科技文献内容语义描述模型研究

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2020.08.20-0183

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义]对科技文献正文内容进行语义建模的方法进行总结分析,为文献模型相关研究和实际应用提供参考和借鉴。[方法/过程]归纳当前科技文献内容语义描述模型的特点,将其分为文档组件模型、修辞特征模型和科学论述模型3类,并进行对比分析,以学术论文为例开展应用实践,从知识管理、语义出版、语义检索、科学论证分析等方面探讨模型的应用情况。[结果/结论]科技文献内容语义描述模型推动了文献的深度挖掘、知识结构定位和关联分析,促进了文献内部细粒度知识的发现、共享和利用,有助于科学传播与知识创新。

关键词: 科技文献, 文档组件, 修辞特征, 科学论述, 语义模型, 数据控据

Abstract: [Purpose / Significance] This paper summarizes and analyzes the semantic models for the content of scientific literature in order to provide references for the research and application of literature modeling. [Method / Process] According to the characteristics, current semantic models for scientific literature are divided into document component model, rhetoric structure model and scientific discourse model. Based on the comparative analysis among these semantic models, a journal article is taken as an example to discuss the applications of semantic models from the perspectives of knowledge management, semantic publishing, semantic retrieval, and scientific discourse analysis. [Results / Conclusions] The semantic model for the content of scientific literature promotes the in-depth exploration of literature, the positioning of knowledge structure and the correlation analysis, improves the discovery, sharing and utilization of fine-grained knowledge in literature, and will contribute to science communication and knowledge innovation.

Key words: scientific literature, document component, rhetorical structure, scientific discourse, semantic model, data mining

中图分类号:

G302

王颖. 科技文献内容语义描述模型研究[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(8): 12-24.

WANG Ying. Semantic Models for the Content of Scientific Literature[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(8): 12-24.

参考文献

[1] 黄永文. 关联数据在图书馆中的应用研究综述[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2010(5): 1-7.
[2] GODBY, C J, WANG S, MIXTER J K.Library linked data in the cloud: OCLC’s experiments with new models of resource description[M]. Morgan & claypool publishers, 2015.
[3] PERONI S, SHOTTON D.The SPAR ontologies[C]. Proceedings of the 17th international semantic web conference, Monterey, Springer, 2018: 119-136.
[4] ELSEVIER. Article of the future [EB/OL]. [2012-01-12]. http://beta.cell.com/index.php/2009/07/article-of-the-future.
[5] Journal article tag suite[EB/OL]. [2018-09-26].https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/about.html.
[6] GROTH P.The anatomy of a nanopublication[J]. Information services & use, 2010(30): 51-56.
[7] ALLEN R B.Model oriented scientific research reports[J]. DLib magazine, 2011(17): 5-6.
[8] SOLLARCI L, PEREIRA M.The introduction, methods, results, and discussion(IMRAD) structure: A fifty-year survery[J]. Journal of the medical library association, 2004, 92(3): 364.
[9] BURROUGH-BOENISCH J.International reading strategies for IMRD articles[J]. Written communi-cation, 1999, 16(3): 296-316.
[10] AGARWAL S, YU H.Automatically classifying sentences in full-text biomedical articles into intro-duction, methods, results and discussion[J]. Bioinformatics, 2009, 25(23): 3174-3180.
[11] ORIOKOT L, BUMEMBO W, MUNABI I, et al.The introduction, methods, results and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a survey of its use in different authoring partnerships in a students' journal[J]. BMC research notes, 2011, 4(1): 250.
[12] KUCER S.The making of meaning reading and writing as parallel processes[M]. Written communi-cation, 1985, 2(3): 317-336.
[13] MEADOWS A.The scientific paper as an archaeological artifact[J]. Journal of information science, 1985, 11(1): 27-30.
[14] DAY R A, GASTEL B.How to write and publish scientific papers[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 2006.
[15] DE WAARD A, TEL G.The ABCDE format-enabling semantic conference proceeding[C]. Proceedings of 1st workshop: SemWik-i2006-from wiki to semantics. budva, montenegro, 2006: 1-13.
[16] Harmsze f: A modular structure for scientific articles in an electronic environment[D]. Netherlands, university of Amsterdam, 2000.
[17] MANCINI C, SHUM S.Modelling discourse in contested domains: A semiotic and cognitive framework[J]. International journal of human-computer studies, 2006, 64(11): 1154-1171.
[18] NESIC S.Semantic document model to enhance data and knowledge interoperability[J]. Annals of information systems, 2009, 6: 135-162.
[19] 王文清, 刘春彤, 张月祥, 等. PUBO: 面向出版的数字资源本体建模[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2015(3): 88-95.
[20] CONSTANTIN A, PERONI S, PETTIFER S, et al.The document components ontology (DoCO)[J]. Semantic web, 2016, 7(2): 167-181.
[21] PERONI S, SHOTTON D.FaBiO and CiTO: Ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations[J]. Journal of web semantic, 2012, 17: 33-43.
[22] CONSTANTIN A, PETTIFER S, VORONKOV A. PDFX: Fully-automated PDF-to-XML conversion of scientific literature[C]. In proceedings of the2013 ACM symposium on document engineering, 177-180.
[23] W3C INTEREST GROUP. Ontology of rhetorical blocks (ORB)[EB/OL]. [2018-09-26]. http://www.w3.org/TR/hcls-orb/.
[24] GROZA T, HANDSCHUCH S, MOLLER K, et al.SALT-Semantically annotated LaTeX for scientific publications[C]. In proceedings of the 4th european semantic web conference, 2007: 518-532.
[25] MANN W C, THOMPSON S A.Rhetorical structure theory: A theory of text organization[R]. In-formation science institute, 1987.
[26] LIAKATA M, SOLDATOVA L.An ontology methodology and CISP[R]. JISC, 2007: 1-36.
[27] SOLDATOVA L N, KING R D. An ontology of scientific experiments[J]. Journal of the royal society interface, 2006, 3/11: 795-803.
[28] GANGEMI A, GUARINO N, MASOLO C, et al.Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE[C]. Proceedings of the 13th int. conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management, Siguenza, Spain: Springer verlag, 2002: 166-181.
[29] CICCARESE P, WU E, WONG G, et al.The SWAN scientific discourse ontology[J]. Journal of bi-omedical informatics, 2008, 41(5): 739-751.
[30] RIBAUPIERRE H, FALQUET G.A user-centric model to semantically annotate and retrieve scientific documents[J]. Data & knowledge engineering, 2013, 13: 21-24.
[31] RIBAUPIERRE H, FALQUET G.Extracting discourse elements and annotating scientific documents using the SciAnnotDoc model: a use case in gender documents[J]. International journal on digital libraries, 2018, 19(2-3): 271-286.
[32] 秦春秀, 杨智娟, 赵捧未, 等. 面向科技文献知识表示的知识元本体模型[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(3): 94-103.
[33] 王晓光, 宋宁远. 语义出版物的内容组织架构研究—基于纳米出版物和微型出版物的比较分析[J]. 出版科学, 2017, 25(4): 20-27.
[34] Concept web alliance. Nanopublication guide-lines[EB/OL]. [2019-12-06]. http://nanopub.org/guidelines/working_draft/.
[35] 吴思竹, 李峰, 张智雄. 知识资源的语义表示和出版模式研究—以Nanopublication为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2013, 39(4): 102-109.
[36] CLARK T, CICCARESE P N, GOBLE C A.Micropublications: A semantic model for claims, evidence, arguments and annotations in biomedical communications[J]. Journal of biomedical semantics, 2014, 5(1): 1-33.
[37] 马雨萌, 祝忠明. 科学篇章修辞块本体标准及其应用分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2012, 31(10): 112-116.
[38] GARCIAL L, MCLAUGHLIN C, GARCIA A.Biotea: RDFizing PubMed central in support for the paper as an interface to the web of data[J]. Journal of biomedical semantics, 2013, 4(1): S5.
[39] 牛丽慧. 微出版及其应用探析[J]. 现代情报, 2018, 38(6): 86-92.
[40] RACITI D, YOOK K, HARRIS T, et al.Micropublication: Incentivizing community curation and placing unpublished data into the public domain[J]. Database, 2018: 1-10.
[41] SCHNEIDER J, CICCARESE P, CLARK T, et al.Using the micropublications ontology and the open annotation data model to represent evidence within a drug-drug interaction knowledge base[C]. ISWC 2014 workshop on linked science, 2014: 1-11.