农业图书情报学刊 ›› 2016, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 76-81.doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2016.01.018

• 工作研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

ESI工程类与中国教育部学科分类的对比研究

梁瑛, 邹小筑   

  1. 南京航空航天大学图书馆,江苏 南京 210016
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-29 出版日期:2016-01-05 发布日期:2016-02-26
  • 作者简介:梁瑛(1973-),女,硕士,助理馆员,研究方向:信息分析与预测,已发表论文1篇。邹小筑(1970-),女,博士研究生,副研究馆员,硕士生导师,研究方向:信息分析与预测,信息资源管理与信息经济,已发表论文10余篇。

Comparative Analysis on Subject Classification Between ESI Engineering and China’s Ministry of Education

LIANG Ying, ZOU Xiao-zhu   

  1. Library of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Jiangsu Nanjing 210016, China
  • Received:2015-09-29 Online:2016-01-05 Published:2016-02-26

摘要: ESI数据库在设计时侧重宏观学科领域的分析,ESI数据不适用于具体专业学科的分析。通过利用Calis联合目录公共检索系统、全国期刊联合目录数据库、JCR期刊主题与期刊名结合的3种归类方式,得到较为准确的ESI工程学排名期刊与中国教育部一级学科的对应关系,以期为高校的具体专业学科建设提供可参考的依据。

关键词: ESI, 中国教育部, 学科分类, 工程

Abstract: ESI database seems to focus on macro discipline analysis when designed, and ESI data is not suitable for the analysis of specific professional disciplines. In this paper, the three subject classification methods: CALIS (China Academic Library & Information System), UNICAT (the Online Union Catalogue of Chinese Academy of Sciences) and the combination of journal subject and journal name of JCR, were used to get a more accurate correspondence relationship between the ESI engineering ranked journals and the first-level disciplines of China’s Ministry of Education, so as to provide reference for the specific professional discipline construction.

Key words: Essential Science Indicators (ESI)

中图分类号: 

  • G254.11

引用本文

梁瑛, 邹小筑. ESI工程类与中国教育部学科分类的对比研究[J]. 农业图书情报学刊, 2016, 28(1): 76-81.

LIANG Ying, ZOU Xiao-zhu. Comparative Analysis on Subject Classification Between ESI Engineering and China’s Ministry of Education[J]. , 2016, 28(1): 76-81.