农业图书情报学刊 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 151-155.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2017.12.033

• 编辑出版 • 上一篇    下一篇

期刊评价4个核心指标之间关系的探讨

黄明睿   

  1. 南京农业大学畜牧兽医编辑部,江苏 南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-22 出版日期:2017-12-05 发布日期:2017-12-28
  • 作者简介:黄明睿(1963-),女,副编审,研究方向:编辑出版学。
  • 基金资助:
    南京农业大学中央高校基本科研业务费人文社科基金(SK2015020)

Discussion on the Relationship among four core Evaluation Indexes of Periodical

HUANG Mingrui   

  1. Editorial Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Jiangsu Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2017-05-22 Online:2017-12-05 Published:2017-12-28

摘要: 为了探讨期刊评价指标载文量、总被引频次、影响因子和综合评价总分之间的相互关系,采用文献计量法和统计学方法,以中国科学技术信息研究所《2014年版中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)》的数据为依据,用统计分析软件spss 19.0对各类期刊的4个指标进行统计分析。结果发现载文量与总被引频次为正相关,载文量与影响因子、综合评价总分在物理类呈正相关,但在农业综合类和农业工程类、临床医学综合类、化学工程综合类、电子技术类、计算机科学技术类显示不相关;总被引频次、影响因子、综合评价总分三者之间呈正相关,尤其是影响因子与综合评价总分之间高度相关。说明总被引频次、影响因子、综合评价总分三者之间相互影响,在期刊评价中起着主要作用。此外,适当的载文量有利于提高被引用率。研究结果为期刊提高影响力提供参考。

关键词: 评价指标, 载文量, 总被引频次, 影响因子, 综合评价总分, 相关性

Abstract: In order to research the relationship among the periodical evaluation indexes including paper quantity, total cited frequency, impact factor and comprehensive evaluation score. Literature measurement and statistical methods were used to analyzed the four indexes with SPSS 19.0 based on the data from 2014 China's Science and Technology Journal Citation Reports (Core) by Science and Technology Information Research Institute of China. The results showed that the amount of published articles were positive related to the cited frequency; the number and impact factor and comprehensive evaluation score in physics were positively correlated, but in agriculture and agricultural engineering, clinical medicine, electronic technology, computer science and technology showed no correlation; the cited frequency, impact factor and comprehensive evaluation score were positively correlated, especially between impact factor and comprehensive evaluation score. It illustrated that cited frequency, impact factor and comprehensive evaluation score influenced each other, and played a major role in the periodical evaluation. In addition, the appropriate number was in favour of improving cited frequency, which provided reference for periodicals to improve influence.

Key words: evaluation index

中图分类号: 

  • G251

引用本文

黄明睿. 期刊评价4个核心指标之间关系的探讨[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2017, 29(12): 151-155.

HUANG Mingrui. Discussion on the Relationship among four core Evaluation Indexes of Periodical[J]. , 2017, 29(12): 151-155.