学位论文的学术影响,提出治理策略。[结果/结论]论文的残留率为75%,即有75%的学位论文在学位被撤销后仍分布在各数据平台中;论文的净化率为36%,即有36%的撤销学位论文被数据平台删除;文献计量分析发现,有58%撤销学位论文被引用过,其中33%的引用发生在撤销之后;Altmetrics分析发现,84%撤销学位论文在网上被上传、收藏、分享、评论和转载,其中有24%的论文在撤销后仍被上传。最后从科研诚信教育和学术不端行为惩戒两个角度提出治理策略。

关键词: 撤销学位论文, 学术不端, 科研诚信, 学术影响力, Altmetrics

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This study examined the distribution of retracted dissertations and theses in order to explore their negative effects. The purpose is to provide recommendations and strategies for management departments to formulate policies to reduce academic misconduct. [Method/Process] We obtained cases of revoked academic degree through media news, and retrieved various databases and online reading sharing platforms to find the residual situation of the papers. We also analyzed the papers' academic impact by bibliometrics and altmetrics measurement. [Results/Conclusions] The results show that 75% retracted dissertations and theses were still in databases and online reading and sharing platforms, and 36% of them were retracted. Bibliometrics analysis found that 58% retracted papers were cited, and one-third of which occurred after the retraction. Altmetrics analysis found that 84% papers were uploaded, collected, shared, commented, and reposted. And 24% of them were uploaded after the retraction. Finally, we put forward the governance strategies from the perspectives of research integrity education and academic misconduct punishment.

Key words: retracted dissertations and theses, Academic misconduct, research integrity, academic impact, Altmetrics

中图分类号:

G237.5

李晓辉, 王珏, 郎林芳. 撤销学位论文学术影响力研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(7): 46-53.

LI Xiaohui, WANG Jue, LANG Linfang. Academic Impact of Retracted Dissertations and Theses[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(7): 46-53.

参考文献

[1] 杨珠. 学术不端论文未被撤销现象及其治理——基于董鹏学术不端事件的个案分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018, 29(7): 691-697.
YANG Z.Phenomenon on unretracted papers of academic misconduct and the corresponding treatment: Based on Dong Peng's academic misconduct[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2018, 29(7):691-697.
[2] 武夷山. 论文撤销之后“谬种”仍会流传[N]. 科学时报, 2011-05-16(A03).
WU Y S. "Fallacy" will still circulate after paper were retracted[N]. China science daily, 2011-05-16(A03).
[3] ISABEL C V, ALBERTO R R.Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors[J]. Gaceta sanitaria, 2019, 33(4): 1584-1588.
[4] 陈小清, 邢美园. PubMed数据库撤销论文文献计量分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2016, 27(4): 352-358.
CHEN X Q, XING M Y.Bibliometric analysis of retracted articles in PubMed[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2016, 27(4): 352-358.
[5] 付中静. PubMed数据库中我国论文撤销原因及学术影响力分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2017, 28(4): 293-299.
FU Z J.An empirical study on reasons of the Chinese retracted articles in PubMed database and its academic influence[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2017, 28(4): 293-299.
[6] JAIME A T D S, JUDIT D. Highly cited retracted papers[J]. Scien-tometrics, 2017, 110(3): 1653-1661.
[7] JUDIT B-I, GALI H.Post retraction citations in context: a case study[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 113(1): 547-565.
[8] 杨奕虹, 杨贺, 万小影, 等. 利用高被引与零被引数据剖析中国博士学位论文学术影响力[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(7): 22-28.
YANG Y H, YANG H, WAN X Y, et al.Analyzing academic impact of Chinese doctoral dissertations based on high-cited and non-cited articles[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2015, 34(7): 22-28.
[9] MITHU A G, SANJAY K S.Citation analysis of doctoral theses of physics: a bibliometrics study[J]. Library philosophy and practice, 2019.
[10] LORETA T, VAIDAS J.Incongruences of ethical and legal norms in academia: The case on revocation of doctoral degrees[J]. Journal of academic ethics, 2017, 15(1): 73-91.
[11] 高俊杰. 基于学术不端撤销学位的程序制度建构[J]. 中国法学, 2019(5): 47-63.
GAO J J.Procedural system construction for revoking degree based on academic misconduct[J]. China legal science, 2019(5): 47-63.
[12] 王茜, 窦天芳, 胡洪营, 等. 国内外学位论文再出版的政策研究及启示[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2020, 38(2): 56-62.
WANG Q, DOU T F, HU H Y, et al.Policy research and enlightenment on republication of dissertation at home and abroad[J]. Journal of academic libraries, 2020, 38(2): 56-62.
[13] PRIEM J, TARABORELLI D, GROTH P, et al. Altmetrics: Amanifesto, 26 October 2010[EB/OL]. [2020-02-15]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto.
[14] WOUTERS P, COSTAS R.Users, narcissism and control-tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century[M]. SURF foundation, 2012.
[15] 王艳波, 汪雷, 吴小兰. 基Altmetrics与文献计量指标的国内学术论文影响力评价研究[J/OL]. 情报理论与实践: 1-10[2020-03-07].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20191219.0845.002.html.
WANG Y B, WANG L, WU X L. Research on the Impact evaluation of domestic academic papers based on altermetrics and traditional bibliometric indicators[J/OL]. Information studies: theory & applica-tion: 1-10[2020-03-07]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20191219.0845.002.html.
[16] 姚长青, 田瑞强, 杨冬雨, 等. 撤销论文及其学术影响研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2014, 25(5): 595-604.
YAO C Q, TIAN R Q, YANG D Y, et al.Research on retracted ar-ticles and its academic impact[J]. Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals, 2014, 25(5): 595-604.
[17] JOS L O.Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC's members[J]. Elsevier ltd, 2015, 9(1): 39-49.
[18] ERTL. Plagiarism in doctoral theses as "occupational risk" of government ministers? The debate on good academic practice in German doctoral education in the light of high-profile plagiarism cases[J]. Oxford review of education, 2018, 44(5): 616-632.
[19] BROOKES P S.Internet publicity of data problems in the bio-science literature correlates with enhanced corrective action[J].
Other, 2014, 2.