脑电技术在信息资源管理学科的应用：现状与展望

doi:10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.24-0262

Abstract

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This study aims to reveal the current state of the electroencephalography (EEG) technology application in the field of library and information science (LIS). By expanding the boundaries of the discipline, it provides insights into the future application of the EEG technology in the LIS field, highlighting its potential to enhance library services and user experience. [Method/Process] The research systematically reviews 65 empirical studies on the application of the EEG technology in the LIS field since the inception of the discipline. These studies were analyzed and organized to reveal the current state of the EEG technology applications in the field. The research examines the methodologies used, the specific applications of EEG in different library environments, and the results of these applications. In doing so, it highlights the role of the EEG technology in the development of intelligent library systems. [Results/Conclusions] This study finds from the 65 literature coding results that the literature on the application of the EEG technology in the LIS field has grown significantly in recent years, with three research foci: first, to study the impact of interface information layout on users' cognitive load and search efficiency; second, to study cognitive behavior in the field of information security; and third, to study the mechanism of followership in human decision making. Future directions and challenges for the application of cognitive neuroscience tools in this area are discussed in order to provide a reference for further applications of the EEG technology in the LIS field. This paper reveals the current research status and characteristics of the EEG technology in the LIS field, fills the gap in the research framework of the EEG technology application, and provides a reference for the further application of the EEG technology. However, the research also acknowledges certain limitations, such as the ambiguity of interpreting EEG research findings in fields such as LIS, and issues related to data privacy and security. These limitations suggest that there are still challenges to be addressed. Therefore, the effective integration of cognitive neuroscience with LIS requires further research and exploration. By providing a comprehensive review and analysis, this study sets the stage for future research that could address current limitations and advance the use of EEG in LIS. The findings underscore the need for interdisciplinary approaches to fully realize the benefits of the EEG technology in understanding and improving user interactions with library systems, ensuring information security, and enhancing decision-making processes in the library context.

Key words: library and information science (LIS), electroencephalography, the EEG technology, interdisciplinary

CLC Number:

G203

LIU Yang, TIAN Huiyi. Application of the EEG Technology in the Field of Library and Information Science: Current Situation and Perspectives[J].Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2024, 36(4): 63-71.

References

[1] PETTIGREW K E, FIDEL R, BRUCE H.Conceptual frameworks in information behavior[J]. Annual review of information science and technology (ARIST), 2001, 35: 43-78.
[2] LIU Y, SHI J L, HUANG F, et al.Unveiling consumer preferences in automotive reviews through aspect-based opinion generation[J]. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 2024, 77: 103605.
[3] 金晓玲, 于晓宇, 周中允, 等. 信息系统研究中脑电技术的应用: 现状与展望[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2019, 24(6): 1-7, 15.
JIN X L, YU X Y, ZHOU Z Y, et al.Application of electroencephalograph as a research tool in the information systems research: Present and future[J]. Industrial engineering and management, 2019, 24(6): 1-7, 15.
[4] 王琳, 熊颖, 江雨薇, 等. 眼动技术方法在图书情报学中的应用研究述评[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2020(8): 63-70.
WANG L, XIONG Y, JIANG Y W, et al.Application of eye-tracking technology in library and information science research[J]. Digital library forum, 2020(8): 63-70.
[5] DE VICO FALLANI F, NICOSIA V, SINATRA R, et al. Defecting or not defecting: How to "read" human behavior during cooperative games by EEG measurements[J]. PLoS One, 2010, 5(12): e14187.
[6] DA SILVA FERREIRA G C, DE SOUSA CRIPPA J A, DE LIMA OS RIO F. Facial emotion processing and recognition among maltreated children: A systematic literature review[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2014, 5: 1460.
[7] SONGSAMOE S, SAENGWONG-NGAM R, KOOMHIN P, et al.Understanding consumer physiological and emotional responses to food products using electroencephalography(EEG)[J]. Trends in food science & technology, 2019, 93: 167-173.
[8] FU Z Z, WU D A J, ROSS I, et al. Single-neuron correlates of error monitoring and post-error adjustments in human medial frontal cortex[J]. Neuron, 2019, 101(1): 165-177.e5.
[9] LAFON B, HENIN S, HUANG Y, et al.Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings[J]. Nature communications, 2017, 8: 1199.
[10] BLEICHNER M G, DEBENER S.Concealed, unobtrusive ear-cen-tered EEG acquisition: CEEGrids for transparent EEG[J]. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017, 11: 163.
[11] LADOUCE S, MUSTILE M, IETSWAART M, et al.Capturing cognitive events embedded in the real world using mobile electroencephalography and eye-tracking[J]. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2022, 34(12): 2237-2255.
[12] BAŞAR E, BAŞAR-EROĞLU C, KARAKAŞ S, et al. Are cognitive pro-cesses manifested in event-related gamma, alpha, theta and delta oscillations in the EEG?[J]. Neuroscience letters, 1999, 259(3): 165-168.
[13] KRAKOWSKA M. Affective factors in human information behavior: A conceptual analysis of interdisciplinary research on information behavior[J]. Zagadnienia informacji naukowej - studia informacyjne, 2020, 58(1A(115A)): 75-95.
[14] AL-SAMARRAIE H, ELDENFRIA A, ZAQOUT F, et al.How reading in single- and multiple-column types influence our cognitive load: An EEG study[J]. The electronic library, 2019, 37(4): 593-606.
[15] 刘晓君, 李丽丽, 王萌萌, 等. 跨学科知识的交叉与融合机制研究——以脑电技术为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(15): 240-248.
LIU X J, LI L L, WANG M M, et al.Research on the mechanism of interdisciplinary knowledge intersection and fusion: Taking EEG technology as an example[J]. Science and technology management research, 2022, 42(15): 240-248.
[16] LIU Y.Depression clinical detection model based on social media: A federated deep learning approach[J]. The journal of supercomputing, 2024, 80(6): 7931-7954.
[17] KAPLAN S E, RECKERS P M J. An examination of information search during initial audit planning[J]. Accounting, organizations and society, 1989, 14(5/6): 539-550.
[18] LIU Y.Analyzing the effect of user-generated content on studio per-formance: A combined approach[J]. Managerial and decision eco-nomics, 2024, 45(4): 2228-2248.
[19] BHATTACHARYA P, GUPTA R K, YANG Y P.Exploring the contextual factors affecting multimodal emotion recognition in videos[J]. IEEE transactions on affective computing, 2023, 14(2): 1547-1557.
[20] 刘洋, 柳卓心, 金昊, 等. 基于BERTopic模型的用户层次化需求及动机分析——以抖音平台为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2023, 42(12): 159-167.
LIU Y, LIU Z X, JIN H, et al.User hierarchical need and motivation analysis ased on BERTopic model: Taking Douyin platform as an example[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2023, 42(12): 159-167.
[21] 夏立新, 周鼎, 叶光辉, 等. 情感负荷视角下探索式搜索学习效果的影响因素[J]. 图书情报知识, 2020, 37(4): 133-141.
XIA L X, ZHOU D, YE G H, et al.Research on influential factors of exploratory search learning effect from the perspective of affective load[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2020, 37(4): 133-141.
[22] SAVOLAINEN R.The interplay of affective and cognitive factors in information seeking and use[J]. Journal of documentation, 2015, 71(1): 175-197.
[23] LIU W L, CAO Y Q, PROCTOR R W.The roles of visual complexity and order in first impressions of webpages: An ERP study of webpage rapid evaluation[J]. International journal of human-computer inter-action, 2022, 38(14): 1345-1358.
[24] RUI Z P, CHANG D N, GU Z Y.Event-related potential and oscillatory cortical activities of artistic methodology in information visualization design in human-computer interface[J]. International journal of human-computer studies, 2023, 177: 103066.
[25] ZHANG X T, WEN D, LIANG J, et al.How the public uses social media wechat to obtain health information in China: A survey study[J]. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017, 17(2): 66.
[26] NAGLER R H, VOGEL R I, GOLLUST S E, et al.Effects of prior exposure to conflicting health information on responses to subsequent unrelated health messages: Results from a population-based longitudinal experiment[J]. Annals of behavioral medicine, 2022, 56(5): 498-511.
[27] ZHOU L N, ZHANG D S, YANG C C, et al.Harnessing social media for health information management[J]. Electronic commerce research and applications, 2018, 27: 139-151.
[28] 刘洋, 吕树月, 黎若琣. 社交机器人在信息行为研究中的概念、任务及应用[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2024, 36(3): 4-20.
LIU Y, LV S Y, LI R J.Concept, task, and application of social robots in information behavior research[J]. Journal of library and information science in agriculture, 2024, 36(3): 4-20.
[29] LIU Y, SHI J L, ZHAO C X, et al.Generalizing factors of COVID-19 vaccine attitudes in different regions: A summary generation and topic modeling approach[J]. Digital health, 2023, 9: 236-245.
[30] TØNDEL I A, LINE M B, JAATUN M G. Information security incident management: Current practice as reported in the literature[J]. Computers & security, 2014, 45: 42-57.
[31] LI Y X, SONG L J, ZENG Y C.Research on information security and privacy protection model based on consumer behavior in big data environment[J]. Concurrency and computation: Practice and experience, 2019, 31(10): e4881.
[32] OPHOFF J, DIETZ F.Using gamification to improve information security behavior: A password strength experiment[M]//DREVIN L, THEOCHARIDOU M, eds. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 157-169.
[33] ANDERSON, AGARWAL.Practicing safe computing: A multimethod empirical examination of home computer user security behavioral intentions[J]. MIS quarterly, 2010, 34(3): 613.
[34] DIMOKA, DAVIS, GUPTA, et al. On the use of neurophysiological tools in IS research: Developing a research agenda for NeuroIS[J]. MIS quarterly, 2012, 36(3): 679.
[35] VANCE A, UNIVERSITY B Y, ANDERSON B, et al.Using measures of risk perception to predict information security behavior: Insights from electroencephalography(EEG)[J]. Journal of the association for information systems, 2014, 15(10): 679-722.
[36] HAN D M, DAI Y H, HAN T L, et al.Explore awareness of information security: Insights from cognitive neuromechanism[J]. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2015, 2015: 762403.
[37] TRAUTMANN-LENGSFELD S A, HERRMANN C S. EEG reveals an early influence of social conformity on visual processing in group pressure situations[J]. Social neuroscience, 2013, 8(1): 75-89.
[38] XIE Y, CHEN M L, LAI H X, et al.Neural basis of two kinds of social influence: Obedience and conformity[J]. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016, 10: 51.
[39] YU R J, SUN S.To conform or not to conform: Spontaneous conformity diminishes the sensitivity to monetary outcomes[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): e64530.
[40] 刘洋, 朱立芳. 国外信息行为研究中的共情理论: 现状与展望[J]. 知识管理论坛, 2023, 8(4): 316-328.
LIU Y, ZHU L F.Empathy theory in foreign information behavior research: Present situation and prospect[J]. Knowledge management forum, 2023, 8(4): 316-328.
[41] 侯冠华. 数字图书信息界面布局影响老年人信息检索交互绩效的眼动实证研究[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2020, 29(5): 21-32.
HOU G H.Eye empirical research on effect of information interface layout on digital book in information retrieval interactive perfor-mance for aged people[J]. Journal of the national library of China, 2020, 29(5): 21-32.
[42] LIU Y, DING X C, PENG S, et al.Leveraging ChatGPT to optimize depression intervention through explainable deep learning[J]. Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024, 15: 1383648.
[43] LIU Y.Depression detection via a Chinese social media platform: A novel causal relation-aware deep learning approach[J]. The journal of supercomputing, 2024, 80(8): 10327-10356.
[44] STEMMLER G, HELDMANN M, PAULS C A, et al.Constraints for emotion specificity in fear and anger: The context counts[J]. Psy-chophysiology, 2001, 38(2): 275-291.
[45] SI Y J, LI F L, DUAN K Y, et al.Predicting individual decision-making responses based on single-trial EEG[J]. NeuroImage, 2020, 206: 116333.
[46] MINNERY B S, FINE M S.FEATURENeuroscience and the future of human-computer interaction[J]. Interactions, 2009, 16(2): 70-75.
[47] PARRY K, COHEN M, BHATTACHARYA S.Rise of the machines[J]. Group & organization management, 2016, 41(5): 571-594.
[48] DIMOKA A, PAVLOU P A, DAVIS F D.Research commentary - NeuroIS: The potential of cognitive neuroscience for information systems research[J]. Information systems research, 2011, 22(4): 687-702.
[49] SLAGTER H A, BOUWER F L.Qualitative versus quantitative indi-vidual differences in cognitive neuroscience[J]. Journal of cognition, 2021, 4(1): 523-556.
[50] LOPATOVSKA I, ARAPAKIS I.Theories, methods and current re-search on emotions in library and information science, information re-trieval and human-computer interaction[J]. Information processing & management, 2011, 47(4): 575-592.
[51] LIU Y, ZENG Q G, LI B B, et al.Anticipating financial distress of high-tech startups in the European Union: A machine learning approach for imbalanced samples[J]. Journal of forecasting, 2022, 41(6): 1131-1155.
[52] ALDAYEL M, YKHLEF M, AL-NAFJAN A.Deep learning for EEG-based preference classification in neuromarketing[J]. Applied sciences, 2020, 10(4): 1525.
[53] TURNER B M, RODRIGUEZ C A, NORCIA T M, et al.Why more is better: Simultaneous modeling of EEG, fMRI, and behavioral data[J]. NeuroImage, 2016, 128: 96-115.
[54] ZADELAAR J N, WEEDA W D, WALDORP L J, et al.Are individual differences quantitative or qualitative? An integrated behavioral and fMRI MIMIC approach[J]. NeuroImage, 2019, 202: 116058.
[55] ROUDER J N, HAAF J M.Are there reliable qualitative individual difference in cognition?[J]. Journal of cognition, 2021, 4(1): 132-145.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Application of the EEG Technology in the Field of Library and Information Science: Current Situation and Perspectives

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 7

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	YAO Ru, WANG Jinfei, LIN Qiao, KONG Lingbo, NIE Yingli. Interdisciplinary Knowledge Integration: Current Situation and Perspectives [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2024, 36(4): 21-35.
[2]	JIA Shiwei, YAN Hui. Application and Development of Ethnography in Library and Information Science Research [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2023, 35(6): 4-15.
[3]	QIAN Lei, HONG Qiulan. Practice and Enlightenment of the Industry-University-Research LIS Projects in iSchool Universities in the United States [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(8): 92-101.
[4]	WANG Yi, KE Ping, DING Huadong, WANG Yujue, ZENG Shizhan, HUANG Yang, LIN Jun, LI Nan, DENG Yongqiu. Advancing the Creative Development of Cultural Resources in LAMs for Serving China's Cultural Development Strategy [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2022, 34(12): 4-32.
[5]	ZHAO Rongying, CHANG Ruru, WANG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Zhaoyang. Progress of Library and Information Science During the 13th Five-year Plan：Analysis on Funded Papers [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(6): 18-29.
[6]	YANG Siluo, TIAN Peilin, ZHU Chuanyu, QIU Junping. Characteristics of UNESCO's Humanities and Social Sciences Research: Topic, Evolution and Cooperation [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(6): 6-17.
[7]	GUAN Cuizhong, FAN Aihong, ZHAO Chenggang. Social Network Analysis of Research Collaborations between Departments—— Taking Tsinghua University as an Example [J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(4): 42-50.